|
My employer just switched to those stupid "unlimited" vacation systems for exempt employees. I'm rather glad that I'm non-exempt. I currently get 20 vacation, 6 sick, plus whatever holidays.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2015 04:30 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 22:32 |
|
sarehu posted:Losing a single well-paid employee will cost you under $10k in accrued vacation time, so the money is a non-issue.
|
# ¿ Jul 1, 2015 20:54 |
|
Pollyanna posted:Yeah, I mean like, working from home more often to double-up on applications on my personal laptop, not literally doing it while in the office or anything. It's just become really hard to focus on or care about my current job and I wanna be productive in a better way instead. It might be selfish to say that, but I genuinely think the best thing for me is to move on as cleanly and quickly as possible.
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2017 17:28 |
|
VOTE YES ON 69 posted:This is dumb advice.
|
# ¿ Jun 12, 2017 17:33 |
|
baquerd posted:Interestingly, at the engineering manager level, I've been through two jobs over the last six years and no one has even mentioned references.
|
# ¿ Jun 13, 2017 23:29 |
|
Seriously, look at the non-traditional student thread in SAL some time.
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2017 01:23 |
|
Is anyone besides Mozilla using Rust?
|
# ¿ Nov 15, 2017 02:52 |
|
baquerd posted:a 48-hour coding binge where you scream at your co-workers, ignore all of the existing code, use notepad as your IDE, only save your work to a single USB flash drive from 1995, and pass out in the closet covered in vomit
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2018 05:09 |
|
Pollyanna posted:So that opportunity I thought was a 1099 is actually a W-2 through a recruiter agency - is that a thing?
|
# ¿ Jan 10, 2018 17:40 |
|
Pollyanna posted:Somehow Amazon is at least passingly interested in me (I have no idea why) Pollyanna posted:If it's some graph theory stuff, hardcore C, or complicated algorithms, I'm probably doomed - I've heard they're really hard. Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 02:00 on Jan 16, 2018 |
# ¿ Jan 16, 2018 01:56 |
|
quote <> edit
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2018 01:58 |
|
Pollyanna posted:I don't think I'm prepared for this screening - is it still worth a try?
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2018 04:28 |
|
Pollyanna posted:I feel like I should get a CS degree in the future just in case a Big 4 style interview happens. Also it sounds like you’re talking yourself into school for the Big 4, when as far as I know you’ve never had an interview with any of them. Try that first. Pollyanna posted:It can only help, right?
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2018 16:21 |
|
The March Hare posted:Sure but Pollyanna already has a job.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2018 19:58 |
|
Skandranon posted:If she can't take herself through CTCI enough to pass further interviews, I don't think spending another 4 years at school will help.
|
# ¿ Jan 16, 2018 20:10 |
|
Loutre posted:Any hot tips for a webcam interview? I often suggest people book a study room at a local library for webcam interviews, assuming it has reliable Internet. You get privacy, space to spread out materials (notebook, whatever), and usually a whiteboard.
|
# ¿ Jan 30, 2018 01:09 |
|
Pollyanna posted:I haven't had any technical epiphanies or published any whitepapers or anything.
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2018 15:06 |
|
Pollyanna posted:I'm not dying for a whitepaper specifically, but it would be good proof that I've advanced in my career. And I think technical epiphanies should come with working on something challenging, right? As best as I can recall, you have a BS in BME, an online MS (incomplete?) in Bioinformatics, and 3 years of spotty web-dev experience. I'm not doing this to poo poo on you, just trying to evaluate you from the perspective of a large company (which you've said you want to work for now) solving interesting problems. What are you doing to work toward these sorts of problems? They're not going to come to you because you're not an expert. Let's put aside the idea of going back for more school right now. What else are you doing to prepare yourself to solve interesting problems? Are you reading white papers in the field you're interested in? Do you know what field you're interested in? If you went to a relevant conference, are you prepared to have a deep conversation about the topic and maybe impress someone enough to hire you? Your situation isn't hopeless, but at this point I don't know what you want. Maybe you don't know either, which means you're unlikely to get it. Mniot posted:As far as CS goes, I can't think of any long-term opportunities that need an advanced degree. Except for "being a tenured college professor". Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 16:02 on Feb 5, 2018 |
# ¿ Feb 5, 2018 15:59 |
|
Jose Valasquez posted:This is completely normal. You're only a few years into your career you don't have to know what you want to specialize in. Pollyanna posted:I basically haven't. I've just worked on what I've been given and never really done a deep dive into anything. That's all on me. Pollyanna posted:As for CS and academia, that assumes I have a particular passion or interest that I want to hone in on. Right now, I don't have that, so there's really no compelling reason to go for it. I'm a stumbler, I don't think I fit that mold. Pollyanna posted:The argument I hear from my parents is "the companies that you really want to work for will not select you without a Masters or a PhD", so their response to your point would basically be "the very specialized roles are the only good ones". Which is pretty lovely. Pollyanna posted:But I've got it in my head that whitepapers somehow equal success.
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2018 16:57 |
|
mrmcd posted:In my experience, CS masters programs are useless, and exist only as cash cows for milking foreign students, or for people with non-technical degrees to get academic cred.
