Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

D_Smart posted:

So this moron Christopher Dicunzolo aka /u/MadnessHel2o/ aka @Cptn_Jack_Ditka decided he was going to buy me a lovely avatar (which I just paid to change back) as per his comment in this Reddit thread.

https://www.reddit.com/r/DerekSmart/comments/3qd34c/psa_the_something_awful_forums_custom_titles/cwe4wz7

Don't these people ever learn? Chris, if you don't stop harassing me, I'm going to call your mom.

Hey Reddit! Archive this!!

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...

See what I mean? This little poo poo stain just put himself on my radar.

https://archive.is/15OrG

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Romes128 posted:

wheres the blog post derek

Still waiting for my slacker attorney to clear it for public release. They've already made me change a bunch of poo poo, verify others etc.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

spacetoaster posted:

They're also discussing taking legal action to stop DS. And a bunch of them are: "I'm all for free speech, but...not when I disagree with it."

Oh please. Don't tools would rather spend money on lovely JPEG ships for a vaporware game.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

jaegerx posted:

Hey now I'm with you on most things but this has gone too far. Those jpegs are drat pretty. They'll never be released into a game but they're still pretty.

I concede that point. However, lovely was about them buying JPEGs, not about the quality of said JPEGs :)

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

The Saddest Robot posted:

Mr Smart, I know your priority is probably developing the framework, networking and balancing, but why don't you hire a couple of decent graphics artists to make your game look like it's not from 20 years ago? Assuming your engine can use shaders it wouldn't even be that huge of a technical issue, just a content one.

Engine is fine. Art style is intentional: http://lodmmo.com/15-07-31-state-of-play/

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice
OK ladies, I was doing some actual work today. You know, fer realz. I even wrote a new Line Of Defense dev blog. You should read it and quit bitching at me.

Also, RPS has stepped into the Star Citizen fray.

Going through everything I missed from p42 last night. Seriously, how many of you have jobs. Or, you know sleep at night?!?!

ps: I also updated the OP with Bootcha's latest video. It's hilarious.

D_Smart fucked around with this message at 20:44 on Oct 27, 2015

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Dapper Dan posted:

The thing that gets me the most is the sheer hypocrisy in the whole thing. If EA or any other gaming company had done something like this (selling concept art with no release date for a game that kept getting pushed back and was still pre-alpha after four years in development) people would be asking for the CEO's head and threatening lawsuits. But no, CRoberts is somehow different! For....absolutely no discernible reason. Even though his last game had to be taken away from him and hasn't done anything in the industry in over a decade. The crowdfunded excuse doesn't fly, you are still a gaming company.

And they wonder why they get called cultists.

^this

Seriously, it's just that backer pool is so massive that it is bound to have attracted some of the worst of the worst in gaming. You know, those loons we avoid on game servers and forums like the plague. When you combine that with Sunk Cost Fallacy and Cognitive Dissonance, you have the perfect recipe for rear end-clowns.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Dapper Dan posted:

The thing that gets me the most is the sheer hypocrisy in the whole thing. If EA or any other gaming company had done something like this (selling concept art with no release date for a game that kept getting pushed back and was still pre-alpha after four years in development) people would be asking for the CEO's head and threatening lawsuits. But no, CRoberts is somehow different! For....absolutely no discernible reason. Even though his last game had to be taken away from him and hasn't done anything in the industry in over a decade. The crowdfunded excuse doesn't fly, you are still a gaming company.

And they wonder why they get called cultists.

^this

Seriously, it's just that backer pool is so massive that it is bound to have attracted some of the worst of the worst in gaming. You know, those loons we avoid on game servers and forums like the plague. When you combine that with Sunk Cost Fallacy and Cognitive Dissonance, you have the perfect recipe for rear end-clowns.
^this

Seriously, it's just that backer pool is so massive that it is bound to have attracted some of the worst of the worst in gaming. You know, those loons we avoid on game servers and forums like the plague. When you combine that with Sunk Cost Fallacy and Cognitive Dissonance, you have the perfect recipe for rear end-clowns.

ps: To the rear end-hat who keeps spending money to change my avatar. I have more disposable income than you. So yeah, let's go.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Wafflz posted:

Challenging a bunch of star citizens to a Spending Money on Stupid poo poo contest might be a poor idea.

They will be giving money to someone else other than Christ Roberts. So I don't mind at all.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Kegslayer posted:

This is a serious response.

If you're looking for evidence that things are hosed then it's right in front of you.

