Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
Small Strange Bird
Sep 22, 2006

Merci, chaton!

Jedit posted:

The turnaround on the first six Boxtree novels was eight weeks, but for the first one John Vornholt only had three weeks because negotiations with Kevin J Anderson had fallen through. He only managed to produce anything coherent because he was a big fan of the show.
Jesus, that's insane. I'm actually a novelist, and I've written tie-in stuff before, but never on a deadline that tight. Assuming the B5 novels were a fairly typical circa-75k words, I would only have written a first draft of 45k of them in that time - and my publishers consider me fast and prolific. :stare:

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Payndz posted:

Jesus, that's insane. I'm actually a novelist, and I've written tie-in stuff before, but never on a deadline that tight. Assuming the B5 novels were a fairly typical circa-75k words, I would only have written a first draft of 45k of them in that time - and my publishers consider me fast and prolific. :stare:

No, insane is Lionel Fanthorpe's output back in the late 50s and early 60s. He used a lot of pseudonyms, so his exact number of published novels is unknown, but it's estimated to be around 180. In one three year period he turned out a 50k potboiler every twelve days.

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Jedit posted:

No, insane is Lionel Fanthorpe's output back in the late 50s and early 60s. He used a lot of pseudonyms, so his exact number of published novels is unknown, but it's estimated to be around 180. In one three year period he turned out a 50k potboiler every twelve days.

Luigi Thirty
Apr 30, 2006

Emergency confection port.

Jedit posted:

No, insane is Lionel Fanthorpe's output back in the late 50s and early 60s. He used a lot of pseudonyms, so his exact number of published novels is unknown, but it's estimated to be around 180. In one three year period he turned out a 50k potboiler every twelve days.

I know L. Ron Hubbard cranked out 100,000 words a month for the pulp rags in the ‘30s which is still nuts (and lines up with how much crap he wrote later on…)

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy
From Pervitin to perverts: a history of SciFi

Clouseau
Aug 3, 2003

My theories appall you, my heresies outrage you, I never answer letters, and you don't like my tie.
As far as I'm concerned, the only canonical B5 book is the asides written by the head chef at Fresh Air in the Babylon 5 Cookbook.

Are the comics any good? I know that's like the only place where you can see Keffer actually do anything.

ultrafilter
Aug 23, 2007

It's okay if you have any questions.


Clouseau posted:

Are the comics any good? I know that's like the only place where you can see Keffer actually do anything.

They're a pretty mixed bag. There are scans you can track down if you really want to read them, or you can just look at the summaries on the Lurker's Guide.

There were 14 issues in total with issues 1-11 coming out during season 2 and issues 12-14 coming out during season 4. They break down into a few discrete storylines like so:
  • Issues 1-4 cover Sinclair's rough start as Earth's ambassador to Minbar. If you want the full Sinclair story you have to read this.
  • Issues 5-8 cover Garibaldi and Sinclair's time on Mars where they found the Psi Corp facility mentioned in s3e08. This is the only part of the comics that I'd say are definitely worth reading.
  • Issues 9-10 tell a story about yet another Narn assassin coming after G'Kar. The art's bad, the story's dull, and it has no connection to the rest of the series. Skip it unless you're a completionist.
  • Issue 11 is Psi Corps propaganda. It's entertaining but by no means essential.
  • Issues 12-14 have the crew of B5 finding the remains of B4 and trying to explore it before it collapses. This touches a bit on Sinclair's life on Minbar after the last war and is a nice epilogue.

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy
From the young ones thread:

adhuin posted:

More on the believers

Franklin is legally wrong. Is he morally right or wrong can be debated.
Factually he is correct and parents and their culture is poo poo, but it isn't our place to 'fix it'.
Alien species aren't subjects to human laws/morality when dealing with their own people. Which is a necessary for a neutral station to work.
Human alliance isn't USA and can't force their cultural values on aliens.

Aliens want to kill their young? As long as it doesn't disrupt the functioning of the station. :shrug:
Narns doing Narn things? Not our problem. Narns and Centauris having disagreement? That's a problem.


