Winkle-Daddy posted:

I'm saying I keep seeing a lady that looks like fractals and idk if I should try to talk to her. or like, how. I don't move or communicate when meditating, I just see stuff, mostly colors and waves but sometimes discrete things, too. I got a sense I should say hello because it's rude to stare.

Hooplah posted:

this'll probably be buried by the nasa conference but that's cool. i just had a very interesting tarot-related experience that i have to share.

i got a r-w deck yesterday to try dipping my toes into this as the reads here have piqued my interest big time. this morning i did a big kindergarten shuffle to really randomize the cards and while doing so i focused on what the cards identified with, or how they would like me to see them. i pulled Justice. cool. getting a major arcana right off the bat, and such a direct-meaning one, felt good. makes sense. next, I did a quick shuffle and asked how the cards saw me. i pulled temperance in reverse. i'm just using the little booklet for interpretation, and all it says for temperance reversed is churches, priesthood, religions, sects, unfortunate combinations, disunion, competing interests. that really didn't mean much to me, and i was wondering how that could fit, but not coming up with much. started wondering if i should be ignoring the reversed meanings for now while i get acquainted. i started another kindergarten shuffle, thinking about that temperance card and what it might mean to me, kinda feeling confused and like it maybe didn't mean as much as the first pull. as i'm gathering the cards up into a deck after shuffling, a random card gets caught on another and pops out, right in front of me. the card was temperance, in reverse, right in the spot i pulled it before. not sideways or crooked or anything, it was literally like i pulled it out on purpose.

inchworm posted:

won't embed but i nailed it stumbling through the heathcliff website for 2 seconds

http://heathcliff.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath10.9.16.png

D-Pad posted:

Uh didn't the pilots say that the object was moving into like a 100mph headwind or was that gimbal? Because lol if it was go-fast and NASA just intentionally ignored that data to come to this conclusion.

Rickshaw posted:

I'd hesitate to call it a detection, it's based on a single data point in a spectrum, which is a very tough cae to make. But very interesting + suggestive and more integration time could tell us more.

Rickshaw posted:

I dunno i don't think Gary (or anyone) is really obligated to spend all the time doing exhaustive science every time a grave robber comes into the institute with an arts and craft project made of chicken bones or whatever the gently caress

inchworm posted:

won't embed but i nailed it stumbling through the heathcliff website for 2 seconds

http://heathcliff.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Heath10.9.16.png

mediaphage posted:

captainbananas posted:

I mean, it's the term the Goddard press release uses, but I was intentional when I noted that it was not one made with high (statistical) confidence. But it is enough to justify getting bumped up in the 'scope queue to take more readings; we'll see what pops or not.

Yeah that was my point too - team mum-ra isn't doing the things that scientists need them to so they don't get to complain that they're not getting whatever attention -qua-scrutiny they think they deserve. And no, for those playing at home, a giant dump of ACTGs in a text file is not enough. Sorry if I wasn't clear enough on that, my posting game is rusty as hell.

Objurium posted:

euphronius posted:

The astral plane is great but remember it’s just another set of forms

Rickshaw posted:

There's a new Heathcliff character, for those who celebrate

Bilirubin posted:

well welcome back and feel free to practice your posting game skills ITT!

Rickshaw posted:

gofast & gimbal are two videos of the same event, as per Graves and others

in gimbal, he says "they're going against the wind, the wind is 120 knots to the west"

in the NASA report, they say "our calculation has neglected wind effects on the aircraft, and thus there is uncertainty in this result." For them, they mean adjusting the speed of the aircraft, not the UAP, which would affect the parallax calculation

what does it mean???? draw your own conclusions at this point

quote:

Videos filmed by Navy pilots show two encounters with flying objects. One was captured by a plane’s camera off the coast of Jacksonville, Fla., on Jan. 20, 2015. That footage, published previously but with little context, shows an object tilting like a spinning top moving against the wind. A pilot refers to a fleet of objects, but no imagery of a fleet was released. The second video was taken a few weeks later.

mediaphage posted:

ArmZ posted:

euphronius posted:

The astral plane is great but remember it’s just another set of forms

*forums

Perry Mason Jar posted:

I'm pretty sure the secret T name for the underwater NHIs is Triads or Tryads. But it's difficult to search. If this makes sense to anyone, please point me in the right direction

LITERALLY A BIRD posted:

Turpitude nailed it I pre-ordered the first printing because when I came across the preview images it just really spoke to me in a way I've never connected with other tarot card pictures I have seen. Not even the Crow tarot deck by the same artist, which is her flagship piece. I definitely think having the right "tools" is part of success, in mystic or magic endeavors as in many others. When she started sharing about The Raven's Dream my brain went "okay, it's time. That's the one."

kraft dinner posted:

it def was the first deck to make me go “yep that’s the one!”

Rickshaw posted:

gofast & gimbal are two videos of the same event, as per Graves and others

in gimbal, he says "they're going against the wind, the wind is 120 knots to the west"

in the NASA report, they say "our calculation has neglected wind effects on the aircraft, and thus there is uncertainty in this result." For them, they mean adjusting the speed of the aircraft, not the UAP, which would affect the parallax calculation

what does it mean???? draw your own conclusions at this point

quote:

On Thursday evening, the agency identified the director as Mark McInerney in an updated news release. He previously served as NASA’s liaison with the Defense Department for U.A.P. issues. In the news release, NASA said he had also worked in various positions at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Maryland, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and the National Hurricane Center.

D-Pad posted:

https://twitter.com/realannapaulina/status/1702456378466369589?t=3HvanONYN1oKjZUFPjYTGw&s=19

Petey posted:

here’s an interview with Shane Harris about his background in national security reporting and his career reporting on UFOs for the Post, with a lot of eyebrow-raising petty subtweeting of Grusch and others https://spotify.link/lgtVaxlb6Cb

Slavvy posted:

Idk if they really turned the tide in Afghanistan tbh

neutral milf hotel posted:

the chuds are also engineering a government shutdown so who knows when another hearing will take place

PokeJoe posted:

Alternatively: they're real as hell

PokeJoe posted:

schrödinger's xeno