The two biggest issues that have happened just this month are Robert's meltdown and also the fact that people are getting refunds from a movie company instead of CIG.

The Escapist article doesn't add much to the story but Robert's verbal diarrhoea should be a story in and of itself. How many CEOs of multimillion dollar companies do you know would spend 8 hours crafting an angry email in response to a negative press article? If CIG was a listed company the stock price would have taken a huge hit since most investors expect a $92+M company to be run professionally.

Having the CEO write 15 pages of batshit crazy and then have their lawyer write an angry letter threatening to sue (all while in the public eye) is the opposite of professionalism and says all you need to know about how management is being run and gives a lot of underlying support to all the rumours floating around. Would you invest your money in a company if the owner was more interested responding to internet trolls and bad press instead of actually making a product and making money off that product? The fact that the Escapist are standing by their article shows that their lawyers have sat down, looked at all the information and sources they used and determined that everything is above board and they'd have an incredibly high chance of winning any potential law suit. They would have settled or issued a retraction if it wasn't the case since nobody wants to go to court.

The other big issue is that some of the refunds aren't coming from CIG. There was a post some pages back where the guy's refund got split between paypal and a credit card with CIG and another company providing the refund. This is a huge red flag that something is wrong with the financials. If CIG can't even afford to refund small amounts of money then that raises serious issues about problems with cash flow and going concern. Either the majority of backer's money has been transferred to a company completely unrelated to the game (and out of the reach of the backers) or CIG is so cash strapped that other companies have had to step in to make sure they don't breach their various ratios for their line of credit. Either way it should be a warning to anyone who still has money in the game.

In all seriousness, go get a refund and spend it on something more useful from other games to giving it to a medical charity and saving lives. All it takes is one email and if the game ever does pick it up, you can always easily buy back in. The whole funding model is based on selling more ships and now that they're still selling all the 'limited edition' ships that they said they wouldn't sell, it's not like you're going to miss out on any particular item.

^this. Yes, things are messed up. Completely.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

alphabettitouretti posted:

The story is changing. Now it was D Smart who did it first and Reddit was just retaliating.

Nope. I had nothing to do with it. I first noticed they were using DMCA takedown requests on imgur when Goons kept bitching at me for not using image tags correctly. On checking my imgur account as well as some images I had posted from my iPad while not logged into imgur, were all gone.

Someone definitely wrote a bot and screwed it up royally because it also hit some Reddit images. Like I said, they're morons. And clowns. As in moronic clowns.

Vire posted:

What's funny is that is wrong too because the first images to get taken down where DSmart's images in the OP of the thread and we all thought he just couldn't use img tags right at first so goons gave him a hard time not knowing it was a bot attack.

Yup

Hey Reddit! DMCA this!!

....................../´¯/)
....................,/¯../
.................../..../
............./´¯/'...'/´¯¯`·¸
........../'/.../..../......./¨¯\
........('(...´...´.... ¯~/'...')
.........\.................'...../
..........''...\.......... _.·´
............\..............(
..............\.............\...

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

sincx posted:



Derek, LOD looks interesting, but the graphics probably could be more modern without overly impacting performance. Higher resolution textures? Better lighting?


edit:

Yeah, working on that actually. Check out the dev blog I wrote earlier today.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Mukip posted:

I went through this trying to find an explanation for why LoD looks like a game from early last decade, but I ended up discovering your tie-in DC comic series instead. I wonder how that collaboration came about.







e:spelling

It's a license to do comics based on the IP. There are five comics in the series. We have done three thus far, and two due out next year.

Also, the Line Of Defense Tactics game which takes it's underlying story line from one of the comics, just passed final XBox One certification and goes on sale in early December. You bastards better buy it. I have to keep paying for avatars here goddamnit!!

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

thatguy posted:

Believe it or not white knights like Wulf and Dolvak are Derek's greatest allies. Always racing to try to prove him wrong when all they actually end up doing is giving his thoughts and ideas more publicity. I mean Goons have been saying the same things Derek is saying now for years (more or less) and it was only until people started to bandwagon hate on him that those ideas started gaining traction outside of SA. Since Derek started loving with people he's had several subreddits made about him as well as numerous threads on r/starcitizen, some of which were actually pinned for a short time. The cultists who think they're defending Star Citizen are only helping to kill it faster. It's pretty comical.

:argh:

Goddamnit!! You've literally unveiled the entire social media war of attrition plan!!

