Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Futaba Anzu
May 6, 2011

GROSS BOY

I find it annoying that there seems to be a dice roll on which abilities and ults do friendly fire, what's up with that

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

RobotsLoveSpectres
Dec 29, 2008
Which ones don't do friendly fire? I can't think of any that don't.

repiv
Aug 13, 2009

Jeza posted:

Vaguely tragically, CS:GO did start to get a handle on cheating in my opinion, in combination with Overwatch, more proactive VAC development and a year plus of Prime MM where eventually most cheaters were culled from the system with the trust factor. Then the game went F2P, and any hope of ever stemming the tide was just detonated on the spot.

It didn't help that you used to need a unique phone number to get Prime but after CS:GO went F2P you just needed to play enough or spend 10bux to become Prime eligible, and all pre-F2P accounts got Prime automatically.

Needing a constant supply of non-blacklisted phone numbers (they blocked most VOIP providers) made life harder for cheaters to come back on new accounts and they just threw that away for no reason.

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

dogstile posted:

People who are cheating know they'll get caught eventually, they're not reducing faith.

some people are hardcore cheaters, but there's also a lot of kiddie rage hackers who if they see a sudden flood of "wtf this no longer works" on the cheat forums, may be dissuaded from trying it.

imo, reducing casual cheaters has a much bigger impact in general.

jimmydalad
Sep 26, 2013

My face when others are unable to appreciate the :kazooieass:

AGDQ 2018 Awful Block Survivor
Patch notes: https://beta.playvalorant.com/en-us/news/game-updates/valorant-patch-notes-0-47/

Major things include Raze grenades being reduced to 1 and recharge with 2 kills, clearer audio with regards to her abilities, melee does double damage to Sage walls and Haven double doors alongside Sage slow reducing bunny hop speed but no longer makes sound if you walk through it.

Interesting changes and curious what more will be introduced later on.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>

Famethrowa posted:

Or... they are trying to reduce false positives + make it harder for cheat sellers to adapt their cheats when they see bans trickling in

... also reduces faith in cheat sellers etc

Knowing you can cheat without disruption for 4-6 months at a time actually increases faith in cheat sellers and ensures people keep buying new accounts after they're banned. hth

We never will, but I would kill to see game sales data for the week before and the week after a ban wave.

Lex Neville
Apr 15, 2009
oh man i did not see them partially taking the sage slow field sound cue away. that's huge

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

Herstory Begins Now posted:

Knowing you can cheat without disruption for 4-6 months at a time actually increases faith in cheat sellers and ensures people keep buying new accounts after they're banned. hth

We never will, but I would kill to see game sales data for the week before and the week after a ban wave.

yes, ban waves every 4 months would be bad, but I have never seen that long of a break between.

and, to remind you, most systems ban pretty consistently over time if the cheat isn't sophisticated. the only reason you see a "wave" is because a new sophisticated cheat signature is fully vetted and it takes time to weed out false positives.

AARD VARKMAN
May 17, 1993
Being able to walk silently through Slow Orb is huge, so glad for that.

Herstory Begins Now
Aug 5, 2003
SOME REALLY TEDIOUS DUMB SHIT THAT SUCKS ASS TO READ ->>
Pretty much every competitive fps or BR that I've played has been on a 4-6 month cycle of banwaves. Apex, pubg, cs, ow, etc. all were 3-4 months minimum and often substantially longer. OW was at over a year recently until some concerned citizen acquired the source for a couple of the prominent hacks and then literally had to raise a shitstorm to get them to do anything at all with it.

The kicker? OW leaderboards lost 120 of the top 500 acounts in korea, and 180 of the top 500 accounts in SEA and a ton out of NA/EU as well.

Herstory Begins Now fucked around with this message at 21:15 on Apr 21, 2020

Pattonesque
Jul 15, 2004
johnny jesus and the infield fly rule
VALORANT tourney back on today
https://www.twitch.tv/espnesports/

Bottom Liner
Feb 15, 2006


a specific vein of lasagna
jacobwolf certainly has a voice for the written word

Famethrowa
Oct 5, 2012

Herstory Begins Now posted:

Pretty much every competitive fps or BR that I've played has been on a 4-6 month cycle of banwaves. Apex, pubg, cs, ow, etc. all were 3-4 months minimum and often substantially longer. OW was at over a year recently until some concerned citizen acquired the source for a couple of the prominent hacks and then literally had to raise a shitstorm to get them to do anything at all with it.

The kicker? OW leaderboards lost 120 of the top 500 acounts in korea, and 180 of the top 500 accounts in SEA and a ton out of NA/EU as well.

I can only speak for CS, but vacwaves are usually 4-6 weeks right now, and they don't even use a kernel system. I'm not surprised the other games with flagging esports aren't doing so hot :smug: (of course, other banning systems don't have an open API so it is possible it is actually more similar to CS. )

if Valorant can do banwaves in this fashion I'm not too concerned.

https://steamdb.info/stats/bans/

bus hustler
Mar 14, 2019

this is also launching with more of a focus on esports out of the gate, because for some reason valve like... refuses to give a poo poo about CS, one of the most popular games to ever exist.

it will always be cat and mouse but if this can stop people from reading memory at the hardware level... i'm cautiously optimistic.

also the dev/apex match was interesting. dizzy moved from apex to this and was doing really well, i'm sure it helped having aceu calling though.

Hackan Slash
May 31, 2007
Hit it until it's not a problem anymore

charity rereg posted:

this is also launching with more of a focus on esports out of the gate, because for some reason valve like... refuses to give a poo poo about CS, one of the most popular games to ever exist.

it will always be cat and mouse but if this can stop people from reading memory at the hardware level... i'm cautiously optimistic.

also the dev/apex match was interesting. dizzy moved from apex to this and was doing really well, i'm sure it helped having aceu calling though.

It also helps that Dizzy and Aceu played competitive counterstrike

Bottom Liner
Feb 15, 2006


a specific vein of lasagna

charity rereg posted:

valve like... refuses to give a poo poo about CS, one of the most popular games to ever exist.


I think it's because Steam makes so much money that esports revenue literally doesn't matter to them. I don't think anyone has really figured out how to monetize it well for the amount of work that goes into it and it's all a huge bubble of ???$$$.

I would bet they make more profit on Steam than every esports league's profits combined.

Jeza
Feb 13, 2011

The cries of the dead are terrible indeed; you should try not to hear them.

charity rereg posted:

for some reason valve like... refuses to give a poo poo about CS, one of the most popular games to ever exist.

Honestly, this is super interesting to me and I'd love to know why this is the case. It's a super long-standing attitude within Valve. I think there are a lot of potential reasons. Probably the key ones being that they perceive the community as very resistant to change, which is true (mostly due to being burned over and over), and not seeing a big competitor in the genre to warrant extra effort, but even so. They could have done a lot of other things to support the development of the game, things they did do for DotA for example.

For all the time, love and money expended on DotA, in the end it seems like CS:GO has grown into their biggest game regardless. I could say a lot about this, but this isn't really the place for it. Kinda cool to see a few CS players crawl out of the woodwork for this game on here, given how utterly dead the CS thread is on this forum. For whatever reason, goons definitely trend towards the MOBA side of things.

teagone
Jun 10, 2003

That was pretty intense, huh?

Bottom Liner posted:

jacobwolf certainly has a voice for the written word

He shouldn't be casting, I agree. Lol.

CampingCarl
Apr 28, 2008




Jeza posted:

Honestly, this is super interesting to me and I'd love to know why this is the case. It's a super long-standing attitude within Valve. I think there are a lot of potential reasons. Probably the key ones being that they perceive the community as very resistant to change, which is true (mostly due to being burned over and over), and not seeing a big competitor in the genre to warrant extra effort, but even so. They could have done a lot of other things to support the development of the game, things they did do for DotA for example.

For all the time, love and money expended on DotA, in the end it seems like CS:GO has grown into their biggest game regardless. I could say a lot about this, but this isn't really the place for it. Kinda cool to see a few CS players crawl out of the woodwork for this game on here, given how utterly dead the CS thread is on this forum. For whatever reason, goons definitely trend towards the MOBA side of things.
Valve has a weird, almost nonexistent, management structure that has people work on what they want to work on, which is not necessarily what makes the most money or is even popular. IIRC Gaben also still owns 51% of the company so they don't have to answer to shareholders demanding profit over quality. This explains lots of both good and bad things about Valve's games.
They also tend to take a more 'libertarian' approach to competitive scenes. For example DOTA didn't get a major system until the players asked for something more like what CSGO had because Valve expected ESL, Dreamhack, and the like to do it instead.

dogstile
May 1, 2012

fucking clocks
how do they work?
I still haven't quite forgiven them for making GBS threads on the OW teams aim for a solid 5 minutes before they beat the siege team :v: Good job boys, glad you definitely know what you're talking about.

RobotsLoveSpectres
Dec 29, 2008
Make a new hero who screams "TRADE ME" every time they die

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

RobotsLoveSpectres posted:

Make a new hero who screams "TRADE ME" every time they die

Esports ready!

Burgo
Jun 1, 2008

Jeza posted:

Honestly, this is super interesting to me and I'd love to know why this is the case. It's a super long-standing attitude within Valve. I think there are a lot of potential reasons. Probably the key ones being that they perceive the community as very resistant to change, which is true (mostly due to being burned over and over), and not seeing a big competitor in the genre to warrant extra effort, but even so. They could have done a lot of other things to support the development of the game, things they did do for DotA for example.

For all the time, love and money expended on DotA, in the end it seems like CS:GO has grown into their biggest game regardless. I could say a lot about this, but this isn't really the place for it. Kinda cool to see a few CS players crawl out of the woodwork for this game on here, given how utterly dead the CS thread is on this forum. For whatever reason, goons definitely trend towards the MOBA side of things.

Honestly it seems like a lot of the issues stem from the lack of management.The whole flat structure. Marc Laidlaw after quitting gave a good account of what could have been for the HL2 episodes. In any case its Gabes baby to do what he wants. Since Alyx has been released the devs have said that scope creep was a major factor in the delay, adding more and more cool stuff. When you have no project manager its not surprising when nothing gets done.

Yeah I was starting to play CS again after a long hiatus and then the Valorant beta happened. Lets get the gang back together!

bus hustler
Mar 14, 2019

I don't blame Valve for staying away from Esports, but CS prints money and famously they have a few side idiots working on it sometimes. Also they let it become a massive vehicle for loving international money laundering AND a horribly addictive gambling casino for children.

cameoflage
Dec 29, 2017

Tiger Millionaire
Jan 25, 2014

He'll eat your kids and fire your parents!
So are the HMGs/Scout/AutoShotty actually viable in this game or are they just part of the iconic CS gun package?

Tetramin
Apr 1, 2006

I'ma buck you up.

Tiger Millionaire posted:

So are the HMGs/Scout/AutoShotty actually viable in this game or are they just part of the iconic CS gun package?

They're all fine. The autoshotty is awesome

hobbesmaster
Jan 28, 2008

Auto shotty is ok but the alt shot on the semi is so much cooler.

I'm not sure I've seen a scout used well? The problem is that theres no reason to get it over the deagle but different maps may change that balance.

HMGs are to wallbang with but again I'm not sure I've seen them do better work than the rifles?

Bottom Liner
Feb 15, 2006


a specific vein of lasagna
They are high and rifles are med for wall penetration. I think it affects the % of damage reduction through the walls.

Jeza
Feb 13, 2011

The cries of the dead are terrible indeed; you should try not to hear them.
Well, I discovered why after 8 days of idling streams I haven't got a key. Turns out my ancient League account, at some point in the transition process from League to Riot Account became region locked to Malaysia for no reason. Good system. On the off-chance somebody else out there is dying out there, check your Riot account through the League portal that allows you to see account settings rather than the Valorant one, which you can't access settings for. Time to idle for like 5 more days on a new one while their glacial support staff get back to me, probably to say they can't help.

RobotsLoveSpectres
Dec 29, 2008
Happened to my friend with a new account. His location was set to vietnam.

Morbleu
Jun 13, 2006
Dear lord watching this espnsports tournament is terrible for viewership. They switch cams as soon as someone dies to someone outside of the fight that happens and then just ignores the 2-3 people that die following it. Also, beta, I get it, but they desperately need some kind of icon highlight on the map for viewers to see where on the minimap the character that is being spectated is located.

Oddly enough I'm finding watching just random pubs on twitch much more enjoyable than this. Maybe it's the ability spam to clog choke points that makes it ultimately uninteresting. Who knows.

RVT
Nov 5, 2003
Llama agreeing to forfeit the final rounds after they were eliminated feels extremely weird and seems like basically match fixing to give Canyon the seed they wanted. That kinda poo poo wouldn't fly in any non-exhibition tournament right?

Bottom Liner
Feb 15, 2006


a specific vein of lasagna
yeah it's a mess of a tourny. whoever green-lighted it at ESPN clearly didn't give a drat

PIZZA.BAT
Nov 12, 2016


:cheers:


RVT posted:

Llama agreeing to forfeit the final rounds after they were eliminated feels extremely weird and seems like basically match fixing to give Canyon the seed they wanted. That kinda poo poo wouldn't fly in any non-exhibition tournament right?

they'd messed with the attack/defend and bans as well which canyon agreed to because llama was doing so poorly. that was just good sportsmanship once it was clear they were going to mess with canyon's seed

The Duggler
Feb 20, 2011

I do not hear you, I do not see you, I will not let you get into the Duggler's head with your bring-downs.

I don't think I've ever been as bad at a video game as I am at Valorant

The REAL Goobusters
Apr 25, 2008

Bottom Liner posted:

yeah it's a mess of a tourny. whoever green-lighted it at ESPN clearly didn't give a drat

To be expected if you have people like Jacob Wolf casting imo lol

RVT
Nov 5, 2003

PIZZA.BAT posted:

they'd messed with the attack/defend and bans as well which canyon agreed to because llama was doing so poorly. that was just good sportsmanship once it was clear they were going to mess with canyon's seed

I saw the casters referring to this as well, and I guess I still don't understand what happened. Canyon let Llama pick how they wanted to start and on what map because they were behind in points, out of the goodness of their hearts, and in return Llama agreed to forfeit all remaining rounds once they had been eliminated? If that's what happened, I don't know if that makes it worse or better.

If it was the championship and only affected the two of them, sure make whatever custom rules you want. It might annoy the fans to see the rules suddenly change, but couldn't really be called unfair if you both agree. But I don't think it qualifies as good sportmanship when you do it in the middle of the tournament and it affects other team(s) that were not party to the agreement.

It's a goofy showmatch tournament, so I guess it doesn't actually matter, it just struck me as a messed up thing to do.

PIZZA.BAT
Nov 12, 2016


:cheers:


I think from the fundamental structure of this tournament it's been clear from the beginning that no one is taking it seriously and wasn't meant to be

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

RVT
Nov 5, 2003
Yeah, it's a good point. Make it a little more interesting without screwing themselves over because of it. Fair enough.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply