|
The Colosseum was inhabited during the Middle Ages. The word "nepotism" comes from the practices of Popes naming nephews (nepos in latin) as cardinals. The practice was so well-established that the Cardinal Nephew was an official position for a century. There is a fragmentary trial document from Renaissance Italy. It is a testimony of the household assassin of an Archbishop and his abbot son, concerning a murder of a peasant that they allegedly ordered. This is an utterly unremarkable case for the era. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 23:08 on Nov 11, 2015 |
# ¿ Nov 11, 2015 23:04 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 17:43 |
|
Tsaedje posted:Also those "nephews" were mostly the various popes' bastard sons Nah, Cesare Borgia was really an exception. Paul III created three grandsons as cardinals, and somebody who might have been his son. Speaking of Paul III's grandsons: Ranuccio Farnese, prior of San Giovanni del Venice, in the habit of a Knight of Malta. Yes, even 12-year olds got monasteries (and codpieces). - The House of Medici produced four popes, the most for a single lineage. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 07:42 on Nov 12, 2015 |
# ¿ Nov 12, 2015 06:56 |
|
Frogfingers posted:I think the crescent moon and star being significant in Islam comes from the conquest as well, but I'm not 100% on that. The star-and-crescent was the symbol of the House of Osman (Ottoman). It became a symbol of Islam in the mid-20th century. Ironically, it's of pagan origin, representing ancient Turkic gods.
|
# ¿ Nov 13, 2015 18:11 |
|
All these Napoleon facts. Napoleon's mother language was Corsican. He first stepped on the French mainland in 1778, only eleven years before the Revolution.
|
# ¿ Dec 29, 2015 00:12 |
|
The 70s were a depressing time.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2016 09:59 |
|
The Roman Empire fell about 563 years ago. Edward Gibbon began writing about the fall of the Romans a little over three hundred years after the fact.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2016 13:54 |
|
It's still Theseus's ship.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2016 18:27 |
|
Don't worry spergs will make mods where it's Basileia Rhomaion.
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2016 23:31 |
|
Even when the game is in english
|
# ¿ Jan 1, 2016 23:40 |
|
Munin posted:It has to be said that the division of Europe was due to the fact that Primogeniture was not the accepted method of succession back then. Every son was entitled to his little share. Charlemagne couldn't increase Crown Authority high enough
|
# ¿ Jan 3, 2016 12:21 |
|
Medieval/renaissance merchants used bills of exchange to create a covert form of moneylending, where the remitter was a moneylender who drew interest on the exchange of currencies. The process was hideously complex and hard to explain, but it eventually developed into creating fictional transfers of money to disguise loans with interest. Richard A. Goldthwaite posted:In 1417 Antonio di messer Francesco Salutati, at the time an employee of the bank of Giovanni di Bicci de’ Medici in Florence, copied out a merchant manual of an earlier date in which exchange is treated extensively, and at the very end he added his own comment that “he who deals in exchanges and he who deals in merchandise is always anxious and beset by worries. I will instead give you a recipe for lasagna and macaroni.” He proceeds to do so and then concludes: “Let him who wants to draw on Bruges and remit to Paris do it. I, for my part, prefer to enjoy supper with my companions. Amen.”
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2016 22:08 |
|
Ichabod Sexbeast posted:So what's the recipe? Not included
|
# ¿ Jan 11, 2016 22:15 |
|
North Africa used to be home to elephants. It's where the Carthaginians got them. They supposedly went extinct because Romans used them too much for bloodsports.
|
# ¿ Jan 15, 2016 11:00 |
|
Fact: the Julio-Claudian family was hosed up: Spot the man who married his niece.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 12:30 |
|
Kennel posted:charles_ii.jpg Just murder and suicide instead of horrible generations-spanning incest. Fact: the Julio-Claudian emperors managed to wipe out their entire family. (The chart doesn't specify that Vipsania, first wife of Tiberius (the Emperor), was from Marcus Vipsanius Agrippa's first marriage. Tiberius was forced to divorce Vipsania and then marry Agrippa's second wife/his own wife's step-mother/his own step-sister. So that's more confusing pseudo-incest.) The people crossed out died either by murder, execution, or suicide. I probably missed somebody - I couldn't Question mark means that they're thought to have been murdered. Germanicus, nephew of Emperor Tiberius, was a popular general who died young under suspicious circumstances. Tiberius is the prime suspect. Tiberius's son Drusus was very likely murdered by his wife Julia Livilla (not to be confused with the sister of Caligula) and her lover Lucius Aelius Sejanus. Sejanus was the commander of the imperial bodyguard who effectively controlled Tiberius and the Empire. He subsequently married the widowed Livilla. All of his children were also killed, along with his wife ([supposedly her own mother Antonia had her starved to death). It also leaves out Ptolemy XV Philopator Philometor Caesar, aka "Caesarion", the son of Julius Caesar and Cleopatra. He was executed on the orders of Augustus (then called Gaius Julius Caesar Octavianus), so that's another cross. Some other Roman family drama, two centuries down the lane: Flavius Julius Crispus, eldest son of Constantine the Great. Crispus was one his father's most trusted lieutenants: he fought against barbarians in Gaul, and commanded the navy against Roman rivals. He repeatedly proved himself a capable commander and a skilled leader. Constantine eventually become sole ruler of the Roman Empire. Crispus's brothers were way younger, making him the natural heir to the throne. Various honours and monuments underline his public presence. In 326, Crispus was arrested and executed on his father's orders. Fact: nobody loving knows why. One of the few clues is that soon afterwards Constantine killed his second wife, Empress Fausta, mother of his younger children. Was Crispus plotting against his ruthless father, who had seen off bigger men? Did Empress Fausta somehow persuade Constantine that Crispus was a threat, only for him to regret the hasty execution? Or was Crispus carrying out an affair with his stepmother Fausta, and they were together conspiring to usurp Constantine? Who knows. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 22:35 on Jan 25, 2016 |
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 14:35 |
|
Mans posted:It's weird how so many people desired to be emperor or be close to the emperor when you see just how few of both reach a mature age that allows them to die of natural causes. I think a good deal of the attempted usurpers were probably unwilling. The usual story with the various usurpers was that their troops decided to hail them as Emperor. This could happen against their will. It's not like they could explain it very well to the ruling Emperor.
|
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 20:48 |
|
Macrinus is a different example. He was the Prefect of the Praetorian Guard (commander of the imperial bodyguard and chief administrator) to Emperor Antoninus "Caracalla". As the story goes, one day a soothsayer made a prophecy that Macrinus would become Emperor. This was the worst possible news, because Caracalla was a murderous lunatic who had killed thousands for much, much less. Macrinus quickly murdered and usurped Caracalla. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 01:26 on Jan 24, 2016 |
# ¿ Jan 23, 2016 21:08 |
|
Plucky Brit posted:Was that out of choice, though? Plenty of contemporaries were capable of painting feminine physiques. As I recall, he simply preferred larger forms for his work. It might have been handy for art that's meant to be viewed at a distance (e.g. In the Sistine Chapel).
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2016 10:54 |
|
LucyWanabe posted:I recall reading that the reason why so many of his female figures are shaped like a dude was because he always used male models. We already established that.
|
# ¿ Feb 2, 2016 19:21 |
|
SKELETON FRAT PARTY
|
# ¿ Feb 3, 2016 07:28 |
|
Fact: people at one point wished for a "dark Zelda game".
|
# ¿ Feb 14, 2016 23:12 |
|
hard counter posted:Check out the concept art for some of the older Zelda games. You could almost see something Dark Soulsy if you squint hard enough.
|
# ¿ Feb 15, 2016 22:30 |
|
Fact: The loss meme became self-aware in 2015.
|
# ¿ Feb 16, 2016 06:26 |
|
A White Guy posted:If you really want to be pedantic, every president of the US, even Barack, is descended from Charlemagne. Looking forward to his concept album.
|
# ¿ Feb 23, 2016 18:53 |
|
goose fleet posted:What the gently caress is going on in this image Kama Swordtra
|
# ¿ Feb 27, 2016 23:19 |
|
Magic is made up.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 15:56 |
|
Our tradition can claim descent from a long lineage of frauds.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2016 19:06 |
|
I have to make a correction. I said that the House of Medici included the most popes for a family (four). I was wrong. The Counts of Tusculum produced six popes and one antipope. The Wikipedia family tree is incomplete for some reason (Benedict VII, nephew of Alberic II, is not included).
|
# ¿ Mar 22, 2016 21:40 |
|
System Metternich posted:Alberic II had an uncle, a cousin, a nephew and a son who all became popes. Dude probably wondered what he was doing wrong Marozia was the alleged mistress of Sergius III, and supposedly of Pope John X. She controlled the Papacy during a period later known as the Pornocracy.
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2016 07:51 |
|
|
# ¿ Mar 23, 2016 22:46 |
|
Tiberius!?Suetonius, a totally trustworthy historian posted:On retiring to Capri he devised a pleasance for his secret orgies: teams of wantons of both sexes, selected as experts in deviant intercourse and dubbed analists, copulated before him in triple unions to excite his flagging passions. It gets from here. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 21:48 on Mar 29, 2016 |
# ¿ Mar 29, 2016 21:45 |
|
Carbon dioxide posted:Being exiled from the Roman Empire as an aristocrat doesn't sound much fun. Where do you go? Into the wilderness? Live with some barbarian tribe? It was exile from Rome, and usually from Italy. If you were lucky, you went to the provinces. If you were unlucky, you'd be confined to a small island. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 22:16 on Mar 29, 2016 |
# ¿ Mar 29, 2016 21:54 |
|
Ensign Expendable posted:Tell me more about these sexperts.
|
# ¿ Mar 29, 2016 22:11 |
|
The play ends with them dying because their families hate each other, and they have to consummate their passions through suicide. This is pretty simple. Vendettas were common between Italian families.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2016 06:25 |
|
Love is actually good.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2016 07:07 |
|
steinrokkan posted:Do you think the contemporaries wouldn't have considered suicide for romance to be selfish in an obstinate teenager way? Doubtful, because there is nothing in the play itself to support that reading. Romeo and Juliet's love is something that allows them to transcend the blood feud that surrounds them. Their love and desperation is never condemned. The whole "they're just dumb selfish teenagers" narrative is a pop factoid that requires mentally editing the play. You need to ignore passages like this, where Romeo wants to leave behind himself: quote:JULIET Isn't this the opposite of selfishness? Here the play offers culprits for the deaths of Romeo and Juliet: quote:PRINCE Romeo and Juliet died because of the selfishness of their families and the inaction of better men. Contemporaries would've gotten this, because they're not deaf. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 07:57 on Apr 1, 2016 |
# ¿ Apr 1, 2016 07:47 |
|
steinrokkan posted:It would be extremely selfish in a culture that valued dynastic interests over personal pleasure, and that also firmly believe in being beholden to the legacy of your ancestors. Especially seeing that they act basically on a whim. I think this is why death and love are equated in RaJ, their naive, egotistical fling makes them dead for the world, cuts them away from the fabric of society. And to read that was transcendence is, Imo, a modern his. Again, where is this in Romeo and Juliet? Let's see what the play itself has to say about "dynastic interests": Romeo and Juliet posted:PRINCE You can also look at a previous English-language adaptation of the story: Romeus and Juliet posted:There were two ancient stocks, which Fortune high did place Their families are selfish and violent, and this is recognized as a bad thing. Contemporaries would have recognized the idea of factional strife and family feuds. This was of course not foreign to Elizabethans, but the vicious family feud would have been somewhat exotic to them. The lovers' youth would have also been curious for them, since they would have married much later. The spontaneity of Romeo's and Juliet's love is contrasted against the designs of Juliet's parents: quote:BENVOLIO quote:CAPULET quote:LADY CAPULET quote:CAPULET Of course contemporaries would have understood the weight of family interests and status - which is exactly why they found these stories appealing! You can even go back to Pyramus and Thisbe, from Metamorphoses, which was a standard text for Elizabethans: quote:The fatal cause was now at last explor'd, All-devouring, desperate love is something that people have found admirable throughout the ages. Tiberius Thyben posted:There's also the bit where Romeo is literally in love with another random Capulet when the play starts. Again, there is nothing to say that they're perfect lovers. On the other hand, that part specifically shows Romeo's transition from fanciful fretting to consuming love. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 08:36 on Apr 1, 2016 |
# ¿ Apr 1, 2016 08:31 |
|
steinrokkan posted:Maybe both sides are selfish in their own way, one being blinded by their feud, the other by their life. Ultimately brother Lsurence attempts to unite the contradictory egos of the families and the lovers through the traditional instrument of marriage, but it fails, exposing the foolishness of both the warring families, and the lovers acting recklessly out of an erotic impulse. Obviously you can condemn them for acting rashly (it's just common sense), but the play doesn't do so explicitly. Again, it's best to look at the actual text first. Laurence considers himself at fault for helping them elope, not because it was improper, but because it led to their deaths: Romeo and Juliet posted:FRIAR LAURENCE e: And Laurence doesn't try to "unite the contradictory egos," his plan is to fake Juliet's death so that she and Romeo can lead new lives in Mantua. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 09:34 on Apr 1, 2016 |
# ¿ Apr 1, 2016 08:52 |
|
Elizabeth I also never married, so it was pretty reasonable to avoid getting children.Alhazred posted:Speaking of royals and cross dressing. In 1756 the French king needed access to empress Elizabeth of Russia. The problem was that the British controlled the border and they only allowed women and children to cross it. Luckily the king's secret service had a man called Chevalier d'Eon that could pass as a woman and he successfully infiltrated Elizabeth's court. In 1774 the secret service was abolished and d'Eon demanded to be recognized as female because d'Eon claimed to have been assigned female at birth. The government agreed but required that d'Eon dress appropriately in women's clothing. During that a betting pool was started on the London Stock Exchange about d'Éon's "true" sex. In 1810 d'Eon died in poverty and an autopsy revealed that d'Eon had "male organs in every respect perfectly formed", Of course this inspired an anime
|
# ¿ Apr 14, 2016 18:37 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 29, 2024 17:43 |
|
hard counter posted:This type of thinking can be found in a general strategy book, Tactica written by Leo VI the Wise, where Leo spends some time discussing the idea that Christianity as a whole should develop so called Muslim-like stances towards holy war. As I recall, the Orthodox Church was very consistent in condemning war as evil, even "holy war". The same source theorized that this might have contributed to the empire's decline, since it meant that military leaders would be even more ruthless and power-hungry, i.e., even less mindful of what Christianity demanded. Seems a bit far-fetched for me, though. BravestOfTheLamps has a new favorite as of 20:16 on Apr 15, 2016 |
# ¿ Apr 15, 2016 20:13 |