|
I keep goddamn forgetting about The Boring Company whenever I go to tell anyone how they, yes they, personally are smarter than Elon Musk. Just amazing.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2021 23:03 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 05:56 |
|
Upside: giant albino tunnel crabs, bred in the dark with a hunger for human flesh.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2021 23:08 |
|
Scarodactyl posted:Upside: giant albino tunnel crabs, bred in the dark with a hunger for human flesh. Those, too, are orders of magnitude smarter than Musk.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2021 23:18 |
|
Hold the payment in escrow until the tunnels are completed. Musk has a ton of cash, he can afford to build tunnels on credit. Also make sure you agree on a price beforehand and don't give in when the project is over budget and they want to renegotiate. gimme the GOD drat candy posted:unfortunately, despite the state paying for them i doubt most of these tunnels will ever actually be dug. it's not just maintaining them that would be impossible. actually digging the tunnels would also be a complex and difficult process and hey where are you going mr. musk.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2021 23:20 |
|
Here you guys are talking about "feasibility" while Musk is on another plane of intelligence where he builds a cosmic pump-and-dump scam where the idiots who fund him are too stupid to ever cash out. I guess that's why he's the richest man in the world and you idiots are down in the tunnels, getting eaten by gators
|
# ? Jan 18, 2021 23:44 |
|
Hillary 2020 posted:Hold the payment in escrow until the tunnels are completed. Musk has a ton of cash, he can afford to build tunnels on credit. That sounds pretty much the opposite of how government contracts work.
|
# ? Jan 18, 2021 23:56 |
|
florida wants to give musk money for nothing. that might sound silly, but apparently it is the cool thing to do. forget baseball; america's game is now giving money to known boer dimwit elon musk.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 00:15 |
|
Bethamphetamine posted:in 2022 Elon Musk bores into the Miami-Dade aquifer, salting the singular drinking water supply for 9.3 million Floridians. oxsnard posted:elon musk calls the public official in charged of water a "gay pedophile communist tesla shortseller"
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 00:48 |
|
Scarodactyl posted:Upside: giant albino tunnel crabs, bred in the dark with a hunger for human flesh. https://twitter.com/paprbckparadise/status/1251269396112093185?s=19
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 01:24 |
|
gimme the GOD drat candy posted:known boer dimwit elon musk. QCS threads are spinning up as we speak.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 05:57 |
|
How long until Musk creates a problem for which his solution will be to basically invent The Cleaner from Labyrinth.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 08:11 |
|
lol perchance he could make something more expensive and less helpful than a train or bus? https://twitter.com/drmario441/status/1351184785511743491?s=19
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 13:35 |
|
“Elon Musk is a chonky boi”
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 13:50 |
|
BEAR GRYLLZ posted:cities are going to dump billions of dollars down these literal holes and when the public finally understands it's all a fraud no one will suffer any consequences the public will never understand this
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 16:41 |
|
Why dig new tunnels instead of just expanding existing sewers so that Teslas can drive through them?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:06 |
|
the boring company has only usesd secondhand sewer tunnel borers already so you probably don't even need to widen the current sewer tunnels, just flush the teslas right on down there
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:10 |
|
Nothing screams American Dream more than begging and pleading the richest man in the world to take even MORE of their money. Elon built his fortune on tax payer funds and will stop at nothing to continually drink the resources away from the American Government. PS: Idiots up here in Canada are FROTHING at the mouth to latch onto the Starlink Teet.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:14 |
|
Miami is gonna end up spending tens of billions of dollars on doomed engineering to get them out of the whole sea level rise thing so why shouldn't some of that go towards elon musk? don't be greedy, goons.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:17 |
|
doesn’t, if fully realized, starlink gently caress up a bunch of our existing satellites for space observation as well as make ground observatories basically useless by over crowding the skies?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:20 |
|
Dr. VooDoo posted:doesn’t, if fully realized, starlink gently caress up a bunch of our existing satellites for space observation as well as make ground observatories basically useless by over crowding the skies? yes
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:21 |
|
Dr. VooDoo posted:doesn’t, if fully realized, starlink gently caress up a bunch of our existing satellites for space observation as well as make ground observatories basically useless by over crowding the skies? yeah it's a great time for astronomy since soon it will be over.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:22 |
|
WHO NEEDS ASTRONOMY WHEN WERE ON MARS Mars slaves quarters and work environments do not contain windows to allow star gazing; don't get any ideas of greatness you have a debt to pay.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 17:29 |
|
Apparently the new Starlink sats that are launching are only half as bad as the previous ones. Also saw the EU wants to launch their own starlink setup.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 18:17 |
|
Also amazon, also other countries. Gonna have 60,000 sats in orbit so we can all watch porn in the boonies.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 18:26 |
|
https://twitter.com/jaymboller/status/1351537740030988289?s=20 lol that they're going to pay someone to do this when there are thousands of idiots who do it every day for free already
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 18:52 |
|
Dr. VooDoo posted:doesn’t, if fully realized, starlink gently caress up a bunch of our existing satellites for space observation as well as make ground observatories basically useless by over crowding the skies? No, ground-based astronomy will survive even a full Starlink. Wide-field imaging surveys with short exposures will lose maybe a few percent efficiency. What hasn't really been discussed is what happens to the unlucky saps who need to take long exposures of faint targets (usually spectroscopy) and have a satellite fly close by unbeknownst to them. Sucks to be those people! Also, astrophotography will definitely be ruined. Colostomy Bag posted:Apparently the new Starlink sats that are launching are only half as bad as the previous ones. Yes, they tried the completely novel solution of painting them black*. But they still have solar panels with necessarily shiny circuitry and such. Colostomy Bag posted:Also saw the EU wants to launch their own starlink setup. This is the major issue - Starlink on its own is manageable, but add another half-dozen competitors, of which at least one is bound to give no fucks about how bright their satellites are because there are no real international agreements to stop anyone from launching arbitrary garbage into orbit, and pretty soon the sky will be filled with giant blinking LED billboards and flaming debris. * this actually isn't trivial; it's hard to cool things in space and they still need to radiate away heat somehow.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 19:00 |
|
It's time to crowdfund some sattelite destroyer sattelites, that can push Starlinks sats back into the atmosphere
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 19:04 |
|
or just wait a few years, they'll come down on their own. the trick is to stop him from launching more
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 19:10 |
|
ekuNNN posted:It's time to crowdfund some sattelite destroyer sattelites, that can push Starlinks sats back into the atmosphere Speaking of, what international law states that some country can’t shoot private satellites out of the sky? I’m sure it exists, but just curious, is it considered an act of war or something? Or treated similarly to ocean shipping? When do we get space pirates?
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 19:53 |
|
Sudden Loud Noise posted:Speaking of, what international law states that some country can’t shoot private satellites out of the sky? You could do it with a big enough ground based laser. It would be difficult to de-orbit them from the ground but you could cook them.
|
# ? Jan 19, 2021 21:23 |
|
Sudden Loud Noise posted:Speaking of, what international law states that some country can’t shoot private satellites out of the sky? if you apply simple maritime law, i think it'd more or less be an act of war. which doesn't mean it'd actually start a war, it just means the consequences depend entirely on the military and economic power of the nation doing the shooting. if the country can fight a costly war of attrition against the US / has nukes / is the US, no military consequences beyond some saber rattling. if the country can singlehandedly cripple the US' economy / is the US, no economic consequences. otherwise, consequences however, iirc there's no universally mutually-agreed limit to a country's airspace, so if one of the above countries with the economic and military power to get away with this actually did it, that might be the justification. but the problem with doing that is now other people can blow up the instigating nation's satellites under the same pretext, and that only leads to economic harm for everyone. and lots of crippled military hardware. and a big uptick in inconvenience in the daily lives of the comfortably rich - aka the people who would be calling these shots and the people who fund their reelections. so basically anyone with the infrastructure and expertise to build and guide that kind of laser or missile without getting immediately dunked on by the US also has enough to lose from a kessler cascade that they won't do it e: that's my understanding anyway. im no authority Cactus Ghost has issued a correction as of 23:28 on Jan 19, 2021 |
# ? Jan 19, 2021 23:21 |
|
Admiral Ray posted:Tunnels Bethamphetamine posted:in 2022 Elon Musk bores into the Miami-Dade aquifer, salting the singular drinking water supply for 9.3 million Floridians. Too late Miami already did that when they dredged a shipping channel deeper for cruise ships or something and breached the aquifer. Please note geologists and engineers told them that this would happen before hand, so this would be "on brand."
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 01:24 |
|
OMGVBFLOL posted:if you apply simple maritime law, i think it'd more or less be an act of war. which doesn't mean it'd actually start a war, it just means the consequences depend entirely on the military and economic power of the nation doing the shooting. if the country can fight a costly war of attrition against the US / has nukes / is the US, no military consequences beyond some saber rattling. if the country can singlehandedly cripple the US' economy / is the US, no economic consequences. otherwise, consequences I say we go full Kessler. We have no business exporting our stupidity to space...
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 03:38 |
|
The Boering Company
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 08:20 |
|
never ceases to make me incredibly angry
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 10:12 |
|
https://twitter.com/OmariJHardy/status/1351159820158689292?s=20
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 11:17 |
|
DeepDickPizza posted:https://twitter.com/jaymboller/status/1351537740030988289?s=20 https://twitter.com/spencerfleury/status/1351625297196552193?s=20
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 11:23 |
|
https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/19/elon-musk-said-it-was-not-a-flamethrower/?tpcc=ECTW2020 Story goes into this a bit more and with more people getting boned but for flavour: quote:Elon Musk said it was ‘Not a Flamethrower’
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 15:54 |
|
Olympic Mathlete posted:https://techcrunch.com/2021/01/19/elon-musk-said-it-was-not-a-flamethrower/?tpcc=ECTW2020 Lmao
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 18:15 |
|
|
# ? May 16, 2024 05:56 |
|
quote:When Craddock managed to get a lawyer, she told him the judge would probably just let him go with a warning. Instead, the magistrate ordered him back to his cell. That was when Craddock learned possession of a flamethrower in Italy can carry a 10-year prison sentence. Lol owned
|
# ? Jan 20, 2021 18:27 |