|
merk posted:I was just wrong when I thought I was right. It reads like you were trying to save natx but realized it wasn't going to work and tried to save face.
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:35
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 20:38 |
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Posted 4 minutes before deadline. I did. I was reading right up until the end and was very very close to switching.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:35
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:Can someone tell me the chances of that 20% chance happening to both of our rear guys? You are Bad at Math
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:36
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:It reads like you were trying to save natx but realized it wasn't going to work and tried to save face. I'm way better than that as scum. That's my defense. I'm done talking about it. Lynch me if you can't handle me being wrong. I'm on a phone and will see what I can do with these flips ASAP.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:37
|
|
|
I would like to take a moment to insult our scum in the other thread, who deserved to die for being so bad.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:37
|
|
|
merk posted:I did. I was reading right up until the end and was very very close to switching. To who exactly? Natx? Me? Would a switch matter?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:37
|
|
|
we gotta murder hal.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:38
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:I would like to take a moment to insult our scum in the other thread, who deserved to die for being so bad. yeah it was pretty bad. that thread has so many conflicting personalities the double plurality should have been their wet dream, but they literally sat back and let themselves get lynched. they should have controlled things with a strong voice, not try to hide.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:38
|
|
|
merk posted:I'm way better than that as scum. That's my defense. I'm done talking about it. Lynch me if you can't handle me being wrong. I'm not casing because you were wrong. Stop trying to strawman my argument. I'm casing you because it looks like you were trying to save a scum buddy. I honestly wouldn't have been up in arms if it wasn't for that Magnus/natx post.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:39
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:To who exactly? Natx? Me? Would a switch matter? Hal. One vote would've shifted away from Mag iirc.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:40
|
|
|
1) can someone explain the case on Hal? Is it that he hasn't done anything 2) ##vote merk will someone have a conversation about this guy, specifically if you see my narrative of his actions? Merk is clearly going to just wave me off instead of engaging.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:41
|
|
|
##vote YPM It's me or YPM. Guy is capitalizing on a vet being wrong. See ya. Your Personal Muse posted:I'm not casing because you were wrong. Stop trying to strawman my argument. I'm casing you because it looks like you were trying to save a scum buddy. I honestly wouldn't have been up in arms if it wasn't for that Magnus/natx post. Cool.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:41
|
|
|
it's not just that he hasn't done anything, but also that he is playing the Scum Hal game, which is where, if you are Hal, and you are also scum, you dont do anything.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:44
|
|
|
merk posted:##vote YPM The sad part is this is going to work. They are going to listen to your mischaracterization of my case. When did I ever say that it was because you're wrong?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:44
|
|
|
A slip of paper was found in TT's effects. It seems he'd been appointed House Atreides' mentat. Shame
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 01:52
|
|
|
There are two viable raid options here. An aggressive push against their fortress, we can hope to turn the tide of momentum. Or the Windtrap, where we can beef ourselves up, but potentially make ourselves weaker if we lose, no matter what would follow would be an offensive from them. The former seems to be the riskier of the two options, but the later is also as risky, with the chance of just making us that much more easy to overrun in the raid after. I guess you can say the difference between the two of them is when the risk plays out, in the case of attacking their fortress the extra front man they get is the risky element, in the case of attacking the windtrap the risk comes in the form of weaker defensive afterwards.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:04
|
|
|
Really this is all appropriate because we can't be the good guys and just steam roll this game.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:06
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:There are two viable raid options here.  latter is the correct word not later
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:07
|
|
|
Magnus Gallant posted:
why... why did i let merk kill you
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:08
|
|
|
we must impeach capps. he is suffering from Sand Madness
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:08
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:we must impeach capps. he is suffering from Sand Madness gulag my most trusted aide, which place shall we raid?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:10
|
|
|
i dont see point of fighting in the wind trap. it has trap in its name for a reason.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:12
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:i dont see point of fighting in the wind trap. it has trap in its name for a reason. all survivors would get +1 dmg in our next battle
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:15
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:all survivors would get +1 dmg in our next battle How much information do you want about your fighters now?
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:16
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:There are two viable raid options here. No guts, no glory. Let's take out his fortress. You being able to instantly kill someone in their thread seems like it will level the playing field.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
yeah, what is the point of fighting a battle to win a buff, when we could just....Fight a battle to win something like killing someone in the other thread. buffing only seems valuable if we can fight a battle to, um, Win the entire game
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:How much information do you want about your fighters now? just tell me exactly what you think i should know, i don't see the point of keeping things hush hush like diqnol is doing
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:17
|
|
|
honestly no matter what i am probably going to choose the fortress option i just want to be a good leader and hear your guys opinons too
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:18
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:just tell me exactly what you think i should know, i don't see the point of keeping things hush hush like diqnol is doing I am a serial killer
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:honestly no matter what i am probably going to choose the fortress option i just want to be a good leader and hear your guys opinons too If you're choosing the fortress, you want me in the fight.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:I am a serial killer 
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:19
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:20
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:just tell me exactly what you think i should know, i don't see the point of keeping things hush hush like diqnol is doing I'm a force multiplier, whom works best with our laser rifle guy (whoever that happens to be). Oh. That could be another explanation for why so many people died in the last fight- there could have been a laser + shield incident.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:22
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:I'm a force multiplier, whom works best with our laser rifle guy (whoever that happens to be). A laser would probably be a range weapon, laser explosions are suppose to kill both the target and the shooter.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:27
|
|
|
mr.capps posted:A laser would probably be a range weapon, laser explosions are suppose to kill both the target and the shooter. We might have had a laser in the back row. I'm just thinking out loud.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:30
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:I'm a force multiplier, whom works best with our laser rifle guy (whoever that happens to be). Don't think it is possible. quote:Spice Field Delta - Deep Desert
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:33
|
|
|
maybe 100yrs brought sandworm bait to the battle
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:34
|
|
|
GulagDolls posted:maybe 100yrs brought sandworm bait to the battle honestly this is what i am thinking, because god drat our rear rank got hosed
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:36
|
|
|
like even without 100 yrs contributing we managed to kill their entire front rank, if it wasn't for those sandworms we probably would have been able to beat them in pure dmg.
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:38
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 12, 2024 20:38 |
|
|
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IfPXVebX1PI#t=11
|
|
#
?
Sep 9, 2014 02:39
|
|