|
Neodoomium posted:Early in this angle's life, but why would Undertaker give a gently caress about fighting for Vince's honor and control of the company? Vince found the Urn. Obviously.
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 04:29 |
|
|
it's crazy that this shane mcmahon fighting for control of the company angle is like plan c and something they threw together on short notice
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
oatgan posted:it's crazy that this shane mcmahon fighting for control of the company angle is like plan c and something they threw together on short notice it makes me wonder what the hell Shane was doing in the meantime
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:52
|
|
|
Neodoomium posted:Early in this angle's life, but why would Undertaker give a gently caress about fighting for Vince's honor and control of the company? At this point Taker just shows up at Mania to fight the person in the ring at that time.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Alain Post posted:it makes me wonder what the hell Shane was doing in the meantime lost in china
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Neodoomium posted:Early in this angle's life, but why would Undertaker give a gently caress about fighting for Vince's honor and control of the company? Maybe the undertaker mismanaged his money for years and since he's a giant he's going to die soon so he needs the money
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
WWE books its top babyface so poorly that fans need to come up with conspiracy theories as to why its so bad, because literally nothing else makes sense
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Alain Post posted:it makes me wonder what the hell Shane was doing in the meantime Googling "dumb boy names" apparently.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:The reason why is WWE has no idea how to book Roman correctly. They just really need to flip him heel. Not a Rock heel, but he'd do great right now as an Orton-ish overly cocky heel. Then you can turn him again somewhere down the road when all this has worn off. The thing that's killing this isn't only their insistence that he be the next Cena, but that it happens RIGHT NOW.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Alain Post posted:it makes me wonder what the hell Shane was doing in the meantime Failing at being a businessman in Asia
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:53
|
|
|
Neodoomium posted:Early in this angle's life, but why would Undertaker give a gently caress about fighting for Vince's honor and control of the company? That's the thing I least get about it, too. Sigma posted:I have feeling the booking for this match is going to make the finish of HHH/Sting look restrained. I'm fine with that. There are literally no good workers not otherwise occupied that could be built in time, so like I said, the best thing is to just go all out with the smoke and mirrors and hope for the best. Honestly fairly shrewd on WWE's part. I have no idea how the company smart enough to fairly well salvage a card with no Cena and no Rollins (top face and in theory top heel), also with no Rock wrestling has managed to bung up Roman Reigns so utterly. StarkRavingMad posted:They just really need to flip him heel. Not a Rock heel, but he'd do great right now as an Orton-ish overly cocky heel. Then you can turn him again somewhere down the road when all this has worn off. The thing that's killing this isn't only their insistence that he be the next Cena, but that it happens RIGHT NOW. 100% agreed.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:54
|
|
|
Hace posted:WWE books its top babyface so poorly that fans need to come up with conspiracy theories as to why its so bad, because literally nothing else makes sense Maybe they're trying to get sympathy heat on Roman by booking him horribly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:Just get banned, this has become the most insufferable thing imaginable. lol at how effectively Lord and Savior Triple H has worked the marks
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
Alain Post posted:Maybe they're trying to get sympathy heat on Roman by booking him horribly. Roman is going to get You Deserve It chants next time he comes out
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:55
|
|
|
shane will develop force lightning powers and retire the undertaker
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:57
|
|
|
Hace posted:WWE books its top babyface so poorly that fans need to come up with conspiracy theories as to why its so bad, because literally nothing else makes sense but enough about shane mcmahon, what's the deal with roman
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:58
|
|
|
is there any way that johnnnn cennnaaaa doesn't swoop in and fight for Shane or am i grasping at straws
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 05:59
|
|
|
oatgan posted:but enough about shane mcmahon, what's the deal with roman don't you dare goof me.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Hace posted:WWE books its top babyface so poorly that fans need to come up with conspiracy theories as to why its so bad, because literally nothing else makes sense Hmmm yes, it sure is a conspiracy theory that the angle where 2016 world champ HHH, who just won the Rumble, and who is now getting cheered at long last, has only HHH benefiting
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:00
|
|
|
Professor Funk posted:is there any way that johnnnn cennnaaaa doesn't swoop in and fight for Shane or am i grasping at straws He said he's trying to make a comeback in 2 weeks So if he's not back in 2 weeks oh well, and if he is, we now know what he's going to do
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:01
|
|
|
Professor Funk posted:is there any way that johnnnn cennnaaaa doesn't swoop in and fight for Shane or am i grasping at straws I could see interference, but the fact that they made up the graphic says to me Shane/Taker is going to be the crux of the match, not to mention there's no kayfabe reason Vince would allow it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
Professor Funk posted:is there any way that johnnnn cennnaaaa doesn't swoop in and fight for Shane or am i grasping at straws What if Shane...is Sister Abigail?!
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:02
|
|
|
I'm guessing Taker's motivation is just going to be "I don't care about your family crap, but I don't like losing fights" or some such thing. Also, I marked out like a loving child when Shane's music hit. I was kind of joking about him coming out while watching it, but didn't really expect it to happen. Happy to be wrong. My initial thought was the VJM Award thing was going to signal some kind of actual, real-life passing of the torch from Vince to the recipient to run the company. I don't know why I thought it, but I thought maybe Vince could be winding down his career and getting ready to HAHAHAHAHAHAHA
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:03
|
|
|
Is Shane/Taker a goofy as all gently caress match for WrestleMania? Yes. Am I far more excited for WrestleMania now than I was 6 hours ago? Yes.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Ty1990 posted:Is Shane/Taker a goofy as all gently caress match for WrestleMania? Yes. My man. 
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:04
|
|
|
Phenix Rising posted:I'm guessing Taker's motivation is just going to be "I don't care about your family crap, but I don't like losing fights" or some such thing. vince is 70 though, he's getting pretty old. not to mention he works constantly and is probably full of stress, so who knows how his health actually is
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:06
|
|
|
There's no way they are going to have undertaker actually lead Shane through a match right? And then when Shane loses does he just gently caress off? Wth THIS MAKES NO SENSE
|
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Chris James 2 posted:Hmmm yes, it sure is a conspiracy theory that the angle where 2016 world champ HHH, who just won the Rumble, and who is now getting cheered at long last, has only HHH benefiting does vince not book his top babyface anymore or
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
Shane o Matic is great Vs stardust http://youtu.be/35hYw_vmCOs
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:07
|
|
|
shane vs undertaker, that'll put a lot of butts in seats 
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
Hace posted:does vince not book his top babyface anymore or No you see because HHH has head of creative as a title it means Vince totally isn't overseeing things now. Open your eyes maaaaaan
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
achillesforever6 posted:HHH's hands were literally bathed in Roman's blood as the bacchanalian crowd cheered for more. Hell, sounds great to me. Ironically enough, I think the best move for Reigns right now is to lose at Mania and turn heel in response to the crowd's reaction. Worked great for Rock who was dealing with a very similar situation, and all he had to work with was the boos, Reigns can add to that being booed while HHH made his life hell and screwed him over, booed while he lost the two biggest matches of his career, etc. You pack in Dean getting a win over Lesnar and you can do a jealousy angle between the two brothers too. We really are through the looking glass when I can root for HHH to bury a young talent at Wrestlemania. It truly is the most HHH thing of all to really get genuine crowd appreciation for beating up a young guy and not for getting his rear end kicked. He is the one who kicks rear end.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
HHH owns.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
Chris James 2 posted:He said he's trying to make a comeback in 2 weeks Never count out Big Match John
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:11
|
|
|
SamuraiFoochs posted:No you see because HHH has head of creative as a title it means Vince totally isn't overseeing things now. If we're going along with this theory HHH has had Vince's ear since the 90's and is even responsible for the Montreal Screwjob is it that much of a stretch to think he couldn't convince him even half of this was a good idea
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:13
|
|
|
Dean turning heel seems unlikely at this point. It would be odd to turn him after 10 weeks of being the underdog who won't quit after taking Brock's best shots
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:14
|
|
|
http://youtu.be/u38bJnxDx4A
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
oatgan posted:If we're going along with this theory HHH has had Vince's ear since the 90's and is even responsible for the Montreal Screwjob is it that much of a stretch to think he couldn't convince him even half of this was a good idea Yeah, I am in no way implying (nor do I think Alain is) that HHH is responsible for Reigns' reaction or booking But he is clearly taking advantage of, and the only one benefiting from, it, and it is really hard to comprehend someone not seeing it while simultaneously knowing even a thing about both the business and HHH's history in it
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:15
|
|
|
astrollinthepork posted:There's no way they are going to have undertaker actually lead Shane through a match right? And then when Shane loses does he just gently caress off? Wth Shane is going to Coast 2 Coast the urn into Undertaker's face and shatter it, killing him. The crowd will cheer for this.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:16
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 04:29 |
|
|
oatgan posted:If we're going along with this theory HHH has had Vince's ear since the 90's and is even responsible for the Montreal Screwjob is it that much of a stretch to think he couldn't convince him even half of this was a good idea Also the theory isn't 'HHH blatantly sabotages Roman's chances with Vince's approval' it's HHH doing sly poo poo here and there.
|
|
#
?
Feb 23, 2016 06:17
|
|