|
I need some help here in a TV decision. Should I get http://www.amazon.com/Panasonic-TC-P60ST60-60-Inch-Plasma-Glasses/dp/B00AVRJK4Y/ref=sr_1_1?s=tv&ie=UTF8&qid=1382710777&sr=1-1 for awesome true blacks, and a possibly burned in screen (my wife is horrible about falling asleep at the end of a movie and leaving it on the netflix menu) Or http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B00CHKPYPW/ref=ox_sc_act_title_3?ie=UTF8&psc=1&smid=ATVPDKIKX0DER Blacks probably not as good, hell picture probably not as good but my god will it be light as hell! I'm leaning towards the plasma, but I need to know if burn is still a major problem, or if it is easily dealt with these days.
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2013 15:43
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 19:12 |
|
|
Mister Macys posted:Get the plasma. Set it to auto-dim and auto-shut off after a few hours of inactivity and you're good. The quality of the 60 line is incredible. What counts as inactivity. Does sitting on the netflix menu that is static count as inactivity (if fed through an xbox or wii-u, heck even if it's the tv built in one)? And what is a proper break in? Oh I just noticed the plasma is active 3d. Is that going to be a problem going forward on replacing glasses? Back to burn in question. I noticed a review on amazon that that said games with static huds were still kind of a no go on plasma. Is this person mis informed or did he just not do proper tv prep before sitting down to 15 hours of CoD? Kilazar fucked around with this message at 19:08 on Oct 25, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2013 18:03
|
|
|
emoltra posted:Re: 3D glasses, AFAIK vendors have standardized their glasses and prices have come down to like $60 / pair. Thanks a ton. One last question for anyone who owns that particular plasma. Is the input lag super noticeable, or just a minor annoyance? I don't game as much as I used too, but I still plan on gaming on the TV. I can deal with minor annoying input lag. But not game breaking input lag.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2013 19:34
|
|
|
I went to best buy Friday to do some in person comparison. Both the vizio and the 55 version of the pany st series were there and on the "best buy promo loop" video. Unfortunately that video kind of sucks. So I have an odd question that might be hard to explain. Looking over at the theater room where the 6k tv's are, or even at some of the "adjusted" 2k samsungs that were on an actual movie, I noticed that the movies have a kind of surreal eye popping almost 3d but not 3d look. As if the video was so clear that you can conceptualize real depth in the picture. Are the Vizio and pany's images that crisp? I mean, breaking bad looked as if I could reach out and touch everything as if I was standing right next to Walter. I asked the bb dude if they could change the feed on the two TV's I came to see, and he said he can only put them over to the cable channels. Also with the bb loop vid, I could discern no difference in image quality between the two panels other than the pany being way dimmer than the vizio.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2013 14:15
|
|
|
I figured it would be hard to explain. This is not a Dynamic color setting. Here is an example they had two identical samsungs side by side playing the same blue ray content synced ( a multi vid blue ray I believe) One TV is "calibrated" by geek squad, and the other is out of the box settings. Now as far as colors and what not go the pictures were totally different on the exact same scenes. What was uniform between the two tv's was that everything still looked "hyper real", it felt like I was looking at a 3d movie without 3d glasses just due to how clear the image is. But not a single other tv on the "wall" had an image that crisp/clear. But I think it is due to the feed they are receiving being the generic best buy video ad loop. So I want to know if the Pany Plasma (ST60 and S60) or the Vizio M60) can even come close to that quality. I don't have a BR player I can just take in and ask them to hook up, otherwise I would. I'm planning on getting a player with my TV purchase. As a note, I don't care about the geek squad calibration, I just threw that in to note that it probably was not a color/dynamic contrast thing.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 28, 2013 18:55
|
|
|
Don Tacorleone posted:That, or maybe they were 4K displays? Those look ridiculously real, almost like you're looking through a windows. This, right here. Soooo maybe I need to save a bit more money than the 1400 I got ready to go...
|
|
#
¿
Oct 29, 2013 13:17
|
|
|
Not sure if I should be asking this somewhere else,but here we go. Does anyone know if there is a trustworthy US site that does prescription 3d glasses similar to http://www.optics3d.co.uk/?/tracking=51b8d679c2294 My google skills are failing me and mostly leading me to clip on's or more tv's. I'd really love it if I could send in my old frames and get them to my current prescription but in RealD polarization. I tried clipons but the posts are too distracting. And I get a massive headache when I add more weight to the bridge of my nose. So wearing two pairs (cocoons or otherwise) is out. Kilazar fucked around with this message at 02:59 on Dec 11, 2013 |
|
#
¿
Dec 11, 2013 02:57
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 19:12 |
|
|
Chumbawumba4ever97 posted:Oddly enough I don't see it anywhere. Are my Shield settings different than yours? It's the 2nd latest version (2017 I believe?) I found turning on "Real Cinema" mode on my LG CX gets rid of judder/stutter without adding SOE. If that is an option for your model you might try it.
|
|
#
¿
Feb 19, 2021 18:11
|
|
