|
Quidthulhu posted:This is LITERALLY what you said about Pmush yesterday So what? You realize this is the entire basis of how i play mafia right? Find the people who write like they are playing instead of playing.
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:47
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 19:30 |
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:I'm defending myself against not much to defend. I'm not really sure what else I'm supposed to do with this. I mean, I can sit here and reread every other poster to try and find the cases against them but the fact is I just wasn't seeing them. Podiima looked dodgy enough for a vote, and CPig is the only one I haven't really looked at too closely. I'm not really giving Asiina a pass. I've mentioned a few times that I'm a little concerned about her. The lack of posting and mostly making town calls worries the hell out of me.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:I'm defending myself against not much to defend. I'm not really sure what else I'm supposed to do with this. I mean, I can sit here and reread every other poster to try and find the cases against them but the fact is I just wasn't seeing them. Podiima looked dodgy enough for a vote, and CPig is the only one I haven't really looked at too closely. I dunno why your scum buddy is getting a pass too!
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:49
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:And I still don't know why Asiina is getting a pass. She's pinging me a tiny bit. But she's much farther down then my other reads.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:52
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:So what? You realize this is the entire basis of how i play mafia right? Well, how well does it work? It certainly didn't work very well for Pmush. I'd argue that certain people's style of posting would be triggering you regardless of their alignment. It's just how they post.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:54
|
|
|
votefinder posted:Votecount for Day 1 Quoting because i believe the key to solving this game is here and i don't want to keep finding this on my phone cause the awful app is awful
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
I've gotta say again that I think it's kind of weird that Snooze hasn't picked up any other votes right now. I mean there are 3 likely town votes on her and I'd think if she was town, scum would try to move the vote that direction. I don't think it would be very hard to do because it could easily be justified as 'redirectors are likely to be scum.'
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:58
|
|
|
Here's Asiina's actual content-posting:Asiina posted:Maybe she got to cop her mason partner if they trusted her or something so you'd pick someone you didn't trust. Trying to suss out the TMM/Capps thing is reasonable enough. Asiina posted:KB are you scum? What has this poo poo ever accomplished? Asiina posted:That's a reasonable point. She's just defining WIFOM. Asiina posted:I was so convinced by the end of D1 that Capps was scum, but night action musical chairs have convinced me everyone in that group is telling the truth. And huge, unsubstantiated leap. She's not helping.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:57
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I've gotta say again that I think it's kind of weird that Snooze hasn't picked up any other votes right now. I mean there are 3 likely town votes on her and I'd think if she was town, scum would try to move the vote that direction. I don't think it would be very hard to do because it could easily be justified as 'redirectors are likely to be scum.' I mean I guess scum could be going for a late push on her. But it's still freaking me out.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
About to leave. My vote seems like it is in a reasonable place to secure a cuddle. Please don't no cuddle again.
|
|
#
?
Oct 17, 2016 23:59
|
|
|
King Burgundy posted:Well, how well does it work? It certainly didn't work very well for Pmush. It works pretty well of course it's not going to hit 100% of the time day one What is the point of saying this, people are wrong sometimes. Also by now i think you guys would realize acting 500 more times confident than i am is part of my thing.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:00
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I've gotta say again that I think it's kind of weird that Snooze hasn't picked up any other votes right now. I mean there are 3 likely town votes on her and I'd think if she was town, scum would try to move the vote that direction. I don't think it would be very hard to do because it could easily be justified as 'redirectors are likely to be scum.' Inactive scums
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:03
|
|
|
Pmach starts trying to push me, quickly backs down. She is frustrated at her inactive scum partners.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:06
|
|
|
Argh something doesn't add up.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:08
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:Yeah, I'm feeling this. She's been belligerent since the start of D2, and her reasoning behind badgering TMM for his role information is to catch him in a gotcha moment we could dunk him on. She also called everybody playing the game stupid, and her best argument for thinking anybody is scum is the fact that she thinks they're scum. Propaganda Machine posted:Remind me who it was that confirmed that TMM's night action had been hosed with? That's all the game-related shade I threw at you. Not sure how that constitutes a push; it's as much pressure as anybody should get, especially since you were/remain vote leader.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:14
|
|
|
I would vote asiina, her votes have been on easy targets.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:18
|
|
|
A push is still a push
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:19
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:I would vote asiina, her votes have been on easy targets. This for example is a push
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
TMMadman posted:I've gotta say again that I think it's kind of weird that Snooze hasn't picked up any other votes right now. I mean there are 3 likely town votes on her and I'd think if she was town, scum would try to move the vote that direction. I don't think it would be very hard to do because it could easily be justified as 'redirectors are likely to be scum.' Also, posts like these are what I find scummy from TMM. If you think someone is scum come out and say it. These hedge-y posts are bad.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:20
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:This for example is a push It is. I'm not convinced by the case on you. It makes no sense to me that a scum redirector comes out and claims as you did at the start of D2. If TMM is town it would have just led to your immediate lynch the next day. I'd much prefer to vote Pod or Asiina today.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:24
|
|
|
Look at Asiina's voting record. This is her D1 voteAsiina posted:I like Quid. I don't like SSV. And this is today's vote. Asiina posted:##vote BK Both zero effort, zero explanation.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:31
|
|
|
People I would vote today: BK Pod CPig PMach BK is the right choice though.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:32
|
|
|
fiery_valkyrie posted:Look at Asiina's voting record. This is her D1 vote I actually explained the SSV vote in the next post, but yeah the BK one I haven't given an explanation for.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:33
|
|
|
Capps creating LITERALLY THE SAME CASE today to push a vote isn't pinging anyone else? Come on guys, this is a load of crap, and her walkback is total damage control, not an actual answer.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:36
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Capps creating LITERALLY THE SAME CASE today to push a vote isn't pinging anyone else? Come on guys, this is a load of crap, and her walkback is total damage control, not an actual answer. No I agree Capps is playing a whole lot like scum, but I'm convinced by night actions because that's how role madness works.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:38
|
|
|
Asiina posted:No I agree Capps is playing a whole lot like scum, but I'm convinced by night actions because that's how role madness works. Can you re-explain your slam dunk case here since you are hanging your hat on it rather than voting someone playing like scum
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:40
|
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:Can you re-explain your slam dunk case here since you are hanging your hat on it rather than voting someone playing like scum I believe the series of night actions from Madman, Capps, fv, Dick, and PMush all happened how we think they did.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:43
|
|
|
Asiina posted:People I would vote today: All shade, no tea. This is a funny list to cobble together. We've got: BK: vote leader, I don't see the case on him but people insist there is one Pod: Side-eyes from myself and FV, on this page; Quid pushed him yesterday I guess and just called out a flimsy point on the last page CPig: is pinging people Me: lol you read the last couple pages I guess No reasons from you,, of course. This is scummy af ##vote Asiina
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:44
|
|
|
Asiina posted:No I agree Capps is playing a whole lot like scum, but I'm convinced by night actions because that's how role madness works. Asiina posted:I believe the series of night actions from Madman, Capps, fv, Dick, and PMush all happened how we think they did. She's town-confirming ALL the night claims. She's presuming/claiming that scum has no way to make that narrative work. She also didn't herself claim anything, which is the only reasonable way I see for anybody to vote on that night-claim circus in and of itself.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:48
|
|
|
And the timing of her sudden content posts is a bit too apt for my taste. Seems like a scumbro alerted her in doc.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
I don't necessarily think they're all town (fv could still be scum) but they all make sense together and account for where people were and why.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
I mean we all pretty much agree pmach has to be scum right, because these posts yo lol
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:49
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:And the timing of her sudden content posts is a bit too apt for my taste. Seems like a scumbro alerted her in doc. Or I just got home from being trapped out in the rain and we're approaching deadline?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:50
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:I mean we all pretty much agree pmach has to be scum right, because these posts yo lol Don't you start.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:50
|
|
|
Asiina posted:Don't you start. The language!!
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:52
|
|
|
Asiina posted:I actually explained the SSV vote in the next post, but yeah the BK one I haven't given an explanation for. So can you give an explanation for your BK vote now?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 00:55
|
|
|
Propaganda Machine posted:What's with these weak cases on me? There's better stuff to work with, there's better stuff from me to work with, and...that's what you're voting on? I'll bite. What's better from you to work with than what I've put forth? BottleKnight posted:this is the definition of me atm Just confirming, you are claiming that you are nothing other than a miller?
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Snooze Cruise posted:I mean we all pretty much agree pmach has to be scum right, because these posts yo lol 
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 01:01
|
|
|
Podima posted:I'll bite. What's better from you to work with than what I've put forth? I'd love to, but I'm out the door. I MIGHT be able to check in, like, 5 minutes before deadline. But if you're really looking for something, my interactions with Capps and TMM have stuff to play with, I'm sure.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 01:02
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 26, 2024 19:30 |
|
|
Quidthulhu posted:COLLUDING? TMM pointed out a soft defense of PMach on BK's part - that could be completely independent from their being the same alignment. BK could be scum trying to whiteknight PMach. I don't see how this is suggesting they are aligned. Explain. BK soft-defended PMach, and PMach did a weird re-vote thing to try and shift momentum away from BK when he was tied as vote lead on Day 1. BK also jumped on me when I did the post history thing to call out PMach for lurking at deadline on Day 1. It's not a smoking gun, but it jumps out at me given my bad feelings about PMach and BK already.
|
|
#
?
Oct 18, 2016 01:03
|
|