Is that true though, especially the bolded part? I disagree:

1) We know souls exist in B5 (triluimary, earth/minbari war, soul hunters)
2) We know souls can be trapped in physical objects (soul hunter, river of souls, triluminary)
3) We have know souls can be released from physical objects by opening them (hinted at in soul hunter, demonstrated in river of souls)

I think there are reasonable (if not strong), in-universe grounds to argue that the aliens are right and Franklin is wrong.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Souls or codified personality constructs? And even if a soul is as you expect, there's still nothing to show that there's some hereafter.

Also the parent's belief was that once Franklin cut the kid open his soul escaped and he was just an animal. But we see no evidence of his soul leaving. He's totally normal.

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

CainFortea posted:

Souls or codified personality constructs? And even if a soul is as you expect, there's still nothing to show that there's some hereafter.

Also the parent's belief was that once Franklin cut the kid open his soul escaped and he was just an animal. But we see no evidence of his soul leaving. He's totally normal.

so? we see no evidence of his soul being present after he was cut. We have evidence of souls leaving physical objects when they are broken. Their belief is reasonable in universe.

Are humans with minbari souls more minbari in action and temperament? We know great souls are greater but I don't think we can say much beyond that given the evidence we have.

has anyone who tested poitive on the triluminary been opened up prior to the test?

Vitruvian Manic fucked around with this message at 20:02 on Feb 20, 2022

Vavrek
Mar 2, 2013

I like your style hombre, but this is no laughing matter. Assault on a police officer. Theft of police property. Illegal possession of a firearm. FIVE counts of attempted murder. That comes to... 29 dollars and 40 cents. Cash, cheque, or credit card?
I always assume the triluminary lights up because it's keyed to the genetic template of Sinclair/Valen, and it's responding to the degree of relatedness a person has, whether descendant (Minbari) or distant cousin (Human).

I mean, maybe it also detects souls. Something comes out of the soul hunter's orbs, after all. (It's been too long since I've seen River of Souls to remember relevant details.)

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy
That's what I thought too but b5 does not preclude the mystical and there are plenty of reasons to think the mystical does exist in b5. That makes more sense than really really really dilute genetic markers.

we knew more about mysticism in b5 than minbari genetics.

Vavrek
Mar 2, 2013

I like your style hombre, but this is no laughing matter. Assault on a police officer. Theft of police property. Illegal possession of a firearm. FIVE counts of attempted murder. That comes to... 29 dollars and 40 cents. Cash, cheque, or credit card?

Vitruvian Manic posted:

we knew more about mysticism in b5 than minbari genetics.

Y'know that is a really good point.

Binary Badger
Oct 11, 2005

Trolling Link for a decade


ultrafilter posted:

They're a pretty mixed bag. There are scans you can track down if you really want to read them, or you can just look at the summaries on the Lurker's Guide.

There were 14 issues in total with issues 1-11 coming out during season 2 and issues 12-14 coming out during season 4. They break down into a few discrete storylines like so:
  • Issues 1-4 cover Sinclair's rough start as Earth's ambassador to Minbar. If you want the full Sinclair story you have to read this.
  • Issues 5-8 cover Garibaldi and Sinclair's time on Mars where they found the Psi Corp facility mentioned in s3e08. This is the only part of the comics that I'd say are definitely worth reading.
  • Issues 9-10 tell a story about yet another Narn assassin coming after G'Kar. The art's bad, the story's dull, and it has no connection to the rest of the series. Skip it unless you're a completionist.
  • Issue 11 is Psi Corps propaganda. It's entertaining but by no means essential.
  • Issues 12-14 have the crew of B5 finding the remains of B4 and trying to explore it before it collapses. This touches a bit on Sinclair's life on Minbar after the last war and is a nice epilogue.

There's also a 3-issue miniseries "In Valen's Name" that explains Sinclair's phrase: "I found her."

It also does go into a -tiny- bit about what happened when Sinclair became Valen, and also what ultimately happens to Babylon 4.

It stars pretty much the whole bridge crew from the time before Sheridan beomes President.

