|
|
In the internet age, content curation is just as important as content creation. There are already multiple lifetimes worth of content available online.  Billions of man-hours poured into the creation of online content in the last decade alone.  Much of it intended for wide public consumption, but more of it,  statistically even most of it, meant for private viewing,  or else viewing by a small number of people.  As a result, some of the most interesting content available  is hyper-specific, hyper-specialized, or just  entirely inscrutable, because the common cultural basis  through which we decode this content simply isn't there.  Paradoxically, the internet's most commonly-shared content:  sex, food, and animals, is its least interesting because  of its universality. It is devoid of any  perspective or meaning, it does not even manage to  capture an experience, so controlled and artificial  that it becomes only a totemic representation of  a real experience, purely symbolic and inviting  any representation the viewer will project onto it.  This is why pornography is at the same time both  completely devoid of eroticism and incredibly popular.  It is a tabula rasa onto which the viewer may place  any fantasy, any desire, any thought. It never  challenges because it is devoid of anyone other  than the viewer. It is the ultimate masturbatory experience.  This is why pornography continues to become  more and more standardized. The same camera angles,  lighting, and so forth in every instance. This removes  any directorial perspective, and even the performers  perform the same acts in each instance, the same way,  with the same timing in all pornography.  It is identical not by practice but by purpose,  a ritualized representation of the idea of sex.  This same pornographic approach is not just taken  in depicting sex, but in every aspect of our lives.  It is a rejection of perspective, which makes the internet  an isolated and isolating place, a solitary experience  built on the ritualization of a symbolic collective  experience, protected from the challenges of real  human interaction. It is purely masturbatory.  It is pornography on a societal scale.  It is the transformation of all human experience  into pornography. Thus the importance of  content curation. True, genuine experiences are  captured (insofar as that is possible) amongst  the data available on the internet. It is  the responsibility of internet users to find and  preserve unique content.  Thus this thread. |
#
?
Sep 3, 2016 19:24
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:48 |
|
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2016 19:32
|
|
      
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2016 19:40
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2016 20:09
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 3, 2016 20:21
|
|
|
|
      http://i.imgur.com/Hy4hbhu.mp4
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 03:28
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 04:50
|
|
  is that principal mcvicker's face? ---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 05:04
|
|
|
|
  
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 05:35
|
|
|
|
 (they're sea squirts, and they're dead)
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 05:36
|
|
|
|
City of Glompton posted:
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 06:23
|
|
|
|
you're right here's some that are alive, much nicer: 
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 06:32
|
|
|
|
https://twitter.com/cursedimages
|
|
#
?
Sep 4, 2016 12:28
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 01:31
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 01:33
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 01:34
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 01:40
|
|
|
|
 This woman looks a lot like Vanessa Bayer from SNL. |
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 01:46
|
|
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 01:59
|
|
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:01
|
|
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:01
|
|
 http://i.imgur.com/5AkdO.jpg
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:03
|
|
|
http://i.imgur.com/kKQBX.jpg
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:04
|
|
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:04
|
|
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:15
|
|
---------------- |
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:16
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:35
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 02:47
|
|
|
|
bad dog
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 05:47
|
|
|
|
I love this. |
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 08:02
|
|
|
here is an interesting picture
|
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 08:37
|
|
| That dick looks like a chair. | |
|
#
?
Sep 7, 2016 23:21
|
|
|
|
Good dog.
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 01:27
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 03:54
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 06:18
|
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 08:24
|
|
|
great dog
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 11:23
|
|
|
|
Business Gorillas posted:bad dog Robot Made of Meat posted:Good dog. Ahundredbux posted:great dog divided opinions on the dog |
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 13:47
|
|
|
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 17:58
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 11:48 |
|
|
|
 the shittiest wikipedia jpg
|
|
#
?
Sep 8, 2016 18:42
|
|