|
mawarannahr posted:The Stanford Prison experiment is fake disinformation and anyone bringing it up henceforth should be permabanned. very john wayne of you
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 20:04
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 05:44 |
|
|
Mods knew.Honky Dong Country posted:It's official, the joke has become too old for the mods. 
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 20:17
|
|
|
Stunt_enby posted:if the mods don't want to be called pedophiles, maybe they shouldn't make posts like this haha wow
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 20:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 21:03
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 21:39
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 21:53
|
|
|
Stunt_enby posted:if the mods don't want to be called pedophiles, maybe they shouldn't make posts like this turns out we were wrong about who the mods were working the asses off the whole time.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 21:55
|
|
|
Sitting Here posted:as someone who got the blue star so I could help run neat contests and change avs in Creative Convention in my spare time, and as someone who was sexually assaulted as a child and sexually groomed as a teenager, I would humbly, respectfully, ask that goons curb their primal irresistible urge to call "mods" pedophiles. personally, i believe that subforums ought to be allowed to apply whatever standards of moderation the posters of that particular subforum in concensus establish. and as can be observed from the response in the original thread the posts in question occurred in, the resident posters of c-spam do not, overwhelmingly, consider the reaction of the moderating hierarchy to fit the posting environment of the thread, in the forum particular. posting my thread (practical balaclava knitting) of future potential in the Creative Convention, i would not make a joke calling the resident mods pedos. in contrast, i am going to call the mods pedos while posting in FYAD and c-sPAM. fluffdaddy doesnt get to decide whats acceptable in cspam, nor does he get to decide what warrants a ban+30 in cspam. thanks, goodnight
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 21:58
|
|
|
exmarx posted:this whole thing started when the trump thread mod blundered into a relatively good discussion about soft power and china, then doubled down with bad probes. the pedo jokes were a direct response to that – mods can't unilaterally demand respect, and larry is basically pure id. i'm not sure what else you can expect? imagine the world in which you are talking about china then some fail mod comes in and gets lambasted/starts being a bitch and an admin starts dropping bombs being viewed as anything other than extremely pathetic lol. completely unable to take the hint so we just keep toeing right up to that line to irritate them. the densest mf'ers alive
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:09
|
|
|
Stunt_enby posted:if the mods don't want to be called pedophiles, maybe they shouldn't make posts like this Impeccable timing. Just incredible.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:24
|
|
|
Kurnugia posted:personally, i believe that subforums ought to be allowed to apply whatever standards of moderation the posters of that particular subforum in concensus establish. and as can be observed from the response in the original thread the posts in question occurred in, the resident posters of c-spam do not, overwhelmingly, consider the reaction of the moderating hierarchy to fit the posting environment of the thread, in the forum particular. tbh i wasn't really talking about anything particular to any specific subforum. I just think it's really awful and painful to throw "pedo" around as an insult because it 1) obfuscates credible accusations and 2) is painful for people who've survived that poo poo. You seem very convicted in your stance so I can only infer it must feel very good for your to use pedophile as an insult. I guess I'd hate for you to have to go without that small joy, because you might have to grow a thicker skin!
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:25
|
|
|
Sitting Here posted:tbh i wasn't really talking about anything particular to any specific subforum. I just think it's really awful and painful to throw "pedo" around as an insult because it 1) obfuscates credible accusations and 2) is painful for people who've survived that poo poo. You seem very convicted in your stance so I can only infer it must feel very good for your to use pedophile as an insult. I guess I'd hate for you to have to go without that small joy, because you might have to grow a thicker skin! personally I wouldn't join a group that has had credible accusations made against it, contained people who stalked girls, posted bestiality, licked toilet seats, were actual, convicted child rapists, wife beaters, people who were diaper furs, sniffed girls hair on the bus, had sock puppet accounts to agree with themselves, and of course the list could go on forever here, but you know... a few bad apples doesn't spoil the whole bunch...right?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:29
|
|
|
That Little Demon posted:personally I wouldn't join a group that has had credible accusations made against it, contained people who stalked girls, posted bestiality, licked toilet seats, were actual, convicted child rapists, wife beaters, people who were diaper furs, sniffed girls hair on the bus, had sock puppet accounts to agree with themselves, and of course the list could go on forever here, but you know... a few bad apples doesn't spoil the whole bunch...right? But you just registered.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:32
|
|
|
That Little Demon posted:personally I wouldn't join a group that has had credible accusations made against it, contained people who stalked girls, posted bestiality, licked toilet seats, were actual, convicted child rapists, wife beaters, people who were diaper furs, sniffed girls hair on the bus, had sock puppet accounts to agree with themselves, and of course the list could go on forever here, but you know... a few bad apples doesn't spoil the whole bunch...right? So you wouldn’t become a goon on something awful dot com?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:33
|
|
|
so did everybody get together in one thread to use this line that joking about rosa parks except shes on a school bus and is a pedophile is obfuscating credible accusations of pedophilia 
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:33
|
|
|
That Little Demon posted:personally I wouldn't join a group that has had credible accusations made against it, contained people who stalked girls, posted bestiality, licked toilet seats, were actual, convicted child rapists, wife beaters, people who were diaper furs, sniffed girls hair on the bus, had sock puppet accounts to agree with themselves, and of course the list could go on forever here, but you know... a few bad apples doesn't spoil the whole bunch...right? I mean... Regular posters have done all that and more.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:35
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Impeccable timing. Just incredible. i literally yelled JESUS loving CHRIST WHY in my house when I saw that, i feel comfortable saying to this thread. It appears to be getting handled, though! That Little Demon posted:personally I wouldn't join a group that has had credible accusations made against it, contained people who stalked girls, posted bestiality, licked toilet seats, were actual, convicted child rapists, wife beaters, people who were diaper furs, sniffed girls hair on the bus, had sock puppet accounts to agree with themselves, and of course the list could go on forever here, but you know... a few bad apples doesn't spoil the whole bunch...right? This is very laudable. But it's kind of a Ship of Theseus problem right? Like, how many mods have to turn over before it's a different group of people who can be held to a different standard? Most of the mods don't have to do much, we're just kind of thread janitors who pootle around answering minor questions and changing avs or giving gang tags. Is it your opinion that SA should have no mods? What does your ideal SA look like?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:35
|
|
|
Sitting Here posted:tbh i wasn't really talking about anything particular to any specific subforum. I just think it's really awful and painful to throw "pedo" around as an insult because it 1) obfuscates credible accusations and 2) is painful for people who've survived that poo poo. You seem very convicted in your stance so I can only infer it must feel very good for your to use pedophile as an insult. I guess I'd hate for you to have to go without that small joy, because you might have to grow a thicker skin! sorry, i thought i was making my point clear with the whole "context" bit that fluffdaddy was violating in his/her moderating choices. my point was that in in context of an in-group, such jokes can be dissociated from the source of their humour, and even traumatic subjects be used as subjects of humour. it isnt a question of skin, thickness whatever, but posting in an environment where one thought such jokes were permissible, and was disabused. of course, if you believe that you ought to be allowed to decide whats permissible in places like FYAD and lite, thatd be your prerorragative i dont want the right to post pedo jokes in the creative corner, nor ask the right to mock posters therein. i just wanna be allowed to do it in a place and environment where it doesnt bother you. cuz you dont post nor read the spooky spectre thread in cspam. nor does fluffdaddy, except when somebody reports a larry post. and then he reads the other guys post, and poof goes 30 bucks i spent on this bloody forum
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:37
|
|
|
That Little Demon posted:personally I wouldn't join a group that has had credible accusations made against it, contained people who stalked girls, posted bestiality, licked toilet seats, were actual, convicted child rapists, wife beaters, people who were diaper furs, sniffed girls hair on the bus, had sock puppet accounts to agree with themselves, and of course the list could go on forever here, but you know... a few bad apples doesn't spoil the whole bunch...right? I dunno dude, you paid for a forums account. Probably more than one judging by your regdate.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:38
|
|
|
noticed today that larry et al are still banned for some reason. what gives?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:39
|
|
|
Sitting Here posted:i literally yelled JESUS loving CHRIST WHY in my house when I saw that, i feel comfortable saying to this thread. It appears to be getting handled, though! What is the different standard, and if it exists, then why does it keep happening?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:42
|
|
|
Kurnugia posted:sorry, i thought i was making my point clear with the whole "context" bit that fluffdaddy was violating in his/her moderating choices. my point was that in in context of an in-group, such jokes can be dissociated from the source of their humour, and even traumatic subjects be used as subjects of humour. it isnt a question of skin, thickness whatever, but posting in an environment where one thought such jokes were permissible, and was disabused. of course, if you believe that you ought to be allowed to decide whats permissible in places like FYAD and lite, thatd be your prerorragative I get you. I mostly just ponder at why ANYONE wants to use that term casually, but your post makes sense to me and it's a fair take. IDK about the bans, I'm just posting as a user on this topic.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:42
|
|
|
In what asinine, idiotic, empty contrarian world is calling someone a pedophile a "joek" and not a serious insult/accusation? And how is the proper response to "stop randomly calling people pedophiles without proof" "lol you're a pedophile"? Did you idiots get lost on the way to 4chan?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:47
|
|
|
That Little Demon posted:What is the different standard, and if it exists, then why does it keep happening? sitting here has been really open, honest, and vulnerable itt. take it easy on them and dont troll or else ya gonna get probied 
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:48
|
|
|
Honky Dong Country posted:It's official, the joke has become too old for the mods.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:49
|
|
|
Flesnolk posted:In what asinine, idiotic, empty contrarian world is calling someone a pedophile a "joek" and not a serious insult/accusation? Elon Musk's https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-50695593
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:49
|
|
|
All I will say is you don't get to cry and whine about being a fyad lite when I pop in and treat you like a fyad lite. No I won't unban any of the people I banned. Call the mods pedos without proof at your own peril.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:50
|
|
|
Fluffdaddy posted:All I will say is you don't get to cry and whine about being a fyad lite when I pop in and treat you like a fyad lite. Oh so this is just about some big old chip on your shoulder and you can't actually defend yourself in any reasonable way, okey doke.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:52
|
|
|
the last thing i would ever call fluffdaddy is light (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST) (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST) (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:54
|
|
|
Office Pig posted:Oh so this is just about some big old chip on your shoulder and you can't actually defend yourself in any reasonable way, okey doke. I don't need to explain myself.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:55
|
|
|
Sitting Here posted:I get you. I mostly just ponder at why ANYONE wants to use that term casually, but your post makes sense to me and it's a fair take. i can understand that the moderation hierarchy hasnt come to a conclusion yet and that youre all currently screaming at each other in post format to decide whether this particular joke form ought to be tolerated in cspam, but could you please instead ask each other, why has this particular question been brought before you to be resolved? i dunno who asked these bans in question, the leperscolonia shows it was fluffdaddy and no-one else, but why is this conversation being had now, after the moderating decisions have already been made, the moment when they ought to be easily explanable to the punished, and everyone else asking for explanation?
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:56
|
|
|
Fluffdaddy posted:Call the mods pedos without proof at your own peril. there wolf posted:Yes, the majority of pedophiles know acting on the impulse would be terrible and so they don't do it, instead indulging in it through media and roleplaying with other adults. As much as it sucks, it's likely that sexual attraction to prepubescents is a hardcoded sexuality the way hetero and homosexuality are, in which case the proshippers have a point that having that sort of content serves a social good, providing an outlet for desires that cannot be actually realized.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:57
|
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Impeccable timing. Just incredible. Aaaaand they're gone.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:57
|
|
|
Fluffdaddy posted:I don't need to explain myself. I feel like admins should not say this tbh
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 22:59
|
|
|
Fluffdaddy posted:I don't need to explain myself.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 23:00
|
|
|
christmas boots posted:I feel like admins should not say this tbh Hey don't call mods pedos without evidence or risk getting banned does not need an explanation
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 23:00
|
|
|
Flesnolk posted:In what asinine, idiotic, empty contrarian world is calling someone a pedophile a "joek" and not a serious insult/accusation? And how is the proper response to "stop randomly calling people pedophiles without proof" "lol you're a pedophile"? Did you idiots get lost on the way to 4chan? i dont care what you call me as long as you dont call me late for dinner.
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 23:00
|
|
|
I still don't know what this thread is about? It's been stated several times before now that calling someone a Pedophile *without evidence* will get you banned. Edit*
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 23:01
|
|
|
Stunt_enby posted:true, but by not explaining yourself, you look like a massive bitch in front of the entire QCS community. how you feel about this is up to you Ok
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 23:01
|
|
|
|
| # ? May 20, 2024 05:44 |
|
|
Fluffdaddy posted:All I will say is you don't get to cry and whine about being a fyad lite when I pop in and treat you like a fyad lite. Ah well I am sure CSPAM has a support network of friends with gift certs at the ready
|
|
#
?
Mar 15, 2021 23:02
|
|
