|
We even have the better mod too!
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 01:15 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 03:01 |
|
I have never played Super Smash Bros, but I have played several of the games of the characters in this game.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 01:48 |
|
Asiina posted:I looked at the other thread and am happy to report it's already a shitshow. Hey, do you still have me on ignore? Cause it's kind of hard to play with you that way.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 02:01 |
|
Also, I probably shouldn't be put in combat.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 02:09 |
|
busb posted:Ok let's hang this duder for cowardice I am not a coward! My abilities just aren't combat oriented.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 02:36 |
|
Asiina posted:Tentatively no. Ok cool. I'll try not to be a giant rear end, but I make no promises.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 03:49 |
|
I just got one thing to say:
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 05:45 |
|
I think bowmore is having a stroke! bowmore, do you smell toast?
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 13:51 |
|
Absurd Revolver posted:I see bowmore kept up the guard while I slept. I've got nothing yet, but this thread has been pretty relaxed and it's still pretty early.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 14:20 |
|
So the only two people who haven't checked in yet are iajanus and MMT. Also, this thread is so chill that we haven't even had a joke vote yet.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 18:26 |
|
BottleKnight posted:Unfortunately I think they're getting some good content out of PBS's hilarious vig. Whether or not to lynch her is a good question. But just because they got immediately hoisted out of jokephase doesn't mean we should have thread envy. I agree with this post. I don't really like the trend that's been happening where games immediately get jerked out of jokephase. Don't get me wrong, I don't think all of D1 should be a jokephase, but I also don't think all of D1 should be serious either.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 18:40 |
|
Absurd Revolver posted:Hence why I don't want to say anything myself, after the catapult incident. I choose to believe that you 'cleared' Inf as a way to ensure that the other thread had to deal with him for the longest possible time.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 18:51 |
|
Chic Trombone posted:yeah that's gonna get annoying really quick, ecco I'll be watching a movie for the next couple of hours. Hell or High Water.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 19:14 |
|
Murmur Twin posted:##vote TMM What? How dare you vote for me! And while I was watching a movie to boot! Prepare yourself for the OMGUS! ##vote MMT
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 22:23 |
|
Absurd Revolver posted:Wake up, soldiers! Alright, for a serious case, I don't really like Ecco's posting. While it isn't impossible to read, the style just makes my eyes want to glaze over it. I don't really think gimmick posting is very helpful past jokephase, so I hope Ecco doesn't plan on doing it for the full game. Also, this post doesn't sit right with me because MMT is responding to my post about how there are no joke votes with a vote that I think is obviously a joke vote, so I don't know why Ecco feels the need to try and clarify it. EccoRaven posted:mwahahahahahahahahahaha
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 22:44 |
|
BottleKnight posted:You were watching a movie instead of watching my team whoop you in the preseason? Sus as hell imo Why would I watch preseason Bears football when I could be (and am now) watching regular season Cubs baseball instead?
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 22:44 |
|
TMMadman posted:Alright, for a serious case, I don't really like Ecco's posting. While it isn't impossible to read, the style just makes my eyes want to glaze over it. I don't really think gimmick posting is very helpful past jokephase, so I hope Ecco doesn't plan on doing it for the full game. Oh and just to try and head this off at the pass: I don't think this is really enough to drop a serious vote, but it is enough to bring up for discussion.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 22:45 |
|
Chic Trombone posted:it's kinda hard to have anything more than a gut call rn AR Chic, how is imgay being quieter than you remember when he has more posts than you? Also, why must you use the scummiest emote? It's very triggering!
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 22:50 |
|
Tommunist posted:I also wish ecco wouldnt do it, but i doubt its gonna change so no point to keep talking about it. Why shouldn't we talk about it? If multiple people bring up the fact that they don't like the way she is posting, don't you think Ecco should think about changing the style? If she's town and the way she's posting is annoying people then her message is going to get lost because people are just going to skip right over her posts.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 22:53 |
|
And finally, just for a trip report: Hell or High Water was a pretty good movie. Good performances by everyone and a good little story.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 22:55 |
|
Chic Trombone posted:I like the shruggy emote! Also more posts than me =/= as many posts as I remember him having when I used to play more frequently Ehh, fair enough. You haven't been playing as much lately but he generally hasn't been posting as much as when I first started playing. I think I'd be more worried about him if was quieter right now because he's been really lurky as scum lately.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:01 |
|
Chic Trombone posted:like i think he's been being quiet for imgay and don't really see what my post count has to do with that metric?? Yeah, I probably shouldn't have brought up your own posting because I know you tend to be towards the bottom of the post count regardless of your alignment. Sometimes I just see that whole 'he/she is being quiet!' argument and automatically look at post counts to compare.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:05 |
|
Also, Podima, you have no idea how hard it is to not respond to this post in the sign up thread:Podima posted:PLAYERS: DO NOT POST IN THIS THREAD AGAIN UNTIL THE GAME CONCLUDES with: Okay! (it's a Simpsons joke)
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:08 |
|
EccoRaven posted:mwahahhaa, TMMadman has revealed his true intentions!! his posting is fake, that is, it is not real, that is, it is constructed to sound real but upon closer examination, which I have conducted, I can say that it is not real, that is, it is fake!! You seem awfully worried about someone bringing up your posting style. Do you really expect anyone to read all that and make sense of it? You call my posting fake, but yours is much faker and designed to be hard to read.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:14 |
|
*Cries in the corner about scummy emotes*
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:14 |
|
tithin posted:Morning am. It's a self administered PR.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:17 |
|
EccoRaven posted:mwahahhaa another fake response from the TMSadman!!! my posts may be longer than yours but they are only harder to read because they are longer not because my meaning is hidden or unclear because my meaning is very clear indeed that is to say I do not think anyone can reasonably read my posts and say that they are uncertain what I mean in them! And now you are avoiding responding to my actual case against you probably because the case is so air-tight and so you are focusing entirely on the tone and length of my posts rather than the words in them, that is to say you are focusing on the amount of the words rather than the words themselves, which is a thing that scum would be more likely to do than town!!! I'm not responding to it because it's complete garbage.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:21 |
|
EccoRaven posted:IT IS NOT GARBAGE, HOW DARE YOU CALL IT GARBAGE!! I, Mooooocco Ravo, will not stand for you to call it garbage when it is anything but garbage! garbage is smelly and sticky and can easily be discarded, but my case against you can-NOT be easily discarded for it touches on your behavior this game and explains why that behavior is more likely to be from scum than town! This is completely bullshit. I have never said it's very clear what you are saying. I said it wasn't impossible to read, just difficult. So you are completely mis-characterizing that point. I think MMTs vote was obviously a joke. You are free to disagree if you so choose, but the whole kind of gives it away as a joke. Announcing that in the thread isn't scummy. I was bored and sharing my day with the thread just before the previews were about to start.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:32 |
|
BottleKnight posted:Ooh, that's a good point. I'll have to reread him. I don't think it's a good point at all. Both town and scum often announce when they won't be posting, even if it's just for a couple hours. It was less about me announcing that I was going to be gone for a couple hours than it was to see if anyone would say something about Hell or High Water while I was watching it.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:41 |
|
Birdstrike posted:TMM watching a movie is a pretty poor basis for voting him But you're voting me?
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:48 |
|
Uh oh, I think birbs been infected by gaspy!
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2016 23:58 |
|
EccoRaven posted:he did not, unless you are referring to him disliking the style of my posting entirely, which my original case said is illegitimate because the style of my posting is not scummy and cannot be unless it is being used to hide or obscure my meanings and that is not happening since by TMM's own repeated admission my meanings and intentions are very clear. I'd like you to quote the posts where I've said your meanings and intentions are clear.
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 00:31 |
|
EccoRaven posted:you have continually, that is repeatedly, that is have multiple times over a period of hours, said that you dislike the style of my posts rather than the substance, and that as I have said, again repeatedly, is scummy. Except that's not what you've been saying, so try again. Here is what you said, I've bolded the important part: EccoRaven posted:he did not, unless you are referring to him disliking the style of my posting entirely, which my original case said is illegitimate because the style of my posting is not scummy and cannot be unless it is being used to hide or obscure my meanings and that is not happening since by TMM's own repeated admission my meanings and intentions are very clear. So, do you want to try actually posting the several times I've stated that your meanings and intentions are clear?
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 00:42 |
|
EccoRaven posted:it is called inference. you are correct in that I overstated how you felt about my posting, however many others said that my posting was clear to them, including our Dear Leader, and so I thought your assessment of my posting was as well. that was a mistake on my part and I humbly apologize, that is I would be humbly apologizing if it meant my case against you was significantly weaker as a result of my mistake. my case however remains strong because you explicitly saying my posts are clear is NOT the thrust of my case against you, the point is you were attacking me exclusively for the style of my posts, that is for their length, rather than explaining why those posts were actually bad, that is incorrect and also fake. that to me was a very fake opinion. yes my posts are longer than most because I am explaining my thoughts more fully and giving them the time to develop in ways that most players do not, but there is no way you can actually say my intentions within my posts are not clear. You know, except for the fact that I did explain why the style is bad: TMMadman posted:Why shouldn't we talk about it? If multiple people bring up the fact that they don't like the way she is posting, don't you think Ecco should think about changing the style? While it's not impossible to read, I find the style distracting and several others have voiced the same opinion. People are going to skip over posts they have trouble reading and that means your message is going to get lost in the shuffle. So do you want to backtrack some more?
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 00:52 |
|
EccoRaven posted:it is called inference. you are correct in that I overstated how you felt about my posting, however many others said that my posting was clear to them, including our Dear Leader, and so I thought your assessment of my posting was as well. that was a mistake on my part and I humbly apologize, that is I would be humbly apologizing if it meant my case against you was significantly weaker as a result of my mistake. my case however remains strong because you explicitly saying my posts are clear is NOT the thrust of my case against you, the point is you were attacking me exclusively for the style of my posts,that is for their length, rather than explaining why those posts were actually bad, that is incorrect and also fake. that to me was a very fake opinion. yes my posts are longer than most because I am explaining my thoughts more fully and giving them the time to develop in ways that most players do not, but there is no way you can actually say my intentions within my posts are not clear. Also, to the bolded part here is the summary of your case: EccoRaven posted:IT IS NOT GARBAGE, HOW DARE YOU CALL IT GARBAGE!! I, Mooooocco Ravo, will not stand for you to call it garbage when it is anything but garbage! garbage is smelly and sticky and can easily be discarded, but my case against you can-NOT be easily discarded for it touches on your behavior this game and explains why that behavior is more likely to be from scum than town! The very first point of your summary is that I've repeatedly said that it's very clear what you're saying.
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 00:58 |
|
EccoRaven posted:if people skip over my posts because they do not want to read posts then that is on them, it is not my job to spoonfeed the lazy and intellectual disinterested except insofar as I wish people to read my cases and to vote with them, but I have made the judgment that players who are unwilling to read my very clear posts simply because they are longer and explain my thoughts more fully are unlikely to be interested in playing mafia at all and so they are not the audience to whom I am trying to appeal but rather to those who wish to actually win the game by hunting for mafia and removing them from the game that is to say the town! You know, except for the fact that you've repeatedly told me in other places that it's my job to be persuasive and get people to agree with my cases. So if people are skipping over your posts, how exactly can you be persuasive enough to get people to agree with your cases?
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 01:01 |
|
EccoRaven posted:and I have already conceded that that point was incorrect, that is it was based on a mistaken remembrance of what you actually said, but again it is not the thrust of my case against you. my point is you have continually chosen to attack the style of my posts in lieu of their content which as I have already said at length is scummy. But I've been responding to each and every point you've made so far. So do you want to keep banging your head against this wall?
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 01:02 |
|
At this point, Ecco has talked more about her style than me. I've addressed every single one of her points in the summary of her case, but she continues to say that all I'm doing is attacking her style of posting. So I'm pretty much done engaging with her right now. She's dead wrong about me, but just wants to tunnel in on it.
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 01:25 |
|
Also, I can't honestly tell if Ecco is scum or town right now. I do know she likes to push me when she's scum, but I just can't tell if that's what is happening here.
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 01:37 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 27, 2024 03:01 |
|
Asiina, do I have to be suspicious of you for agreeing with me now?
|
# ¿ Aug 28, 2016 02:00 |