Basically, once the media wrote about that first blog, then RSI/CIG proved that PR is only as good as the person you hired and who (that would be David Swofford) you should be listening to, and overreacted by refunding me, the die was cast.

And they were hosed.

Then they all decided to pick on the craziest force of nature.

It went steadily downhill from there.

The End.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Furious Mittens posted:

XBone? No PS4 release?

I might actually pick it up to support Uncle Derek if it was PS4. My questionable purchasing decisions have to be limited, so no XBone for me.

It's approved for PS4. But being that I have small teams, we can't tackle two console ports at once. So PS4 is next year.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Young Freud posted:

It's available for mobile devices as well. You can play LOD on the shitter, what more can you ask for.

Yeah, it's a Unity4 game, so it's out on PC, Apple, GooglePlay and Amazon Android. We did lots of improvements and unique features in the XB1 version though.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Goredema posted:

It's pretty clear that the image-deleting culprit is Dick Wulf. A common tactic to avoid accusations in a case like this is to categorize yourself as one of the victims. In this case, Dick Wulf couldn't have done it, since he had pictures deleted too! And there's no chance he has copies of those as his desktop wallpaper or saved in his porn folder.

Plus he's exactly the sort of Internet Mastermind that would write a reporting script, but then completely gently caress it up by having it report EVERYTHING.

Yeah, that's my theory as well. But then again, they're all incompetent fucks over there. So who knows.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

DarkRefreshment posted:

This link from the RPS article...

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/tnx5w5EwJw23lPYhHdlHs5g/htmlview

There are 100 ships listed. 27 are in a full flyable state. So only about a fourth are actually usable right now. Yet more ships keep going on sale, ever increasing the backlog. This is what happens when there is no oversight. An "evil" publisher type role would step in at this point and smack everyone around. Hell, get 75% done (starting oldest first) before you add to the pile. I think it's indicative of the whole situation over there with the mismanagement.

Not to mention a lot of those are variants of the same ship. So even that 27 number is inflated, because you can't tell me it is that hard to make a version of an existing model.

Yup. This is where some are getting the Ponzi scheme theory from because they are selling JPEG ships in order to fund the 3D construction of previously sold JPEG ships.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

TheCoach posted:

Mentioning DSmart is like mentioning the devil on the internet right now.
He tweeted that he liked Infinity Battlescape and immediately on I:B forums there were people freaking out about SC fans going mental about this.

EDIT: Also Mr. DEREK for all your words you still haven't backed it, are you not a man of your SMART word?

Actually I have a reminder. I just forgot tbh. Keith (I've known him for a few years now; going all the way back to the early engine versions) let me know when it first went live on KS.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice
So our new contender for my WIP blog (latest PDF export) on the abusive White Knights in the Star Citizen community, is Nick Butler (that's him in the wheelchair) aka /user/NitroTypat/ aka @Bipii_4084.

If you look at his Reddit and Twitter feeds (1, 2, 3, 4), he is one of my top harassers (I'm rounding them all up like cattle, for the blog, then I'm going to link to all their social media feeds).

Hey Nick, if you don't knock it off, I'm going to have my people get in touch with your Dad in Virginia and let him know you're harassing people online. No further warnings. Go play a game or something.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Beer4TheBeerGod posted:

Aaaaaand we're creepy again.

Not sure why that's creepy. Clowns harassing and abusing people online don't get any special treatment. It works both ways. If they can troll my social media feeds, my forums posts etc and setup shop on Reddit to continue their attacks, abusive behavior, harassment etc, so can I.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Tim Pawlenty posted:

cant believe this crippleteen nerd has the nerve to call derek smart an idiot. beat him up derek. we're all rooting for you, this is definitely a great use of your time and is cool + good.

No, that's not why. I don't give a poo poo about that. People call me names all the time; it doesn't faze me. If you took the time to use Topsy and search his Twitter feed for mentions of me, along with his posts on Reddit, you'll see why.

And I don't care if he's in a wheelchair or not as that has no bearing on anything. He's perfectly OK doing poo poo online from that chair (if that's him) and so he should know that online anti-social behavior does have consequences and they can be held accountable.

This sort of nonsense is precisely why online abuse is so rampant because people - hiding behind the confines of anonymity - are so quick vilify others like me who do not have the benefit of anonymity. Just today, alone, this happened whereby abusers threatening violence, caused a major event to cancel panels.

And while I was at the SPJ Airplay panel discussion back in August, some rear end-clown called in a bomb threat and had us out in the sweltering heat for over six hours.

