Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
MrOnBicycle
Jan 18, 2008
Wait wat?

Nidhg00670000 posted:

The white one in Nybro? Kind of looks like a ten meter car to me from the photos.

Yep. The pictures were pretty honest. Rust was where you could see it on the pictures, not too bad. Posted a trip report in the chat thread.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

randomidiot
May 12, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 11 years!)

monsterzero posted:

And to add, I think my truck's got worms


One of my neighbors has a same-generation Silverado, in the same color, doing the exact same thing.

Colostomy Bag
Jan 11, 2016

:lesnick: C-Bangin' it :lesnick:

Common problem. Just comes off in chunks.

shy boy from chess club
Jun 11, 2008

It wasnt that bad, after you left I got to help put out the fire!

Mines black and the rockers and frame come off in chunks

Combat Theory
Jul 16, 2017

Weird it looks like the primer is still intact and there bonding between color and primer failed.

monsterzero
May 12, 2002
-=TOPGUN=-
Boys who love airplanes :respek: Boys who love boys
Lipstick Apathy

Combat Theory posted:

Weird it looks like the primer is still intact and there bonding between color and primer failed.

Yeah, it is primer. The clear and color usually come off separately, especially on the horizontal surfaces, this was just a lucky bubble.

The primer has about a year of UV exposure before it wears away and starts blushing with rust.

Elviscat
Jan 1, 2008

Well don't you know I'm caught in a trap?

That's the era where some car makers were struggling with the new low-VOC paints, right?

Goober Peas
Jun 30, 2007

Check out my 'Vette, bro


Elviscat posted:

That's the era where some car makers were struggling with the new low-VOC paints, right?

Especially white. And it was near universal.

IOwnCalculus
Apr 2, 2003





Elviscat posted:

That's the era where some car makers were struggling with the new low-VOC paints, right?

Just like they were a decade before as well.

FogHelmut
Dec 18, 2003

Probably wrong thread

BigPaddy
Jun 30, 2008

That night we performed the rite and opened the gate.
Halfway through, I went to fix us both a coke float.
By the time I got back, he'd gone insane.
Plus, he'd left the gate open and there was evil everywhere.


Would V6 pooer fit?

KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22
That's a quality Honda J35S1 baby

Darchangel
Feb 12, 2009

Tell him about the blower!


Deteriorata posted:

It turns terrible when it's ugly or unsafe or half-assed. Whatever you do, do it right so that someone coming after you will admire your work rather than ridicule it.

If it's your own car, do whatever you want to it. Assume you'll never sell it so don't focus on value-added changes, just make the car the way you want it to be. If it's not rare or valuable, consider it a blank canvas to paint your masterpiece.

Personally, I hate restomods. The point of having an old car is to have a time capsule of what cars were like when that one was made. lovely handling and bad brakes are all part of the experience. If I want a car with a modern drivetrain, I'll buy a modern car. If I'm going to drive a '48 DeSoto, it's going to be a real '48 DeSoto as close as I can get it to how it left the factory.

I disagree, vehemently.
There's always a place for fully restored cars and time capsules, but, frankly, how many "as they were" cars do you need? They were modded when they were new, they can continue to be modded when parts improve.

Imagined posted:

I have to say I disagree. I love old cars for how they look. They're gorgeous. Now if we're talking about collector/historical pieces to keep in my billionaire aircraft hanger, sure. Keep it pure. But if I'm going to actually drive it? If I can have those looks but modern safety, reliability, and power? Best of both worlds!

What he said.
It's really no fun driving around a shitbox with 85 HP when you're surrounded by 2-ton or better vehicles with 250 HP to start, before you even get into trucks and SUVs. Something with a little more get-the-hell-out-of-the-way, please. My RX-7 is marginal with 100 HP and 2500 pounds. My AE86 with less than the original 85 HP and 2700 pounds is downright frightening in traffic if I don't cane the absolute gently caress out of it. 150-175 HP would be nice, with that weight. I mean, as original, a Prius could walk me in the Corolla, easily.
My Cutlass, with original 310 HP and 3860 pounds, is adequate. All I want on it is EFI for reliability and some improvement of fuel economy, and an overdrive transmission. And better suspension. And brakes. Better brakes would be nice.

