|
Squiggle posted:Wait where's web4 Web5 is two bad ideas giving each other a high 5
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:47 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 21:34 |
|
Squiggle posted:Wait where's web4 web2 + web3 = web5 that is their actual excuse for the name
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:48 |
|
Jack seems like a dingus who just kind of got lucky with twitter and square but has convinced himself that he is some kind of revolutionary genius. Basically like all tech bros I guess.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:50 |
|
Picturing a group of the planet's dumbest people puzzling over a whiteboard that just says "web3??" and someone else walks up and crosses out the 3 and writes 4, and they all nod along excitedly until atjack saunters up with a "this is to go even further beyond,"
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:52 |
|
^ Jack is a broke brain billionaire that thinks his sub 1000 calorie diet is what allows his brain on a whole another level and makes ihm superior to use normal people. and yet the Bubsy Visits the James Turrell Retrospective is still a better game / greater impact on civilization / piece of art.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:53 |
|
Probably the same reason WinAmp went from 3 to 5. Who wants to create a Web4skin.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:54 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:web2 + web3 = web5 Except the webpage says (Web2)(Web3) = Web5. So really it should be Web6 if they are multiplying like their thing indicates.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:55 |
|
A decentralized network of computers, you say? That's a stupid idea. It would just be a matter of time before someone does something stupid like try to make a fake currency on it.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:55 |
|
Winamp also went from version 3 to 5, so I guess there's something to it?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 19:56 |
|
Sure but that really whipped the llama's rear end, web3 has never done that even once. web3 whips absolutely no rear end of any sort
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:03 |
|
Squibbles posted:Except the webpage says (Web2)(Web3) = Web5. So really it should be Web6 if they are multiplying like their thing indicates. Web growth is exponential so they add, not multiply.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:04 |
|
Party Ape posted:Holy poo poo guys, after more than a decade of trying to figure out a use for blockchain - I finally came up with one: authenticating video game speed runs by recording key milestones in a purpose built blockchain with a very short block time. I thought of a better use: Giving me money instead.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:07 |
|
web5 is when Krillin gets murdered yet again and Goku gets so angry he powers up straight past 4
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:11 |
|
greazeball posted:Ooooh crypto bros are going to discover bounced paychecks This is the UK, we dont really have cheques at all any more. But a single missed payday and yeah youd immediately bounce
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:12 |
|
ultrafilter posted:How much of that is equity with a hypothetical value? From the three people I know well enough to have asked, they insisted on actual money. Again, these arent crypto bros but will happily take their (actual) money
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:14 |
|
Main Paineframe posted:web2 + web3 = web5 Ah, playing the Winamp game.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:14 |
|
drk posted:Looking at it closer, it looks like the bill has a thin conductive strip in it which is presumably how it decides whether to send the public key (check balance only) or private key (spend balance). I'm sure there is no possible way to tamper with this high tech system drat this is from a few pages ago but I read the bill as "SCAN TO VERIFY SCAM" and that feels just as accurate and funny.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:15 |
|
maybe they skipped 4 because theyre weebs and know that 4 sounds like death in some asian countries.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:18 |
|
I thought Jack was a new age tech bro
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:20 |
Squibbles posted:Except the webpage says (Web2)(Web3) = Web5. So really it should be Web6 if they are multiplying like their thing indicates. Wouldn't that then be Web26? Even more growth!
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:22 |
|
WebNaN
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:23 |
|
I think Jack Dorsey is onto something, but I think the plan needs some tweaking. I think Web5 would majorly benefit if they gave me money instead.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:31 |
|
i wrote this up yesterday but lots of stuff got in the way of me finishing it...Somfin posted:So to put it in human terms, the company made a deal to hand over a bunch of money but fat fingered the address (same street number, same street name, wrong city), the delivery got sent there, and nobody involved was around to get it returned but sort of assumed it would be fine until they figured out a fix. The hacker found out, got to the place where the money was sent, and then dropped a building into that spot that looked legit enough to fool the delivery folks into handing it over, and then took it all and immediately put it through a "I just stole a bunch of money, make it seem legit" machine. MechaCrash posted:Here's the thing about the Wintermute test whatever that I don't understand. Scratch Monkey posted:What does this mean? If a “multisig” is some form of identifying key how on earth did the hacker make his match? I’d say “the hacker must have done some sort of technical trick” but the whole scenario sounds less like a techno thriller and more like a three stooges bit so that couldn’t be right so now how could the hacker recreate the same multisig again? i'm not entirely clear on this but apparently the safe creates copies of its smart contracts but the id of these contracts don't change so between different blockchains it will generate the same sigs everytime you go to create a new contract (CREATE or createProxy). one thing i will note... is that it is incredibly difficult to find information about this. i would consider myself relatively technical, but the only way i can figure any of this out is to read 2-3 twitter accounts and look around. otherwise i'd have to manually dig into the actual codebase. my gut feeling is very very few people actually understands all this tech and most of them are just waiting around for people to gently caress up so they can steal their tokens. smellmycheese posted:What could possibly go wrong? i honestly wish they would actually challenge the senators to just basic questions.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:33 |
|
web4 was rug pulled before it could get the scam going.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:49 |
Conceptually isn't it web2 served via web3? So web2 over web3, expressed as web2/web3 = 0.666. Ergo, Jack Dorsey is the devil. QED
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:57 |
Hey, funny how quote isn't edit.
|
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 20:57 |
|
PhazonLink posted:
It’s the only video game that’s so perfect, it encourages you to stop playing video games
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 21:10 |
|
Squiggle posted:Sure but that really whipped the llama's rear end, web3 has never done that even once. web3 whips absolutely no rear end of any sort to be fair, I remember winamp 3 also sucking rear end and sticking with 2 until 5 came out. that said, I just assume anything webX made by tech bros is going to be a colossal shitshow that goes nowhere / scams the gently caress out of people.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 21:15 |
|
carticket posted:Hey, funny how quote isn't edit. In keeping with thread subject matter, posts here are write-only.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 21:21 |
|
carticket posted:Wouldn't that then be Web26? Even more growth! Web64 will finally take the 64 bit crown from Nintendo
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 21:34 |
|
if web 2 is centralized and web 3 is decentralized then how is web 5 extra decentralized?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:12 |
|
look, imagine five webs on the edge of a cliff
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:14 |
|
priznat posted:Jack seems like a dingus who just kind of got lucky with twitter and square but has convinced himself that he is some kind of revolutionary genius. Basically like all tech bros I guess. They all think they're Oscar Issac in Ex Machina.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:19 |
|
Vashro posted:if web 2 is centralized and web 3 is decentralized then how is web 5 extra decentralized? 3 is higher than two so it’s 1 decentralized
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:21 |
|
Seems like the exact same web3 use cases that have not worked because they are full of obvious problems
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:22 |
|
Illuminti posted:They all think they're Oscar Issac in Ex Machina. Cept without the sweet dance moves!
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:26 |
|
Booyah- posted:Seems like the exact same web3 use cases that have not worked because they are full of obvious problems isnt this just local storage? they just rein- also I know the A-, B-, C, etc names are just easy place holder names for these things, but when coinerz or techbros do it I KNOW they just lazily copying textbook 101 things they remembered from freshman year. e: also we already have some de-cent social media platforms, like Mastodon or whatever dinosaur they chose, theyre not very popular and tbh I dont see them being moderately or minorly "successful" PhazonLink fucked around with this message at 22:38 on Jun 10, 2022 |
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:32 |
|
Booyah- posted:Seems like the exact same web3 use cases that have not worked because they are full of obvious problems connie is the con artist who hopes to get rich quick by selling alice and bob some convoluted bullshit that they don't need and is worse than all existing solutions she gets really really pissed off when people point out that this isn't likely to happen
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:41 |
|
Both of the use cases depend on industry adoption of technologies (the wallet and its storage scheme) that make it easier for a user to deny the industry the things from which it makes money. Why do they think that would work?
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 22:53 |
|
|
# ? Jun 12, 2024 21:34 |
|
I like how Alice is based on the idea you want to be yourself on every site on the Internet, instead of silo’ing in your identity. Unless you want your relatives knowing you the same way as your D&D group, your group text, your two different boyfriends, and SA.
|
# ? Jun 10, 2022 23:20 |