|
rear end cobra posted:“victim” lmao  also dustcat talking about grudges is pretty 
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:48
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 16:12 |
|
|
Dustcat posted:the victim first they came for the posters who had made extremely embarrassing posts-- and i did not speak out, for my posts were always great
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:49
|
|
|
Dustcat posted:This flareup happened because once again the internet drama forum couldn't be content with laughing at the poop but had to go sticking their fingers in it. Is it that hard to quit brigading and chasing people around the forums? Several posters in this thread have sincerely expressed the opinion that that was somehow a virtuous thing to do and the victim deserved it, which is messed up and toxic as hell, and I really hope that's not officially tolerated. I know this is hard to understand for the people who only post ten thousand times a day in CSPAM and occasionally in QCS when one of their CSPAM posting brethren has their reputation unfairly maligned, but this website has dozens of subforums and everyone is allowed to post in all of them sight unseen.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:50
|
|
|
The ban for this seems really heavy handed and may even have some kind of weird revenge/friend protection angle. If a poster who flaunted leaving the forums for good, posting his new internet posting address, saying they are never coming back, and then they come back. Maybe this should be pointed out and laughed at and remembered.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:50
|
|
|
Glad to see Dustcat stop by to make the exact same post he does in every single qcs thread
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:51
|
|
|
Dustcat posted:This flareup happened because once again the internet drama forum couldn't be content with laughing at the poop but had to go sticking their fingers in it. Is it that hard to quit brigading and chasing people around the forums? Several posters in this thread have sincerely expressed the opinion that that was somehow a virtuous thing to do and the victim deserved it, which is messed up and toxic as hell, and I really hope that's not officially tolerated. Extremely uncool to call making fun of someone for an incredibly cringe "I'm leaving the internet forever" post as "toxic" behaviour and call them a "victim". Insulting to people who suffer actual harassment, please do better
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:52
|
|
|
CountryMatters posted:Extremely uncool to call making fun of someone for an incredibly cringe "I'm leaving the internet forever" post as "toxic" behaviour and call them a "victim". Insulting to people who suffer actual harassment, please do better He doesn't actually care about that. He (and many others like him) uses that specific language purposefully as a cudgel to paint the opposing viewpoint as heinously as possible. It's the tactic of a coward that works a depressing amount of time.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:57
|
|
|
HugeGrossBurrito posted:Banning should in general be a process, unless its something egregious like advocating for dog murder. There should be a substantial paper trail that shows yes, this person was asked to stop, explained to why they should stop and they kept doing it multiple times. Its difficult and I have hosed it up plenty of times modding but in general no one should be scratching their head wondering why someone was banned. I already posted as much in here a few minutes ago, but at what point do time outs stop working? Like the person knows that they'll get 24/72/168/etc till ban and they still do it. If it becomes more economical to just make a throwaway account to put out that righteous copy pasted own instead of just posting tiduslaugh. In this particular case that caused the drama now, would 24 hour bans curtail the culture already created? It would delay it at best but it will keep happening. Should moderators be forced to stick to some rote process that can be pussyfooted and taken advantage of? Should moderators not have the ability to tackle the problem more forcefully if it has a more direct effect on stopping other people from doing it?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:58
|
|
|
anyway unban hizke you fuckin psychos lol
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 22:59
|
|
|
Those bans suck and should be reversed, but also, everyone who has posted in this thread, myself included, sucks.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:00
|
|
|
I realize the nazi thing was blown out of proportion and FYAD is still bitter about that but are we really going to sit here and act like lowtax kneejerk banning a bunch of people because a bunch of sycophants in twitch chat told him they were talking poo poo about him was cool and okay and nobody should have been bothered by it smarx overreacting to lowtax being an rear end in a top hat feels like such a weird thing to be mocking a year later, it just seems like a bunch of boring personal grievances and circular arguing and not anything actually funny. scary ghost dog posted:I know this is hard to understand for the people who only post ten thousand times a day in CSPAM and occasionally in QCS when one of their CSPAM posting brethren has their reputation unfairly maligned, but this website has dozens of subforums and everyone is allowed to post in all of them sight unseen. being a QCS regular is not the virtue you seem to think it is Augus fucked around with this message at 23:08 on Dec 6, 2020 |
