|
How do you rollen? This poll is closed. |
|||
|---|---|---|---|
| Fahrvergnügen |
|
34 | 25.95% |
| Lederhosen |
|
41 | 31.30% |
| Schnitzelhasen |
|
56 | 42.75% |
| Total: | 131 votes | ||
|
orange juche posted:China very much has a very real navy, they've just stayed close to home because they don't have a lot of overseas friendly ports to base out of. They're working on that I believe.
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2020 22:14
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 20:36 |
|
|
https://twitter.com/lawrencehurley/status/1321561851898060802?s=12
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2020 22:19
|
|
|
CMD598 posted:They're working on that I believe. Yep, amazing what investing in infrastructure in a third world country can get you, friendly ports for one.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2020 22:23
|
|
|
Fun times ahead https://twitter.com/stevenmazie/status/1321563621470707713?s=21
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2020 22:25
|
|
|
Democrats can ratfuck too. https://twitter.com/dnewhauser/status/1321564792512020480?s=19 Could be TLP or some other organization though, that'd be peak 2020.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2020 22:36
|
|
|
MazelTovCocktail posted:Fun times ahead https://twitter.com/steve_vladeck/status/1321565561504079875 https://twitter.com/stevenmazie/status/1321564274876125184
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2020 22:42
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:Democrats can ratfuck too. It's the Harrison campaign. He more or less admitted it in an interview that got published last week iirc.
|
|
#
?
Oct 28, 2020 22:52
|
|
|
Just in case you thought Hillary was out of the news Hillary Clinton says she is an Electoral College elector in New York. I thought EC Electors were supposed to be secret.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 00:05
|
|
|
I can't be the only person who immediately thought "Great that just tanked a bunch of loving votes for Joe". Whether it did or not I don't know but jesus loving Christ Hilary stay the gently caress home and shut up haven't you done enough damage?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 00:06
|
|
|
orange juche posted:I thought EC Electors were supposed to be secret. No. In some states electors names appear on the ballot. In others it’s not typically public until after electors are awarded. It’s just a list of people selected by the respective parties, typically months in advance. Varies from “who?” Bureaucrats to bug name people.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 00:15
|
|
|
orange juche posted:Just in case you thought Hillary was out of the news No, they're just usually nobody anyone cares about - party donors and high level functionaries.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 00:15
|
|
|
mlmp08 posted:No. In some states electors names appear on the ballot. In others it’s not typically public until after electors are awarded. It’s just a list of people selected by the respective parties, typically months in advance. Varies from “who?” Bureaucrats to bug name people. Such as Chak-tha, Chit'al, Drik-chkit, Gulnik, Kacht-ta, Kat'chka, Kiktul, Klaktuk, Krik, Pak'cha, Pik-ik-cha, Pok, Ptekwe, Tak-tha, Tal'tich, Tilnak, and Tik-tik.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 00:24
|
|
|
Can a law-talker break this and some of the subsequent tweets about it down for me a bit? I feel like I need a flow chart of negatives, double negatives and law-speak words.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 00:36
|
|
|
As of 10/14/2020 per CNN, here's the cash on hand for each campaign and their respective friendly PACs and donors: Biden: $360.7M ($162M of his own money) Trump: $255.3M ($43.6M of his own money)
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 00:50
|
|
|
CBJSprague24 posted:As of 10/14/2020 per CNN, here's the cash on hand for each campaign and their respective friendly PACs and donors: What do you mean by “his own money”? Like is Biden loving rich or that’s just what his campaign has?
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:00
|
|
|
nwin posted:What do you mean by “his own money”? What the campaign has, the rest is PAC/DNC money.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:04
|
|
|
Yea, Biden is worth like 9m.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:05
|
|
|
I'd believe Biden is an actual billionaire before I believe that Trump is.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:06
|
|
|
bird food bathtub posted:Can a law-talker break this and some of the subsequent tweets about it down for me a bit? I feel like I need a flow chart of negatives, double negatives and law-speak words. I have a mental image of Barrett being too busy with typical new-job stuff like filling out benefits forms,
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:22
|
|
|
Discussion Quorum posted:I have a mental image of Barrett being too busy with typical new-job stuff like filling out benefits forms, She's too busy trying to find the manager
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:23
|
|
|
bird food bathtub posted:Can a law-talker break this and some of the subsequent tweets about it down for me a bit? I feel like I need a flow chart of negatives, double negatives and law-speak words. Pennsylvania Democrats petitioned Pennsylvania courts to allow absentee ballots to be counted after election day, provided they were postmarked before election day. This is a power the state courts have and have used before in states of emergeny. They won. Republicans said “Reeeeeeeeeee! Help us, ratfucked super‐Senate (read “SCOTUS”), you’re our only hope. Chief Justice John Roberts thought “I really don’t want to be remembered for this” and joined Breyer, Kagan, and Sotomayor in declining to take the case.This allows the state court ruling to stand.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:33
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:Pennsylvania Democrats petitioned Pennsylvania courts to allow absentee ballots to be counted after election day, provided they were postmarked before election day. This is a power the state courts have and have used before in states of emergeny. Apparently Kavanaugh changed his position on it to join those four? So they won't be hearing the argument.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:36
|
|
|
Pine Cone Jones posted:Apparently Kavanaugh changed his position on it to join those four? So they won't be hearing the argument. Kavanaugh would have taken up the issue, but he did not join the three others in their call to revisit that matter after the election, possibly leading to another Bush vs. Gore. If they did that, Democrats would 100% pack the court the first chance they get, and I guess Roberts and Kavanaugh don't want that to happen.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:40
|
|
|
piL posted:Such as Chak-tha, Chit'al, Drik-chkit, Gulnik, Kacht-ta, Kat'chka, Kiktul, Klaktuk, Krik, Pak'cha, Pik-ik-cha, Pok, Ptekwe, Tak-tha, Tal'tich, Tilnak, and Tik-tik. Giant Bug-people 2020.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:42
|
|
|
Alito said outright they could take the case after the ballots are cast. Thomas and Gorsuch just kind of griped “well the GOP raised a good point and we should have taken the case earlier”. It’s not clear if they are salivating along with Alito at the prospect of flipping an election post facto.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 01:43
|
|
|
Given the timing, I'd like to think this would be the 2020 version of the Comey Letter, but  , it won't matter:https://twitter.com/davidenrich/status/1321202566584324098/photo/1 https://twitter.com/davidenrich/status/1321202788542676994 https://twitter.com/davidenrich/status/1321203160770318338 ...and there's an entire thread of Tweets. CBJSprague24 fucked around with this message at 02:10 on Oct 29, 2020 |
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 02:05
|
|
|
bird food bathtub posted:Can a law-talker break this and some of the subsequent tweets about it down for me a bit? I feel like I need a flow chart of negatives, double negatives and law-speak words. Man I'm an attorney and it can be confusing to me sometimes.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 02:16
|
|
|
CBJSprague24 posted:Given the timing, I'd like to think this would be the 2020 version of the Comey Letter, but If he loses the Election, he's in for a world of hurt. Or at least his family is. Even if he doesn't, so much of this stuff isn't going to wait on him.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 02:21
|
|
|
The essential SCOTUS position makes *some* sense, but it's real iffy. - State makes the election law and that's the baseline. It's the state legislatures' job to set the rules. - If a Federal Judge recently overturned the state law, reverse the Federal Judge. State trumps Feds and too close to the election to gently caress with things (Purcell Principle). These are the Michigan/Texas rulings. - If a State Supreme Court overturned the state law and extended turn-in deadlines, leave them alone. State Supremes are allowed to gently caress with their state rules (NC/PA decisions today). The trouble is that the minority is saying gently caress YOU, CALVINBALL BECAUSE [dumb pretext]. OH BY THE WAY, WE CAN REVIEW THIS AFTER THE ELECTION BECAUSE [dumb pretext]. Also, this all flies in the face of the SCOTUS view of "gently caress you state courts, you can't review gerrymanders because [dumb pretext]". It doesn't help that Kavanaugh is dumber than a box of rusty hammers. Speaking of dumb, here's proof that they're graduating from having absolutely nothing to having absolutely loving nothing: https://twitter.com/NikkiMcR/status/1321608091503366144 facialimpediment fucked around with this message at 02:47 on Oct 29, 2020 |
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 02:33
|
|
|
I'm the carefully not naming the carrier in question, because a rep from the carrier in question might go on the record and say "We have no idea what the gently caress you're talking about Tuck."
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 02:52
|
|
|
“Also, they’d sue me for defamation with real damages.”
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 02:59
|
|
|
Yes, because I know that when I'm dealing with original documents that I apparently haven't made a copy of, scanned or photographed, I just throw the one and only copy in existence in a fed ex envelope and hope for the best, and I definitely don't throw an intern on a plane to deliver it by hand.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:00
|
|
|
https://www.military.com/daily-news/2020/10/27/marine-booted-after-racist-posts-arrested-federal-weapons-charges.html I knew Duncan a little. We were at DLI at the same time. Weird as hell that names I recognize are involved in this kind of thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:02
|
|
|
not caring here posted:Yes, because I know that when I'm dealing with original documents that I apparently haven't made a copy of, scanned or photographed, I just throw the one and only copy in existence in a fed ex envelope and hope for the best, and I definitely don't throw an intern on a plane to deliver it by hand. https://twitter.com/Bearded_Hippo/status/1321616699028885510?s=20
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:02
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:Speaking of dumb, here's proof that they're graduating from having absolutely nothing to having absolutely loving nothing: loving
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:03
|
|
|
facialimpediment posted:
Brand name company? Should have tried USPS.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:08
|
|
|
Sounds like a case against privatizing the postal service.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:18
|
|
|
"They used pictures of what we had sent" Great they made photocopies first. So in other words this whole whoopsie daisy it's lost thing is irrelevant. Also there's no way in hell a company as archaic as Fox is doesn't have fax machines.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:30
|
|
|
As Nero Danced posted:"They used pictures of what we had sent" Fox News is the one company I would never expect to use fax. 
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:41
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 2, 2024 20:36 |
|
|
facialimpediment posted:The essential SCOTUS position makes *some* sense, but it's real iffy. This is not exactly correct. The argument from kav et al is that the constitution specifically vests the decision making for elections in the state legislatures so no one but the state legislature has a say in how the election is run. Delegation of that authority is allowed, but interpretation of state law is apparently not because the constitution says it belongs only to the legislature. You'll notice this position is in complete contrast to the position they took on the voting rights act where the amendment specifies that congress alone has the power to enforce constitutional voting compliance.
|
|
#
?
Oct 29, 2020 03:42
|
|
