|
Haha if you clone him he's Booba Fett Or Boba Feett Booba Feett
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 22:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 19:00 |
|
|
Saint Drogo posted:Lucas was so loving disinterested in the extra work needed to make the CGI look good/real. the prequels coming from the same time as LotR is embarrassing as hell. if they'd had 1/10 of PJ's craft, the PT would have blown minds & probably hold up to this day. Yeah the first time I remember being like "whoa" at sweeping CGI shots was the prologue to Fellowship of the Ring. Conversely the arena battle in AoC is one of the worst CGI battle scenes ever filmed and there is plenty of competition for that list Zoran posted:A problem with depicting the Jedi in a war against clones is that there'd be an awful lot of flesh-and-blood maiming done by the heroes. Harder to make kid-friendly war movies that way. https://i.imgur.com/Sl88Nl6.mp4
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:00
|
|
|
I actually like that the clones are in the Republic's side, and that the "Attack" that the clones do is really just the true beginnings of the Republic slowly shifting into the militarized empire.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:01
|
|
|
I think the prequels were good.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:01
|
|
|
Zoran posted:A problem with depicting the Jedi in a war against clones is that there'd be an awful lot of flesh-and-blood maiming done by the heroes. Harder to make kid-friendly war movies that way. So don’t. Keep it as part of the dark offscreen backstory. There’s a reason why Star Trek alludes to WW3 all the time but never shows it. (and when it does, it’s embarrassing examples like Q’s dumb biohazard suit in the TNG pilot) Halloween Jack posted:I'm being unfair; they get really into it in the first few episodes of season 6 which you probably haven't seen. Fair enough, I’ll give it a watch.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:01
|
|
|
Saint Drogo posted:Lucas was so loving disinterested in the extra work needed to make the CGI look good/real. the prequels coming from the same time as LotR is embarrassing as hell. if they'd had 1/10 of PJ's craft, the PT would have blown minds & probably hold up to this day. George Lucas is one of the figures most singularly responsible for making CGI look good, by investing hundreds of millions of dollars into it so his ambitious new films could feature novel things like the first all-CGI main character in live-action.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:01
|
|
|
Zoran posted:the first all-CGI main character in live-action. How'd that work out
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:03
|
|
|
Zoran posted:George Lucas is one of the figures most singularly responsible for making CGI look good, by investing hundreds of millions of dollars into it so his ambitious new films could feature novel things like the first all-CGI main character in live-action. He also is responsible for a lot of setbacks. Many of which can we seen in the prequels.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:03
|
|
|
Majorian posted:He also is responsible for a lot of setbacks. Many of which can we seen in the prequels. I dont think there were any setbacks.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:04
|
|
|
SHISHKABOB posted:I dont think there were any setbacks. “Setbacks” probably isn’t fair; call them “unmitigated disasters.”
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:06
|
|
|
zoux posted:Yeah the first time I remember being like "whoa" at sweeping CGI shots was the prologue to Fellowship of the Ring. oh my god is that the shadow of the head flying off the right
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:06
|
|
|
SHISHKABOB posted:I think the prequels were good. counter point: no
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:06
|
|
|
zoux posted:Yeah the first time I remember being like "whoa" at sweeping CGI shots was the prologue to Fellowship of the Ring. The CGI in Lord of the Rings relies extensively on the classic trick of making it dark, muddy, and sometimes rainy so that you can obscure the flaws. Phantom Menace, which came out two years earlier, eschews that. For example, there's an entire CGI battle scene in broad daylight. It's a braver choice that sometimes shows its flaws.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:06
|
|
|
To be honest, I really did not feel like the CGI in lord of the rings held up at all
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:07
|
|
|
Zoran posted:George Lucas is one of the figures most singularly responsible for making CGI look good, by investing hundreds of millions of dollars into it so his ambitious new films could feature novel things like the first all-CGI main character in live-action. although putting in the scratch to drive CGI to new levels, while also providing a masterclass to future films in how not to do it, is legitimately a hell of a contribution (not even joking about the 2nd part).
