|
Hmm. I cast Detect Magic. Success. Looks like there's no sorcery here, just a good case! ##vote Lumpen
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 06:00
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 04:48 |
|
|
Yeah I was going to laugh off that first bit, but the follow up case actually isn't that bad.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 06:08
|
|
|
Hahahaha Lump is already at -3.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 06:51
|
|
|
Presumably that's because Lumpen is acting scummy as gently caress? Pushing newbies to "build meta" is weird and lame, even by the standards of the mad navel-loving dimension in which we find ourselves. ##vote Lumpen
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:16
|
|
|
It'd be pretty funny to turbo Lumpen
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:19
|
|
|
Contradictory isn't that scummy though, just probably lazy on Lumpen's part ##unvote
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:21
|
|
|
Someone vote and I might hammer 
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:22
|
|
|
oh well I can't now
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:23
|
|
|
Antivehicular posted:Presumably that's because Lumpen is acting scummy as gently caress? Pushing newbies to "build meta" is weird and lame, even by the standards of the mad navel-loving dimension in which we find ourselves.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:23
|
|
|
bowmore posted:oh well I can't now
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
bet that if Lumps isn't scum then one of the last 2 or 3 people on him were
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:24
|
|
|
here's something that's scummy: does anyone honestly think lumpen can actually generate worthwhile content or opinions about new players by voting for someone for a few posts on d1 or that he's doing the more likely thing human beings do and that is maintain appearances i'll freely renege on this opinion of he tells me what he's found out so far about anidav
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:25
|
|
|
If I were to play my part of merk in this game I'd be quoting Bowmore and casing him on forward posturing over a player who hasn't even flipped yet. But I hate AntiV's post more because he doesn't actually explain a thing and just cusses. ##vote antiv
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:27
|
|
|
but ras is there a better case going now? like why unvote?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:28
|
|
|
ah okay.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:28
|
|
|
wait ras that's not a real vote! you don't like that better than the lumpen vote! no way. no wayyyy. ##vote Rascyc
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:29
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:here's something that's scummy: Look at BlackNyte and don't tell me it doesn't sound like he tried to put together something resembling a case on Lumpen. We can do better than "maintain appearances" for d1. ZzzZzzZzzzz
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:30
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:wait ras that's not a real vote! you don't like that better than the lumpen vote! no way. no wayyyy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:31
|
|
|
Good night thread.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 07:32
|
|
|
Rascyc posted:Why exactly is it scummy? Weird and lame maybe, but scummy? Newbies are soft targets, and voting them to "create meta" or pressure them to stammer out a half-formed case is not really town-friendly play, imho! It's a good way to thrust a probably-defenseless town player into the spotlight and either get them killed or make them a running subject of interest for no good reason. It amounts to saying "I don't have a case on this person, but pay attention to them anyway!"
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 09:38
|
|
|
Also I am a lady, even though I didn't wear me sexy red dress to this game.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 09:43
|
|
|
Would vote Antivehicular and am still happy to turbo Lumpen (hi lumpen)
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 10:04
|
|
|
Friends, my city is about to be hit by a cyclone, who should I vote for while I remain alive?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 11:08
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Friends, my city is about to be hit by a cyclone, who should I vote for while I remain alive? Vote 1: Moving to NSW, where poo poo is hosed but we're not all going to die in a cyclone.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 11:12
|
|
|
Ernie. posted:here's something that's scummy: anidav stayed chill almost apologetic when poked. blacknyte freaked the gently caress out when poked. Antivehicular preemptively freaked the gently caress out at the mere prospect of possibly being poked. This is data. It doesn't establish a strong argument for alignment for any of them at this point, but it is valuable data to establish the kind of players they are, and as flips happen, it will be valuable data for constructing meta expectations for future games. Ultimately, the entire exchange generated, for me, a positive of Rascyc, and drew out some Scummy activity from Somberbrero. Somberbrero posted:Hmm. ##Vote Somberbrero
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 13:10
|
|
|
I fully agree with Lumpen, he's merely doing a common type of poking. Even though I know none of the posters here, I do know exactly what he's trying to do and atleast for now; is a pretty bread and butter town move. As for voting is concerned, there's a high chance that a cyclone will knock out my power tomorrow so I might not have another chance to post on day one after this. I'm not sure what kind of poster Somberbrero is and at a glace it looks like a joke post with a joke vote. Since a cyclone is coming; I'm more than happy to add in a little extra pressure to get the joke posting out of the way. ##Vote Somberbrero
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 13:53
|
|
|
Discrediting my vote in this manner is scummy.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 15:46
|
|
|
blacknyte posted:Discrediting my vote in this manner is scummy. I'm willing to have a dialog with you, and I suggest you dial down the defensiveness if you're Town. Lumpen fucked around with this message at 16:28 on Feb 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 16:26
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:How so? Please explain. You are implying that I reacted emotionally to your vote, which I did not. You again do that in this post by saying I am playing defensively when it is pretty clear that I believe you are scummy and have a case and vote that supports that opinion. Instead of waving away my vote, why not respond to what I've said?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 16:28
|
|
|
Above post edited only to add the sound effect, no content changed, just missed the ninjaedit.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 16:29
|
|
|
Lumpen posted:Above post edited only to add the sound effect, no content changed, just missed the ninjaedit. Following live. Confirmed. e: Today is the last day I'll hear requests for a change in deadline. weekly font fucked around with this message at 16:36 on Feb 19, 2015 |
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 16:30
|
|
|
blacknyte posted:
The first quoted post is seeking context and explanation of Anidav's implicit assumptions about my vote on him. You labeling it "admonishing" is jumping to a false conclusion about my point of view. The second quote is just true, and supported by my subsequent posts. I'm transparently poking the newbs that I don't have meta knowledge of, both to generate contentful reaction and to build a meta profile for future games. I don't understand what could be considered "contradictory" there, or what you consider Scummy about it. Your reaction to my gentle prod vote on you certainly struck me as overemotional and overdefensive. Your case is a real stretch to support a reactionary OMGUS vote, and doubling down on it makes you look silly at best and Scummy at worst. I have my eye on you.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 16:43
|
|
|
blacknyte posted:Isn't this contradictory? He's admonishing Anidav for the wildcard comment and then saying in his next post to bowmore that he's trying to build meta on the newbies... who, by that analysis, are wildcards? Somberbrero posted:Hmm. My initial reaction to Lumpen's early game was that he was just trying to get us out of jokephase and into the game proper. I didn't read the votes on Anidav and Blacknyte and think "Lumpen thinks they're scum", to me the fact he was prodding felt clear. Moving on.. Antivehicular posted:Presumably that's because Lumpen is acting scummy as gently caress? Pushing newbies to "build meta" is weird and lame, even by the standards of the mad navel-loving dimension in which we find ourselves. Rascyc posted:If I were to play my part of merk in this game I'd be quoting Bowmore and casing him on forward posturing over a player who hasn't even flipped yet. I agree with Rascyc here as well. Initiating conversation (through either votes or discussion) is pro-town, and the fact that Anti read it as "scummy as gently caress" seems either (a) incorrect or (b) scummy. I don't think it necessarily means she's scum, but.. Somberbrero posted:wait ras that's not a real vote! you don't like that better than the lumpen vote! no way. no wayyyy. I find it surprising that Somber won't even consider the fact that Anti's dogpiling on the Lumpen vote is scummier than Lumpen prodding for reactions. Would vote Somber or Anti so far, but want to observe more because we have plenty of time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:16
|
|
|
Anidav posted:Friends, my city is about to be hit by a cyclone, who should I vote for while I remain alive? Anidav posted:I fully agree with Lumpen, he's merely doing a common type of poking. Even though I know none of the posters here, I do know exactly what he's trying to do and atleast for now; is a pretty bread and butter town move. First off - good luck with the cyclone! Natural disasters suck  That said, I feel like Anidav is going through a lot of effort to stress to us that he might not be able to change his vote on Somber, which feels scummy to me. I can see saying it once to let us know why he's not around, but three times gives me a vibe of him trying to cover his tracks in the event that Somber is lynched and flips town. Also, asking who he should vote for instead of reading over posts strikes me as someone giving the appearance of scumhunting but not actually trying. Would also vote Anidav.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:18
|
|
|
I strongly disagree that Antivehicular post is scummy, and so it makes very little sense to me that Ras would make the posts that he did. Opop were you phone posting yesterday?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:29
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:I strongly disagree that Antivehicular post is scummy, and so it makes very little sense to me that Ras would make the posts that he did. Probably. Depends on if I was on lunch or not
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:33
|
|
|
Alright, I was wondering why you didn't vote Lumpen when you said you agreed with that Black Nyte case.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:37
|
|
|
Does anyone else think I'm silly for casing Lumpen here? What reactions do people have to the case?
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:37
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:Alright, I was wondering why you didn't vote Lumpen when you said you agreed with that Black Nyte case. Because I don't have to put down a vote on everything scummy I see
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:40
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 1, 2024 04:48 |
|
|
blacknyte posted:Does anyone else think I'm silly for casing Lumpen here? What reactions do people have to the case? His behavior is anti-town and he should be dunked. I'm voting Rascyc because Lumpen is difficult to understand and I feel more comfortable in my read there. Rascyc's behavior doesn't make sense to me. It's very strange that Rascyc would unvote for fear of a turbo, then come up with a different case immediately afterwards. Rascyc has played a couple games with AV now and I don't get how what she posted is any scummier than what she normally does. Her response is on-point and, as an aside, I'm confused why Murmur didn't seem to consider that when making a post about how she'd vote Anti and myself.
|
|
#
?
Feb 19, 2015 17:48
|
|