|
Platystemon posted:It’s like a line made in Adobe Illustrator. The line shape actually seems to stay same. It just moved forward 1-2 days, because the numbers didn't start falling down like was predicted.
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 12:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 17:58 |
|
|
 This graphic is trying so hard. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jir/2019/6491738/
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 12:55
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:
Am I missing something? This looks like every other signalling pathway in my Molecular Biology textbooks.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 14:32
|
|
|
Yeah that's pretty par for the course, they get way worse when you h ave more complete ones like http://www.metabolic-pathway.com/fullMap.html or some of these https://www.cellsignal.com/contents/science/cst-pathways/science-pathways
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 15:04
|
|
|
I’m sure in molecular biology textbooks, science diagrams that look like shitposts are in every corner drug store, but in 167, they’re a little hard to come by!
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 15:18
|
|
|
Fathis Munk posted:Yeah that's pretty par for the course, they get way worse when you h ave more complete ones like http://www.metabolic-pathway.com/fullMap.html or some of these https://www.cellsignal.com/contents/science/cst-pathways/science-pathways as a non biologist the first link here looks way better to me than the MERS chart despite being way bigger and more complicated. the MERS chart has text partially overlapping similarly-colored graphics, a weird mishmash of graphical shading that seems to serve no purpose, lines and text that are poorly-aligned, stuff scrunched together for no apparent reason, etc. the design is  incarnate
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 15:52
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:as a non biologist the first link here looks way better to me than the MERS chart despite being way bigger and more complicated. the MERS chart has text partially overlapping similarly-colored graphics, a weird mishmash of graphical shading that seems to serve no purpose, lines and text that are poorly-aligned, stuff scrunched together for no apparent reason, etc. the design is Fair point, it's a bit indeed. I think part of it is also that a lot of the representations used are pretty standard shorthand for biology figures but looking at them again I can see how they are incomprehensible for someone not used to them.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 16:48
|
|
|
From the USPOL thread
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 17:18
|
|
|
that appears to be a real chart, minus the nuke bit e: wait, hang on. the person who made the edit dutifully subtracted 10% from the yellow chunk on the right in order to add the green slice. lol wut  Memento posted:
Lutha Mahtin has a new favorite as of 18:47 on Apr 14, 2020 |
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 18:44
|
|
|
 Former NZ Finance Minister posted:This second graph shows the close correlation between the number of Covid 19 cases in New Zealand and the number of tests. It raises a question about the nature of NZ's observed "curve" and its assumed exponential nature.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 22:11
|
|
|
Wait a minute, so if we reduce testing then we can reduce the number of new confirmed cases? We should start this immediately.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 23:07
|
|
|
my local department of health said they think we have 100 times more cases than they've been able to confirm 
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 23:23
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:my local department of health said they think we have 100 times more cases than they've been able to confirm It's that really so much of an outlier opinion? I've personally been assuming that the large majority of the entire population is infected but asymptomatic, it's not like people give a crap about actual mitigation or quarantine with what I see when I go to work
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 23:29
|
|
|
i dunno, i just found it to be a spooky number
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 23:30
|
|
|
Lutha Mahtin posted:i dunno, i just found it to be a spooky number What if it was 69 more cases?
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 23:36
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:It's that really so much of an outlier opinion? I've personally been assuming that the large majority of the entire population is infected but asymptomatic, it's not like people give a crap about actual mitigation or quarantine with what I see when I go to work I expected this, but in my region (out of the way, to be fair) shows consistently small numbers. Fewer than 5% of tests done have been positive for Covid, and this hasn't changed as testing has passed 1000 per day.
|
|
#
?
