Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
KingNastidon
Jun 25, 2004

Bifner McDoogle posted:

But directly charging customers over something as simple as a vaccine makes no sense, offers little innovation or reputation and just leaves everyone pissed off.

They're not directly charging customers $3k. It will be subject to the same health insurance costs like any other treatment. The cost of a single day in the ICU stay almost certainly exceeds $3k.

I've already said that Gilead shouldn't have charged $3k if only for optics reasons. I've only talked about why it shouldn't be $1.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

SubG
Aug 19, 2004

It's a hard world for little things.

Arcsquad12 posted:

With a name like Gilead could they have ever beem something other than evil?
There was an United States League of Gileadites, which was an armed black militia organised by John Brown following the passage of the Fugitive Slave Act.

Revelation 2-13
May 13, 2010

Pillbug

KingNastidon posted:

The Sean, it's time for you to Do The Work and show me you know how this works in practice. I gave you an example of a ten year R&D cost and the 10% profit per $1 dose. Show me what sort of volume would be necessary for 2009 NPV to be $0 even if assuming zero dollars were spent on other development costs (e.g. Ebola) that will yield no revenue.

Holy poo poo KingNastidon. Not only do you not have the faintest idea as to how R&D in the pharmaceutical industry works, how it is funded, or how their products get to be profitable - you’re also a disgusting piece of poo poo. You should gently caress off forever.

(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

Alkydere
Jun 7, 2010
Capitol: A building or complex of buildings in which any legislature meets.
Capital: A city designated as a legislative seat by the government or some other authority, often the city in which the government is located; otherwise the most important city within a country or a subdivision of it.




I think I'd take the actual sea lion at this point.

plogo
Jan 20, 2009

The Sean posted:

This request is so absolutely stupid.

How about you "Do The Work" by defining what "profit margins" means since you keep claiming you're not talking about them.

Hint: you keep talking about profit margins but keep pretending you're not. If you want an easy way out you can just review what you've posted in the last <12hrs.

Second Hint: Anyone advocating for medical companies to make a profit are horrible people and any of their justifications are ultimately terrible.

Maybe he means "actually im talking about gross margin not net profit margin cause i only mentioned COGS" :sarcasm:

Lemming
Apr 21, 2008
Stop complaining that you can't drive your car because the engine won't start unless you can explain what went wrong and how to fix it

Babylon Astronaut
Apr 19, 2012
Oh god. His stupid industry thinks contribution to expenses and profit are the same thing, and that's why we're ignoring that the largest private healthcare provider in the world is a non-profit.

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009


That lady was clearly being a racist piece of poo poo and the sealion is in the right

Catalyst-proof
May 11, 2011

better waste some time with you
But if Americans stop believing that the cost of vaccines fund research and development, they might realize that other countries don't have a problem where people have to choose between their utility bills and their medications. And if that's true... then it means those honest upstanding pharma employees that spend their free time shilling for their company in their free time on privately owned forums weren't actually telling the truth!

Catalyst-proof
May 11, 2011

better waste some time with you
Upstanding pharma employee, in his free time: Boy my employer is only following the laws of basic economics! How would we pay scientists if we don't extort sick people?

The company they work for: *spends 30 billion dollars on stock buybacks*

Epinephrine
Nov 7, 2008

Terror Sweat posted:

That lady was clearly being a racist piece of poo poo and the sealion is in the right
I agree, replace the sealion with any POC and see how that comic reads.

Bifner McDoogle
Mar 31, 2006

"Life unworthy of life" (German: Lebensunwertes Leben) is a pragmatic liberal designation for the segments of the populace which they view as having no right to continue existing, due to the expense of extending them basic human dignity.

KingNastidon posted:

They're not directly charging customers $3k. It will be subject to the same health insurance costs like any other treatment. The cost of a single day in the ICU stay almost certainly exceeds $3k.

I've already said that Gilead shouldn't have charged $3k if only for optics reasons. I've only talked about why it shouldn't be $1.

We get that Gilead isn't walking up with a vaccine and a cartoonishly large bill so big that it will hit the ground and roll out the door, the objection is to the idea that any company would try to make money off of this instead of treating it as a humanitarian or even just patriotic duty. The objection is to the fact that this company is looking to do more than just break even.

To go back to goofy analogies: It'd be like if every time Batman stopped you from getting robbed, you had to pay them a commission.

VH4Ever
Oct 1, 2005

by sebmojo

KingNastidon posted:

They're not directly charging customers $3k. It will be subject to the same health insurance costs like any other treatment. The cost of a single day in the ICU stay almost certainly exceeds $3k.

I've already said that Gilead shouldn't have charged $3k if only for optics reasons. I've only talked about why it shouldn't be $1.

So now after having been laughed out of the thread for making someone do Excel tricks for your amusement, you're back defending that no, actually, the profit is only a LITTLE unreasonable but is mostly reasonable. No it isn't. We pay to subsidize this poo poo. gently caress their profits. gently caress pricing life saving vaccines and etc out of people's reach. And gently caress people who defend doing such. Like you. gently caress you.

The Sean
Apr 17, 2005

Am I handsome now?


plogo posted:

Maybe he means "actually im talking about gross margin not net profit margin cause i only mentioned COGS" :sarcasm:

:hmmyes:

Twibbit
Mar 7, 2013

Is your refrigerator running?

Terror Sweat posted:

That lady was clearly being a racist piece of poo poo and the sealion is in the right

This was made during the height of Not All Men. It is kind of understood that the sea lion was standing in for those guys

Taerkar
Dec 7, 2002

kind of into it, really

Gilead has tried repeatedly over the years to market Remdesivir for various things since it failed at its original intended use: Hep C treatment. There's no long research chain for it and it saw very little use, which is why they still have a claim upon it. Most medical R&D is more or less marketing research to find something else that the drug miiiiight sorta kinda work for so that A) the patent can be extended and B) it might be able to be sold for something else. Viagra of course is one of the best known examples of it as it originally was a rather mediocre HBP medication that caused erections in older men.

Catalyst-proof
May 11, 2011

better waste some time with you
Hey Nastidon, you seem to be a "whiz" with finance, I'm hoping you'll accept this INSIDER TIP: if you're going to be a walking billboard for your company, make sure to get in on some of that sweet ad spend (Gilead spent on average 2.5 billion dollars a year on marketing from 2010-2017)

KingNastidon
Jun 25, 2004

VH4Ever posted:

So now after having been laughed out of the thread for making someone do Excel tricks for your amusement, you're back defending that no, actually, the profit is only a LITTLE unreasonable but is mostly reasonable. No it isn't. We pay to subsidize this poo poo. gently caress their profits. gently caress pricing life saving vaccines and etc out of people's reach. And gently caress people who defend doing such. Like you. gently caress you.

Do you have any evidence that the government paid for 100% remdesivir development costs from 2009? If not, then I don't know why you're arguing with me. Any costs that Gilead (its investors) invested in remdesivir from 2009-2019 should be included in the 2020 list price. Otherwise there's zero possible chance the remdesivir program (beginning in 2009) will be profitable.


Do the NPV, fancy MBA. There's good reason for why MBA's are laughed at.

punishedkissinger
Sep 20, 2017

maybe provide evidence- any at all- that Gilead has spent $100mil for ten years on the drug. Then i want a spreadsheet that shows how they have to sell it for $3k to turn a profit. please stop posting until you do the work.

The Sean
Apr 17, 2005

Am I handsome now?


KingNastidon posted:

Do you have any evidence that the government paid for 100% remdesivir development costs from 2009? If not, then I don't know why you're arguing with me. Any costs that Gilead (its investors) invested in remdesivir from 2009-2019 should be included in the 2020 list price. Otherwise there's zero possible chance the remdesivir program (beginning in 2009) will be profitable.


Do the NPV, fancy MBA. There's good reason for why MBA's are laughed at.

Cool, bro. Keep on not responding to my specific inquiries. Really makes you look like a cool strong man like our dear leader Trondald Dump.

You can have a cool "i'm better than an MBA" flair if you want but it's really incredibly embarrassing when you go "lol mba" while you also are all ""npv" and "I don't know what profit margin means" and "beep boop I'm a business man!"





(USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)

The Sean fucked around with this message at 00:12 on Aug 7, 2020

Gatts
Jan 2, 2001

Goodnight Moon

Nap Ghost
Maybe this is not the hill to die on and wreck one's self and turn into a corncob?

Wylie
Jun 27, 2005

Ever to conquer, never to yield.


sweet bleeding JESUS can y'all take this slapfight to at least the newly-formed Healthcare thread, or, as an alternative, shut the hell up about it entirely?

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

KingNastidon is the normal guy who bought me a red text that said that I was a “crypto-fascist child murder advocate” because I had the temerity to equate Republicans with xenophobes, misogynists, racists, and other kinds of bigots.

Like, the second red text that he bought me that night literally included something like “I’m an intolerant crypto-fascist who can’t differentiate between republicans and xenophobes, misogynists, and racists” which is :psyduck: on a few levels, like the idea that there’s an appreciable difference between bigots and the political apparatus that explicitly works on behalf of bigots. He spent $20 to argue this.

Anyway, you should wind him up about the injustices heaped on Covington Kid, he seems to really identify with that little twerp.

Whether he’s a bad troll, legitimately unwell, or both you should probably stop wasting your time having a conversation with him.

DynamicSloth
Jul 30, 2006

"Man is least himself when he talks in his own person. Give him a mask, and he will tell you the truth."

Gatts posted:

Maybe this is not the hill to die on and wreck one's self and turn into a corncob?

Seems like defending for profit healthcare in TYOOL 2020 was the hill this rear end in a top hat was destined to die on. He's that Upton Sinclair quote in the flesh.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Ok Comboomer posted:

KingNastidon is the normal guy who bought me a red text that said that I was a “crypto-fascist child murder advocate” because I had the temerity to equate Republicans with xenophobes, misogynists, racists, and other kinds of bigots.

Like, the second red text that he bought me that night literally included something like “I’m an intolerant crypto-fascist who can’t differentiate between republicans and xenophobes, misogynists, and racists” which is :psyduck: on a few levels, like the idea that there’s an appreciable difference between bigots and the political apparatus that explicitly works on behalf of bigots. He spent $20 to argue this.

Anyway, you should wind him up about the injustices heaped on Covington Kid, he seems to really identify with that little twerp.

Whether he’s a bad troll, legitimately unwell, or both you should probably stop wasting your time having a conversation with him.

He didn’t just spend $20, he gave $20 to loving Lowtax, in July of 2020. Giant oof.

KingNastidon
Jun 25, 2004

punishedkissinger posted:

maybe provide evidence- any at all- that Gilead has spent $100mil for ten years on the drug. Then i want a spreadsheet that shows how they have to sell it for $3k to turn a profit. please stop posting until you do the work.

Gilead doesn't provide this information. You can say they spent $10M per year instead of $100M. All I'm trying to do is provide some framework for why the drug should not be priced at the marginal cost of $1/vial.


Ok Comboomer posted:

KingNastidon is the normal guy who bought me a red text that said that I was a “crypto-fascist child murder advocate” because I had the temerity to equate Republicans with xenophobes, misogynists, racists, and other kinds of bigots.

Like, the second red text that he bought me that night literally included something like “I’m an intolerant crypto-fascist who can’t differentiate between republicans and xenophobes, misogynists, and racists” which is :psyduck: on a few levels, like the idea that there’s an appreciable difference between bigots and the political apparatus that explicitly works on behalf of bigots. He spent $20 to argue this.

Anyway, you should wind him up about the injustices heaped on Covington Kid, he seems to really identify with that little twerp.

Whether he’s a bad troll, legitimately unwell, or both you should probably stop wasting your time having a conversation with him.

You're a moron. I went out of my way to contact GJB to send you a PM saying I didn't buy you that avatar because you seemed to be having a mental breakdown. I have never bought myself nor another person an avatar because I'm not interested in personal harassment (see my post to Sundae today) and instead discussing bad ideas and false information. Do you refute that GJB contacted you with my message?

Terror Sweat
Mar 15, 2009

Twibbit posted:

This was made during the height of Not All Men. It is kind of understood that the sea lion was standing in for those guys
Maybe to white people, but that comic is just standard racism that I've been hearing my entire life
"Asians I'm fine with, but Chinese? I could do without"
No, gently caress off

The Sean
Apr 17, 2005

Am I handsome now?


KingNastidon posted:

Gilead doesn't provide this information. You can say they spent $10M per year instead of $100M. All I'm trying to do is provide some framework for why the drug should not be priced at the marginal cost of $1/vial.


You're a moron. I went out of my way to contact GJB to send you a PM saying I didn't buy you that avatar because you seemed to be having a mental breakdown. I have never bought myself or another person an avatar because I'm not interested in personal harassment (see my post to Sundae today) and instead discussing bad ideas and false information. Do you refute that GJB contacted you with my message?

Before you challenge anyone else to refute things maybe you should respond to calls for refutation yourself...?

Like, for instance...

1) what is the definition of profit margin?

2) why should medical care be profit-oriented?

3) what is the definition of profit margin because you keep dodging it you coward?

The Sean fucked around with this message at 00:26 on Aug 7, 2020

trilobite terror
Oct 20, 2007
BUT MY LIVELIHOOD DEPENDS ON THE FORUMS!

KingNastidon posted:

You're a moron. I went out of my way to contact GJB to send you a PM saying I didn't buy you that avatar because you seemed to be having a mental breakdown. I have never bought myself or another person an avatar because I'm not interested in personal harassment (see my post to Sundae today) and instead discussing bad ideas and false information. Do you refute that GJB contacted you with my message?

I never got that PM, no

Pick
Jul 19, 2009
Nap Ghost
There is no way even for moderators or administrators to know who bought anyone in avatar. It is a pointless accusation of anyone.