Keffer, unfortunately, doesn't exist in this strip, he might be the background character in issue 1 who asks Ivanova some question.

The art is adequate, if accurate at least and Zathras bitches through a few panels.

ultrafilter
Aug 23, 2007

It's okay if you have any questions.


Per the Lurker's Guide that is issues 12-14.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004



In a show that shows us "souls" doing things, if it doesn't show us a "soul" doing things, then it isn't doing the thing.

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

CainFortea posted:

In a show that shows us "souls" doing things, if it doesn't show us a "soul" doing things, then it isn't doing the thing.

With the notable exception of Sheridan, I don't think we see any souls leaving bodies when they die on the show, including people we know strong reason to believe have souls.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Vitruvian Manic posted:

With the notable exception of Sheridan, I don't think we see any souls leaving bodies when they die on the show, including people we know strong reason to believe have souls.

You don't get to eat your cake and have it too.

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

CainFortea posted:

You don't get to eat your cake and have it too.

I'm not. do you think neroon doesn't have a soul? what about Marcus?

Vitruvian Manic fucked around with this message at 23:43 on Feb 20, 2022

Habibi
Dec 8, 2004

We have the capability to make San Jose's first Cup Champion.

The Sharks could be that Champion.

Vitruvian Manic posted:

I'm not. do you think neroon doesn't have a soul? what about Marcus?

Clearly not in the case of the latter: he sold it for the hair and the accent.

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy
this got me thinking. since clairvoyance is reasonably common in centauri after first contact people probably reexamined prophecy in human history. humans adopting the centauri religion were probably neopagans who recontextualized ancient Greek (and possibly other) religions within the centauri religion. so less wholesale adoption of thegrwat maker and more venus=aphrodite=ishtar=isis=li type stuff. still pretty cringe though

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

Habibi posted:

Clearly not in the case of the latter: he sold it for the hair and the accent.

I had to include Marcus as a joke. incel dweebs definitely don't have souls. I can't speak for anyone else though.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Vitruvian Manic posted:

I'm not. do you think neroon doesn't have a soul? what about Marcus?

I know you don't. But you're trying. The viewer only seeing souls only counts when it supports your position. When we don't it doesn't count.

Narsham
Jun 5, 2008
There is no conclusive evidence presented in B5 concerning the existence of the soul:

River of Souls clearly establishes the Soul Hunters "saved" a species that was uplifting at the time they did it. The process turned the whole species into energy beings. Soul Hunters trap energy in their containers. The fact that they trapped energy beings doesn't prove that when they "save" a dying person who is NOT an energy being, that they capture their souls instead of forming an electromagnetic duplicate of the person that believes itself to be them. It is unclear how well the Soul Hunters understand the technology they're using.

The Minbari, and multiple other races, believe in a soul. That is not proof. The Minbari believe the Triluminary detects souls. But we see on-screen evidence that it's a genetic encoding device, and picks up Sinclair's DNA, and we learn Delenn has traces of that DNA, so the soul is not required for any of that.

Vorlon deaths involve "non-localized phenomena", but that could be a soul or it could be unique to energy beings. That we hear the soul described in those terms once is not conclusive proof, no more than saying the existence of water proves the existence of liquid intelligence.

Lorien appears to be an energy being. Kosh is an energy being. Sheridan, when reconstituted, has bits of two energy beings keeping his body together. When he simply stops at the end of his life, he might be taken up body & soul by Lorien. Or what's left of his body might be entirely the energy stuff, and Lorien might reabsorb it, meaning there was nothing left of his body. As whatever happens leaves no traces behind for in-universe analysis, Sheridan's death is subject to interpretation.

The Day of the Dead implies the possibility of life after death. But the visits could have all been hallucinations; in any event, no mechanism is ever on offer to explain what happened.

Believers offers no mechanism through which the presence of the soul can be determined. If souls do not exist, obviously performing surgery cannot release a non-existent soul, and the child was unharmed and then murdered. If souls do exist, there is no reason that the souls of Children of the Egg might not be released through surgery; it is also possible that their belief happens to be false. But if there is no way to prove the child had a soul going into the surgery, it is equally impossible to prove he has a soul after the surgery. So their belief can neither be confirmed nor denied, even if B5 elsewhere gives us proof that souls exist.

Chevy Slyme
May 2, 2004

We're Gonna Run.

We're Gonna Crawl.

Kick Down Every Wall.

Vitruvian Manic posted:

this got me thinking. since clairvoyance is reasonably common in centauri after first contact people probably reexamined prophecy in human history. humans adopting the centauri religion were probably neopagans who recontextualized ancient Greek (and possibly other) religions within the centauri religion. so less wholesale adoption of thegrwat maker and more venus=aphrodite=ishtar=isis=li type stuff. still pretty cringe though

Alternately: We know that vorlon influence on human history has been coded as aligned with the dominant trio of monotheistic faiths (since they all have an "Angel" concept akin to what Kosh was seen as, we can ignore distinguishing between them).

We also know that those from similar worlds with similar Vorlon interference also saw whatever their Vorlon religious programming was when they looked at a Vorlon.

We know that Londo saw nothing.

Is the similarity between the Centauri pantheon and ancient Human pagan faiths the result of Shadow influence on theology on both worlds?

Mr. Apollo
Nov 8, 2000

Binary Badger posted:

There's also a 3-issue miniseries "In Valen's Name" that explains Sinclair's phrase: "I found her."
Was it Catherine?

I just realized that Catherine Sakai and Carolyn Sykes both have the initials CS. I’m assuming that was intention like Sinclair and Sheridan having the initials JS.

ultrafilter
Aug 23, 2007

It's okay if you have any questions.



There's also the early season 5 episode where Lyta scans a dying ranger. Bester does the same in the telepath trilogy and actually crosses the threshold with the deceased.

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

CainFortea posted:

I know you don't. But you're trying. The viewer only seeing souls only counts when it supports your position. When we don't it doesn't count.

no I'm just saying we don't know. maybe only some people have soils, that could be supported. its like trill where there are only so many. we have good reason to believe that 1) souls can be assayed for and 2) are visible under certain circumstances. if everybody could always see souls there would be no need for a triluminary. plus if we could always see souls the world of b5 would be immediately very different from our own

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

Narsham posted:

giant wall of text

you can create a justification for souls not being real in the world of b5 but it feels pretty forced, see: your post. if souls aren't real then of course the family is factually wrong and Franklin is right.

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

Chevy Slyme posted:

Alternately: We know that vorlon influence on human history has been coded as aligned with the dominant trio of monotheistic faiths (since they all have an "Angel" concept akin to what Kosh was seen as, we can ignore distinguishing between them).

We also know that those from similar worlds with similar Vorlon interference also saw whatever their Vorlon religious programming was when they looked at a Vorlon.

We know that Londo saw nothing.

Is the similarity between the Centauri pantheon and ancient Human pagan faiths the result of Shadow influence on theology on both worlds?

I like this, this is a cool idea. makes the shadows more of an indirect actor as opposed to the direct actors we see. the vorlons being sneaky makes sense but despite their name the shadows aren't very shadowy

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy
prior to them losing the war and having to go into hiding do we ever see the shadows do something dishonest or tricky? despite the framing I think they are honest actors who, at worst, engage in iterated prisoners dilemma tit-for-tat.

CainFortea
Oct 15, 2004


Vitruvian Manic posted:

no I'm just saying we don't know.

Vitruvian Manic posted:

you can create a justification for souls not being real in the world of b5 but it feels pretty forced

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

it's like our world but reversed. in our world I think we have strong reasons to believe souls don't exist and justifications for souls existing is pretty thin and circumstantial. so I don't think souls exist but I could be wrong. in b5 i think there is really strong evidence that we see as an omniscient perspective for the existence of souls. I could be wrong but I think the evidence against it is a muuuch heavier and more convoluted interpretation of the events we see.

