|
nft.c:15:9 error: 'law' undeclared (first use in this function)
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 20:53
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:54 |
|
|
except, like, it doesn't make it harder? there's literally no way of determining from the Immutable Blockchain if a token was sent legitimately or not. all it shows was a token being sent from address A to address B
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:02
|
|
|
it doesn't matter really, it's just a way for seth green to back out of something irredeemably stupid
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:06
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:except, like, it doesn't make it harder? there's literally no way of determining from the Immutable Blockchain if a token was sent legitimately or not. all it shows was a token being sent from address A to address B it turns out that most laws like most code is poorly implemented and based on fundamentally flawed assumptions
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:09
|
|
|
DaTroof posted:man, does that look dire What do you wanna bet this whole "Oops my ape got stolen, can't make the show now!" is just trying to gracefully get out of making that poo poo show?
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:12
|
|
|
e: wrong post, disregard
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:13
|
|
|
*Seth Green, after watching the trailer for his new show and realising how poo poo it is* Wow, guys, ha-ha, this is great, but, uh, I just got a text, and my ape was stolen, so now we can't make the show. It's, uh, copyrights, you know. Man, what a shame, really wanted to see this show through, oh well.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:22
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:except, like, it doesn't make it harder? there's literally no way of determining from the Immutable Blockchain if a token was sent legitimately or not. all it shows was a token being sent from address A to address B if someone posts "my red FooCorp bicycle was stolen" and then you later buy a red foocorp bike on craigslist, you don't know for sure whether it was actually the stolen one or just a normal secondhand bike. if it later turns out that it was the stolen bike, that could have just been an honest mistake. if seth green posts "i've been hacked, all my apes gone", and then you buy an ape whose blockchain transaction history shows it leaving seth green's wallet, you are undeniably buying stolen property.
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:26
|
|
|
being poo poo has never stopped seth green doing anything before
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:34
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:if someone posts "my red FooCorp bicycle was stolen" and then you later buy a red foocorp bike on craigslist, you don't know for sure whether it was actually the stolen one or just a normal secondhand bike. if it later turns out that it was the stolen bike, that could have just been an honest mistake. who’s to say Seth Green didn’t sell the ape himself and lied about it online? does the blockchain show that?
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:34
|
|
|
hi i understand you're having trouble with your sefth green nft. i'm a customer support expert for seth greem so just click this link and i can answer your questions for you
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:40
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:if someone posts "my red FooCorp bicycle was stolen" and then you later buy a red foocorp bike on craigslist, you don't know for sure whether it was actually the stolen one or just a normal secondhand bike. if it later turns out that it was the stolen bike, that could have just been an honest mistake. Do exchanges actually specify who owns every wallet involved in an NFT, though? Isn’t it always just a jumble of letters? You’d have to prove in court that of course anyone would recognize Seth Green’s famous wallet address on sight: jdifirndk-laogifisn-8;73kdkgntn-$,&:’fbv🤠kdjdi
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:43
|
|
|
Pigbuster posted:Do exchanges actually specify who owns every wallet involved in an NFT, though? Isn’t it always just a jumble of letters? You’d have to prove in court that of course anyone would recognize Seth Green’s famous wallet address on sight: jdifirndk-laogifisn-8;73kdkgntn-$,&:’fbv🤠kdjdi if they comply with kyc (lol) shouldn't they have PII associated with every account, so if a trade is made through an exchange, they should be able to identify the parties
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:50
|
|
|
i think in this case its more that what's the point of owning an enefftee if no one else knows you own it so lots of people link their profile on their social media of choice
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 21:52
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:if someone posts "my red FooCorp bicycle was stolen" and then you later buy a red foocorp bike on craigslist, you don't know for sure whether it was actually the stolen one or just a normal secondhand bike. if it later turns out that it was the stolen bike, that could have just been an honest mistake. right, but in this specific instance, he didn't announce all my apes gone until after darkwing84 apparently bought it, so unless he can be proven to be known to the hacker, there's no way to prove he in any way knew he was buying a stolen receipt. if darkwing84 sells it to someone else, sure that may be more difficult to claim ignorance, but that still brings the greater point that there's no distinguishing between an honest sale and an illegitimate one beyond potentially having PII records, i suppose, assuming the transfer was done off-chain
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 22:13
|
|
|
none of that really matters anyway, they don't own jack poo poo. whoever originally created the horrible ape just confers derivative rights to it, not total ownership. under current law they can only use it in defined scenarios (and possibly pay royalties to the creator), they don't own it yeah yeah the blockchain says they do. the actual law (not code!) says they don't
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 22:21
|
|
|
there's also bots that are poised to buy up any of the apes the second they hit the market
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 22:24
|
|
|
i'm just gonna laugh at all of seth green's apes....gone
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 23:10
|
|
|
Endless Mike posted:i'm just gonna laugh at all of seth green's apes....gone the best part is it sounds like a robot chicken parody of nft owners
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 23:20
|
|
|
Seth green thought he owned his nfts but in a way I guess they owned him
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 23:21
|
|
|
"dad all my apes gone" "alright zip it." "but my ap-" "zip it." "look they wer-" "ziiiip."
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 23:28
|
|
|
I’ve been thinking about proving nft ownership, like if your twitter av had to be a verified nft the only way you could link accounts would be to send twitter a fraction of penny from your wallet, which could cost several dollars and you’d have to do that for every site that verified nfts
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 23:45
|
|
|
Perplx posted:I’ve been thinking about proving nft ownership, like if your twitter av had to be a verified nft the only way you could link accounts would be to send twitter a fraction of penny from your wallet, which could cost several dollars and you’d have to do that for every site that verified nfts twitter literally has this feature because there are some dumb crypto dorks in management. verified nfts get a hexagonal border instead of a square one and no it doesn't require sending pennies public-key cryptography is pretty cool. you can prove you own the private key to a wallet address without actually revealing the key or touching the blockchain im glad satoshi nakamoto invented cryptography
|
|
#
?
May 24, 2022 23:50
|
|
|
RPATDO_LAMD posted:if someone posts "my red FooCorp bicycle was stolen" and then you later buy a red foocorp bike on craigslist, you don't know for sure whether it was actually the stolen one or just a normal secondhand bike. if it later turns out that it was the stolen bike, that could have just been an honest mistake. in this case I think the thief flipped the ape before seth even noticed it was gone, so there was no way for the buyer to know
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 00:24
|
|
|
Fabricated posted:https://twitter.com/morebuttertv/status/1529151981792727040?s=20&t=52z3s_qbL2P-I8rxK0F2Ag "Good"
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 00:44
|
|
|
Perplx posted:I’ve been thinking about proving nft ownership, well that's a colossal waste of your time. there are so many more worthwhile things you could be thinking about, like how amberpos is superior, or tubgirl
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 02:39
|
|
|
Weatherman posted:well that's a colossal waste of your time. there are so many more worthwhile things you could be thinking about, like how
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 03:04
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 03:07
|
|
|
code:
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 04:28
|
|
|
Paladinus posted:*Seth Green, after watching the trailer for his new show and realising how poo poo it is* the triticum guzzler copypaste but it's for ape nfts not doobie kickstarters
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 04:39
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:"dad all my apes gone" "there's a good NFT show on skinemax" "so this is what you want to do with your life?"
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 04:40
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/buttcoin/status/1529335472463310848?s=21&t=29rn02T3mxmVqVESYBYylA
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 06:38
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/KateClarkTweets/status/1529156984888430592?s=20&t=Zh2vJTou1ZDmYih38VSllQ lmao
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 06:54
|
|
|
Beeftweeter posted:none of that really matters anyway, they don't own jack poo poo. whoever originally created the horrible ape just confers derivative rights to it, not total ownership. under current law they can only use it in defined scenarios (and possibly pay royalties to the creator), they don't own it whats really funny is according to legal eagle if seth bought the ape second hand, the ape men can turn around the moment the show makes a profit and sue the pants off him because they aren't in privy
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 07:58
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:whats really funny is according to legal eagle if seth bought the ape second hand, the ape men can turn around the moment the show makes a profit and sue the pants off him because they aren't in privy what if he buys it back from the people that stole it from him
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 08:09
|
|
|
chaosbreather posted:whats really funny is according to legal eagle if seth bought the ape second hand, the ape men can turn around the moment the show makes a profit and sue the pants off him because they aren't in privy this show is totally in a privy
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 08:11
|
|
|
Shame Boy posted:what if he buys it back from the people that stole it from him if the people who stole it were the ape club klan or whatever then maybe, otherwise nah the way he explained it / i understood it is: you can buy a thing with conditions and restrictions other legal goodies baked into the sales contract. you give the guy money, you entered into that contract. but the first sale doctrine means that if you buy a thing from someone else, you only get the thing. you can't sell them the fact that you're in a contractual relationship with (in privy with; tee hee) someone else, because then they would be in a contractual relationship with someone they never interacted with, which is just not a thing. so an nft is like a package of contractual rights, dubious legal title and a blockchain record which the in group pretends is always in lock-step but in reality gets detached almost immediately, and that apparently makes this potentially extremely funny with DAOs
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 08:25
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/SethGreen/status/1529191356660215808
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 08:25
|
|
|
while you were having premarital sex i was studying copyright law
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 08:27
|
|
|
|
| # ? Jun 10, 2024 23:54 |
|
|
i also really like how he thinks legal precedent is set via "debates"
|
|
#
?
May 25, 2022 08:31
|
|