|
ultrafilter posted:Varies by location, but yeah, the very mathy jobs are a very small part of the overall market. If you're a "mathy programmer" you might be applying to "Data Scientist" jobs anyway. They're are a lot more "math" than "programmer" (in that its working code, but I would never ever want to ship it), but that's actual computer scientists anyway
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 18:20 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 04:21 |
|
matti posted:yeah i should learn to get over my own perceived complexes good luck with that. I have a masters degree and just a crushing amount of imposter syndrome. Blinkz0rz posted:it's definitely less i want to dispute this number but i can't
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 18:26 |
|
yeah it used to be like 0.01% and then the stats and ml poo poo boom happened. real peeps math ("you are expected to know what a cohomology is") is still 0.01% tho
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 19:21 |
|
Quant finance has been a larger part of the job market than that since at least the early 2000s. It's just not terribly visible because it's super-concentrated in one industry and a few locations, and a lot of the jobs don't use the same titles as everyone else. Cut that out, though, and you're looking at a very small part of the market.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 19:24 |
|
ultrafilter posted:Quant finance has been a larger part of the job market than that since at least the early 2000s. It's just not terribly visible because it's super-concentrated in one industry and a few locations, and a lot of the jobs don't use the same titles as everyone else. quant finance is very much a part of the stats and ml poo poo boom and its not in the 0.01% lol by the 0.01% i mean the dude i know who proves theorems about toposes for money for a brutally obscure database product that needs this poo poo somehow
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 19:26 |
|
Boiled Water posted:I have a masters degree and just a crushing amount of imposter syndrome. I'm head of department and I have this too
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 19:51 |
|
bob dobbs is dead posted:quant finance is very much a part of the stats and ml poo poo boom and its not in the 0.01% lol No one was doing stats in quant finance before about 2004 or so, and a lot of what happened after predates the ML boom. But if you're claiming that a job solving SDEs isn't very mathy, then I guess we've just got different standards.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 20:00 |
|
ultrafilter posted:No one was doing stats in quant finance before about 2004 or so, and a lot of what happened after predates the ML boom. But if you're claiming that a job solving SDEs isn't very mathy, then I guess we've just got different standards. last time i heard the s in sde stands for stochastic yeah yeah the ito calc peeps are not even close to the ml peeps and they never talk to each other. but the underlying dealio is greatly increased data flows that have sometimes required mathmatically competent peeps who code, as opposed to other weird poo poo w math
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 20:07 |
|
it's basically quant, ml, data science, and game engine design which is like, a few thousand jobs at most bls says there was 230k programming jobs in 2019 but that's a super narrow category because it also claims 1.5 million software developers so even if we say 10-15k "math" software jobs that's less than 1% and that's also assuming that those 2 bls categories include all programmers (hint, it doesn't) all this is to say you can be a successful and well paid computer toucher without knowing any kind of "real" math
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 22:46 |
|
You're missing jobs related to physics-based simulations. It doesn't change your conclusions, but there are a fair amount of jobs in that field. They're just entirely concentrated in industries that people here basically never think of.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 23:02 |
|
ultrafilter posted:You're missing jobs related to physics-based simulations. There are a fair amount of jobs in that field, but they're entirely concentrated in industries that people here aren't thinking of. oil, gas and bombing people ?
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 23:03 |
|
A lot of engineering companies do simulated designs before they build anything as well, but yeah, the DoD is one of the big employers there.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 23:04 |
|
Also there are random jobs for numerical methods people in places you might not expect. Sometimes those people are called data scientists or quants, but it's really a different skillset from what those titles usually refer to.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 23:05 |
|
sure but the op was feeling anxious about not having a math background, not worried that he couldn't find a math job
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 23:12 |
|
We're pretty far past what the OP was talking about by now.
|
# ? Jul 3, 2021 23:15 |
|
no I think it's important we circle back, if we don't make the guy feel bad about his lack of a math degree there's a very low chance his future job will
|
# ? Jul 4, 2021 02:46 |
|
I'm starting to interview for new hires again. I gave a developer with three.js on their resume a simple task of animating a logo however they saw fit, about 5-10mins work. Apparently they couldn't do it and their "job coach" recommended against doing it. I guess as a screening method it works? I have to hire a junior operations "devops" position, absolutely no idea how to test them. All the resumes are copy paste of every industry term possible.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2021 03:57 |
|
MrMoo posted:Apparently they couldn't do it and their "job coach" recommended against doing it. lol
|
# ? Jul 4, 2021 09:11 |
|
I thought the idea of juniors were that they have good intentions and you train them I guess call some of them and see what they’re like
|
# ? Jul 4, 2021 09:12 |
|
They all seem nice on the phone. This one in particular only had three.js on their resume, so I called them out on it. I think we’re after junior because there is not that much work or complexity. They can grow in the role and most likely leave once a process is in place, for a more challenging position.
