Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
(Thread IKs: sharknado slashfic)
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Delta-Wye
Sep 29, 2005

Lampsacus posted:

My god, you people could benefit from having gone through an internet atheist phase.
Burden of proof.

Group A asserts they have been convinced aliens definitely have not visited Earth.
Group B asserts they have been convinced aliens definitely have visited Earth.
Group C hasn't been convinced either way.

You can be convinced for bad reasons and good reasons.

There are plenty of bad reasons to be convinced aliens are here. But that doesn't mean that they aren't. And right now, these UAP videos and such are compelling to some, and aren't to others. The good question that keeps brought up here is; Why is it reasonable to find these compelling. The bad question that keeps getting brought up here is; Why are those who seem to either be convinced of something I am not, or seem less or more inclined to believe it, so stupid and dumb and not like me a reasonable, rational human so wise

Group D who knows aliens are real, they can feel it in their assholes

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Lampsacus
Oct 21, 2008

Vomik posted:

why do you think they are aliens? its supposed to be objects in the sky - our sky - not even in space. why do you think they came from a different planet?
I don't.

Why do you think they are angels? its supposed to be objects in the sky - our sky - not even in heaven. why do you think they came from a different plane?

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan
the only compelling reason in 2021 over 1996 or the NASA SETI program or project bluebook or roswell is because it's the military providing the videos to the media. that doesn't seem that convincing to me and i'm not even particularly skeptical of aliens in general (although quite skeptical of them ever coming here)

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

Vomik posted:

i would guess the biggest reason people like to argue about it is its weird to see a leftist forum just literally reposting military and cia videos and nytimes articles.

if these objects are truly objects - what is the proof that it isn't the cia testing out a new populace control mechanism and they're using some military technology to gently caress with people? they said they aren't?

It undermines their authority, their capability to defend our own territories, and the narrative that has been relentlessly adhered to by multiple generations of military and executive leadership.
Also China, Russia, the UK, France, and Canada (these all just to my knowledge) have released corroborating information or reports about similar events from their own governments.

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan

Lampsacus posted:

I don't.

Why do you think they are angels? its supposed to be objects in the sky - our sky - not even in heaven. why do you think they came from a different plane?

what? this is the worst possible rebuttal

Bideo James
Oct 21, 2020

you'll have to ask someone else about the size of her cans
Imagine this scenario: you're outside for once in your lifetime. You look up from staring at the sidewalk and see a bright light coming your direction. You are knocked to your feet suddenly and the light gets brighter, more intense. A hand reaches out to comfort you and suddenly you are taken to a bright white room. You feel nothing, no pain but cannot move. Your mother is crying over you saying what an even bigger burden you've become for being so stupid. She wails against a nurse nearby and says that she's sorry you'll never move or speak again, but to cherish your life. You and her watch reruns of The Office for hours ever day.

Rah!
Feb 21, 2006


Vomik posted:

i would guess the biggest reason people like to argue about it is its weird to see a leftist forum just literally reposting military and cia videos and nytimes articles.

if these objects are truly objects - what is the proof that it isn't the cia testing out a new populace control mechanism and they're using some military technology to gently caress with people? they said they aren't?

sightings have been occurring since long before the CIA existed

also:

Good Soldier Svejk posted:

It undermines their authority, their capability to defend our own territories, and the narrative that has been relentlessly adhered to by multiple generations of military and executive leadership.
Also China, Russia, the UK, France, and Canada (these all just to my knowledge) have released corroborating information or reports about similar events from their own governments.

