|
A & G
|
# ¿ Mar 15, 2016 00:28 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 12:36 |
|
C; any bird friend of Treemomdad is a bird friend of mine.
|
# ¿ Mar 16, 2016 02:36 |
|
E — I think being a spooky swamp tree goes best with our theme thus far.
|
# ¿ Mar 17, 2016 05:26 |
|
A & K – Let's guzzle down water and make new friends!
|
# ¿ Mar 18, 2016 04:13 |
|
BE all we can tree.
|
# ¿ Mar 19, 2016 05:12 |
|
B – I don't know much about spider life expectancy, but one hundred generations seems excessive.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2016 18:06 |
|
For clarification regarding the terms of the deal, we're not a flowering tree at this point, are we? After all, we used to be a seed. If so, accepting the spiders' current deal would also mean that we'd have to divert resources into developing fruit instead of adapting to the unfriendly conditions of our environment more, given the option.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2016 18:54 |
|
C – Akua mentioned the centipedes, so let's talk with this one. Maybe we can see what she thinks about the feud between the frogs and spiders if we can work it into the conversation.
|
# ¿ Mar 21, 2016 02:01 |
|
A
Auralsaurus Flex fucked around with this message at 00:14 on Mar 25, 2016 |
# ¿ Mar 24, 2016 21:02 |
|
Mr. Nemo posted:Otherwise it may end in a "We want YOUR True Name, evil laugh", and then they can ask us to do whatever. Outrail posted:At which point we scream out the true name of the nematodes for all to hear and peace out under a suffocating writhing blanket of angry biomass. paragon1 posted:You do not yet have a name, though one may be given to you. Some creatures are just rude like that.
|
# ¿ Mar 25, 2016 01:37 |
|
C Listen to Foreign Snakes Ate All My Food
|
# ¿ Mar 27, 2016 21:54 |
|
SerSpook posted:Actual vote is F, talk to the centipedes This is my vote. Also throwing in for What's Buggin' The Bugs!?.
|
# ¿ Mar 30, 2016 20:42 |
|
A Listen to What's Buggin' The Bugs!?. If we do decide to broker a deal between the spiders and frogs, we might be able to use true names as an enforcement/retribution method should they agree to the terms we propose. They could be more open to peace if they know anyone who breaks it is going to end up either marching straight into snake territory to get swallowed whole or swimming out to sea until they become exhausted and drown.
|
# ¿ Apr 3, 2016 04:46 |
|
A
|
# ¿ Apr 18, 2016 18:37 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 12:36 |
|
Either population-proportional territory restructuring or mutual habitation is enticing as an end goal sometime further down the line, but both of those options are likely to lead to a large increase in tension even if we succeed. So C seems like the least relationship-straining option and a good place to start. Maybe we can revisit things if relations go well for a few generations.
|
# ¿ Apr 22, 2016 19:21 |