|
Question, (one that isn't all that serious, but is also not an attempt to troll) How racist is it that when I think of cool black people, I think of Morgan Freeman, and Cordozar Calvin Broadus, Jr.? Because I'm sure its racist somehow, I just don't know exactly in what way, and how much. Not saying that other black people aren't cool, just that they are the first to come to mind. thechosenone fucked around with this message at 02:13 on Nov 8, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 8, 2016 02:11 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 18:56 |
|
To be serious, I would also like to know how African americans view the election. How much worse has voter surpression efforts gotten? Have you had problems with early voting, especially compared to how it usually is? Though I also would like to know just how racist it is that when I think of black people (specifically cool ones) I think of Morgan Freeman, and Cordozar Calvin Broadus, Jr. (not a troll, just an idiot who just wants wants to know. sorry if this is bothering anyone and I'll stop if you want.) (also once again not to imply that the only cool balck people are those two, just that they are the ones that come to mind first.) thechosenone fucked around with this message at 02:23 on Nov 8, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 8, 2016 02:17 |
|
negromancer posted:Not even close to a violation. Oh...darn. I'm sad to hear that. What about Cordozar Calvin Broadus, Jr., is he still cool? Also holy poo poo that dude's hair is like SSJ Goku to Fabio's 100% power final form Frieza (I don't even know what I'm saying, except that he seems to have nice hair). thechosenone fucked around with this message at 02:37 on Nov 8, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 8, 2016 02:33 |
|
I always figured that people who belonged to a minority group at least weren't AS racist (on average), due to having experienced being on the receiving end of discrimination themselves. Is this an incorrect idea? (also is it racist for me to think of Cordozar Calvin Broadus, Jr. when I think of cool black people? I have for some reason latched onto this, and since I have received no resistance to the idea of asking, and am just curious.). I feel like I'm really enjoying this thread already. I enjoy being able to ask people who have had significantly different life experiences from me about their perspectives on things. (once again, if people get tired of me asking questions, I'll gladly stop. I don't want to cause any problems).
|
# ¿ Nov 8, 2016 02:45 |
|
What do African American folks in this thread even think Reparations should even BE? Because I don't even know where they would start.
thechosenone fucked around with this message at 02:56 on Nov 8, 2016 |
# ¿ Nov 8, 2016 02:54 |
|
BI NOW GAY LATER posted:I think that for a lot of minorities, they hear and know that if you do not address systemic racism first or as a major part, that anything you do to improve "economic equality" automatically helps white people more than it helps them. This is, of course, a larger debate of intersectionality, but I think it's an important thing to remember. What do folks here think about this post. I like to harp on about economic equality, and I think that that is very compatible with racial equality, and that we should never sacrifice racial equality for economic equality. I just think that one doesn't have to sacrifice racial equality in order to push for economic equality though. Is that unrealistic? I figured that it might be useful to ask this to this thread, and If it is inappropriate to do so, I apologize, and I appreciate your time. I might ask this in the minority perspectives thread. Hope that is okay. I'll leave this post here in case someone is interested. thechosenone fucked around with this message at 00:22 on Mar 1, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 00:08 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:I think Binow is right, but there's also nothing wrong with each of us focusing our activism on our strong suits. The important thing for people more focused on economic equality is to avoid telling minorities to "wait your turn" or to assure them that money will magically make all the racism go away. You can also help maintain visibility of minority-specific economic issues simply by bringing them up, to keep discussions from drifting off to focus only on the poor white coal miner or the anxious white middle class. Any numbers we use to talk about economic inequality are worse when you remember to look at minorities too. White women make 70 cents on the dollar compared to white men, but for black women it's 64 and for latina women it's an appalling 54. Black middle-class household net worth is lower than working class white households. Unemployment rates for black and latino men dwarf white male unemployment rates, which are already pretty drat bad. I think that's the key. When you've got an ally talking about poverty, and you can see they're only thinking about white poverty, agree with them that it's bad and then talk about how it's actually even worse than that when we think about all the other people in this country. Okay, I'm glad to hear that wanting income equality isn't entirely worthless. As it is, I'm just going to lay off the debate and discussion forums right now, since I seem to have worked myself into tears thinking about how useless I am. I apologize for wasting your time, but I appreciate that you were so kind as to waste it on me. I hope one day I can be something other than utterly worthless, and maybe even be halfway helpful to people sometimes. I now this sounds facetious, but I really am a a piece of poo poo, and I hope one day I can be someone people can say was worth being born. Edit: sorry for the melodrama folks. I was just really upset over how stupid and useless I am. But do you think that as racial inequality is addressed, that it will make it easier to address income inequality? I just wanted to hear it again as a confirmation, because at this point, I don't really feel confident about anything at all. I know that is just me, me, me again, but if your okay with indulging this bit of selfishness, I would really appreciate it. Thank you so much for being so patient with me. thechosenone fucked around with this message at 01:53 on Mar 1, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 01:11 |
|
I know, I apologize, I was just freaking out. I'll stop posting. Thank you once again for being willing to tolerate me. I don't really have anything to contribute to things anyway, since all I can really do at the moment is agree while trying not to repeatedly shove my foot in my mouth, which doesn't really add to the conversation. I guess I should specifically say that if I'm unwilling to contribute to improving things actively, that I should not discuss politics, especially race or economic politics. So if the mods could just put me on that list of people who are not allowed to post in this subforum, that would probably be best for everyone here. The sooner I stop distracting folks from meaningful discussion, the sooner I do something else other than waste people's time. I hope this doesn't come off as passive aggressive or anything, I just figure it makes sense that if I'm just going to wring my hands and do nothing, that everyone else who actually wants to try to actively make the world a better place will have a better time if I am not posting. thechosenone fucked around with this message at 01:55 on Mar 1, 2017 |
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 01:24 |
|
xthetenth posted:You're reminding me of me in the middle of my breakdown. Worry about you. You've got a lot of time to pay things off but if and only if you're wallowing in it you are actually justified. Get therapy and or meds so you can be helpful. Hell, my life's a shitshow and I don't get to do more than slacktivism a lot of the time, but I'm no good to anyone having another freak out and at least I can try and advocate people to be a bit less poo poo. And hell I guess I create some value at my day job, but that's mostly maintenance for me and maybe some other incidental good comes of it. Listen, that is cool of you to say, but I'm honestly thinking that If I want to be of use, that I should stop letting myself post on this forum. Which I'm gonna do until I can't. I figure I'm gonna look out for number one, and what I'm starting to think is that this internet forum doesn't really do me any good to post on. It isn't you guys, its me, it has always been me.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 02:00 |
|
Yup.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 02:09 |
|
Push El Burrito posted:Looking out for number one is the first step to becoming a shithead libertarian I don't recommend it. Probably, though to be honest I think thapaosfopaioaf aioai aopaihfapoi <- That is about the meaningfulness of what I was about to say. As it is, maybe if I can succeed in taking care of myself, then maybe I can help those close to me. If I can help those close to me, maybe I can help those in my community. If I can do that, I can probably spread out even further. That is nothing but platitudes though. You won't have to worry about me becoming a shithead libertarian. Not because of me thinking communism is cool, because that is just lip service, but probably because I am so incompetent that it is unlikely I will ever be able to take care of myself, much less be a vocal whiny idiot (or you know, more of one). I guess the idea was to say that if I can't even take care of myself, that there is no reason to believe I can be anything other than a dead weight on everyone else.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 02:21 |
|
sorry double post.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 02:23 |
|
Alrighty, I think I've embarassed myself enough for one day. Mods, thank you for not banning me, and regular posters of this forum, thank you for I don't know, not punching my face through the internet because of how stupid I am. Hope things turn out better for everyone here in the Great Race Space, I figure you'll all be much happier to listen to me blather about communism or something once you are actually given something approaching a fair lot in life. Heck, if that happens in my life, I'll imagine full communism will be a easy.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 02:46 |
|
there wolf posted:I don't get what the emotional stuff is about so just gonna bypass it. Oh okay this is cool I can actually work with this. Yes, yes, yes, yes. A thousand times yes. I figure that the real barrier to economic equality is basically all the other inequalities. Does it make sense to figure that this also holds for one type of inequality in relation to other inequalities? I mean, I would figure that african american rights went a long way to help with the treatment of other folks, since if one destroys some of the barriers between one group and another, it puts into question the barriers we put between ourselves and other groups.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 02:54 |
|
remusclaw posted:Something I was watching about Cuba a while back made it very clear that socialism was supposed to make everyone equal, at least according to the people in charge. What happened instead is darker skinned Cubans are targeted by police at higher rates than the rest of society and are subject to pretty much the same issues they are in capitalist societies when compared to their lighter skinned fellows, who all in all seem to get a pretty fair deal for as far as that goes in Cuba. Wow really? poo poo. That is weird. Is lighter skin tone correlated with being more racist or something? I mean like in general.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 02:57 |
|
That makes sense, but surely when we manage to push ahead of the public's general opinion, it helps people to realize that treating people with some modicum decency isn't so bad right? Actually now that I say that, it makes even more sense to push for local elections since one state having a greater degree of equality helps to normalize it for adjacent states.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 03:18 |
|
remusclaw posted:All that aside, the key point to get is that socialism doesn't fix racial inequality. Yeah I understand that more clearly now. What does everyone think of Perez's appointment to DNC chairman? I actually appreciate that he appointed Ellison as vice-chairman. Is everyone at TGRS okay with this turn of events?
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 03:21 |
|
Tiny Brontosaurus posted:I like Perez a lot and I'm glad he'll be working with Ellison, who is also great . Wonderful, I feel reassured. Heck, I'm pleased as punch by the whole thing.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 03:59 |
|
remusclaw posted:I want the Democrats to win. The lefter the better, but I will vote Dem until such time as there is an electable better option. I know enough people for whom it matters a great deal and I know of far more. Oh yes, me too. While I voted for Bernie in the primary, I did not hesitate in the slightest to vote for Hillary in the general. I'll likely vote in the midterms as well, and probably the election days where neither are happening , at least if any elections are happening where I can vote.
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 04:05 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 18:56 |
|
Pastrymancy posted:I hope Perez sticks to his commitments to having the Dems defend voting rights because the DOJ isn't doing poo poo against voter ID laws anymore. Yeah, I feel like one of the main things propping up Republicans is voter ID laws. I mean, I honestly don't think we should be allowed to restrict the rights of felons to vote. Honestly, I think if someone has spent seven years Mainly in the US that they should automatically become citizens. That make any sense? If folks in this thread have different opinions, I'll pretty much roll over, I don't really have too much invested. (USER WAS BANNED FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Mar 1, 2017 14:18 |