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:00
|
|
|
Cao Ni Ma posted:I already posted as much in here a few minutes ago, but at what point do time outs stop working? Like the person knows that they'll get 24/72/168/etc till ban and they still do it. If it becomes more economical to just make a throwaway account to put out that righteous copy pasted own instead of just posting tiduslaugh. Exactly. Banning them instead of probating them put a complete halt to the mockery of smarxist. If they had just been probated then who know what might have happened. Someone might have made a QCS thread where a large number of people all agreed that making fun of smarxist is funny because he's a pathetic loser.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:01
|
|
|
yea ok posted:why was that poo poo even worth a “long probe”? it was in a dogshit garbage thread making fun of the offsite banme guy after saying weird funny poo poo about people who post in fyad. cspam is a fyad-lite where you talk poo poo about government and the only rules are there are no rules cause anarchy reigns. why are people getting banned or even “longly probed” lol for reposting a post from this very same website and subforum? get a loving grip Kagaya Homoraisan posted:this is chickenshit and we both know it. ill repeat my (anonymous but not anymore) criticism i shared in the survey: the biggest problem with qcs is that without staff accountability it doesnt function. at all. mods are never accountable because "well they know their subforum culture, i will defer to their judgement" or 'i will never force a mod to explain themselves in qcs thats dogpiling". so were supposed to bring it to admins. except admins are also not accountable because "they do good work all over the site" or "theyre really busy making the forums better" when the latter seems to be rubberstamping punishments. i would again like to repeat that the suggestion of pming staff doesnt even work because they are free to ignore those pms or blow them off with a non-answer. this is literally the only response ive gotten from any staff member on this website about my issues. including the "list of forums nazis" that i begged to have removed because it harmed my friends. Read these posts athanatos
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:02
|
|
|
sourdough posted:Read these posts athanatos he won't
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:03
|
|
|
C-SPAM not only has entire threads dedicated to mocking posters in other forums, its posters are openly advocating for violence against other posters and go completely unpunished. This guy has been making posts like this for years and has yet to get banned by a CSPAM moderator for this behavior!Phi230 posted:1. There is no evidence that Biden is harm reduction in any way as compared to Trump. You are delusional, and literally making that up whole cloth.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:07
|
|
|
yea but at least he didn't copy and paste someone's super cringe banme post, then the mods would really have to step in!
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:12
|
|
|
LinYutang posted:C-SPAM not only has entire threads dedicated to mocking posters in other forums, its posters are openly advocating for violence against other posters and go completely unpunished. This guy has been making posts like this for years and has yet to get banned by a CSPAM moderator for this behavior! why do you have this random post from April just saved offhand to pull out at an opportune moment. This is what people are talking about when they make fun of QCS whiners lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:14
|
|
|
sourdough posted:Read these posts athanatos The last post Athanatos made in this thread was an explicit lie about their motivation for approving the bans. They have no interest in approaching this with any degree of honesty. Augus posted:why do you have this random post from April just saved offhand to pull out at an opportune moment. This is what people are talking about when they make fun of QCS whiners lmao Augus posted:I realize the nazi thing was blown out of proportion and FYAD is still bitter about that but are we really going to sit here and act like lowtax kneejerk banning a bunch of people because a bunch of sycophants in twitch chat told him they were talking poo poo about him was cool and okay and nobody should have been bothered by it Does anyone know what this moron is talking about?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:15
|
|
|
scary ghost dog posted:
If you say fyad in a mirror three times a bunch of guys with kids show avatars appear to post that actually posting cringe poo poo is normal lmao and if you notice it you're being abusive lmao
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:23
|
|
|
i gotta keep it real, i dont see any problem with cspam officially making a rule saying "no helldumping". thats a reasonable rule to have. people might break that rule but i wouldnt turn up my nose at cspam having a rule against helldumping. of course, then you would have to, yknow, enforce it equally like how smarxist in this thread was quoted as calling out fluffdaddy for "simping for bigots(..?????)" but that would be a fair rule to have. what i do see a problem with is dropping bans on people for this without any warning. i dont see any world where that makes sense as a decision. so reverse the bans, maybe slap on a week probation or something if you want to be severe, or a day probation if you want to be reasonable, because quoting peoples posts back at them is not some high crime that must be punished by death.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:23
|
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K9tcA_AM4BE
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:25
|
|
|
Looking forward to reading funny Bloom posts after the pardon goes through.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:27
|
|
|
pog boyfriend posted:i gotta keep it real, i dont see any problem with cspam officially making a rule saying "no helldumping". thats a reasonable rule to have. people might break that rule but i wouldnt turn up my nose at cspam having a rule against helldumping. of course, then you would have to, yknow, enforce it equally like how smarxist in this thread was quoted as calling out fluffdaddy for "simping for bigots(..?????)" but that would be a fair rule to have. what i do see a problem with is dropping bans on people for this without any warning. i dont see any world where that makes sense as a decision. so reverse the bans, maybe slap on a week probation or something if you want to be severe, or a day probation if you want to be reasonable, because quoting peoples posts back at them is not some high crime that must be punished by death. Or maybe no probations at all. Just a thought
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:27
|
|
|
pog boyfriend posted:i gotta keep it real, i dont see any problem with cspam officially making a rule saying "no helldumping". thats a reasonable rule to have. people might break that rule but i wouldnt turn up my nose at cspam having a rule against helldumping. of course, then you would have to, yknow, enforce it equally like how smarxist in this thread was quoted as calling out fluffdaddy for "simping for bigots(..?????)" but that would be a fair rule to have. what i do see a problem with is dropping bans on people for this without any warning. i dont see any world where that makes sense as a decision. so reverse the bans, maybe slap on a week probation or something if you want to be severe, or a day probation if you want to be reasonable, because quoting peoples posts back at them is not some high crime that must be punished by death. Quoting a single post made on these forums back at someone multiple times isn't helldumping, I mean it isn't even harassment, smarxist said in this thread it didn't bother him
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:28
|
|
|
epic bird guy posted:he won't His eyes are tied
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:31
|
|
|
Maybe in the future Bloom & other posters can avoid continuously posting in other subforums specifically to make fun of people. That way, they won't get punished for doing that, in the most predictable turn of events ever. Good ban.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:31
|
|
|
Syenite posted:Maybe in the future Bloom & other posters can avoid continuously posting in other subforums specifically to make fun of people. That way, they won't get punished for doing that, in the most predictable turn of events ever. Good ban. Speaking of extremely predictable turns of event, look who's here to ignore the actual discussion so they can offer disingenuous summaries of events in an attempt to discredit their posting nemeses. Do you really want to argue that mods should be allowed to arbitrarily ban people who post in their subforums without warning or oversight?
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:36
|
|
|
pardon if i was unclear everyone, i am not advocating punishing hizke or bloom at all. my point was simply that if you had to punish them, 1 week would be an unfairly harsh punishment, and 1 day would be considered reasonable. in this context a ban is clearly excessive to the point of reflecting poorly on the moderator and admin involved in the decision to use a ban in this caseSyenite posted:Maybe in the future Bloom & other posters can avoid continuously posting in other subforums specifically to make fun of people. That way, they won't get punished for doing that, in the most predictable turn of events ever. Good ban. Syenite posted:Nah I'm basically just laughing at the mod that continues to prove why everyone left his fiefdom, don't really care about people taco-posting Syenite posted:Frankly I was just kinda astonished that you would try to fit in with FYAD after all the poo poo that went down. Kinda proves how much of a hellsite this place is.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:38
|
|
|
Augus posted:I realize the nazi thing was blown out of proportion and FYAD is still bitter about that but Stopped reading here, as this is an ongoing underlying issue on the forums in general. I'm just supposed to smile and take this while the same people are in charge here? No thank you
