|
Toalpaz posted:what a sus thing to say I don't understand what your thought process is for the entire thread being suspicious for not voting you? What ulterior motives could it be? I guess, the only thing I can think of is that there are scum lurker(s), so going after you for lurking and not their scumbuddies could be a thing they are trying to avoid, but otherwise I am drawing a blank.
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 16:11
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 00:39 |
|
|
Grandicap posted:I don't understand what your thought process is for the entire thread being suspicious for not voting you? What ulterior motives could it be? I guess, the only thing I can think of is that there are scum lurker(s), so going after you for lurking and not their scumbuddies could be a thing they are trying to avoid, but otherwise I am drawing a blank. look at this lil sussy over here
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 16:13
|
|
|
lol
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 16:20
|
|
|
Solus didn't scum claim which is a point against him being town. Why are we stumpifying hum?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 16:45
|
|
|
Toalpaz posted:Solus didn't scum claim which is a point against him being town. Why are we stumpifying hum? For the hum bit... why not? Seems like a fun thing to do.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 16:46
|
|
|
who activated the stumpification
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 16:50
|
|
|
Voodoofly posted:
Oh poo poo! YEAH ##stumpify HUM
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 16:51
|
|
What’s that you say? It sounds like the “technicality” siren has gone off! Just as there is no rule that a dog can’t play baseball, there is no rule that someone can’t signup to a game in progress!
|
Toalpaz posted:I think that I will base all of my opinions of this game by people's reads of keane now, because this is a pretty garbage post in a vacuum. Its a promise to vote with 2 hedge statements on day one lol. Keane isn't a bad vote. I could go back.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:07
|
|
|
merk posted:Keane isn't a bad vote. I could go back. Keanes an awful vote, he's mod confirmed town.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:11
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Keanes an awful vote, he's mod confirmed town. can confirm. he's a daytime friendly neighbor
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:13
|
|
|
Does CCKeane have me on ignore or is he just intentionally not responding to my two posts? :P
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:17
|
|
|
.random posted:Shoot. Sorry. I am sleepy and misplayed. You didn’t call it scummy. You said it sounds like he’s calling Solus town Ah yes, let me respond to this one.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:20
|
|
|
.random posted:Do you still think AT-LOW thinks Solus is town? IDK maybe.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:20
|
|
|
I hope random is satisfied.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:21
|
|
|
Anyway I'm not going to fight people calling me scummy because that's tedious, I'm a mystery role and I will take the secret to the grave with me if I'm executed, driving everybody to madness with curiousity.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:25
|
|
|
.random posted:Does CCKeane have me on ignore or is he just intentionally not responding to my two posts? :P Anyway you know this strikes me as weird because random asked me two questions yeah, but here's the first one: .random posted:Hm. I’m confused about CCKeane. Which is normal, except that random immediately posts: .random posted:Shoot. Sorry. I am sleepy and misplayed. You didn’t call it scummy. You said it sounds like he’s calling Solus town This is literally the next post. So I want to know why Random wants a response to something he closed himself.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:30
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Anyway I'm not going to fight people calling me scummy because that's tedious, I'm a mystery role and I will take the secret to the grave with me if I'm executed, driving everybody to madness with curiousity. this seems premature
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:48
|
|
|
but yeah random's demand was weird. i kinda think you should have ignored it
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:50
|
|
|
and i do think it's worth asking random why he felt those 2 questions were so vital that they needed to be answered
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:51
|
|
|
Mr. Steak posted:and i do think it's worth asking random why he felt those 2 questions were so vital that they needed to be answered 1 question, he answered the other question himself.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:52
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:1 question, he answered the other question himself. yeah, its also weird that he seemingly forgot that he'd resolved that issue
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:55
|
|
|
random literally wasnt on my radar at all before now, but i cant wrap my head around that. but also random was #1 draft pick so that's risking losing a powerful role if he's town. is that bad logic? should i not be thinking about that.......?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 17:57
|
|
|
The question still stood - I just misstated your perspective. I should have rewritten it as “do you still think AT-LOW is calling Solus town in after later post” but I was posting on my phone and sleepy and lazy. Thus I re-asked it later on when I got no response. Sorry for my sleepy post and thanks for responding now  Someone asked my feelings on you, which is why I asked this. And I think it’s weird you’re reading AT-LOW as calling Solus town originally (I still don’t get why dy. read it that way tbh) but find it even weirder that you are still unsure after the clarifying post. (I think A-LOW is pretty clear in intentionally not making a call on Solus, aside from saying the action itself was anti-town - but his recommended approach doesn’t rely on either situation.) The follow-up question from me was going to be what you thought of AT-LOW’s suggestion of how to handle Solus, but if you still think AT-LOW is assuming Solus is town... I don’t know how you can still hold that opinion. It doesn’t explicitly make you scummy. However, it does give you a convenient way to ignore reconsidering your vote on Solus. Which is therefore derivatively kinda scummy. So to whoever asked my read on CCKeane, I guess I’m leaning a bit scummy now.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:01
|
|
|
Mr. Steak posted:random literally wasnt on my radar at all before now, but i cant wrap my head around that. You shouldn’t, because I could be a scum power role. However I hope my post above clarified things. Let me know if it doesn’t.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:02
|
|
|
it clarifies the "you forgot you resolved an issue" thing (which was my major gripe). tho that 2nd post really did seem like a cancellation of the first post, i can see how you intended for the first question to still stand. one thing: .random posted:Someone asked my feelings on you, which is why I asked this. i cant find this anywhere
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:07
|
|
|
.random posted:Hm. I’m confused about CCKeane. This quotes it. From merk apparently!
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:14
|
|
|
Solus’ posts were not good and if they don’t really post again I’m down to vote there.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:36
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:Solus’ posts were not good and if they don’t really post again I’m down to vote there. I agree with Sandwolf.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:38
|
|
|
Ah right, on that matter. Welcome back Solus. Would you agree to the terms of not using your power except how the town votes for you to use it?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:40
|
|
|
.random posted:Ah right, on that matter. Welcome back Solus. Would you agree to the terms of not using your power except how the town votes for you to use it? lol
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:46
|
|
|
Yeah, not signing on for that.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:47
|
|
|
also i thought u meant someone asked u more recently, and u were explaining why u posted the question at keane. theres been a lot of misreading here lol
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:47
|
|
|
Grandicap posted:Yeah, not signing on for that. Hm. Ok. I think it’s a good approach. Mind giving me a bit more on why you oppose it?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 18:53
|
|
|
Well a lot seems to have happened. Need to go back and skim to figure out what the heck happened yesterday. My brain is currently not working great. I keep waffling back and forth on what I think of Solus. It's weird, and kind of scummy, that he shot off a vig and then stopped contributing to the game - but if I'm WIFOMing the situation, I would expect scum to feel more pressure and anxiety about being seen as contributing. I don't know that it fits the mold I would expect from a scum gambit. Gonna keep thinking about it.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 19:07
|
|
|
.random posted:Ah right, on that matter. Welcome back Solus. Would you agree to the terms of not using your power except how the town votes for you to use it?
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 19:08
|
|
|
If we don’t lunch Solus, which I’m starting to feel is a bad idea, then he should be forced to shoot for himself, so we can actually think about the implications of picking someone instead of shifting responsibility to an RNG
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 19:27
|
|
|
.random posted:Hm. Ok. I think it’s a good approach. Mind giving me a bit more on why you oppose it? I think he's scum. If he's scum he'll find a way to use the power in the way that most benefits scum. Maybe following along with town as long as it works for him but swerving if he needs to, maybe, if he feels his usefullness is at an end swerving off to kill someone else when the person he swerved off of is also town to create a misexecution in the future. There is no trust there, I'm not going to stop voting the person I think is scum because he might point the gun in the direction we tell him to if we ask nicely.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 19:28
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:If we don’t lunch Solus, which I’m starting to feel is a bad idea, then he should be forced to shoot for himself, so we can actually think about the implications of picking someone instead of shifting responsibility to an RNG I agree with the second half of this entirely. Not the first because Solus is scum, but if he isn't the execution target he needs to make the call on his own, no RNG, no thread telling him what to do. Shoot who he thinks is scum and make him defend those choices.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 19:30
|
|
|
It also seems unrealistic to think that a dude who took a vig shot as his first post of the game will promise to not use his action recklessly (and then also deliver on that promise). I'm still interested in understanding what random thinks such a promise would accomplish.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 19:33
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 00:39 |
|
|
dy. posted:I don't really get this approach. He's scum, or he's not, right? What do you expect to come out of such a promise? If he does the town’s will, we effectively get two lynches one day. That doesn’t free him from scrutiny or mean he’s not scum, and he should have to post and vote just like everyone else so his motives and vote history can be evaluated. I don’t think it should give him a free pass by any means, and his behavior is demonstrably the scummiest (I.e., anti-town), so I’d accept a vote on him. I just think it’s a creative and potentially useful alternative if we 1. Get that agreement, and 2. Find a different compelling D1 case. Failing either 1 or 2 however, I think a Solus vote is a good option.
|
|
#
?
May 10, 2021 19:34
|
|