|
I was listening to her defense, it basically went along the lines of "The men in the office were being horrible men (which im sure is true to be fair) so I got angry and sold info to the NotW", I don't know what kind of defense she thinks that is?
|
#
¿
Jan 9, 2013 00:06
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 04:07 |
|
|
idgi.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 2, 2013 20:41
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Just an FYI, I wouldn't recommend people in the UK repost the Gawker article, it could get you in trouble with the law. This is going to seem really dumb, but which one? Is it the massive glaringly obvious one that is very much related to the thread, or am I going to get someone in trouble if they answer that? I am so confused about what can and can't be said, its kind of appalling. Ah yes, I am guessing it is, when I click on the obvious article, this happens quote:Error 451 freedom of speech not found
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2013 16:24
|
|
|
Jut posted:I just accessed it without a proxy a few min ago...I presumer it's only blocked in the UK then. That is the error message I get when I try and access it and I'm not technical enough to know how to use a proxy to pretend I'm not in the UK, which is what as I understand it, a Proxy does.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2013 16:30
|
|
|
Murodese posted:So... the Guardian is totally broken minutes after they posted that story? Totally broken? How so?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2013 16:34
|
|
|
Murodese posted:Getting a 503 error on every single page, including the frontpage. It's working fine for me
|
|
#
¿
Jul 28, 2013 16:55
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:Aaaaand the police are looking into prosecuting News UK itself. Looking into, does that actually mean anything other than, we could do it?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 17, 2013 18:34
|
|
|
What's a Royal charter and what does this now mean? Are the press now forced to apologise for mistakes with the same level of prominence as the original story? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24746137 It seems the newspapers wanted to stop it so it's probably a good thing.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 30, 2013 19:39
|
|
|
Brown Moses posted:Here's the Times' piece on the affair Lovely, I hope it sticks and this David chap isn't right.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 31, 2013 22:07
|
|
|
Is forcing a paper to apologise for lying in the same prominance as the original lie really that infringing on freedom of press?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2013 13:47
|
|
|
thehustler posted:This is why I mentioned I was pissed off with Cohen and Hislop's stance. It's a fair point that the illegal stuff needed dealing with properly, and it's taken a long time to get to this point. They're correct about that. But the inquiry wasn't JUST about the illegal. It was all the other immoral stuff too. I didn't think I was missing anything, im glad you have said that.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2013 15:32
|
|
|
Just heard on the BBC news that the assistant Cheryl Carter is trying to take the blame for Brooks yet, they are both saying they did nothing wrong. How does that work then? http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-24806279
|
|
#
¿
Nov 4, 2013 16:14
|
|
|
Why would they want a copy of her birth certificate? Fraud?
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2013 17:09
|
|
|
I missed the child bit of the tweet...
|
|
#
¿
Nov 7, 2013 17:15
|
|
|
What problem would someone have with BM apart from just disliking his reporting? (And thus saying far more about them than him)
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2013 16:18
|
|
|
Why do Red Pillers want to get involved bashing hacking and Syria journalists? They are all about being alpha and having sex with women, like the pua Taliban.
|
|
#
¿
Nov 13, 2013 21:02
|
|
|
He's been interviewed recently or are we just finding out about the interviews done back then?
|
|
#
¿
Feb 14, 2014 13:57
|
|
|
Fucks sake
|
|
#
¿
Feb 20, 2014 12:10
|
|
|
Is this a historical case that was reported back then and ignored or is this someone coming forward after plucking up the courage, if the latter so how can it possibly be anything other than a he said she said unless their are photos/letters as per Rolf Harris?
|
|
#
¿
Aug 14, 2014 13:56
|
|
|
Arsenic Lupin posted:No thanks, I was just reading about the Marc Dutroux case, which has equally high-level participants and an equally successful coverup. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Marc_Dutroux I went to stay with some people from Belgium who told my partner and I about this case, they seemed completely unaware about the cover up aspect of it and put it down to complete incompetence.
|
|
#
¿
Dec 18, 2014 20:41
|
|
|
Plavski posted:I agree with that, except that the Unions really were loving the country hard in the 70's. They were more powerful than the government in many areas, and as they were holding the country hostage - cf. winter of discontent etc. - poo poo couldn't continue. It had stopped being a democracy and ended up being a virtual Mafia racket. Course, the ridiculous extremes Thatcher went to to break the Union power was above and beyond, but it's hard to argue that elected governments should kow-tow to that much pressure from outside parties. My family voted in the 1979 election, but they never had a vote for the leaders who were leaving bodies to pile up outside cemetaries. Yes she broke them, but then she went further and firebombed them so they could not come back in any way shape or form to help with the good they did before they got out of control. There was a massive middle ground she skipped over to the extreme.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 6, 2015 20:22
|
|
|
So the person who managed to prove that the Lost Prophets singer was a complete scumbag, ended up in court herself, because the people she initially tried telling he was a pedophile ignored her 5 times, and didnt want to look bad when it all came out, so instead of listening to her in the first place, tried to shut her up, am I putting the pieces together right or have I connected dots where no connection lies.