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:40
|
|
|
pog boyfriend posted:i gotta keep it real, i dont see any problem with cspam officially making a rule saying "no helldumping". thats a reasonable rule to have. people might break that rule but i wouldnt turn up my nose at cspam having a rule against helldumping. of course, then you would have to, yknow, enforce it equally like how smarxist in this thread was quoted as calling out fluffdaddy for "simping for bigots(..?????)" but that would be a fair rule to have. what i do see a problem with is dropping bans on people for this without any warning. i dont see any world where that makes sense as a decision. so reverse the bans, maybe slap on a week probation or something if you want to be severe, or a day probation if you want to be reasonable, because quoting peoples posts back at them is not some high crime that must be punished by death. The "don't whine about D&D in CSPAM." was pretty much the "no helldumping" rule because C-SPAMers would helldump D&D posts there.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:41
|
|
|
scary ghost dog posted:Does anyone know what this moron is talking about? the smarxist post from a year ago that this entire thread is centered around, try to keep up
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:45
|
|
|
GoutPatrol posted:The "don't whine about D&D in CSPAM." was pretty much the "no helldumping" rule because C-SPAMers would helldump D&D posts there. very intuitive, extremely clearly written
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:45
|
|
|
This isn't that loving hard. Are the mods/admins egos so loving fragile that they'd rather not lose face than overturn an obviously bullshit ban? What the gently caress? Must be some weird cliques in those circles for this to not have happened yet.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:46
|
|
|
Augus posted:the smarxist post from a year ago that this entire thread is centered around, try to keep up Ah, I understand. You and smarxist are birds of a feather so when we read an embarrassing five paragraph banme post, what you're reading is an impassioned plea for civility and hope in the face of bigotry. Well, I'm glad I don't live in your world, where stupid and pathetic losers are noble quixotic warriors. You can continue living in your fantasy world and I'll continue engaging with reality, and let's not ever interact with each other again please.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:48
|
|
|
GoutPatrol posted:The "don't whine about D&D in CSPAM." was pretty much the "no helldumping" rule because C-SPAMers would helldump D&D posts there. It seems like a good "no helldumping" rule would be, for example, if it said "no he'll dumping", instead of that, which no one was doing here. At least if that was a rule when a mod has an anxiety attack and bans three people for posting about being outside there's an actual rule they were attempting to enforce scary ghost dog posted:Ah, I understand. You and smarxist are birds of a feather so when we read an embarrassing five paragraph banme post, what you're reading is an impassioned plea for civility and hope in the face of bigotry. Well, I'm glad I don't live in your world, where stupid and pathetic losers are noble quixotic warriors. You can continue living in your fantasy world and I'll continue engaging with reality, and let's not ever interact with each other again please. Reading this post and nodding like Jack Nicholson in the shining
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:49
|
|
|
I gotta say, this guy with the cartoon avatar talking about how making fun of someone's embarrassing post is passe while at the same time saying "lol that threat of violence is from months ago dude" might not be the most well adjusted of individuals.
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:52
|
|
|
scary ghost dog posted:Ah, I understand. You and smarxist are birds of a feather so when we read an embarrassing five paragraph banme post, what you're reading is an impassioned plea for civility and hope in the face of bigotry. Well, I'm glad I don't live in your world, where stupid and pathetic losers are noble quixotic warriors. You can continue living in your fantasy world and I'll continue engaging with reality, and let's not ever interact with each other again please. yeah that’s exactly what I said, you’re doing great. keep this up and you might even reach the level of Online Brain to be a mod yourself
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:55
|
|
|
I think there's something very strange going on with CSPAM's moderation when a dog murder post gets a three day slap on the wrist and gently ribbing a guy by reminding him of the all time hall of fame terrible post he made gets two people banned Those two things occuring, within 24 hours of each other. That seems odd to me
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:55
|
|
|
Free Hizke and Bloom
|
|
#
?
Dec 6, 2020 23:59
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 16:12 |
|
|
multijoe posted:I think there's something very strange going on with CSPAM's moderation when a dog murder post gets a three day slap on the wrist and gently ribbing a guy by reminding him of the all time hall of fame terrible post he made gets two people banned
|
|
#
?
Dec 7, 2020 00:00
|
|