SlothfulCobra
Mar 27, 2011

I think the existence of souls is implied in Babylon 5, but also potentially dismissed as various other phenomenae. I don't think the show intends to be definitive on the existence or not of god, the soul, or the spiritual world, that's up to your own personal sense of religiosity. The Minbari used Sinclair (and complaints about Minbari kids these days) to conclude that Minbari and human souls were getting reincarnated with the wrong races, but it turned out that Sinclair didn't just happen to have Valen's soul, he WAS Valen, or was going to become him. When the soul hunter appears, Franklin offers a theory on what else the "souls" could be. Franklin does surgery on a child, and nothing seems notably different.

But on the other side of things, he show for the most part expressly doesn't contradict the ideas of the religions depicted in the show. Christian monks and jewish rabbis have genuine useful insight. The guy searching the stars for the holy grail is respected in his weird quest. The Vorlons may co-opt some aspects of religion to their own ends, but crucially they didn't pose as the prophets themselves. The show respects religion but also doesn't hinge on it being physically observably real and accurate.

Jedit
Dec 10, 2011

Proudly supporting vanilla legends 1994-2014

Mr. Apollo posted:

Was it Catherine?

Yes, it was. At the end of To Dream In The City of Sorrows Catherine disappears into a time rift created by the Great Machine. It's unknown exactly what happened to her after that, but it's believed that Sinclair used the Triluminary to convert her into a Minbari and that she is the wife of Valen mentioned in 4X09 Atonement.

ultrafilter
Aug 23, 2007

It's okay if you have any questions.


Chevy Slyme posted:

We know that Londo saw nothing.

But we don't know what another Centauri would've seen.

Midjack
Dec 24, 2007



Chevy Slyme posted:

We know that Londo saw nothing.

We know that's what he said, at any rate.

Gnome de plume
Sep 5, 2006

Hell.
Fucking.
Yes.

Clouseau posted:

Are the comics any good? I know that's like the only place where you can see Keffer actually do anything.

The art's about what you'd expect form a 90s licensed comic, mostly on-model, one issue however:



It's like they didn't know when to stop drawing it

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy

SlothfulCobra posted:

I think the existence of souls is implied in Babylon 5, but also potentially dismissed as various other phenomenae. I don't think the show intends to be definitive on the existence or not of god, the soul, or the spiritual world, that's up to your own personal sense of religiosity. The Minbari used Sinclair (and complaints about Minbari kids these days) to conclude that Minbari and human souls were getting reincarnated with the wrong races, but it turned out that Sinclair didn't just happen to have Valen's soul, he WAS Valen, or was going to become him. When the soul hunter appears, Franklin offers a theory on what else the "souls" could be. Franklin does surgery on a child, and nothing seems notably different.

But on the other side of things, he show for the most part expressly doesn't contradict the ideas of the religions depicted in the show. Christian monks and jewish rabbis have genuine useful insight. The guy searching the stars for the holy grail is respected in his weird quest. The Vorlons may co-opt some aspects of religion to their own ends, but crucially they didn't pose as the prophets themselves. The show respects religion but also doesn't hinge on it being physically observably real and accurate.

I agree. I just think from the omniscient perspective we have souls are *at least* much more likely to exist in b5 than in our real world. We have evidence that they exist and evidence that they can leave physical bodies (either the person or a soul hunter orb). we don't know how or when they leave physical bodies other that ensoulled individuals lose their soul when they die.

if souls are real and if they can leave the body, we don't know if they can leave the body before death just that ensoulled individuals do lose their soul on death. So could we lose our soul prior to death? opening the soul hunter orb releases a soul but I don't think delenn thought she was murdering people when she released their soul from the soul hunter orb (the soul hunter strongly disagreed!). for all we know the believers got the idea from observing a soul hunter after they liberated its lair. I think there is room for reasonable doubt that they could be correct.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Vitruvian Manic
Dec 5, 2021

by Fluffdaddy
plus the "other phenomena" line feels a bit like a zombi/vampire movie where no one calls them "zombies" or "vampires". if it is close enough we may as well use the word we have for it even if it isn't a 100% match.

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply