|
I want that man thrown in the brig!
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 03:39 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 17:41 |
|
Good grief the updates are coming hard and fast tonight; glad I'm online to participate in our inaugural draft! Vote to discard #5 : P85 Intrepida I can actually see use for the submarine; I don't see use for a patrol gunboat.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 05:27 |
|
Vote to discard the Fire Can
slothrop fucked around with this message at 13:42 on Mar 17, 2019 |
# ? Mar 17, 2019 05:31 |
|
Yeah, the SSK is actually a decent sub, even if it would be a weird fit for our formerly air superiority outfit. The PT boat is a piece of poo poo. So Discard the Intrepida
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 05:47 |
|
Nnng...procurement is always so hard. I say discard the Fitter B.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 05:54 |
|
power crystals posted:Agreeing with this goon. Discard the Mirage F.1CE FrangibleCover posted:I'd like to discard the J-7s, because they're like the F-5s but worse. The missiles don't work, we don't get any more of them than we do of other crap-but-less-crap options and they're going to lose in a fight to nearly anything. On some thought I am changing my vote to Discard the J-7C. The Mirage F.1CEs at least have the same missile as the F-5 and are in the same quantity, with extra anti-runway capability.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 06:08 |
At least the Intrepida can help protect the Tokyo Bay. RandomPauI fucked around with this message at 07:35 on Mar 17, 2019 |
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 06:14 |
|
RandomPauI posted:At least the Intrepida can help protect the Tokyo Bay. I would argue that the sub would be much better protection (and provide area denial) for Tokyo Bay.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 06:27 |
CourValant posted:I would argue that the sub would be much better protection (and provide area denial) for Tokyo Bay. Oh sure, but the J7 comes across as that much worse
|
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 06:42 |
|
Discard the Fitter B Also bote lobby is very excited at the support options available.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 06:57 |
The J7 are basically good for as disposable bomb trucks in permissive environments or as decoys/cannon fodder. This isn't a permissive environment. Using them as decoys and cannon fodder would let us get thru crew rotations faster, but the new rules are going to make that happen anyways. If we discard them we probably won't do any worse for a fighter. The Intrepida would at least provide another radar, some protection against attempts to board the Tokyo Bay, and shore bombardment. And it'll retain its resale value better than however many J7's survived.
|
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 07:17 |
|
I don't know how to make this more clear. Voting to discard the J-7 is a waste of a discard. We're unlikely to get something much better and already have 2 reasonable candidates in the Fighter category. Discard something else.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 07:21 |
|
RandomPauI posted:The J7 are basically good for as disposable bomb trucks in permissive environments or as decoys/cannon fodder. This isn't a permissive environment. Using them as decoys and cannon fodder would let us get thru crew rotations faster, but the new rules are going to make that happen anyways. If we discard them we probably won't do any worse for a fighter. What on earth are we comparing the two biggest shitheaps in the pile for? We'd be making a mistake buying either of them. The J7 has no good comparables, every other aircraft has it beat in every way. The boat may as well be a zodiac. This vote isn't about losing the opportunity to buy something (unless you are a hardcore boat lobbyist in which case please sink), it's about what we want a reroll on. Reroll Fighter -> Discard J7 Reroll Attack -> Discard Fitter B Reroll Support -> Discard any of the support stuff
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 07:36 |
I'm retracting the vote for the J-7. Ditch the 100mm Fire Can We've kept all our AA assets and they're better than the 10 AA we'd be getting. And we aren't really in the business of massing artillery for bombardment. Edit: TheDemon, I want a reroll on whatever the worst item was based on the premise that we will almost certainly get something better. RandomPauI fucked around with this message at 07:46 on Mar 17, 2019 |
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 07:44 |
|
Ditch the 100mm Fire Can It looks like straight up ww2 era crap. ldragon fucked around with this message at 07:55 on Mar 17, 2019 |
# ? Mar 17, 2019 07:51 |
|
no. we are absolutely not putting a person in a su-17 for any purpose other than a life insurance scam.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 09:36 |
|
Discard the 100mm Fire Can
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 10:34 |
|
Discard the 100mm Fire Can A drunk Greek with a decent throwing arm could outrange these things.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 11:20 |
|
Ditch the Fire Can
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 11:43 |
|
Discard the P85
Dreamsicle fucked around with this message at 14:00 on Mar 17, 2019 |
# ? Mar 17, 2019 13:57 |
|
Ditch the 100mm AAA Out of everything we have left, AAA is the least concern
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 14:38 |
|
TheDemon posted:This vote isn't about losing the opportunity to buy something, it's about what we want a reroll on. If we get rid of the AAA then that's least likely to get us a new cool plane. Although, I will admit, whatever planes are in the Support category are probably very cool indeed. We don't have to buy the AAA in the actual voting, we can just ignore it.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 15:09 |
|
Discard the F-16DGs. They're too capable and will tempt people to foolishly try to be good instead of correctly striving to being awesome.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 15:15 |
As a reminder on voting. You get three choices, they may all be the same choice. No need to vote for a category you don't want. If you don't like any of the support options, don't vote for any of them. We could end up with two flights of Mirages, or two flights of F-16's. Warcrime lobby could vote for ALL SU-22's. A coordinated lobby could have us end up with three botes (unlikely, but hilarious). Eukie gave me some vote tallying methods to check out so it may not just be goonrush and go. I'll do the redraw in a few hours, so get in your discards. All things being equal, we'll see how the choices shake out. If it turns in sperg minmax simulator I'll be sure to add more comedy options next time. I tried to be fairly even between comedy, normal, and decent. But next time we may just get crap, slightly better crap, and slightly worse crap.
|
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 15:51 |
|
Grumio posted:I want that man thrown in the brig! Sorry man, I got really blasted on slivovitz.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 15:54 |
|
Discard the Su-17s, they're similar to but worse than the Su-22s. We might get an interesting choice to replace them, and worst case we just buy the Su-22s (or something else).
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 15:56 |
Grumio posted:I want that man thrown in the brig! Unfortunately that's the problem, the name of the bar is The Brig. Gervasius posted:Sorry man, I got really blasted on slivovitz. All in all, a fairly hilarious bug.
|
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 16:27 |
|
Yooper posted:All in all, a fairly hilarious bug.[/b] I mean, I now have two kills in a shitheap that is the MiG-21. One of them was friendly, but it still counts!
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 16:52 |
|
I feel like we've got reasonable options in the A2G and A2A realm that we can vote for, so I'm cool with ditching either the lovely AA or the lovely patrol boat to get a reroll there. The only support option I like is the sub, and that's primarily because I'm a full member of bote lobby and it'd give us some really neat sea denial options that won't be so neat if we're facing off against solely air and ground opposition.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 17:14 |
|
Yooper posted:All things being equal, we'll see how the choices shake out. If it turns in sperg minmax simulator I'll be sure to add more comedy options next time. I tried to be fairly even between comedy, normal, and decent. But next time we may just get crap, slightly better crap, and slightly worse crap. So what you're saying is if I sperg it up now, we will finally have our super tukes next time around.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 17:19 |
|
Discard the J7
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 17:55 |
Voting is closed! It was close too! The 100mm Fire Can battery has been shoved off onto the open market. In it's place we get... #18! OH-58D Kiowa Warrior, QTY - 4 http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/1331/ Now give me a bit to make an effortpost with all of the voting options and we'll get moving.
|
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 18:29 |
|
oh gently caress yeah, rocket pods and helicopter, we have a support winner folks
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 18:32 |
First, here's what we have remaining as far as air assets go. EA-6B Prowler - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/2316/ A-6E Intruder - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/2327/ QTY 4 BR.1150 Atlantique 2 - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/4249/ C-130J Hercules - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/1723/ CN-235-200 - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/3935/ KC-135R Stratotanker - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/3949/ S 100B Argus - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/563/ VC.10.K4 - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/1709/ MQ-9B - http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/3726/ QTY 2 (The Marjata is stuck on the beach at the moment) A decent helping of support assets, just the cargo and fueling aircraft alone are worth a shitload. Beyond that the S100 and EA-6B make a powerful pair. The A-6E wing and the MQ-1C's round out a healthy front line contingent. ZSU-23-4 http://cmano-db.com/facility/80/ I-HAWK Battery - http://cmano-db.com/facility/669/ SA-22 Panstir - http://cmano-db.com/facility/1934/ The SkyBow unfortunately had to go away as it became questionable whether we could procure reloads. It's one thing to source a Russian SAM, it's another for a rather obscure Taiwanese system. Too difficult to weasel into the legal system. Here's how this will work.
#1 : F-16DG Blk 40 Falcon - 1991 (QTY 4) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/3549/ #7 : Mirage F.1CE (QTY 8) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/26/ #4 : J-7C (QTY 8) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/82/ #8 : Mirage 2000C (QTY 6) (Note : The 40.7km missile is considered BVR LEGAL) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/1244/ #14 : F-5A (QTY 8) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/1817/ #3 : Su-22M-4K Fitter K (QTY 8) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/379/ #17 : SU-17 Fitter B (QTY 8) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/1621/ #8 : F-16XL Falcon (QTY 6) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/4190/ #16 : Belarus Volunteer Mechanized Company http://cmano-db.com/facility/2045/ http://cmano-db.com/facility/205/ http://cmano-db.com/facility/1814/ #18 : OH-58D Kiowa Warrior (Qty 4 Units) http://cmano-db.com/aircraft/1331/ #4 : TR-1700 SUBMARINE http://cmano-db.com/submarine/37/ #5 : P85 Intrepida http://cmano-db.com/ship/23/ There we go! PICK 3 :: PICK 3 :: PICK 3 :: PICK 3 Yooper fucked around with this message at 19:56 on Mar 17, 2019 |
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 19:33 |
|
Actually you know what, gently caress that. I couldn't call myself a subnerd if I didn't shout it from the rooftops! Three votes for the submarine! Radio Free Kobold fucked around with this message at 19:41 on Mar 17, 2019 |
# ? Mar 17, 2019 19:38 |
|
3x vote for the Su-17 Fitter B. Going max war crimes, all in..
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 19:40 |
|
1x Mirage F.1CE (QTY 8) 1x F-16XL Falcon (QTY 6) What this gets us is a nice mix of planes with a clear engagement strategy: 1. Zoom in and fire off 12 SARH missiles, then gently caress off. 2. SEND IN THE DOGFIGHTERS. 3. Carpet bomb everything. The F.1CEs have 4th gen agility mod so they're the best dogfight fighters we have other than the F-16DGs which are too few in number. Frankly, the F-16XLs are useless and I'd rather have Fitters but I'm sure they'll get a lot of useless votes for EXPERIMENTAL PLANE whoa, and we're going to be carried by our Intruders anyway. e: Changing my vote to DGs instead of XLs as that's the way the wind seems to be blowing and the DGs are waaaaay better. TheDemon fucked around with this message at 14:47 on Mar 18, 2019 |
# ? Mar 17, 2019 19:47 |
|
3 votes for the TR-1700 Bote Lobby:The Return:The Revengance 2: Electric Boogaloo
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 19:47 |
|
2 votes for the Block 40 Falcons, one vote for the F-16XLs.
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 19:49 |
|
|
# ? Jun 11, 2024 17:41 |
|
#4 : TR-1700 SUBMARINE #4 : TR-1700 SUBMARINE #8 : F-16XL Falcon (QTY 6)
|
# ? Mar 17, 2019 19:51 |