|
Zero VGS posted:I dunno, maybe my Windows servers have blue-screened one too many dozen times and I just can't trust them to actually serve any more. Not to get into a pissing contest but servers these days just don't blue screen for fun - if they are, and given your comments about how unreliable your Windows DHCP server are, it might say more about something in your Windows environment than it does Windows DHCP as a product.
|
# ¿ Dec 28, 2014 17:28 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 14:35 |
|
Lord Dudeguy posted:I understand his argument where if you want something with a few million years' uptime, you'd use Cisco IOS or a *nix of some sort. I've built a DHCPD server or two about 6 years ago that I'm pretty sure are still running. So just run a pair like you would domain controllers or anything with a SPOF. I'm not trying to claim that Windows is more stable, reliable, whatever term you want to use than a switch/router where the vendor has 100% control over the code and hardware, but in an AD environment, given how nicely Windows DHCP and DNS integrates, I'd need a compelling reason not to use them. Plus the way it was written kind of sounded like "The Cisco guy said we should use Cisco" which is little bit like saying Turkeys don't vote for Christmas
|
# ¿ Dec 28, 2014 17:44 |