|
For one the way you are handling it wastes an entire day of scum hunting, for 2, I am not scum, and for 3 you are scum so stop talking scum
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 15:31
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 05:59 |
|
|
kleedrac do you have any opinions on the game or is this going to be your day 1?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 15:33
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Hold on, let me do this right... Also leaning more scum on WWM after this post. Who puts this much effort into defending a player without making an alignment call? I am actually leaning harder on WWM scum than kleedrac, but its prolly really both of them
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 15:36
|
|
:
Hey I'm a survivor what's up
NM, also we can't trust you, ##vote Jake
Yeah, seriously? ##vote Kleedrac
Bad vote, also Kleedrac is a heat magnet ##vote Apostate
|
quote:hidden behind your grossly exaggerated dislike of my meta reasoning for not voting Kleedrac. like look at this lol
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 15:37
|
|
|
good morning "  " ##vote wwm
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 16:43
|
|
|
I love how wwm says I'm just following Jake's lead when I was the first one to vote for him 
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:02
|
|
|
It's almost like two people can come to similar conclusions independently!
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:03
|
|
|
AnonymousNarcotics posted:Tbf I didn't know that this game usually has a survivor role in it. Mithross' explanation was actually really helpful. also yeah this, jake makes more sense now that i know this is a typical thing
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:08
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:I love how wwm says I'm just following Jake's lead when I was the first one to vote for him Nah, all you've done is prove you'll put your vote anywhere  Though at least your omgus reason is a reason, Punt and Kumba don't have anything behind their votes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:11
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Nah, all you've done is prove you'll put your vote anywhere The vote isn't omgus no matter how many times you say it. It's because of your weirdly dedicated defense of another player.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:18
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Nah, all you've done is prove you'll put your vote anywhere This is what scum says when they know they're boned ##vote WWM
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:20
|
|
|
##vote wwm
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:25
|
|
|
Kleedrac posted:They win with whoever right? Like am I missing something here? Why wouldn't we kill the guy who's not on our team? How does lynching the claimed survivor help us win the game? Said another way, every non-scum player that dies gets the remaining scum team closer to winning. You're effectively giving scum a free night kill. If you believe Jake to be scum or a serial killer instead, that's one thing. But deciding that you believe his claim AND that he should be the lynch is choosing to avoid scum hunting and is acting against the best interest of town, IMO. It's a waste of a lynch if he is telling the truth because we are giving up the major tool we have to fight scum for ~policy reasons~.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:41
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:Nah, all you've done is prove you'll put your vote anywhere Saying we don't have any reasoning behind our votes doesn't make it so and your lack of curiosity about it speaks volumes.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:46
|
|
|
bowmore has been replaced by POISON MUSHROOM
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:49
|
|
|
Also I'm churchposting, can someone tell me how close I am to the 25 posts? tia
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:57
|
|
|
I'm a loving daycop. Kleedrac is town, I investigated him because he's always scummy. It's a 1-shot, but if I get the 3rd Mona Lisa it becomes permanent.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:59
|
|
|
The timeline has been changed!
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 17:59
|
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:I'm a loving daycop. Kleedrac is town, I investigated him because he's always scummy. It's a 1-shot, but if I get the 3rd Mona Lisa it becomes permanent. daycop usually a public action
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:00
|
|
|
##unvote ill unvote for now though i guess begrudgingly, CL does that sound in line with your need for mona lisas?
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:01
|
|
|
Also since 25 posts seems to be too much for people I will relax it. I just threw out an arbitraty number since given the nature of this game My posts + Votefinder will end up being higher than normal.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
but I would be surprised if CPig had private day actions, all day actions are usually public
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:02
|
|
|
Let me fix Lincoln hang on
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:03
|
|
|
Does WMMs thing about gaining stronger powers when he completes his goal sound in line with anyone else, without revealing too much about your powers or anything. I want to know if there is any legitimacy to his claim
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:06
|
|
|
JakeP posted:Does WMMs thing about gaining stronger powers when he completes his goal sound in line with anyone else, without revealing too much about your powers or anything. I want to know if there is any legitimacy to his claim I don't get any powers before I complete my objectives
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:07
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:I don't get any powers before I complete my objectives interesting. Well at this point my thoughts are WMM is scum, and Kleedrac is likely town, because for scum to double down like this to protect each other would be insane, but really based on how messy this whole thing has gotten, I could see that even The claim at -4 or -5 was def a bit early, and the day cop claim is super super questionable.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:11
|
|
|
The timeline was partially restored!
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:14
|
|
|
You're welcome.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:18
|
|
|
JakeP posted:##unvote ill unvote for now though i guess begrudgingly, Nah I need one Mona Lisa plus two others to get a 1 shot power
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:20
|
|
|
##vote wwm
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:37
|
|
|
I want to be clear: there isn't a "typical" survivor in Chrononauts, there is just a character who can win if the timeline is paradox'd out (because he owns a storefront outside of time.) I had anticipated him being the survivor. That said, Squa Tront makes some sense, if you look up the reference. And it's obscure enough to make it less likely he's faking that part, at least.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:39
|
|
WHICH WAY MADNESS posted:I'm a loving daycop. Kleedrac is town, I investigated him because he's always scummy. It's a 1-shot, but if I get the 3rd Mona Lisa it becomes permanent. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7qKcJF4fOPs ##vote WMM
|
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:40
|
|
|
apostateCourier posted:You're welcome. You couldn't have someone drawn and used a patch you don't have, instead of just flipping him? Psh, that's just lazy.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 18:51
|
|
|
The timeline has changed!
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 19:39
|
|
|
I don't believe WWM's claim, and I think he's scummy. But I see no reason to push for his vote today. It doesn't hurt us to look elsewhere for the day in case he's telling the truth. Would suck to lose a cop.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 19:43
|
|
|
Also, I'm about to get ready and go to the airport. Then I'll be leaving on a jet plane. I'm thinking it's likely I won't be here for deadline. But I should be able to phone post from the airport once I get there for an hour or so.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 19:45
|
|
|
CapitalistPig posted:The timeline has changed! oh ffs I can't fix this one
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 19:55
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:I don't believe WWM's claim, and I think he's scummy. But I see no reason to push for his vote today. It doesn't hurt us to look elsewhere for the day in case he's telling the truth. Would suck to lose a cop. he claims he is basically one shot for all intents and purposes he is done even if he is telling the truth. Needing all the mona lisas before he can use his power again makes it likely it won't even be useable again anyway
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 20:14
|
|
|
JakeP posted:he claims he is basically one shot for all intents and purposes he is done even if he is telling the truth. Needing all the mona lisas before he can use his power again makes it likely it won't even be useable again anyway I would agree with you if they were still unrevealed artifacts. But since they appear to already be out there and we know who has them, that makes his claim testable/his ability improvable if he's telling the truth.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 20:23
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 05:59 |
|
|
King Burgundy posted:I would agree with you if they were still unrevealed artifacts. But since they appear to already be out there and we know who has them, that makes his claim testable/his ability improvable if he's telling the truth. I know for a fact that there are 17 artifacts.
|
|
#
?
Jul 26, 2015 20:24
|
|