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan

Bideo James posted:

Imagine this scenario: you're outside for once in your lifetime. You look up from staring at the sidewalk and see a bright light coming your direction. You are knocked to your feet suddenly and the light gets brighter, more intense. A hand reaches out to comfort you and suddenly you are taken to a bright white room. You feel nothing, no pain but cannot move. Your mother is crying over you saying what an even bigger burden you've become for being so stupid. She wails against a nurse nearby and says that she's sorry you'll never move or speak again, but to cherish your life. You and her watch reruns of The Office for hours ever day.

sounds like a standard police beating, nothing to see here

Lampsacus
Oct 21, 2008

Vomik posted:

what? this is the worst possible rebuttal
Not really. You are asking me why I believe they are aliens. I don't.
E; also, its kind of disingenuous and borderline gas-lighting and abusive to ask why somebody believes something, and when they say they don't, you say what you said.

Lampsacus has issued a correction as of 23:11 on Jun 6, 2021

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY
Feb 3, 2006

Lampsacus posted:

My god, you people could benefit from having gone through an internet atheist phase.
Burden of proof.

Group A asserts they have been convinced aliens definitely have not visited Earth.
Group B asserts they have been convinced aliens definitely have visited Earth.
Group C hasn't been convinced either way.

You can be convinced for bad reasons and good reasons.

There are plenty of bad reasons to be convinced aliens are here. But that doesn't mean that they aren't. And right now, these UAP videos and such are compelling to some, and aren't to others. The good question that keeps brought up here is; Why is it reasonable to find these compelling. The bad question that keeps getting brought up here is; Why are those who seem to either be convinced of something I am not, or seem less or more inclined to believe it, so stupid and dumb and not like me a reasonable, rational human so wise

What if I'm still in an internet atheist phase but I'm too thickheaded to progress any further??

Log082
Nov 8, 2008


LIVE AMMO COSPLAY posted:

What if I'm still in an internet atheist phase but I'm too thickheaded to progress any further??

May I suggest the DnD thread for you, friend? You can talk about how your engineering degree lets you calculate that aliens don't exist there all you want. They'll love you.

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan

Lampsacus posted:

Not really. You are asking me why I believe they are aliens. I don't.

ok if it was a hypothetical for group C - why do they find these videos of uap compelling evidence that aliens visited earth? why do people assume unidentified objects in the sky are aliens?

i assumed you were part of it since you seemed to imply group C are the smart or maybe misunderstood ones

Bideo James
Oct 21, 2020

you'll have to ask someone else about the size of her cans
They wouldn't create a movie about cartoons joining up with Michael Jordan to fight aliens from loving outer space if cartoons weren't real you dipshit. God I can't stand hanging out with you.

Rah!
Feb 21, 2006


Vomik posted:

why do people assume unidentified objects in the sky are aliens?

this has been answered about 69,000 times in this thread

Log082
Nov 8, 2008


Rah! posted:

this has been answered about 69,000 times in this thread

easier to just repost the same old thing and ignore any answers you don't like, imo

this is my normal posting strategy, anyway.

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

Vomik posted:

ok if it was a hypothetical for group C - why do they find these videos of uap compelling evidence that aliens visited earth? why do people assume unidentified objects in the sky are aliens?

i assumed you were part of it since you seemed to imply group C are the smart or maybe misunderstood ones

I think the folks in this thread are just people having fun. Imagining the phenomena as something with intent opens up a pantheon of speculation, whether that's aliens or hyper-intelligent ocean people or sentient lightning monsters or whatever the hell.

At the very least I think our collective assumption/conceit is that the long history of reports are accurate (at least some of them) and that there are things that behave this way that we don't understand and that they are real physical objects and when you take those two things together you have to strongly discount the possibility that what has been reported for nearly a century is man-made technology.