Tell you what. New deal. I'll just continue sticking them in my blog as I write it, and not post it here.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

OhDearGodNo posted:

Because right now there's a good possibility that the kid is a minor.

No, he's not. I know better. Plus he's on Reddit.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Cpt Underpants posted:

I think Dolvak may have sought legal advice and was told to delete because we know Derek never ever keeps copies of things in case this happens. They are a known hater of Something Awful and they said as much in one of those deleted posts while using official mod-speak on the Star Citizen subreddit.

As if. I'm sure that by now they've figured that I'm simply not bluffing or playing around.

TheLastRoboKy posted:

Derek's already shown he'll let people that are (by their own admission) working hard to smear him off the hook if they just apologise and move back from the keyboard-warrior poo poo, I think it's fairly safe to say as more and more of these idiots making the bad decision to publicly declare they're going to ruin Derek get dragged into the light the more we'll just see that as an easy out for them that gives Derek everything he wants out of this situation.

They're dumb people that thought that this poo poo was the best way to deal with someone saying nasty stuff about the video game they were really looking forwards do. They got all caught up in the idea they were fighting a pretend war where no matter what everyone including CIG would thank them for waging it, when in reality it was only tangentially related to them, and they should have stayed out of it and let the natural legal mechanisms being tossed around by both sides get put in play by paid legal professionals. They should have just sat back and made photoshops of Derek Smart as Don Quixote riding at a windmill made of ships, and they still can if they just come up for air and understand that this is poop you just don't touch.

MeLKoR posted:

God drat, this is a pretty dumb kid.

[lack of empathy intensifies].gif

Amethyst posted:

It's incredible how easy it is to reduce the big hard internet men of Star Citizen crew into puddles of tears when you suggest that maybe stalking a wheelchair bound cripple isn't a cool and badass thing to do. Perhaps the tightneing you feel in your chest when confronted with your own shortcomings should be harnessed for personal growth, rather than going into a panic and posting the loving get out frog 12 times in a row.

Amethyst posted:

Hmmmmmmm yes, it's perfectly reasonable to dox a kid, and publish his personal details on a hugely trafficked forum, because he left a bunch of negative reviews on steam. I am a Rational human being who does not stuff magazines up his rear end as soon as I get home every night

Maldoror posted:

I don't consider the 19 year old kid in question to be any different than anyone else. If I was in a wheelchair I would not want people helping me or holding the door for me or treating me special or different or say things like "let him say whatever he wants, he's special, he lost life, his life sucks, etc., leave him be." To me, THAT would be discrimination I wouldn't want. I would want to be taken as seriously on the Internet as any other rear end clown, as I would in life.

Seems to me Derek Smart sees the dude the same way, and would have posted what he did whether the kid was in a wheelchair or not. He doesn't see handicap, he accpets him on the same terms as any other person giving him poo poo.

I can respect that.

kordansk posted:

Okay real post. There is absolutely a line here. That line is crossed when you actually go out of your way to personally threaten someone. Mocking Sandi because of some random story about pubes, or the complete lack of progress on the game, or the fact that they can't keep project managers or middle/upper level management employed, or the fact that refunds are coming from random companies that you never sent money to, or... I can keep going... none of that is harmful. When you create a campaign that actively targets an individual and begins reporting their social media because you don't agree with them, or you threaten to 'destroy' someone because you disagree with their assessment of your obsession with a game, you have taken it too far. DSMART MD DDS PHD literally is the only one in this so called fight with CIG, and he can do whatever the gently caress he wants with his money and his lawyers for all I care. It is his time and energy and money spent. But don't sit here and equate the rest of us to Derek's crusade. If we were to stoop to the level of those idiot reddit cultists we would have to be reporting all of them to reddit to get banned, or actually doxxing them and using it for malicious purposes like attacking their place of work, or causing financial difficulties for them. This ridiculous Smart Shart War is only between him and RSI, and any of those loving morons that keep inserting themselves as cannon fodder for RSI are literally falling on their own swords for no reason.

Here's the thing. I don't loving care if he's in a wheelchair or has lost both legs or has a metal plate on the side of his scalp. Being disabled doesn't make you a better person nor exempt from consequences. There are hardcore criminals wheelchair bound, amputees etc sitting in jail.

When you go online and act like an rear end-clown, abusing, cyberbullying and cyberharassing someone - all illegal and not to be confused with Free Speech - the law doesn't loving care if you are handicapped or not. Civil and criminal consequences are real.

Here is a small section of this "kids" impressive dossier of cyberharassment. Oh, and there's this montage.

And within the next 24hrs, if he doesn't apologize and promise to disengage from this pattern of conduct, it's all going to his Dad, along with a letter from my attorney. And I have no doubt that he's a bully at school as well. So my guess is that his principal would be delighted to get a letter from an attorney as well.

Unlike Dolvak, Wulf et al, I have no intentions of suing him.

These morons think that I'm capable of taking on corporations, yet they are above my radar? That's just stupidity laced with arrogance. That's why I'm lining all of them up and setting an example of why it's a dumb idea to gently caress with Derek Smart.

Aside from that, ALL of these things are associated STAR CITIZEN and its toxic community. So all they are doing is hurting the game and the community. They are not hurting me because they simply do not have the capacity to do that. Ever.

Karl_Ramseier posted:

Hmm, I think I am gonna give this kid some infos about your lawsuits (starting with the parentship one, don't you think?) and other personal info, let's see at which point someone thinks gently caress it and publish it all.
That will be glorious to watch.

Be my guest. Anything that's in the public record, is open season. I have nothing to hide and I don't care. That sort of thing neither fazes nor scares me. When people break the law, that's when the gloves come off.

Your hollow threats are just that: hollow. And meaningless. And inconsequential. And dumb.

FYI dumbass, there is no "parentship lawsuit". It's called a "legal paternal petition" and is used to establish paternity for children with dual-citizenship, child support, setting up trusts, private school placement etc. And the details are sealed (you make it public, I guarantee that that you will end up behind bars) in order to protect minor children.

D_Smart fucked around with this message at 22:43 on Oct 28, 2015

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

kordansk posted:

Okay real post. There is absolutely a line here. That line is crossed when you actually go out of your way to personally threaten someone. Mocking Sandi because of some random story about pubes, or the complete lack of progress on the game, or the fact that they can't keep project managers or middle/upper level management employed, or the fact that refunds are coming from random companies that you never sent money to, or... I can keep going... none of that is harmful. When you create a campaign that actively targets an individual and begins reporting their social media because you don't agree with them, or you threaten to 'destroy' someone because you disagree with their assessment of your obsession with a game, you have taken it too far. DSMART MD DDS PHD literally is the only one in this so called fight with CIG, and he can do whatever the gently caress he wants with his money and his lawyers for all I care. It is his time and energy and money spent. But don't sit here and equate the rest of us to Derek's crusade. If we were to stoop to the level of those idiot reddit cultists we would have to be reporting all of them to reddit to get banned, or actually doxxing them and using it for malicious purposes like attacking their place of work, or causing financial difficulties for them. This ridiculous Smart Shart War is only between him and RSI, and any of those loving morons that keep inserting themselves as cannon fodder for RSI are literally falling on their own swords for no reason.

^this. That is all.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

BeefThief posted:

Old School Internet Warlord DEREK SMART was verbally abused online :qq: by a 19 year old in a wheelchair and is now threatening to call his dad and tell him what a big bully he (the kid in the wheelchair) is.


And I'm too lazy to find/link the original doxx-lite post containing "That's him in the wheelchair."

E: for the new page:

It's all over here.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Tank Boy Ken posted:

I dare say he's a young adult with what seems to be a very hard handicap. I doubt DS knew about his disability from the get go. Young adults do also get treated differently by the law (at least in germany). Because there is a certain age range in which people are legally adults, but still tend to do a lot of stupid poo poo.
So yeah if someone is giving you trouble on the internet and you know their age is in this range. Calling the parents can help more than trying to reason with those persons. I mean Tripwire Interactive (Red Orchestra series) has (or had) a statement in their ToS/EULA that basically said: "If you cheat we revoke your ... blah blah ... and will call your mom!".

And if you look at it: Cheating in a video game is a far less serious thing to do than online harassment.

P.S.
I have not looked deeply at the :wheelchair: guy thing to have an opinion wether or not it can be considered harassment. It's just an interesting thing to argue about.

Strategic Tea posted:

He knew because he was giving us pics from post one.

Until the researcher sent me the details, I didn't know. Then I I knew. Then I still didn't give a poo poo.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

CrazyLoon posted:

Why the hell is this nobody more important to waste your precious time on, rather than sayyy CIG? Rather than starting that lawsuit to sue them for hosting, allowing and encouraging this kind of poo poo to go on? Every moment you spend on this cripple, is just giving him more validation (regardless of whether or not he stops, or if your threat of suing him goes through/works). If you go after every single white knight psycho, you'll never get around to actually going after the source of all this rot, which is CIG and the way they treat people.

You DO realize that I, you know, PAY people to DO this work right?

All I did was give an instruction akin to: find and get me all those who fit a certain threshold of cyberharassment & cyberbullying, so I can make an example of them. That's what my blog is about. And that's why I said that we're identifying the ring-leaders and herding them like cattle in this blog (which will have Star Citizen in the name). Some WILL face legal action, others will face a strongly worded legal letter (if you've seen how my attorney smacked Ortwin around, then you get the idea).

It's a process. But these wankers are part of EVERYTHING that's WRONG with Star Citizen and these rear end-clowns who are a blight to it's community.

Tank Boy Ken posted:

I doubt he's doing the legal stuff himself. I think he's smart enough to know that he only needs to pay the bills and tell what he is going for.

Yup

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Raskolnikov posted:

So this thread has at least closed beta right?

No. It's still pre-Alpha-Alpha.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

mormonpartyboat posted:

derek are you going to be watching the gop primary

No. I tend to watch clowns only at a circus or birthday parties.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

thatguy posted:

Why won't you hire Skoll or I?

gently caress you.

ROTFLMAO!! :)

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Skoll posted:

Um.. What exactly are they innovating?

Stupidity it looks like. I hear they've actually got a patent-pending in the works as well. I don't think we're going to petition the USPTO to deny it, are we?

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice
So our new contender for my WIP blog (latest PDF export) on the abusive White Knights in the Star Citizen community, is [url=]Cristian Romero[/url] aka /user/Tr3vayne/ aka @tr3vayne aka White Knight tr3vayne aka MES3rd on Facebook

If you look at his Reddit and Twitter feeds, he is another one of my top cyberharassers (I'm rounding them all up like cattle, for the blog, then I'm going to link to all their social media feeds) who has engaged in not only doxing me, but also my kid and family members.

"Found his kid online, looks exactly like him."

"Guy needs to go away already for good."

Hey Cristian, since you're an adult over 30, with an actual job, and living in a State (Chula Vista, CA) that has some serious defamation laws like Florida. I'm coming for you. Pucker up.

The list of Usual Suspects thus far; all of who are engaged in a protracted CyberHarassment & CyberBullying campaign. Still reviewing and researching the others. Every single one of them is going to face legal action; and they are all going to be tied to Star Citizen and its abusive White Knight community.

Cristian Romero
Keith Elwood
Nick Butler
Trevor Noblitt
Wulf Knight

D_Smart fucked around with this message at 17:33 on Oct 29, 2015

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Paladinus posted:

If that helps, the photo in his twitter profile is actually not of him.

Yeah we know. And I know what he looks like. His Facebook feed is a Gold mine of publicly available data.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Chalks posted:

Have all the images in the OP been reported and taken down again because if so that's super dumb and we should get someone to host them on a private host or something.

Yup. I've moved them to Tinypic now and updated the OP with new links.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Amun Khonsu posted:

wtf man, these people are dangerous searching other peoples personal info with the IRS and Florida Department of State, etc over things they dont like that you say about a game. What is he doing on the internet searching up other peoples kids? You better get this guy.

Yeah. We're going to be filing a criminal complaint on this one.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Beet Wagon posted:

This next blog is almost guaranteed to be a shitshow of epic proportions. I can't decide if I'm more excited to see SC fanboys making GBS threads themselves over imaginary lawsuits or D_Smart's insane 10-page blog post about meanies on the internet.

The next blog (now cleared legal and to be published on Nov 3rd) is as about the RSI/CIG connection to Gizmondo. The following blog is about the abusive Star Citizen White Knights.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Beet Wagon posted:

Those bastards looked up matters of public record! Get 'em!

Soooooo, you think that's what the issue is then? Got it. Now siddown.

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

Bob Loblaw posted:

Please tell me he doesn't have Parkinson's or is in an iron lung.

Dunno. Maybe he has just run-of-the-mill good old fashioned stupidity. And a metal plate in his head.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

D_Smart
May 11, 2010

by FactsAreUseless
College Slice

wyoak posted:

Has dsmart ever actually successfully sued anyone or is it all :gary:

Yup. Several times in fact over the years. Publishers and individuals alike.

  • Locked thread