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:07
|
|
|
between this and dooku's head landing upright in RotS i think george liked sneaking brutal decapitations into kid movies
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:07
|
|
|
Zoran posted:The CGI in Lord of the Rings relies extensively on the classic trick of making it dark, muddy, and sometimes rainy so that you can obscure the flaws. Phantom Menace, which came out two years earlier, eschews that. For example, there's an entire CGI battle scene in broad daylight. It's a braver choice that sometimes shows its flaws. It wasn’t the braver choice, it was the worse choice.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:08
|
|
|
GODDAMN i LOVE TO FIGHT ABOUT STAR WARS
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:08
|
|
|
zoux posted:How'd that work out 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:11
|
|
|
People who think the p[requels are bad just watched the red letter media videos and cant think for themselves, sorry.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:11
|
|
|
yeah that must be it
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:12
|
|
|
Raskolnikov38 posted:oh my god is that the shadow of the head flying off the right Finally an explanation for why his head didn't fall out when baby boba picked up his helmet.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:12
|
|
|
SHISHKABOB posted:People who think the p[requels are bad just watched the red letter media videos and cant think for themselves, sorry. I saw this poo poo in the theater in 1999. I saw AotC in theaters too. I've never seen RotS the whole way through in one sitting.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:13
|
|
|
Saint Drogo posted:i get that in a way Jar Jar is Bob Dylan's version of All Along the Watchtower, but with a real director blending that cutting edge poo poo with traditional effects & some judgement about how to shoot it, those hundreds of millions could have made something that didn't look like rear end. You should go check out exactly how many miniatures and other cool practical stuff was built to do effects for the prequels. It's awesome. And then compare with something like TFA, which had way more CGI poo poo going on in spite of the “Real sets! Practical effects!” campaign. I guess we can credit JJ with making two dozen practical aliens that were all slight variations on “creature with a huge brown ballsack for a head.”
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:14
|
|
|
zoux posted:I saw this poo poo in the theater in 1999 drat, so you just naturally come up with bad ideas.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:14
|
|
|
Zoran posted:You should go check out exactly how many miniatures and other cool practical stuff was built to do effects for the prequels. It's awesome. Buddy that's not a movie screen it's a mirror!
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:15
|
|
|
SHISHKABOB posted:drat, so you just naturally come up with bad ideas.  I really hope the actual subtitle is also misspelled but i don't give a poo poo enough to check
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:16
|
|
|
Pick posted:Booba Feett Do not type this into DeviantArt!
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:16
|
|
|
all the movies are poo poo
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:17
|
|
|
SHISHKABOB posted:drat, so you just naturally come up with bad ideas. He is a certified bad opinion machine
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:18
|
|
|
SHISHKABOB posted:People who think the p[requels are bad just watched the red letter media videos and cant think for themselves, sorry. Nah I saw them in theaters. I knew they were bad at the time.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:18
|
|
|
Who What Now posted:Do not type this into DeviantArt! holy poo poo there's a lot of random star wars characters beating the poo poo out of jar jar fan art what the 
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:19
|
|
|
Majorian posted:Nah I saw them in theaters. I knew they were bad at the time. But they're good, so you are bad at understanding and forming opinions about movies. At least in this case.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:19
|
|
|
Pick posted:Haha if you clone him he's Booba Fett Following the examples from the EU, it would be Buuba Fett
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:19
|
|
|
Zoran posted:The CGI in Lord of the Rings relies extensively on the classic trick of making it dark, muddy, and sometimes rainy so that you can obscure the flaws. Phantom Menace, which came out two years earlier, eschews that. For example, there's an entire CGI battle scene in broad daylight. It's a braver choice that sometimes shows its flaws.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:19
|
|
|
zer0spunk posted:
It's hilarious how many people saw this as a righteous dunk on Jar Jar instead of reacting to Qui-Gons xenophobic dickishness
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:20
|
|
|
zer0spunk posted:holy poo poo there's a lot of random star wars characters beating the poo poo out of jar jar fan art classic fascism
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:21
|
|
|
SHISHKABOB posted:But they're good, so you are bad at understanding and forming opinions about movies. At least in this case. Nah, I don’t think the movies with Jar Jar, General Grievous, and “I hate sand!  ” are good, and I am right to do so.
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:21
|
|
|
Saint Drogo posted:there's no way this is can be read as a point in TPM's favour. we're in straight Bizzaro territory where bad is good and good is bad. In order to get an S rank in CD you have to successfully say the prequels are good and well here we are
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:21
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 27, 2024 19:00 |
|
|
Majorian posted:Nah, I don’t think the movies with Jar Jar, General Grievous, and “I hate sand! General Grievous rules
|
|
#
?
Jan 22, 2020 23:22
|
|