Vermain
Sep 5, 2006



Azathoth posted:

i've always thought that the best solution to the fermi paradox is to posit that life is relatively common throughout the universe but consciousness is not, and that without consciousness, there's no way for a species to figure out what those stars in the sky that they can't interact with are all about and formulate the necessary intention to visit them. life has been evolving on earth for billions of years, but it's only within the last few million that its produced a species with consciousness. it's at least worthwhile to consider that while life might not be rare, the thing in our brains that lets us spend massive resources to possibly go there is exceedingly rare.

i mentioned it previously but my personal solution is simply that the milky way galaxy is a bizarre statistical anomaly, whereas every other galaxy out there actually has a ton of sentient life roaming around

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

Vermain posted:

i mentioned it previously but my personal solution is simply that the milky way galaxy is a bizarre statistical anomaly, whereas every other galaxy out there actually has a ton of sentient life roaming around

It would be very fitting for our galaxy to be the celestial equivalent of Idaho

Lampsacus
Oct 21, 2008

Vomik posted:

ok if it was a hypothetical for group C - why do they find these videos of uap compelling evidence that aliens visited earth? why do people assume unidentified objects in the sky are aliens?

i assumed you were part of it since you seemed to imply group C are the smart or maybe misunderstood ones
I am not implying Group C is smart. We are all absolute dummies we are posting online. Maybe misunderstood. There is unexplained stuff. It's OK, and imho the most reasonable position, to say that we don't know. That's all Group C is saying, we don't know. It's OK to say that we don't know.

I mean, no wonder humans are thinking its aliens or a software glitch or angels or whatever, we love to fill in gaps with certainty. But that compulsion to do so doesn't mean it's reasonable to do so. Also, just because I'm saying I don't know doesn't mean it's my job to explain why people assume ufos are aliens. That's their job to convince you. Stop doing this weird thing where you assume everybody who isn't asserting it's definitely not aliens therefore thinks its aliens and has to come up with reasons to explain their beliefs.

And stop gas lighting and acting abusively. To continue to assert that somebody believes something, three times now, when they have said point blank that they do not is absolutely an element of abusive rhetoric.

WEH
Feb 22, 2009

Lampsacus posted:

And stop gas lighting and acting abusively. To continue to assert that somebody believes something, three times now, when they have said point blank that they do not is absolutely an element of abusive rhetoric.

lol come on you can't be serious

animist
Aug 28, 2018
help help im being abusively rhetoricked

The Protagonist
Jun 29, 2009

The average is 5.5? I thought it was 4. This is very unsettling.
gentlemen please! this is the uap room!

Lampsacus
Oct 21, 2008

Um, telling somebody what they believe, repeatedly, despite them stating otherwise, is abusive language. It sickens me that any of you would defend that.

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan

Good Soldier Svejk posted:

I think the folks in this thread are just people having fun. Imagining the phenomena as something with intent opens up a pantheon of speculation, whether that's aliens or hyper-intelligent ocean people or sentient lightning monsters or whatever the hell.

At the very least I think our collective assumption/conceit is that the long history of reports are accurate (at least some of them) and that there are things that behave this way that we don't understand and that they are real physical objects and when you take those two things together you have to strongly discount the possibility that what has been reported for nearly a century is man-made technology.

i realize most people are joking or just throwing out possibilities - i just find it kind of interesting that aliens are always the first choice of stretch explanations behind the unexplainable. why isn't the first assumption that they are human time travelers from the future? i mean i'm guilty of it too when anyone brings up a uap or whatever its what my mind jumps to aliens as an out there possibility first too

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan
what if star wars was the culmination of MKUltra and george lucas has reprogrammed us to expect aliens? i hate to be the bearer of bad news... but george lucas started drafting star wars the same year mkultra was officially halted

Bullfrog
Nov 5, 2012

Vomik posted:

i realize most people are joking or just throwing out possibilities - i just find it kind of interesting that aliens are always the first choice of stretch explanations behind the unexplainable. why isn't the first assumption that they are human time travelers from the future? i mean i'm guilty of it too when anyone brings up a uap or whatever its what my mind jumps to aliens as an out there possibility first too

i mean, ive been in this thread from the start and there were many multiple pages of theories not involving aliens and also including time traveling humans, quantum bubbles, etc