IOwnCalculus posted:

If somehow you think this is the only way to run exhaust on a LS-swapped B-body, you deserve all the poo poo you're going to get and then some:


Sometimes you come to a point of "I just want it to run and drive it, and I'll improve that later." Hopefully that's the case here.


It's OK - he's got *two* jacks.

GutBomb posted:

Why fake a GTR? People who don’t know what it is won’t be impressed and people who do know what it is will know it’s fake. I don’t get it at all.

And it's not like the G35/37 looked awful beforehand.
Also, I assume that it had fancy wheels that were sold separately, because otherwise, LOL stock wheels.
LOL airbag hat will now kill you, too.
All the displays are annoying. Why in the sunvisors? For whom and what purpose? - reminds me of the bit about the piece of poo poo car in "gently caress poo poo Stack":
(Warning, a whole lot of naughty words)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJQU22Ttpwc&t=170s
Relevant bit at 2:50 if video doesn't go there already.

CAT INTERCEPTOR posted:

I'd have that over an R35 in a heartbeat.

Fair.

Midjack posted:

Explain yourself please.

I believe it to be a comment on the expensive unreliability of the R35, and I would agree.
The G35 can be entertaining without all the amazing fragile bullshit the R35 ended up with, primarily the glass transmission that has features you can't use without grenading it, and the expensive service procedures surrounding said transmission and drivetrain.

Frond
Mar 12, 2018

KYOON GRIFFEY JR posted:

That's a quality Honda J35S1 baby

Bizarre move by GM. Good engine, but couldn’t they use one of their own?

Frond
Mar 12, 2018
If you can deal with the cut rate interiors the G35/7+Z33/Z34 have good chassis underneath. Some of the last good cars Nissan made.

KYOON GRIFFEY JR
Apr 12, 2010



Runner-up, TRP Sack Race 2021/22

Frond posted:

Bizarre move by GM. Good engine, but couldn’t they use one of their own?

They were trying to differentiate Saturn, I think. At least initially Vue had an Opel engine, L81, which was a weird unicorn (for the US, it was Saturn-brand only) 54 degree V6. The Honda powerplant was an attempted selling point to I think keep the powertrain differentiated, but at the same time the L81 carried on in the Saturn L series, so that's strange too. At the end of its miserable life, the Vue got the High Feature V6.

The siblings, Torrent and Equinox, had GM 60 degree V6s and later on some trims had the High Feature V6 when that came out, contemporaneous to the switch away from Honda power for Vue.

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin

Frond posted:

Bizarre move by GM. Good engine, but couldn’t they use one of their own?

Are you at all familiar with early 2000s General Motors

At one point they just gave up and made a transverse LS

CAT INTERCEPTOR
Nov 9, 2004

Basically a male Margaret Thatcher

Darchangel posted:



Fair.


I believe it to be a comment on the expensive unreliability of the R35, and I would agree.
The G35 can be entertaining without all the amazing fragile bullshit the R35 ended up with, primarily the glass transmission that has features you can't use without grenading it, and the expensive service procedures surrounding said transmission and drivetrain.

There's more to it than that (If it aint Slow Is Fast then it's a R32 GT-R or GTFO) altho the horror stories from local R35 owners have been mind boggling. One of the guys detonated 4(!) engines and three gearboxes .... and not even doing track day bro. That G35 is dumb as gently caress but it's a dumb as gently caress that gives me a laugh.

BOOTY-ADE
Aug 30, 2006

BIG KOOL TELLIN' Y'ALL TO KEEP IT TIGHT

monsterzero posted:

And to add, I think my truck's got worms


Better get it fixed before it starts dragging the bed on the ground in circles

kastein
Aug 31, 2011

Moderator at http://www.ridgelineownersclub.com/forums/and soon to be mod of AI. MAKE AI GREAT AGAIN. Motronic for VP.

Throatwarbler posted:

Are you at all familiar with early 2000s General Motors

At one point they just gave up and made a transverse LS

Where by "made a transverse LS" you mean took an LS, lick-n-sticked a 60 degree V6 pattern onto the back of the block, got rid of the starter mounting pad, made the crank ends different, maybe made the motor mount pads different, and called it a day :v:

All so it would shoehorn into a fwd Impala for the SS option without making a different 4Txxe trans housing.

I just like it because it means aside from starter mounting concerns, I can bolt the factory manual or automatic trans from an 80s V6 Toyota pickup right to the back of a late 00s GM V8 using only factory bellhousings from a variety of 80s and 90s Jeep and Dodge products. Auto industry engineering laziness and supply chain incest are loving awesome that way.

Elviscat
Jan 1, 2008

Well don't you know I'm caught in a trap?

They should just go even lazier and have an SAE, JIS and Metric standard for everything, so you can pop on over to Fastenal or McMaster and order any combination bell housing you want, just like hydraulic fittings.

Dr.Smasher
Nov 27, 2002

Cyberpunk 1987

kastein posted:

Where by "made a transverse LS" you mean took an LS, lick-n-sticked a 60 degree V6 pattern onto the back of the block, got rid of the starter mounting pad, made the crank ends different, maybe made the motor mount pads different, and called it a day :v:

All so it would shoehorn into a fwd Impala for the SS option without making a different 4Txxe trans housing.

I just like it because it means aside from starter mounting concerns, I can bolt the factory manual or automatic trans from an 80s V6 Toyota pickup right to the back of a late 00s GM V8 using only factory bellhousings from a variety of 80s and 90s Jeep and Dodge products. Auto industry engineering laziness and supply chain incest are loving awesome that way.

I like how the old Saginaw steering column was in a variety of Jeeps and GMs. I wouldn't be shocked if it ended up in a Ford at some point.

wesleywillis
Dec 30, 2016

SUCK A MALE CAMEL'S DICK WITH MIRACLE WHIP!!

Throatwarbler posted:

Are you at all familiar with early 2000s General Motors


I keep seeing random GM products that I don't think I ever knew about before. Like the Chevy Orlando. How long did they make those things for?
The Pontiac G5 and G6? I guess they were the Sunfire and Grand am? G8 was a Grand prix? Or were they?

Wrar
Sep 9, 2002


Soiled Meat

wesleywillis posted:

I keep seeing random GM products that I don't think I ever knew about before. Like the Chevy Orlando. How long did they make those things for?
The Pontiac G5 and G6? I guess they were the Sunfire and Grand am? G8 was a Grand prix? Or were they?

G5 is Delta, shared with the Cobalt
G6 is an Epsilon, aka Malibu and Saturn Aura.
G8 is a Holden Commodore

Pontiac died as a result of GM being forced to clean out their brand catalog in 08.

Humphreys
Jan 26, 2013

We conceived a way to use my mother as a porn mule


Wrar posted:

G8 is a Holden Commodore


And if only they released the SS Ute over in the USA, you'd have your modern El Camino.

Humphreys fucked around with this message at 12:55 on May 19, 2020

cakesmith handyman
Jul 22, 2007

Pip-Pip old chap! Last one in is a rotten egg what what.

Elviscat posted:

They should just go even lazier and have an SAE, JIS and Metric standard for everything, so you can pop on over to Fastenal or McMaster and order any combination bell housing you want, just like hydraulic fittings.

They do have these...

https://www.sbmar.com/articles/understanding-bellhousing-and-flywheel-measurements/

SAE anyway, I don't know about metric.

Colostomy Bag
Jan 11, 2016

:lesnick: C-Bangin' it :lesnick:

Wrar posted:

G5 is Delta, shared with the Cobalt
G6 is an Epsilon, aka Malibu and Saturn Aura.
G8 is a Holden Commodore

Pontiac died as a result of GM being forced to clean out their brand catalog in 08.

The G6 claim to fame was via Oprah.

kastein
Aug 31, 2011

Moderator at http://www.ridgelineownersclub.com/forums/and soon to be mod of AI. MAKE AI GREAT AGAIN. Motronic for VP.

I've been beaten. Sadly auto makers aren't on board with this, though industrial marine and commercial trucking are.

randomidiot
May 12, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 11 years!)

Frond posted:

Bizarre move by GM. Good engine, but couldn’t they use one of their own?

Because Saturn gonna be Saturn. They used the Honda drivetrain for a few years in the V6 Vue (04-07 IIRC, with the Honda 5 speed auto).

They also used an Aisin-Warner 5 speed auto in the 03-05 Ion sedans. Along with a Hugarian-built GM/Fiat CVT for a couple of years in both the Vue and Ion, but only behind the 2.2, and dropped after... 04 on the Vue, 05 on the Ion coupe? Their reliability was measured in "you actually made it to 50k miles? HOLY poo poo!". Later models got the GM 4T45E instead of the Aisin-Warner or VTi (CVT). Wikipedia suggests the 1st gen AWD Vues also got the Aisin-Warner transmission.

randomidiot fucked around with this message at 04:06 on May 20, 2020

Throatwarbler
Nov 17, 2008

by vyelkin
During that period GM had *checks notes* 6 different V6 engine families in its lineup

Buick 3800
60* V6
90* V6 SBC used in the base trucks
High Value V6
High Feature V6
The 54* Opel V6 used in the Saturn Vues that didn't use the Honda V6

Plus the LX5 V6 Northstar and the Atlas Inline-6. Plus 5 different displacement/NA/Turbo/Supercharged versions of each. And an Inline 5 Atlas because why not.

GM Today: Welp, no manual transmission Corvette because it would cost too much to certify another drivetrain with the EPA.

Fornax Disaster
Apr 11, 2005

If you need me I'll be in Holodeck Four.
At one point in the late 60s they were building four completely different 350 cid V8s.

kastein
Aug 31, 2011

Moderator at http://www.ridgelineownersclub.com/forums/and soon to be mod of AI. MAKE AI GREAT AGAIN. Motronic for VP.
Don't forget the 455 BOP big block next to the 454 GMC big block with two entirely different bellhousing patterns just because.

Fornax Disaster
Apr 11, 2005

If you need me I'll be in Holodeck Four.
And the Olds, Buick and Pontiac 455s are also completely distinct engine designs from each other.

Edit - And up until 1970 each division was using it's own differential design for basically no reason, unless it was assembled in Canada, then it may have a Chevy 12 bolt.

Fornax Disaster fucked around with this message at 05:44 on May 20, 2020

randomidiot
May 12, 2006

by Fluffdaddy

(and can't post for 11 years!)

kastein posted:

Where by "made a transverse LS" you mean took an LS, lick-n-sticked a 60 degree V6 pattern onto the back of the block, got rid of the starter mounting pad, made the crank ends different, maybe made the motor mount pads different, and called it a day :v:

All so it would shoehorn into a fwd Impala for the SS option without making a different 4Txxe trans housing.

I just like it because it means aside from starter mounting concerns, I can bolt the factory manual or automatic trans from an 80s V6 Toyota pickup right to the back of a late 00s GM V8 using only factory bellhousings from a variety of 80s and 90s Jeep and Dodge products. Auto industry engineering laziness and supply chain incest are loving awesome that way.

If you mean the LS4, the Getrag F23 (from... the Saturn Ion, Chevy Cobalt, Chevy Cavalier, Saturn Vue, etc etc etc etc... basically the F23 designed for the Ecotec family, not the Iron Duke family) bolts right up to them for a 3 pedal option. And despite their seriously low power rating for those transaxles, so long as you can keep wheel hop at bay, they hold up really well. You have a decent selection of final drive ratios too, depending which vehicle it comes out of (the heavier cars had a shorter final drive - HHR and Vue had the shortest).

And if you blow one up... it's not like there's not millions of Cavaliers, Ions, Cobalts, G5s, HHRs, Grand Ams, Vues, etc in junkyards. Finding the right combo of flywheel and clutch parts to make it work is just a Google search away. If you're bolting one of these up to an LS4, it's required that you know how to do a transaxle swap quickly anyway... and axles, since you're gonna be snapping CV joints left and right.

The somewhat beefier Getrag F35 showed up in the Ion Redline, Cobalt SS, and HHR SS, but finding one of those is like finding the needle in a haystack today. Fairly sure it had the same bellhousing pattern.

randomidiot fucked around with this message at 06:05 on May 20, 2020

kastein
Aug 31, 2011

Moderator at http://www.ridgelineownersclub.com/forums/and soon to be mod of AI. MAKE AI GREAT AGAIN. Motronic for VP.
I am, but those are all fwd and not really a surprise. The one I mentioned is a fwd transverse engine bolted to a longitudinal red/4wd trans using all factory parts.

Fornax Disaster posted:

And the Olds, Buick and Pontiac 455s are also completely distinct engine designs from each other.

Edit - And up until 1970 each division was using it's own differential design for basically no reason, unless it was assembled in Canada, then it may have a Chevy 12 bolt.

I'm sorry WHAT

They... Seriously built 3 completely different 455s AND the 454?

What the absolute gently caress

Q_res
Oct 29, 2005

We're fucking built for this shit!
Chevy, Buick, Oldsmobile and Pontiac all also built their own, unique 350s. And if you define a big block as an engine "capable of reaching comfortably over 400 cubic inches with a bore spacing of at least 4.500 inches" the Chevy and Buick 350s would be considered small blocks and the other two big blocks. I know technically nobody uses "Big Block" in relation to Pontiac because the 301, 303, 326, 350, 389, 400, 421, 428 and 455 are all the same block. But if you use that universal definition it does fit.

edit: Almost forgot, Chevy produced a 400 ci small block and a 402 ci big block simultaneously. 1970-72.

Q_res fucked around with this message at 06:30 on May 20, 2020

That Works
Jul 22, 2006

Every revolution evaporates and leaves behind only the slime of a new bureaucracy


Really should have let GM go under in 2008 huh.

cakesmith handyman
Jul 22, 2007

Pip-Pip old chap! Last one in is a rotten egg what what.

kastein posted:

I've been beaten. Sadly auto makers aren't on board with this, though industrial marine and commercial trucking are.

I only know that because of your megatruck engine shenanigans. How are you thinking of getting that cross country if you get everything else in a trailer?

BigPaddy
Jun 30, 2008

That night we performed the rite and opened the gate.
Halfway through, I went to fix us both a coke float.
By the time I got back, he'd gone insane.
Plus, he'd left the gate open and there was evil everywhere.


kastein posted:


I'm sorry WHAT

They... Seriously built 3 completely different 455s AND the 454?

What the absolute gently caress

Chevy, Olds, Buick and Pontiac V8 are all entirely different. Olds, Buick and Pontiac share the bellhousing pattern so you can interchange the trans but that is about it. Want to use a chevy distributor in a Pontiac? Nope they turn different directions. All the engine mounts are different as well so you can’t just use a LS mount kit without modifying the frame mounts on most B bodies, A bodies there are kits since the frames are the same.

Also the engine designs didn’t really stabilize until the mid 60s and for Pontiac at least there are 4 different intakes and head designs from 1950 to 1965 and there are no aftermarket options for anything pre 1965. The other thing with Pontiac V8s is that because there is not big block and small block definition it is all one design you cannot use heads designed for a 389 and above to work on a 350 or below without chamfers due to the bore size on the smaller engines. This means Pontiac 350s are relatively cheap and anyone who wants power has to find a 65 to 68 389 or a 68 and up 400 to 455 if they want to be able to just bolt on speed parts.

The tl;dr is if you have an old GM and want to hop up the engine just throw a SBC or BBC in it and enjoy the huge after market.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

wesleywillis
Dec 30, 2016

SUCK A MALE CAMEL'S DICK WITH MIRACLE WHIP!!

Q_res posted:

Chevy, Buick, Oldsmobile and Pontiac all also built their own, unique 350s. And if you define a big block as an engine "capable of reaching comfortably over 400 cubic inches with a bore spacing of at least 4.500 inches" the Chevy and Buick 350s would be considered small blocks and the other two big blocks. I know technically nobody uses "Big Block" in relation to Pontiac because the 301, 303, 326, 350, 389, 400, 421, 428 and 455 are all the same block. But if you use that universal definition it does fit.

edit: Almost forgot, Chevy produced a 400 ci small block and a 402 ci big block simultaneously. 1970-72.

IIRC, the 402 was just some weirded out version of the 396 that got a slightly bigger bore or something right? And it was installed in "396" cars and called a 396, but it just happened to be 402ci instead was it not?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply