|
JakeP posted:no, which is why it is weird that he had nothing to say about him He said exactly the same thing I did.
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 03:51 |
|
|
The Ninth Layer posted:Back to the voting. The Ninth Layer posted:Anyway, Allen Wren was reading the thread close enough to respond to YPM targeting him but not closely enough to see like three very important claim discussions. Reads to me like scum scanning the thread for his own name.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:09
|
|
|
It is a power role.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:10
|
|
|
If it's a role with a power.... it's a power role. I don't know who Li Dawny is so I'm guessing probably not experienced enough to make the distinction that in this game such an ability would be VT equivalent. Either way not something I find scummy.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:12
|
|
|
Among other things he has voted for the person you are currently voting.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:14
|
|
|
JakeP posted:lol what difference does that make It's content. I don't think she is scummy. Should be obvious by now.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:18
|
|
|
Yes.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:19
|
|
|
Vote Allen Wren.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:20
|
|
|
Engaged enough to recognize someone claiming to target him, not engaged enough to spot lightning rod, nexus, watcher/tracker claims.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:21
|
|
|
Why would you be so opposed to voting AW just for claiming a VT equivalent role?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:22
|
|
|
IllegallySober posted:Catching up on the last four pages but ##unvote based on that flavor claim because the flavor and role he claimed match mine. I now believe he's actually town. Hope you have a better option because otherwise it'll probably be you we flip today.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:28
|
|
|
There's also no reason why scum might not have that role as a fake claim.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 1, 2016 22:29
|
|
|
I'm busy with the 4th of july weekend, will post more tomorrow.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 3, 2016 18:08
|
|
|
I'm moderately hungover and extremely sunburned. Sorry I missed yesterday.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 17:42
|
|
|
dongsbot does your redirect work both ways?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 18:42
|
|
|
I think in a non-standard game like this watcher-tracker is actually a fairly strong scum role. With that said I find it hard to believe that dongsbot is a one-way redirector that can redirect actions off himself.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
Are you sure that your two targets don't get redirected to each other?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 20:11
|
|
|
He provides target A and B. He says anything targeting A gets redirected to B but not the other way around. I'm saying the role probably doesn't work that way.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 20:14
|
|
|
If that's true then AA got horribly short-changed with the nexus role. My role says that anything redirected to my first target will hit the second instead. I've been reading that as "anything that targets one will get redirected to the other" aka traditional busdriver.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 20:16
|
|
|
I sorta don't believe that Kashuno targeted nobody.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 5, 2016 20:28
|
|
|
Third party or scum left?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 20:42
|
|
|
I redirected myself to jakep lol.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 21:09
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:Also it seems scummy that IS would redirect with some heat on him Anyone who can busdrive themselves to someone else is going to do it, just common sense.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 21:10
|
|
|
What doesn't make sense about it?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 21:11
|
|
|
That gives us a fair bit of information. We have an action chain of YPM -> IllegallySober -> Ninth -> JakeP -> Li Dawny -> Li Dawny. Assuming that matches YPM's results we've cleared a lot of people from nightkilling or at least from attempting a nightkill.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:10
|
|
|
Also the nightkiller could have targeted any of about half the game and hit the doctor block.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:11
|
|
|
Still a little confused on how visiting in this game actually works. For example why would JakeP show up as visiting Li Dawny but I wouldn't, even though I presumably visited JakeP who would then redirect to Li Dawny.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:14
|
|
|
But based on those results I'd be inclined to think RF is the killer too.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:15
|
|
|
I think it's scummy that you didn't claim to have done nothing on day 2.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:39
|
|
|
Your Personal Muse posted:For posterity, I don't think its relevant, but n2 I track TNL, and the result was whoever I tracked visited AW I swapped myself and AW. Not sure who you would have seen in that instance.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:44
|
|
|
Retro Futurist posted:
You didn't think it was noteworthy that you were seen targeting someone even though you did nothing?
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:45
|
|
Didn't see much point in playing all my cards right away. If he'd specifically called me out like today maybe, but I figured it made more sense to wait it out
|
Your Personal Muse posted:I think that CPig gave up on figuring that out because going back and looking, he literally confirmed that you, TNL, visited AW instead of keeping it vague like usual One of the reasons I rarely put in redirectors in my games and never put them in with a roleblocker on top. Good luck trying to figure out what happens when a roleblocker targets a busdriver who redirected himself with someone else, or worse, what happens to a roleblocker who targets the person the busdriver redirected themselves with.
|
|
#
¿
Jul 6, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 03:51 |
|
|
Thanks for running the game CPig! It was fun 
|
|
#
¿
Jul 7, 2016 06:02
|
|