Log082
Nov 8, 2008


Vomik posted:

i realize most people are joking or just throwing out possibilities - i just find it kind of interesting that aliens are always the first choice of stretch explanations behind the unexplainable. why isn't the first assumption that they are human time travelers from the future? i mean i'm guilty of it too when anyone brings up a uap or whatever its what my mind jumps to aliens as an out there possibility first too

Aliens occupy the biggest stretch of cultural space. If you accept that these are some kind of manufactured craft and are far beyond our current capabilities, time travelers aren't a terrible explanation. The only real difference is that we have evidence intelligence life exists, and so it could exist again somewhere else; time travel, not so much. Still, FTL is so unlikely it's not THAT much more out there than time travel.

in short, if you want to talk about time travelers or interdimensional visitors, post about it. ain't no one here going to shut you down.

LIVE AMMO COSPLAY
Feb 3, 2006

Humans have already reached the endgame of politics so it stands to reason that we have also reached the peak of technology. Anyone that suggests more is possible is a creationist.

WEH
Feb 22, 2009

Vomik posted:

i realize most people are joking or just throwing out possibilities - i just find it kind of interesting that aliens are always the first choice of stretch explanations behind the unexplainable. why isn't the first assumption that they are human time travelers from the future? i mean i'm guilty of it too when anyone brings up a uap or whatever its what my mind jumps to aliens as an out there possibility first too

Potentially because that's what most people have been conditioned to select? I don't think there's any reason for a normal person to land on time traveling humans as the first possibility

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

Aliens just seem like we're most psychological primed to believe as "scientifically feasible" over time travel.
I'm also a fan of weird unknown natural phenomenon like plasma balls and weird deep sea bubbles or some poo poo who knows.

I can also get down with jungian collective unconscious psychological something or other but I really don't know enough about psychology or pseudo-psychology to play in that space

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

Wheeee posted:

Let's be honest here, the people who even entertain the idea of aliens are so far down the motivated reasoning hole that they can't properly evaluate actual evidence. They also get super defensive that you have dared to object to their opinion and that they are victims and being silenced by anyone not willing to entertain the idea that it could actually be aliens.

It's like the conservative / conspiracy theorist victim complex applied to aliens.

You just don't see the truth maaaaan

Can we please for the love of things that are actually interesting and relayed to space, ban UFO stuff to its own thread.

the end part is nice, since you're posting in the UFO thread lmao

Hodgepodge
Jan 29, 2006
Probation
Can't post for 242 days!

Vomik posted:

i realize most people are joking or just throwing out possibilities - i just find it kind of interesting that aliens are always the first choice of stretch explanations behind the unexplainable. why isn't the first assumption that they are human time travelers from the future? i mean i'm guilty of it too when anyone brings up a uap or whatever its what my mind jumps to aliens as an out there possibility first too

they are travellers from a compact extra dimension which is much smaller than the 3+1 we inhabit. also the only habitable environment for their species occurs in the extra dimensions packed into the human taint and therefore they have an interest in continuing to eat (and breathe and setlle) our taints

Azathoth
Apr 3, 2001

Vomik posted:

i would guess the biggest reason people like to argue about it is its weird to see a leftist forum just literally reposting military and cia videos and nytimes articles.

if these objects are truly objects - what is the proof that it isn't the cia testing out a new populace control mechanism and they're using some military technology to gently caress with people? they said they aren't?

those videos are only useful in that they're a visual record of what a whole lotta people have been reporting and recording on lovely cell phones and film going back decades. there's absolutely nothing in any of it that is in any way groundbreaking or even remotely novel. where they do have some use in the current discourse is as a rebuttal to the stock "if there's ufos in the sky, why don't we have videos :smug:" crowd, who usually respond to the bevy of poor quality cell phone videos and photos with either "a ball of light on a cell phone doesn't show anything, we don't have a frame of reference!" or "special effects are so good nowadays that anyone could fake that". if the government is faking ufo videos, then they're faking them down the same lines that ufo witnesses outside the government have been reporting.

and the point is also that what is seen in those videos matches reports going back decades from credible witnesses who not only have no reason to lie but for whom denying what they saw would be a benefit. if what is being seen in those videos is some cia populace control mechanism or some secret military tech, then it's really not new.

it's something that has been circulating since the 60s at least, and that alone is what makes the mystery so appealing. like, I'll buy that in tyool 2021, craft with those characteristics could theoretically exist. it'd be a pretty big scientific advancement to do some of that stuff, but I'll buy it could exist. what i don't buy is that some government has had this stuff under wraps since the 60s and it hasn't leaked out, been stolen by spies and recreated somewhere else, or been developed in parallel at any point in the intervening 60 years.

a common skeptical tactic is to not engage with the body of witness reportings and take one particular video or witness report and provide a plausible explanation for it but not give any evidence that said things did happen then apply that particular solution out to every ufo incident ever, even when said explanation requires a really implausible sequence of events to come together to produce the explanation for one event.

like, i don't know what's happening, i really don't. on my good days, maybe i think i have an idea, but i'm almost certainly wrong. the one thing that i do know, however, is that ufo skeptics engage in some condescending lib bullshit because they're desperate to prove to everyone that they really understand the universe and that something mysterious couldn't be happening

Azathoth has issued a correction as of 23:41 on Jun 6, 2021

WEH
Feb 22, 2009

Ironically iirc time travel (or at least going back in time) is actually more feasible within the accepted scientific framework than FTL

The Vinja Ninja
Mar 16, 2006

Sometimes, time beats you.
Remember most creationists do not believe in aliens and, not thinking aliens exist is a neo-Christian belief where they think GOD chose ONLY EARTH in the Bible to have souls and LIFE. Therefore no aliens can exist, flat earth, etc, and that permeated into “only simple cellular life exists in space and only earth was chosen to have complex life, tanq” types, who unbeknownst to them were influenced by the crazy Christians.

Victory Position
Mar 16, 2004

WEH posted:

Ironically iirc time travel (or at least going back in time) is actually more feasible within the accepted scientific framework than FTL

I mean, you just have to bend the curvature of timespace to get to where you need, right? the math speaks to it, but since we're having problems staying outside of the magnetosphere with our equipment,

Sushi The Kid
Sep 10, 2005
<img src="https://forumimages.somethingawful.com/images/newbie.gif" border=0>


Anyone else remember that thread in GBS way back when like 10+ years ago, where the OP was posting as a alien. Fun thread.

The Protagonist
Jun 29, 2009

The average is 5.5? I thought it was 4. This is very unsettling.

WEH posted:

Ironically iirc time travel (or at least going back in time) is actually more feasible within the accepted scientific framework than FTL

i dont think so tim

anyway ftl isn't necessary for any of this, i still think the most likely explanation of uaps (the small fraction that aren't terrestrial) are ancient autonomous robotic probes.

so they got launched from wherever long ago at sublight speed

Vomik
Jul 29, 2003

This post is dedicated to the brave Mujahideen fighters of Afghanistan

Log082 posted:

Aliens occupy the biggest stretch of cultural space. If you accept that these are some kind of manufactured craft and are far beyond our current capabilities, time travelers aren't a terrible explanation. The only real difference is that we have evidence intelligence life exists, and so it could exist again somewhere else; time travel, not so much. Still, FTL is so unlikely it's not THAT much more out there than time travel.

in short, if you want to talk about time travelers or interdimensional visitors, post about it. ain't no one here going to shut you down.

yeah, that's true. and it also feels "likely" they have to exist somewhere given the vastness of the universe.

I dunno - I'm a pessimist and when i hear governments coordinating together to release unknowns which they know implies aliens to people it makes me think they might be trying to pull some bullshit

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Good Soldier Svejk
Jul 5, 2010

I'm loathe to post reddit/Ricky Gervais content but this is fairly fascinating if at all true
https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/ntx0kv/sam_harris_goes_further_on_ufos/

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply