|
Hail Khaz Gebsi, our Golden Dragonlord!
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 00:17
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 24, 2022 02:52 |
|
|
You can't join this mafia game if you're not worthy.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
BK you in??
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 05:27
|
|
|
now I don't have to resort to loving a robot! Thanks Beeeeeeeek!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 4, 2017 05:31
|
|
|
Yo ho, yo ho, off to work we go!
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 01:10
|
|
|
chores wins, game over.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 01:20
|
|
|
almost forgot I Understand That Tf I Do Not Unvote The Mod Will Not Count A Revote Unless I Am A Doublevoter.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 01:24
|
|
|
Murmur Twin posted:##vote Chaoslord - I'm just getting this out of the way early. but whhhhhy?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 01:25
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:I'm a lynchbomb. If ever a need should arise to test this claim, I volunteer. It's becoming my thing now I guess.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 18:19
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:
Nevermind then.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 18:21
|
|
|
The Lord of Hats posted:I don't know if it's remotely relevant, but I'd like to note that I am human, not a lizard like poor old Saqaada was. I don't think there's going to be any kind of split that matters regarding that (like how in that one parliament one a while back the Pink-party people were the traitors), but it may as well be mentioned. Also means that the vanilla chunk of my town PM is very slightly different from what was posted. What motivated you to share this? I'm not seeing the relevance here. This reads like it's a 3P claim essentially but clearly states your alignment as town. 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
I'm FEARLESS.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 19:41
|
|
|
Per the OP, names in this game are worthless as a source of game relevant info (the way I read it). Fwiw my name is Scum Person v0v
|
|
#
¿
Mar 7, 2017 20:52
|
|
|
I'm gonna go ahead and go get drunk, be back in a bit to solve the game.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 21:06
|
|
|
If being the Pope is haram, then I don't want to be haright.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 22:52
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Executioner looking for a specific role?! Nothing about this indicates a lynchbomb.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
"Hi, my name is explody, and my fav method of mining is dynamite" AT LEAST PUT SOME EFFORT INTO IT
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 22:54
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Is joke phase over? Is it time to truth sleuth? Based on the current pool of posts upon which a case could be made in all seriousness, what is your honest take? I find it somewhat difficult to take your current vote seriously.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 23:01
|
|
|
I agree that AA's reaction seems a bit overstated. I also to think it's a bit humorous that the idea of taking this game too seriously (at this point) is a scummy thing to do especially when the proponent of such a sentiment called for an end to joke phase to begin with. Using big words and TRYING HARD HERE GUYS. don't worry, I am riding the train to hammeredville and will make less coherent posts soon I promise.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 23:23
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:a female pope would be haewe I'd vote you to be Pope if us regular flock could vote for such a thing.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 23:25
|
|
|
FUUUUUUCK I'm afeard now
|
|
#
¿
Mar 8, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Why? *whispers* You know why
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 00:22
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:Alright, so what's your role name? drat fine question. There is absolutely no reason not to answer this if you're already willing to claim anyway.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 00:24
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Blaster lunchingbomb I'd actually be willing to buy this if it was just left as "Blaster", seeing as how my role flavor ID just "Miner" not "Miner McMiningtown"
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 00:27
|
|
|
That seems more likely. Thank you for clarifying.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 00:42
|
|
|
Keane is that a serious question because DONT PLAY WITH MY EMOTIONS MAN
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
Keane, your questions feel slightly too absurd to be genuine imo.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 00:56
|
|
|
Dick Bastardly posted:Keane, your questions feel slightly too absurd to be genuine imo. There I go again TAKING THINGS TOO SERIOUSLY. Just Lynch me and get it over with already.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 00:58
|
|
|
CCKeane posted:I'm not, "Keane only serious posts as scum" is a false meta read on me that's been propagating. Um... you're the first person to point this out so far so..... paranoid much?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 01:36
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Blaster lunchingbomb Anomalous Amalgam posted:Blaster is my flavor name. A lynch bomb is what it is. On phone. Ain't nobody eating lunch. CCKeane posted:Okay, so here's what's standing out to me the most: Keane, this is a stretch bro.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 01:41
|
|
|
I don't really believe AA so much, but I also don't believe Keane as being genuine either. Those are my dunken takes so far. ANYONE ELSE WANT WEIGH IN? FISK? CHAOS? RARITY EVEN?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 01:44
|
|
|
I'm not saying I 100% believe AA, but claiming lynchbomb D1 is not anti-town TOBBS.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 01:54
|
|
|
Tobbs Gnawed posted:Explain it like I'm drunk. I mean, it's clearly beneficial to warn your town brethren against hammering, but at the same time scum could use that as a life line. It comes with the assumption that AA would even be a candidate for a "lunch" to begin with, which is kind of self conscious and possibly a indicator of a scum insurance policy. I DONT loving KNOW, ZIGGy ZAGGGY ZIGGY ZAGGY OY OY OY!!! take to slam a screwdriver
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 02:26
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:However I volunteer my life for the cause. That's no life line, and it's a curious claim to make and stick to seriously for anything other than telling the truth. Speaking of volunteering my life for the cause, my offer to hammer to test this claim still stands.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 04:00
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:In defense of my life for an actual better use of it, consider the following: Anomalous Amalgam posted:Make someone you think is SCUM hammer me. Anomalous Amalgam posted:No, I'm a lunch bomb. Town can use me as a vig. I don't like this. Town using your bomb as a "weapon" against a scummy target a la dayvig is a pretty ridiculous concept if you really think about it. The only player in this game that I think is dumb enough to test it is me. Try to convince a scum to hammer you? What incentive would they have? Would a scum risk it when a no-lynch -> NK works just as well and without potentially losing a scumbro? I think not. I'm pretty sure the only logic here from your perspective AA is that it would be foolish for town to push a lynch on you given the risk involved, it doesn't actually help anyone like your "democratic dayvig" idea suggests. Now the real question is why would you position yourself in a manner to avoid being lynched so early?
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 20:16
|
|
|
Going to that length to back up chores is odd imo. Why not just say "this is so town chores, trust me" or something to that effect instead of saying "I'd still not vote chores, even if he claimed cop, was counterclaimed, we lynched the counter claimer and they flipped cop", like.... that senario doesn't paint you or chores in a town light 
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 20:30
|
|
|
The way Keane kept on with the questioning is what made me feel uncomfortable about his genuineness in asking. The first question was simple and to the point which I thought was a good question and was thinking that AA would probably not have a good answer to, it validated my suspicion of AA in my mind at that point. But then Keane kept going on with it in a manner that seemed less logical than it had started out, and I felt like serious Keane throwing "joke" questions around was a sort of affront to what I thought we shared in our suspicion of AA.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 20:41
|
|
|
The last joke post about me taking things too seriously was a jab at AA's dumb idea that I am trying too hard and it's a bad thing.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 20:43
|
|
|
Anomalous Amalgam posted:Well, how about you let everyone else get me to next to hammer I'd prefer a vig just take the mystery out of the equation, but if it comes down to it I'll hammer you.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 20:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 24, 2022 02:52 |
|
|
chaoslord posted:So, to be clear, you think this sequence is not logical for Keane to pursue? Yes, this is were I found Keane's post to be facetious. The way I see it, I think the order of role name vs. flavor name is obvious.
|
|
#
¿
Mar 9, 2017 20:59
|
|