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2018 16:58 |
|
Pollyanna posted:I don't really know what to tell you. I'm not a super self-motivated individual, that's just how I am. Pollyanna posted:Why get therapy when a dead gay comedy forum does the job also every therapist I've been to bar one or two has been utterly useless, though maybe it's just me Pollyanna posted:And I don't think it's so strange to specifically seek out companies, projects and products that might expose me to new and interesting things.
|
# ¿ Feb 5, 2018 17:43 |
|
Pollyanna posted:Y...yeah I should probably practice now that I know what I’m dealing with I think I got a book of common interview questions so I can work through that. Pollyanna posted:Somehow Amazon is at least passingly interested in me (I have no idea why), so they want to set up a phone/online interview to cover "coding, data structures, and operating systems fundamentals, as well as design questions". I have no idea what this will cover and I'm not exactly expecting to pass it, but has anyone done Amazon's phone screens? What do they usually cover? Star War Sex Parrot posted:Amazon's usually not too difficult, at least not for the first round. Basic data structures, basic graph and tree algorithms, threads, etc. -- typical CtCI stuff. Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 16:47 on Feb 15, 2018 |
# ¿ Feb 15, 2018 16:42 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:There's nothing better than feeling like you "get" problems you've been working to get comfortable solving for a while.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2018 17:02 |
|
ultrafilter posted:Can you write a thread-safe queue?
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2018 16:50 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:I'm going to write a thread-safe queue without locks when I get home tonight or during lunch but I don't think it's actually that difficult to do? Isn't it just a matter of using something similar to the atomic updates in Java already? It’s a pretty big research area for DBMS indexes at the moment as they finally try to supplant the cache-unfriendly B+tree.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2018 17:22 |
|
Xarn posted:RB trees can suck it, AVL or B-tree.
|
# ¿ Feb 26, 2018 23:14 |
|
b0lt posted:One weird trick to tell if someone went to CMU and took a class from Daniel Sleator.
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2018 04:59 |
|
I was rather happy with my recent rounds of interviews for NVIDIA: they tailored the technical questions both to my resume (asking about the languages and experience I have on there) and to the job (systems programming stuff mostly concerning C, kernel programming, etc.) I was really expecting at least a first round of generic string manipulation or graph traversal questions but was pleasantly surprised. Way to go, NVIDIA. Star War Sex Parrot fucked around with this message at 17:06 on Mar 16, 2018 |
# ¿ Mar 16, 2018 16:52 |
|
JawnV6 posted:I've got a sneaking suspicion you're studying like the guy in my chem class who didn't want to understand math and memorized all 18 flavors of PV=nRT rather than just do the symbolic manipulation on the fly, just doing every single CTCI problem with the handicap of a whiteboard rather than breaking those into distinct areas of practice and doing the CS bits on a computer. I honestly haven't spent that much time with CtCI or Hackerrank or anything but anytime one of those problems is thrown at me, I typically feel comfortable deconstructing the problem space and applying the tools I have from a thorough CS background. Maybe I don't always get the perfect, "ha, I saw this in CtCI already!", regurgitated answer but my interviewers generally seem happy with my ability to discuss the problem, implement solutions, and let me identify shortcomings in the solution I present.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2018 20:09 |
|
Keep doing whatever works for you then. You asked how people get by without spending 2 months reviewing almost every day, and then people responded "not doing what you're doing." I'm not really sure what advice to offer for your studying process if you're saying that's what's necessary for you to succeed in interviews.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2018 20:17 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:One I really struggled with last time was Towers of Hanoi. Regardless of being able to solve most of the other recursion problems I saw - that one still kicked my rear end to conceptualize.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2018 20:32 |
|
Keetron posted:in memory database Also good luck!
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2018 13:48 |
|
ultrafilter posted:Spend some time learning Haskell or OCaml. You'll get a lot of practice writing recursive functions, and that will translate into an easier time doing imperative programs.
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2018 15:16 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:E; http://learnyouahaskell.com/ this is... something
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2018 03:42 |
|
Please not Fizzbuzz again, please.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2018 22:08 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:I'm guessing it really depends on the team? Amazon's pretty easy to get through. Just review their leadership principles beforehand and you'll be fine.
|
# ¿ Jun 2, 2018 17:30 |
|
Xerophyte posted:Trie chat made me want to see if my old algo textbook (Kleinberg & Tardos) bothered mentioning them and the structure doesn't have an entry in the index at least.
|
# ¿ Jun 15, 2018 00:53 |
|
(Adaptive) Radix trees are awesome.
|
# ¿ Jun 15, 2018 17:37 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:I'd rather be asked harder questions that are more about coming up with solutions and explaining them than the same poo poo over and over but I guess that doesn't happen.
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2018 20:53 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 22:32 |
|
Good Will Hrunting posted:I was the one who said "yeah this is how it is, it sucks but it's how it is" and people said "no it's not like that" so I'm circling back now that I'm literally experiencing it and saying "yeah it's exactly how it is".
|
# ¿ Jun 20, 2018 21:00 |