|
iospace posted:Legally, in the US, they can not take out money out of your paycheck for shoplifting or the drawer being short. Oh certainly. When I worked at a petrol station as a young bloke, if you had a drive off they'd take it out of your pay. So I just stole from them to equal value because gently caress that bullshit.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 06:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 08:43 |
|
Megillah Gorilla posted:Oh certainly. When I worked at a petrol station as a young bloke, if you had a drive off they'd take it out of your pay. Dude was there for the whole encounter with the employees, when the dude started threatening the employees the dude walks up to him like "Oh you think you're a big tough dude?" and *POP*
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:08 |
Pirate Radar posted:It’s like they think that when they point out some flaw in logic or hole in the law the judge will go “oh, drat, you got us, we have to let you go now” and not “lol I don’t care, go away” Didn't it work on that cop at 13:30 in that video a couple of pages ago that everyone was saying was awesome for not taking sovcit poo poo? The guy eventually said AM I BEING DETAINED? AM I FREE TO GO? and the cop just sent him on his way
|
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:19 |
|
Every sovereign citizen argues like Charlie from Always Sunny practising bird law
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:22 |
|
EmmyOk posted:Every sovereign citizen argues like Charlie from Always Sunny practising bird law http://alexanderlozada.com/iasip/?VGhlIEdhbmcgRG9lcyBOb3QgV2lzaCB0byBDcmVhdGUgSm9pbmRlciB3aXRoIFlvdQ==
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:36 |
|
Lmbo
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:37 |
|
Dumb Lowtax posted:Imagine the dude who walks in on the chess tournament cheater in that goon story, who goes all decorum on the screaming referee about assuming good faith and hearing the person out. I need a link, because how do you even cheat at a chess tournament?
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:53 |
|
It's not an actual story but more of a goon parable.quote:A better analogy would be if someone walks into a championship tournament, says "GEE I THINK I MAY HAVE TRANSCENDED THE UNDERSTANDING OF SOME OF YOU GRANDMASTERS HERE, WANT TO JOIN MY NEW SCHOOL OF CHESS STRATEGY?", then loses by scholar's mate twice in the first round.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 07:56 |
|
Raygereio posted:I need a link, because how do you even cheat at a chess tournament? Hide a smart phone in the bathroom. https://nypost.com/2015/04/13/chess-champ-busted-in-embarrasing-bathroom-cheat/
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 08:02 |
|
Raygereio posted:I need a link, because how do you even cheat at a chess tournament? Chess gets... weird sometimes. Wikipedia: 1978 World Chess Championship posted:The 1978 World Chess Championship was played between Anatoly Karpov and Viktor Korchnoi in Baguio City, Philippines from July 18 to October 18, 1978. Karpov won, thereby retaining the title. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/World_Chess_Championship_1978 And now you know the background for the Arbiter's song from the musical Chess, just a few years later: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JoTDsFtC0TM
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 08:27 |
|
EmmyOk posted:Every sovereign citizen argues like Charlie from Always Sunny practising bird law I did not expect to read this on the wikipedia though: "The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) classifies some sovereign citizens ("sovereign citizen extremists") as domestic terrorists. In 2010 the Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) estimated that approximately 100,000 Americans were "hard-core sovereign believers", with another 200,000 "just starting out by testing sovereign techniques for resisting everything from speeding tickets to drug charges". In surveys conducted in 2014 and 2015, representatives of US law enforcement ranked the risk of terrorism from the sovereign-citizen movement higher than the risk from any other group, including Islamic extremism, militias, racists, and Neo-Nazis. The New South Wales Police Force in Australia has also identified sovereign citizens as a potential terrorist threat."
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 08:30 |
|
Raygereio posted:I need a link, because how do you even cheat at a chess tournament? Sometimes competitors are allowed just have PDA on the table, ostensibly to notate moves as they make them, but it makes it hilariously easy to cheat.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 08:33 |
|
Ommin posted:I did not expect to read this on the wikipedia though: Unsurprisingly a group of people with only a partial grasp on reality who are armed to the teeth and believe that the government has no real authority turn into very real and very dangerous threats. Of course that's probably taken a back seat now that the FBI is focusing on Black Identity Extremistst (i.e. blacks who don't like getting murdered by cops.)
