|
It hardly matters, since she's just lost to the other two.
|
#
?
Jul 20, 2022 16:37
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 18:43 |
|
|
 The (great) article I found this in reprints it an an example of an insufficient modification to the EBM paradigm. It is originally from this 2016 paper.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2022 03:04
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ajtourville/status/1548383960727597056
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2022 10:37
|
|
|
Hmm, something about that seems off, but I can't quite place my finger on it.
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2022 19:44
|
|
|
Zil posted:Hmm, something about that seems off, but I can't quite place my finger on it. I think it's that the stat is actually "No more than this many among our monetized daily active users," not "exactly this many out of all users".
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2022 19:53
|
|
|
As much as Twitter sucks, yeah, the person who made that chart doesn't understand what it's measuring. It's basically twitter saying they think their margin of error is 5% when they tell advertisers "this many daily human viewers of your ads" rather than measuring how many http requests
|
|
#
?
Jul 21, 2022 21:36
|
|
|
Twitter has consistently been confident that the proportion of active accounts which are bots is below five percent. They just don’t get more granular than that. Maybe it was three percent one quarter and four percent a few quarters later. Who cares? Plenty of other stuff works like this all the time. Like, is it suspicious that my 99.9% pure reagent has always been sold me to me as “99.9%”? Of course not. Maybe one batch tests at 99.92% and another at 99.94%. It doesn’t matter as long as it meets the advertised threshold.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2022 00:30
|
|
|
Its actually more important than that. A terrorist planted a bomb on our favorite dipshit and if twitter hits more than 5% bots per hour Elon Musk will literally explode.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2022 00:41
|
|
|
Outrail posted:Its actually more important than that. A terrorist planted a bomb on our favorite dipshit and if twitter hits more than 5% bots per hour Elon Musk will literally explode. brb, figuring out how many twitter bots I can host before my server runs out of ram
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2022 00:47
|
|
|
Finally, the incentive that people need to Learn to Code.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2022 00:51
|
|
|
Update: Bomb threat was a misunderstanding, however the danger is still real and Elon refuses to leave the Tesla.
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2022 00:57
|
|
|
Can we get it to drive itself into a fire truck
|
|
#
?
Jul 22, 2022 02:33
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/kmpanthagani/status/1550992928008454149
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2022 04:56
|
|
|
While on vacation we had stopped in a town near Philadelphia. Since our hotel was pretty much a dump, she looked up the safety of the town. Mrs. Underbridge: Oh, it's pretty safe. Only a one in forty-two chance of being killed. Me: PER DAY!?!?! Just a reminder that contextualizing your stats is important!
|
|
#
?
Jul 24, 2022 22:07
|
|
 Ha, wrap it up libtards 
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 14:21
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ConcernedMom69/status/196437773874499585
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 16:31
|
|
|
I'm gonna need to do some followup research on this one
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 16:35
|
|
|
Isn't it a known problem in mathematics that a trend can appear to be regular, but at some point change? Also, I do note that the description of the number of buttholes does not confine the buttholes present to a single individual. Ergo, the authors self reported data shows some interest in orgies/gangbangs when the number of participants reaches a critical level. Science!
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 16:55
|
|
|
It's more of a statistical issue. The problem is that fundamentally quantitative models assume that the future will be like the past and if that turns out not to be the case, then whatever model you've fit to past data doesn't need to be of any value. There are a lot of ways to capture the idea of a data generating process changing over time, and some of those models are even useful, but you always run into the possibility that something you haven't seen before happens.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 17:28
|
|
|
Captain Hygiene posted:I'm gonna need to do some followup research on this one I have 8.5 buttholes, which means I should be *checks chart* not entirely devoid of sex appeal  hypothesis disproven I guess
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 18:32
|
|
|
I'd like to see the
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 23:01
|
|
|
I have -2 buttholes. I feel very entirely unrepresented in that graph.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 23:38
|
|
|
You could improve the graph by dashing the line >6 buttholes and putting "office of butthole responsibility" on the bottom.
|
|
#
?
Jul 25, 2022 23:44
|
|
|
Eight legs Grimsby. Eight legs!
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 02:53
|
|
|
Xelkelvos posted:Eight legs Grimsby. Eight legs! 
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 14:24
|
|
|
https://mobile.twitter.com/AlexSteffen/status/1551701032945692673
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 16:27
|
|
|
 Related https://www.reading.ac.uk/planet/climate-resources/climate-stripes
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 17:43
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/rosecitypeach/status/1551716084998459392?t=7JZ8q0W3lgvojKE8PNiJUA&s=19
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 19:03
|
|
|
Platystemon posted:
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 19:12
|
|
|
Henchman of Santa posted:https://twitter.com/rosecitypeach/status/1551716084998459392?t=7JZ8q0W3lgvojKE8PNiJUA&s=19 any actual analysis? 2020 looks supect but the rest not so much.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 21:02
|
|
|
Outrail posted:any actual analysis? 2020 looks supect but the rest not so much. Nah it's just a goofy thing because Murray's new contract stipulates that he has to do four hours of "independent study" during game weeks.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2022 22:42
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ftrain/status/1552409171089395713
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 17:10
|
|
|
Is the possibility of pregnancy the only reason men and women are in separate columns? Because that's some bullshit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 18:26
|
|
|
Dienes posted:Is the possibility of pregnancy the only reason men and women are in separate columns? Because that's some bullshit. Looks like it. quote:Women who were exposed to relatively high levels of PCBs in the workplace or ate large amounts of https://www.health.ny.gov/environmental/investigations/gowanus/docs/pha_final.pdf
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 18:33
|
|
|
Dienes posted:Is the possibility of pregnancy the only reason men and women are in separate columns? Because that's some bullshit. (In all seriousness it could definitely be phrased better - I'd go with "children under 15, and people who may become pregnant" and "all others" personally)
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 18:45
|
|
|
Who the gently caress would knowingly eat fish from the Gowanus anyway? Are there fish in the Gowanus?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 19:20
|
|
|
Not for long!
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 20:08
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/ZhugeEX/status/1552618869818261506 Note the bar graphs are measuring units of time, not how much each game made. I mean it's not the worst I've ever seen, but it's just a really unusual way of displaying time.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 20:13
|
|
|
Zil posted:https://twitter.com/ZhugeEX/status/1552618869818261506 Man that's weird, one of the more "technically correct, but the exact opposite of how it should be" charts I've seen in a bit.
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 20:17
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 29, 2024 18:43 |
|
|
Vincent Van Goatse posted:Who the gently caress would knowingly eat fish from the Gowanus anyway? Are there fish in the Gowanus? Is there any part of the Gow you would eat fish from?
|
|
#
?
Jul 28, 2022 20:24
|
|