|
# ? Jul 4, 2021 15:14 |
|
MrMoo posted:their "job coach" recommended against doing it. Funny way to write "mom"
|
# ? Jul 5, 2021 23:54 |
|
Took me all of three minutes to Google and make an example on jsfiddle, for perspective to the crazy take homes reported here. It looks awful, but that doesn't really matter: https://jsfiddle.net/ho2zbaxr/
|
# ? Jul 6, 2021 19:01 |
|
In my experience there has been no correlation between what a devop is like and how successful they are, or by what metrics. There's no middle ground here, for some reason the state of the art seems to be nothing but trilemmas on steroids. I guess I'm trying to say despite doing most of the devops work on my team I still have no idea what to test for when hiring another one.
|
# ? Jul 6, 2021 21:27 |
|
ask them what the last thing that made them really mad at work was, to see if they have a personality disorder or not and also to see how deep into the infra they got
|
# ? Jul 6, 2021 21:36 |
|
That's an evilly genius question
|
# ? Jul 7, 2021 00:52 |
|
Welp, interview on Monday. I'm pretty sure this is just a practice interview because "From $X per hour" usually means "Up to $X.01 per hour" but we'll see. It would be nice not to be NOC anymore and get back into proper IT work again, at least?
|
# ? Jul 9, 2021 15:55 |
|
the place i interviewed with four months ago called me up and said "our new director is really excited to talk to you" so i guess i'll talk to them.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 06:43 |
|
Schadenboner posted:Welp, interview on Monday. I'm pretty sure this is just a practice interview because "From $X per hour" usually means "Up to $X.01 per hour" but we'll see. good luck buddy!
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 09:09 |
|
ultravoices posted:the place i interviewed with four months ago called me up and said "our new director is really excited to talk to you" so i guess i'll talk to them. good luck! (the person they hired didnt start or they opened a new req)
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 11:07 |
|
CarForumPoster posted:good luck! that's likely not wrong, although I think it's the latter. trying to puzzle it out is kremlinology though. i'll put up with being jerked off for months and hopping through the required hoops in exchange for how good my inside sources say this company is to work for + the amount of money + the insanely good benefits + the positioning it will put me in 3ish years if I want to move along.
|
# ? Jul 11, 2021 15:04 |
|
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh Offer paperwork tomorrow Ahhhhhhhhhhhhh (it's more money than I was expecting. never give a number.)
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 02:13 |
|
great now ask for more
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 02:14 |
|
bob dobbs is dead posted:great
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 02:21 |
|
Place I'm applying for is asking for a 20 minute presentation on a technical topic, preferrably a project I've completed somewhere else. What the gently caress just give me a takehome job for a week
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 03:33 |
|
i would much rather give an animated 20 minute talk on something i'm excited about having built than go through the usual gauntlet of bullshit whiteboard interviews
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 03:57 |
|
yah, I’ve got a half dozen projects that I could easily wax on about for 20 minutes or more I’d take that over most take homes any day
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 04:19 |
|
we do that and it owns we had a candidate who used to be in the navy and did a presentation on how nuclear subs work
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 04:38 |
|
I did one a couple of jobs. I avoid public speaking but I enjoyed crafting a presentation of my choosing and it helped as an ice breaker with everyone on the team. Overall a positive experience.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 05:05 |
|
lol holy poo poo depending on how much i cared if either do bog standard "i made a thing to exploit a thing" or "gently caress yeah we're talking about the sickness unto death now" that would be so good. a buddy of mine got to do a presentation when they interviewed (successfully) at activision a few years ago. i've never got to do that though
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 05:08 |
|
|
# ? Apr 27, 2024 04:21 |
|
Bossy posted:Place I'm applying for is asking for a 20 minute presentation on a technical topic, preferrably a project I've completed somewhere else. What the gently caress just give me a takehome job for a week I had to do one of these. I had to submit the deck a couple days in advance and they distributed it internally to the panel. During the presentation it became clear they didn’t care about the content, it was a test on how you thought on your feet. They would chuck questions at me and deliberately try to hijack the conversation. Real obvious attempts, too, like someone would stop me to ask a question about a 100% unrelated thing that was two slides further in. The whole thing felt like a big improv comedy bit and I was there as the unwitting stooge.
|
# ? Jul 14, 2021 05:14 |