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 08:42 |
|
Garrand posted:Unsurprisingly a group of people with only a partial grasp on reality who are armed to the teeth and believe that the government has no real authority turn into very real and very dangerous threats. Of course that's probably taken a back seat now that the FBI is focusing on Black Identity Extremistst (i.e. blacks who don't like getting murdered by cops.) My god...you're right.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 08:47 |
|
FUSION WEDGIE https://i.imgur.com/XfJWdOB.mp4
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 09:58 |
|
Powered Descent posted:I sometimes wonder if that's what keeps people trying various sovcit bullshit. The actual law is full of strange verbiage and stranger logic, and people can convince themselves they've discovered some top-secret instruction set they can use to crash the system. I mean, Captain Kirk could talk a computer to death using its own logic against it, why shouldn't they be able to do the same to the powerful-but-byzantine system they're up against? Basically, yeah. The law is confusing and has a lot of arbitrary-seeming rules. They don't understand why it's the way it is, so they think it's like a computer where you insert the right phrasing at the right time it gives you the results you want. They don't get that the fancy phrasing and the careful rules are really just a way for everyone in the court to be on the same page. There's a reason for it all (sometimes very good reasons, sometimes just because we've always done it that way), but if you don't go looking, it seems really confusing. They think of the courts as being a more-or-less automatic function, where you only need to set up the right input to get the output you want. They fail over-and-over-again to realize that there are human beings involved. Judges are not machines and the courts are designed around the idea that they have some autonomy in how they render judgements. As well, it doesn't matter how airtight you think your argument is for why the law doesn't apply to you. The men with tasers think it does, and so it will.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:16 |
|
When an officer of the law doesn’t do what they want, a sovcit thinks they’ve encountered the equivalent of a syntax error.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 10:31 |
|
I once got to translate an NDA and when I learned that English-language contracts start with a big-rear end WHEREAS for no particular reason I chuckled out loud because it reminded me of some old English chronicle where every entry began with a big-rear end WHÄT. It's probably not funny to anyone else but yeah magic words are totally a thing in Anglophone law.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 11:15 |
|
WHEREAS we spear-danes have heard the glory of the folk-kings in the days of yore
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 11:38 |
|
iospace posted:Legally, in the US, they can not take out money out of your paycheck for shoplifting or the drawer being short.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 11:50 |
|
Jerry Cotton posted:I once got to translate an NDA and when I learned that English-language contracts start with a big-rear end WHEREAS for no particular reason I chuckled out loud because it reminded me of some old English chronicle where every entry began with a big-rear end WHÄT. Ah yes, The Chronicle of Little John. We read it in high school. The teacher was super into bit but I just thought it was OKAY.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 12:01 |
|
Trig Discipline posted:Ah yes, The Chronicle of Little John. We read it in high school. The teacher was super into bit but I just thought it was OKAY.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 13:21 |
|
Eh, close enough https://i.imgur.com/5tf1C1Z.mp4
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 13:29 |
|
Ommin posted:
It's basically because there have been multiple incidents of sovcits getting stopped because of their fake license plates and then just shooting the cops when their nonsense doesn't work. Also a favorite tactic of theirs is to file liens on anyone they think wronged them.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 14:00 |
|
Incoming schad Texas physician tells medical journal women 'do not work as hard' quote:Tigges later told the Dallas Morning News that his comments were taken out of context. He said he responded to an email from the Dallas County Medical Society and did not know they would be included in a publication. So of course someone instantly found causally racist internet posts by same doctor This guy's gonna have a bad week
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 14:26 |
|
this is amazing also; Germany has lots of SovCits too. They're called Reichsbürger there, meaning citizens of the empire. quote:Reichsbürger is used as a label for a loosely connected group of Germans who believe that the 1871 borders of the German empire are still in effect and that all of the country's governments since (and including) the Nazis have been illegitimate, many also subscribe to anti-Semitic ideologies. ekuNNN has a new favorite as of 14:39 on Sep 3, 2018 |
# ? Sep 3, 2018 14:29 |
|