Goatse James Bond
Mar 28, 2010

If you see me posting please remind me that I have Charlie Work in the reports forum to do instead

KingNastidon posted:

Do you refute that GJB contacted you with my message?

i, uh, just checked my sentmessages and apparently I just thought really hard about it (until just now when I saw comboomer's post)

:negative:

but yeah i can corroborate that nastidon made a legit effort to smooth things over the last time this came up

Pick posted:

There is no way even for moderators or administrators to know who bought anyone in avatar. It is a pointless accusation of anyone.

and it is in fact a Good Idea to keep purchases as anonymous as possible

Goatse James Bond fucked around with this message at 00:37 on Aug 7, 2020

Crows Turn Off
Jan 7, 2008


I think $50 (a 5000% markup) is an acceptable level of greed and profit for something they got tax payer money to develop.

But $3000?! Can't even understand it.

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

KingNastidon posted:

You're a moron. I went out of my way to contact GJB to send you a PM saying I didn't buy you that avatar because you seemed to be having a mental breakdown. I have never bought myself nor another person an avatar because I'm not interested in personal harassment (see my post to Sundae today) and instead discussing bad ideas and false information. Do you refute that GJB contacted you with my message?

Okay, then someone got so loving angry on the internet they dropped $20 in Noted Domestic Abuser Lowtax’s pocket to own the... libs?

The Mystery of the Angry Avatar Buying rear end in a top hat deepens :tinfoil:

Booourns
Jan 20, 2004
Please send a report when you see me complain about other posters and threads outside of QCS

~thanks!

nine-gear crow posted:

Okay, then someone got so loving angry on the internet they dropped $20 in Noted Domestic Abuser Lowtax’s pocket to own the... libs?

The Mystery of the Angry Avatar Buying rear end in a top hat deepens :tinfoil:

There's literally no way to know who bought the red text avatars and it's really annoying watching people accuse others of doing it all the time

Catalyst-proof
May 11, 2011

better waste some time with you
Hey KingNose or whatever, real question for you. From 2010-2017, Gilead spent 14% of its revenue on research. Their profit margin was 40%. So, knowing that your leash-holders could spend three times as much on research as they do, I guess my question is why does Gilead hate science and the advancement of medicine?

Catalyst-proof fucked around with this message at 00:35 on Aug 7, 2020

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Booourns posted:

There's literally no way to know who bought the red text avatars and it's really annoying watching people accuse others of doing it all the time

Did we ever find out who the Mad Cobber was? Their reign of post-2016 avatar terror was amazing.

Medullah
Aug 14, 2003

FEAR MY SHARK ROCKET IT REALLY SUCKS AND BLOWS
I think I prefer the endless No Joe v Vote Blue No Matter Who battles to this.

Did anything other than the NRA thing happen today?

DaveWoo
Aug 14, 2004

Fun Shoe
https://twitter.com/CNN/status/1291512883323572226

I don't think this is how the Madman Theory is supposed to work...

KingNastidon
Jun 25, 2004

The Sean posted:

1) what is the definition of profit margin?

Drug candidates are looked at as "programs." The cost of that program is deemed profitable if the NPV is >=$0 or ROI is >=0%. If you only looked at profitability post approval then essentially every drug would be profitable. You're playing dumb little semantics games because you know nothing about the industry and have repeatedly shown as much.

The Sean posted:

2) why should medical care be profit-oriented?

I haven't commented on this. I've talked about a for-profit company operating in the system as it operates today. If you advocated for 100% nationalization/internationalization of the healthcare industry then that's fine. It's not what we're talking about and you're trying to steer the direction there because you don't know anything about how the US healthcare system operates today.

The Sean posted:

3) what is the definition of profit margin because you keep dodging it you coward?

See #1

GreyjoyBastard posted:

i, uh, just checked my sentmessages and apparently I just thought really hard about it (until just now when I saw comboomer's post)

I even followed up with you afterwards to make sure you sent it, which you confirmed you did and provided Comboomer's "response." I was legitimately concerned for their well being. I wouldn't have contacted you unless I thought you were one of the good ones. Bad bad bad!

KingNastidon fucked around with this message at 00:41 on Aug 7, 2020

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

nine-gear crow
Aug 10, 2013

Medullah posted:

I think I prefer the endless No Joe v Vote Blue No Matter Who battles to this.

Did anything other than the NRA thing happen today?

Joe Biden showed off his old car and D&D ragebrained over what a rich rear end in a top hat he was for... reasons.

Trump went to Ohio and rambled about poo poo and almost met with its COVID-positive governor before it was called off at the last minute.

Other than that, it’s been a slow news day.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply