|
I think Jupiter Ascending being such a good film ruined any chances of Alita succeeding.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:22 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 14:55 |
|
fart simpson posted:yes, it was. it surely wasn't bad because james cameron is a master of his craft (unlike zack snyder). but it was just a bland action movie and nothing is really memorable other than the huge cgi eyes and there wasnt much of an emotional connection with any of the characters or lacking that, any truly cool action set pieces That's not who directed the movie
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:22 |
|
oh sorry. i forgot most of alita anyway but it was pretty mediocre
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:23 |
|
hey serious poster fart simpson - do you also think Zack Snyder just stumbles into his action scenes by accident and hopes for the best? and that it's just blind luck he develops interesting characters and shots?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:25 |
|
Vintersorg posted:hey serious poster fart simpson - do you also think Zack Snyder just stumbles into his action scenes by accident and hopes for the best? and that it's just blind luck he develops interesting characters and shots? no, i think he doesn't develop interesting characters or shots
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:26 |
|
serious poster fart simpson, did you waste four hours of your time watching a film you know you wouldn't like so you can try to own people on the internet, or did you not watch it and are just pretending?
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:27 |
|
Hakkesshu posted:This movie was an incredible slog that kept most, if not all of what was terrible about the original, and then added nothing of substance to double its length, you guys are out of your minds lol I'm sorry about your blindness
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:28 |
|
Horizon Burning posted:serious poster fart simpson, did you waste four hours of your time watching a film you know you wouldn't like so you can try to own people on the internet, or did you not watch it and are just pretending? my wife wanted to watch it and i got dragged in
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:28 |
|
if you arent willing to watching something for 4 hours to own someone then what are you even posting for
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:28 |
|
Horizon Burning posted:serious poster fart simpson, did you waste four hours of your time watching a film you know you wouldn't like so you can try to own people on the internet, or did you not watch it and are just pretending? This is the weird thing to me. If I disliked a director I would simply not watch four hours of his undiluted vision. Especially immediately after it's released.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:29 |
|
doomisland posted:if you arent willing to watching something for 4 hours to own someone then what are you even posting for there's also this. the pure love of posting is powerful motivation.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:29 |
fart simpson posted:my wife wanted to watch it and i got dragged in At four in the morning?
|
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:30 |
|
So what does our lord and savior Joker Christ end up doing in the movie
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:30 |
|
Babysitter Super Sleuth posted:At four in the morning? im in china. we started it at 4 pm
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:31 |
|
teagone posted:Nothing needed to be cut. The movie needed 4 hours to match the scope/scale. Which is fine imo. That 4 hours was breezy as hell for me. I'm not the artist, and I've been conditioned by years of watching Hollywood films. I'm aware of the bias, but it also informs how I watched this film. I definitely think some parts could have been cut, could have helped the flow of the film, and we wouldn't have missed out on any of the story. Off the top of my head Wonder Woman/Alfred tea scene Martian Manhunter impersonating Martha Kent - it could have easily been left as just a caring Mother-in-law looking after Lois. A few of the slower moments between Dr. Silas and Ryan Choi Lex Luthor/Deathstroke scene Knightmare epilogue scene We'd still be looking at a long film, maybe 3 hours and 45 minutes.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:31 |
|
RBA Starblade posted:So what does our lord and savior Joker Christ end up doing in the movie Talking poo poo to Batman
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:32 |
|
RBA Starblade posted:So what does our lord and savior Joker Christ end up doing in the movie He pointificates about SOCIETY and razzes batman
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:32 |
|
RBA Starblade posted:So what does our lord and savior Joker Christ end up doing in the movie literally nothing. he only showed up in one of batman's dreams after the movie ended.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:33 |
fart simpson posted:im in china. we started it at 4 pm Incorrect. China does not exist
|
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:34 |
|
RBA Starblade posted:So what does our lord and savior Joker Christ end up doing in the movie He gets scared because Batman says he's going to loving kill him slowly
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:34 |
|
The (three?) slow motion lighting zaps we got to see Zeus do were excellent. I do think that "the history lesson" scene kind of sets you up for a more epic film than you get (that is, a fight in an abandoned power station with a henchman figure); LOTR has a similar sweeping sort of history lesson but the film kind of makes good on that promise by the end (of the trilogy, admittedly).
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:35 |
|
So does the Snyder cut really do much to improve the Whedon cut from something mediocre and barely memorable to something worth sitting for 4 hours watching? I can't imagine it does all that much to improve on the flaws of the original aside from adding more context and character development.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:35 |
|
Mr. Funktastic posted:So does the Snyder cut really do much to improve the Whedon cut from something mediocre and barely memorable to something worth sitting for 4 hours watching? I can't imagine it does all that much to improve on the flaws of the original aside from adding more context and character development. Yes, it does. It's knight and day difference
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:36 |
|
Mr. Funktastic posted:So does the Snyder cut really do much to improve the Whedon cut from something mediocre and barely memorable to something worth sitting for 4 hours watching? I can't imagine it does all that much to improve on the flaws of the original aside from adding more context and character development. It does. If you're not a Snyder fan you probably won't like it because it's four hours of his kinda poo poo, but it's very different from the theatrical cut.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:37 |
|
Mr. Funktastic posted:So does the Snyder cut really do much to improve the Whedon cut from something mediocre and barely memorable to something worth sitting for 4 hours watching? I can't imagine it does all that much to improve on the flaws of the original aside from adding more context and character development. It's a completely different movie with a few of the same plot beats. Even the same scenes are different.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:37 |
I'm not sure where to start with my praise for this film. It's exactly my brand of superhero poo poo. So much detail, so much character, so much heart - the action, the score! What WB and Whedon did to this film is abominable. I wonder which of them will point fingers first?
|
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:37 |
Mr. Funktastic posted:So does the Snyder cut really do much to improve the Whedon cut from something mediocre and barely memorable to something worth sitting for 4 hours watching? I can't imagine it does all that much to improve on the flaws of the original aside from adding more context and character development. The Whedon film includes thirty minutes of footage Snyder shot. This film includes four hours.
|
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:38 |
|
Mr. Funktastic posted:So does the Snyder cut really do much to improve the Whedon cut from something mediocre and barely memorable to something worth sitting for 4 hours watching? I can't imagine it does all that much to improve on the flaws of the original aside from adding more context and character development. apparently if you have the right brain worms then yes it does as evidenced by posters in this thread it does add character development yes. for example in the original steppenwolf is generic bad guy who just loves to be evil. now he’s been elevated to generic henchman who wants to impress his generic bad guy boss who just loves to be evil
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:38 |
|
Mr. Funktastic posted:So does the Snyder cut really do much to improve the Whedon cut from something mediocre and barely memorable to something worth sitting for 4 hours watching? I can't imagine it does all that much to improve on the flaws of the original aside from adding more context and character development. I think it's going to depend on where you fall when you watch films. Does shot composition/editing/design/and music elevate your enjoyment of film? Can you appreciate these aspects independently from the plot? Then yes. Do you care about character development? Then yes. Do you enjoy cool action scenes? Then yes. Are you only concerned about the plot beats? Then no.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:40 |
|
LesterGroans posted:It does. If you're not a Snyder fan you probably won't like it because it's four hours of his kinda poo poo, but it's very different from the theatrical cut. I thought 300 and Watchmen were pretty good. Sounds like it's actually living up to the hype based on the knee jerk reactions in the thread at least so I might check it out.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:40 |
|
fart simpson posted:apparently if you have the right brain worms then yes it does as evidenced by posters in this thread This thread has people who like movies for visuals and sound, so simple things like well directed sequences instead of TV framed weirdness and an actual good score that carries over thematic relevance goes far here. As opposed to viewing films like a Wikipedia summary.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:41 |
|
fart simpson posted:apparently if you have the right brain worms then yes it does as evidenced by posters in this thread gently caress off with the brain worms poo poo and equating liking this movie to having a mental disorder. Either come here to discuss things or get the gently caress outta here you parasite.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:41 |
|
Mr. Funktastic posted:I thought 300 and Watchmen were pretty good. Sounds like it's actually living up to the hype based on the knee jerk reactions in the thread at least so I might check it out. This movie is like 300 and Watchmen but dialed up an extra notch from those.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:42 |
|
fart simpson posted:apparently if you have the right brain worms then yes it does as evidenced by posters in this thread may you seethe and cope, amen
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:42 |
|
roffels posted:I'm not the artist, and I've been conditioned by years of watching Hollywood films. I'm aware of the bias, but it also informs how I watched this film. I'm aware of my bias, and don't give a gently caress lol. I love that it's 4 hours long. This is some pure rear end cape poo poo and it is incredible.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:42 |
|
BROKE: Dad Suicide by Tornado BESPOKE: Dad Suicide by X-Ray (yeah, some of the starlabs scenes could have been cut... all of the heating stuff)
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:43 |
|
Whedon cut isn't just a different edit. It has ADR in places to add superfluous lines, extra rear end shots for...reasons, extra scenes that don't really add anything except make characters act like dicks or make fun of them. A comparison video of Whedon and Snyder is going to be hilarious.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:43 |
|
This movie loving owns, lmao.
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:43 |
|
fart simpson posted:apparently if you have the right brain worms then yes it does as evidenced by posters in this thread Meanwhile, if you have your head stuck up your rear end, as evidenced by this poster, you won't like it at all. So YMMV!
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:44 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 14:55 |
|
fart simpson posted:apparently if you have the right brain worms then yes it does as evidenced by posters in this thread I know you're a bit riled up right now, but is it necessary to insult people when you've haven't said much but "it's bad" over and over? Nothing said in this thread is that far off from what the general reviews have been saying,
|
# ? Mar 18, 2021 14:44 |