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2015 21:12
|
|
|
Total Meatlove posted:She decided to play at being a policewoman and traded child porn with him to try and snare him. So how did she get off? And why did it take her to go that far for her to be believed? Who is being punished for the incompetence?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 15, 2015 22:01
|
|
|
stickyfngrdboy posted:http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2015/jan/17/lawyer-ex-girlfriend-paedophile-ian-watkins-hits-out-police Whose getting fired for this?
|
|
#
¿
Jan 18, 2015 04:48
|
|
|
http://www.mirror.co.uk/news/uk-news/westminster-child-abuse-scandal-kgb-5080120 It's good that this isn't going away
|
|
#
¿
Feb 2, 2015 08:39
|
|
|
She didn't inspire me with confidence this morning on radio 4
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2015 13:24
|
|
|
stickyfngrdboy posted:don't bother sharing why, we'll use our imaginations Haha sorry my bad. She just sounded poo poo, umm'ing and arr'ing, talking about the future when it's clear to me their is a clear and present danger amongst British elites right now as well as a need for consequences and accountability for previous actions, even if perpetrators are dead, their legacies need scorching, including Thatchers. You can love her for her politics all you want as a Tory role model if that's your cup of tea but as a pedophile enabler and protector? What I want is an inspiring judge to come in and claim they will leave no stone unturned and promise consequences and vengeance for the victims. I want the people who are still alive today who helped pedophiles quaking in their boots.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 5, 2015 15:42
|
|
|
This New Zealand judge sounded poo poo again today, both unprofessional and kept banging on about the future with not a hint of wanting to discuss the fact that there has been previous cover ups and current people alive complicit in terrible crimes that are on the verge of being very exposed.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 11, 2015 21:24
|
|
|
The incompetence astounds me, even now.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2015 17:58
|
|
|
Serotonin posted:It's not incompetence. It's wilful classism and rape culture shite. Good point
|
|
#
¿
Mar 3, 2015 19:14
|
|
|
goddamnedtwisto posted:So Don Hale's story has changed yet again - at first he was just claiming that he had information about one nonce and he got served a D-Notice, now he's claiming that he had info supplied to him by Barbara Castle (who chose to entrust the biggest political story of the century to her local paper, and also neither her nor this guy had apparently heard of "photocopiers") about an entire network and 15 Special Branch officers stormed his office to seize papers. Also he's now claiming the papers carried protective markings which have never existed ("for your eyes only" is a loving Bond film, for fucks sake, and "Eyes Only" - the actual protective marking - would have been alongside other protective markings that are way more memorable than the ones he mentioned). There are going to be people jumping on the bandwagon for personal gain, expect a lot of books and what not to be authored.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
A posh guy I know got a call from the Police today, his old "house master" from his fancy private school had set up hidden cameras all around the house and has been trading photos and videos of all the boys on the internet. It's freaked him out. He, and every other male student, are apparently going to be suing the school.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 18:44
|
|
|
Mr. Squishy posted:I dont think you need to put scare quotes around house master, also, you know, name names. Dish the goss, nothing bad will happen. I want to respect his privacy some what, despite him putting it on facebook for all the world to see. It was in the papers, fancy private school that did boarding. It wasn't scare quotes, I have trouble picturing what a private school is like and what a house master actually is.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 14, 2015 22:41
|
|
|
Lord Janner gets away with it scott free
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2015 19:05
|
|
|
The shame is that no one will be held accountable for both his actions and the failures to stop it, and the consequent cover ups
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2015 20:29
|
|
|
PerpetualSelf posted:Man what's wrong with England why are all brits pedophiles. I'm never gonna trust a british person again. Definetly not visting there with my childrens. Jerry Sandusky is still regarded as a hero to many Americans despite being a pedophile rapist, as well as Joe Paterno who helped cover it up, it's not a UK based problem, it's a wealthy elite problem
|
|
#
¿
Apr 17, 2015 16:45
|
|
|
Lol how pointless.
|
|
#
¿
Jun 3, 2015 10:20
|
|
|
These loving imbeciles still get there cushy pensions despite their complete failings, zero accountability for anyone, pedophiles and their enablers UK wide. Lord Janner is getting done though according to the bbc app
|
|
#
¿
Jun 29, 2015 11:15
|
|
|
tdrules posted:Ben Fellows has been found not guilty of making a false claim that they were abused by Kenneth Clarke. Correct me if I'm wrong but that doesn't mean Ben Fellows didn't do it but it's not beyond reasonable doubt that it's made up.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 30, 2015 15:50
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 04:07 |
|
|
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11935056/Victim-testimonies-permanently-deleted-by-child-sex-abuse-inquiry.html Lol, can it get any more comedically villainous at this point?!
|
|
#
¿
Oct 16, 2015 21:21
|
|