Apr 14, 2020 23:49
|
|
|
Sentient Data posted:It's that really so much of an outlier opinion? I've personally been assuming that the large majority of the entire population is infected but asymptomatic, it's not like people give a crap about actual mitigation or quarantine with what I see when I go to work jjack229 posted:Wait a minute, so if we reduce testing then we can reduce the number of new confirmed cases? We should start this immediately. vyelkin posted:Top: The "testing is going up and looking great!" graph showing cumulative tests performed.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2020 00:00
|
|
|
This paper estimates the actual number of infected in the US as of March 18th to be about 50 times greater than the official numbers. That's very high but it still puts the prevalence at way less than 1%.
|
|
#
?
Apr 15, 2020 00:06
|
|
|
Topknot
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 17:06
|
|
|
Millenials reading papers at more than 2x the rate of boomers REALLY doesn't pass the sniff test, for the UK at least.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 17:10
|
|
|
Good thing that’s not what the authors say. The % are percent increase over consumption before the outbreak. Without the pre-outbreak consumption rates, those percent increases are close to meaningless, tho.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 17:14
|
|
|
Very close
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 17:28
|
|
|
Why do I have to be a "millenial", why can't I just be in Gen Y? You know, the one that came between X and Z? Edit: Eh, "boomers" are only 57-64 years old? Couldn't they find any older boomers than that? (Wikipedia says the baby boom is commonly defined as the period between 1946 and 1964.) Hippie Hedgehog has a new favorite as of 18:56 on Apr 16, 2020 |
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 18:54
|
|
|
I'm putting this in a spoiler because it makes me actually queasy to look at this for more than a few seconds at a time. my eyes (from this article about coronavirus on cruise ships)
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 19:47
|
|
|
I need glasses after looking at this chart for five seconds.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 20:30
|
|
|
I'm an oldlennial and I wish I had enough hair for a man bun best I could do now is a skullet
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 21:52
|
|
|
ookiimarukochan posted:Millenials reading papers at more than 2x the rate of boomers REALLY doesn't pass the sniff test, for the UK at least.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 22:08
|
|
|
I can't believe that Boomers actually had the capacity to increase their viewing of broadcast television that significantly. Most Boomers I know come home, they turn the TV on, and it stays on. Like hours and hours of CNN or MSNBC or Fox depending on their preference. And this is pre-plague!
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 22:23
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I can't believe that Boomers actually had the capacity to increase their viewing of broadcast television that significantly. Most Boomers I know come home, they turn the TV on, and it stays on. Like hours and hours of CNN or MSNBC or Fox depending on their preference. And this is pre-plague! That's just it, now they aren't coming home from anywhere, so it's on all the time.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 22:24
|
|
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:I can't believe that Boomers actually had the capacity to increase their viewing of broadcast television that significantly. Most Boomers I know come home, they turn the TV on, and it stays on. Like hours and hours of CNN or MSNBC or Fox depending on their preference. And this is pre-plague! Maybe they're working from home now, so they watch TV then, too.
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 22:29
|
|
|
Angepain posted:I'm putting this in a spoiler because it makes me actually queasy to look at this for more than a few seconds at a time. my eyes
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 22:37
|
|
|
the part that surprises me is that younger generations have increased broadcast watching. watching for the news makes sense but i think i have known a single millennial over the past 10 years who said they watch broadcast news regularly, and that was because it helped her get to sleep
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 22:58
|
|
|
Dr. Arbitrary posted:Figured I'd follow up on this one:  California  North Carolina  Florida
|
|
#
?
Apr 16, 2020 23:58
|
|
|
if you're interested, somebody has put up a website where you can see how the ihme model has changed over time http://www.covid-projections.com/ 
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2020 00:07
|
|
|
Tree Goat posted:if you're interested, somebody has put up a website where you can see how the ihme model has changed over time That's awesome, but that color legend is garbage.
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2020 00:33
|
|
|
Phy posted:I'm an oldlennial and I wish I had enough hair for a man bun get into wigs, its the 20s
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2020 00:41
|
|
|
 (Explanation)
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2020 11:50
|
|
|
thats awesome lol
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2020 13:31
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/i/status/1251073095764336640
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2020 15:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 17:58 |
|
|
that's correct
|
|
#
?
Apr 17, 2020 16:30
|
|