Dumb Lowtax posted:No, there are plenty of cowardly people in the world who that poo poo works on. Imagine the dude who walks in on the chess tournament cheater in that goon story, who goes all decorum on the screaming referee about assuming good faith and hearing the person out. Now a judge is probably hardened to that poo poo and power tripping as well and won't be the mark they're looking for, but the bad faith technicality arguing probably works on little day to day things on people immediately around them in their life. It's just a textbook form of mental abuse is all. It's also worth pointing out a lot of these Sov Cit cases you see in court are people repeating something they've learnt by wrote. They're poor, vulnerable people, usually in masses of debt. Can men pray upon them, teaching them the secrets of law at seminars that can cost thousands of dollar, but it's worth it if you can stop the bank fore closing your house right? It's easy to mock these people because they sound so stupid, but they're just desperate.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 14:32 |
More like Arschburgers
|
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 14:52 |
|
Aramoro posted:It's also worth pointing out a lot of these Sov Cit cases you see in court are people repeating something they've learnt by wrote. They're poor, vulnerable people, usually in masses of debt. Can men pray upon them, teaching them the secrets of law at seminars that can cost thousands of dollar, but it's worth it if you can stop the bank fore closing your house right? It's easy to mock these people because they sound so stupid, but they're just desperate. Many sides. Many sides.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 14:55 |
|
EmmyOk posted:Every sovereign citizen argues like Charlie from Always Sunny practising bird law Charlie and his bird law actually won a case, though.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 14:59 |
|
Data Graham posted:Didn't it work on that cop at 13:30 in that video a couple of pages ago that everyone was saying was awesome for not taking sovcit poo poo? The guy eventually said AM I BEING DETAINED? AM I FREE TO GO? and the cop just sent him on his way While it's true that invoking your right to remain silent is the closest real thing to sovcit magic words, they wouldn't have helped in this case because he was at a traffic stop and required to provide a valid license and proof of insurance. He was released because he provided a valid license and proof of insurance.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 15:48 |
|
LifeSunDeath posted:This guy's gonna have a bad week His twitter is already gone. That was quick!
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 16:16 |
|
StrangersInTheNight posted:His twitter is already gone. That was quick! And they say @jack doesn't ban nazis. I know he doesn't lol
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 16:16 |
|
LifeSunDeath posted:Incoming schad "It was out of context! By which I mean, I didn't think it would be published!" "Women should be paid less! I mean, I'm not saying women should be paid less. . ." gently caress you, Gary. I look forward to hearing about your termination.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 17:00 |
|
Aramoro posted:It's also worth pointing out a lot of these Sov Cit cases you see in court are people repeating something they've learnt by wrote. They're poor, vulnerable people, usually in masses of debt. Can men pray upon them, teaching them the secrets of law at seminars that can cost thousands of dollar, but it's worth it if you can stop the bank fore closing your house right? It's easy to mock these people because they sound so stupid, but they're just desperate. yeah but in some cases, like the video linked to the 370z guy (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zTMvCjpIiI0) they're idiots trying to buy luxury cars using a scam technique
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 17:21 |
|
Phanatic posted:Charlie and his bird law actually won a case, though. Clearly these dudes are dropping “I’m travelling not driving“ as an attempted bombshell which is a real Mac move.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 17:24 |
|
Somfin posted:Like with the anti-feminists I'm pretty sure these guys started out in the atheism debate, where one logic hole can actually spiral out and bring the whole thing down; unfortunately, most real topics don't work that way. Additionally these folks seem convinced that simply finding the logical problem is sufficient. I'm reminded of the stories from the MtG thread where people would learn what the one-move-win combos are and then never learn, or forget, why they work, then be unable to actually execute the win if their opponent didn't recognise the combo and fold immediately. Except these guys don't even have a winning move. The people who insta fold are dumb 90% of players cant do alot of 1 turn ko combos because most are super complicated.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 17:41 |
|
Powered Descent posted:powerful-but-byzantine *and
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 18:07 |
|
ekuNNN posted:this is amazing I like how they consider all German governments including the Nazi regime as illegitimate but they still hate Jews. Come on guys, why can't you just believe in magic laws and leave the poor Jewish community alone. Also, I couldn't imagine being German and still being anti-Semitic. It seems really trite at this point.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 18:33 |
|
|
# ? Jun 6, 2024 08:43 |
|
Guyver posted:They can for drawer shortages legally actually as long as it doesn't bring you below minimum wage. Though that's federal law and good luck getting them to abide by it, you might have better protections under state laws. Good luck if you work in a red state.
|
# ? Sep 3, 2018 19:06 |