|
as much as i like zacks last name, ill have to go with Jimmy because having a man on the ground is always helpful
|
#
¿
Apr 1, 2017 05:12
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 08:50 |
|
|
we should probably get some mavricks too. Mission coming up is gonna be close air support and having a "gently caress this guy" option that's more agile than a paveway would be handy for not much extra cost
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 16:47
|
|
|
Do we know if the squareheads' mavericks are compatible with the phantoms? And how many each f4 can carry? since if they at comparable I'll have to say we get some phantoms since they'll have relevant weapons from the get go
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 02:15
|
|
|
Quinntan posted:They ought to be, the Rb 75 is an AGM-65B and the Greeks have those. They're also compatible with our Paveways and our Mjolnirs. In-game, the F-4 can carry a pair of Mavericks, I would guess on the inner wing pylons. oh poo poo only 2 each? That might be workable though since we're fighting in Tibet so it's not like we'll see a full tank push. Still though, I'm starting to lean towards the frogfoots, since while the different missile types will be annoying it's not like we're a huge company that has a lot to keep track off. Plus dat can opener. brrrrrrt
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 02:33
|
|
|
Triple A posted:We probably should in that case put SK-60s to CAS duty while we'll send a flight of Gripens to see what's going down in the sea. We probably can spare 2 Gripens for SEAD. correct me if I'm wrong, but arnt we operating at sea? why do we need sead? it might be helpful if a warship shows up, but let's be honest if a warship that can pose a large threat shows up our first action should be to freeze operations and call up our employer for a large pay increase because doing fleet engagements on our budget is bad business
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 16:17
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:The SEAD would be picking off AAA up north. yeah I read back through and missed the entire primary mission in a caffineless haze 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 16:22
|
|
|
Quinntan posted:It does... Up until you realise that we are solely dependent on the Chinese for the more advanced munitions for them, and I do not see them selling weapons to the company that 1) sank one of their frigates 2) bombed their airbase and 3) helped free Tibet. except they're back in the warlords era. Theres probably some dude willing to sell some stockpile he isnt going to use, and failing that china is probably triple corrupt by this point so finding some missiles that fall off the back of a truck should be doable for our good friend abramof. therefore Entebble
|
|
#
¿
Apr 11, 2017 06:30
|
|
|
i think we should stick with euro gear. The frogfoots did good, but i think their best left as opportunity buys rather than something to eat that 20% tax when we could get more gripens and tornadoes. also go sk60s. those guys have sealed themselves a role as being helpful AND expendable!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 04:04
|
|
|
Dr. Snark posted:
Yeah "they tried to pay us in proprietary bitcoins so we blew their base up and sold the survivors to a lithium mine" would be a pretty rad story on that note Lets help out von Hoff in angola as your not a real merc company until you operate in a sub-saharan african country. Agean90 fucked around with this message at 05:57 on Apr 16, 2017 |
|
#
¿
Apr 16, 2017 05:41
|
|
|
Angola-Hoff Bering seas look boring aside from ecoterrorism. The dictator would try to kill us after his paranoia makes him think were plotting to overthrow him and some fucktarded dweeb in the free state would stiff our payment in some attempt to pretend he's a game of thrones character.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 03:00
|
|
|
if we are going to go diamond dogs we should change our coporate charter to be employee owned so we dont get other mercs sent after us so the stakeholder can try to recoup their investments we'll give militant socialism a new meaning 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 18, 2017 05:36
|
|
|
I support Menongue for resource access reasons. We should stick to one base too, our base defense will work best concentrated
|
|
#
¿
Apr 19, 2017 01:15
|
|
|
Zack Really wanna be a bro and help out rohan, but id rather not have her go loose cannon and blow up aid convoy because she thought it was a chinese AA battery.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 20, 2017 05:03
|
|
|
lol at all these soft weaklings wanting "permanent bases". We should basically just be an aerial version of the Mongolian horde
|
|
#
¿
Apr 21, 2017 01:08
|
|
|
sniper4625 posted:Given that she's so far bombed fewer "things the dictator has" and more "representatives of a major American corporation" I really think the thread needs to revisit it's all-in stance. not sure i see the problem with either
|
|
#
¿
Apr 23, 2017 22:36
|
|
|
UberJew posted:I'd be surprised if it could take off from any of our airfields though what if we get a b-17 and replace the turrets with CIWS. what then
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 03:41
|
|
|
Olothreutes posted:CRAZY OLO doesn't have a B-17. But if I go dig around in my backstock I might be able to find you a B-29 or a B-47 if you are really interested... Cheif Engineer: You started calling objectively terrible plans "insanely good" in order to protect yourself from how ignorant you are about modern air combat Me: lol that owns *starts making doodles of ww2 era fighter with a gau8 strapped to them*
|
|
#
¿
Apr 24, 2017 04:34
|
|
|
Davin Valkri posted:Sperwers don't have an armed option. You'd have to use the Reaper. I think you'll find that goatse>furries
|
|
#
¿
Apr 26, 2017 04:02
|
|
|
K&P Euro-planes have done good so far, i see no reason to miss out on more. Also holy poo poo that last mission.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2017 15:05
|
|
|
Night10194 posted:"Apparently it goes crazy and turns almost invincible when shot at. Key word almost, but still." It actally got hit by 2 missiles. The first had no effect other than making it flash, so we think the russians have figured out hitpoints and i-frames
|
|
#
¿
Apr 30, 2017 17:58
|
|
|
Dear Delvanos, lol no Signed Hayard goones Bitching out on a job makes future employers leery.
|
|
#
¿
May 7, 2017 18:46
|
|
|
It'll have to be the coast. It'll be bloody, but we're at a point where the longer this goes on the worse it is so attempting caution gets us nothing. Is there a way to get von Hoff some artillery? some old rear end SMERCHes would probably do a lot to make thier assault a lot smoother.
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
So what does the Demoratic Republic 9f the Congo need payment for this strikes me as something we should be investigating.
|
|
#
¿
May 8, 2017 15:02
|
|
|
Cthulhu Dreams posted:SDBs are more a symptom of the problem than the problem themselves. Modern airframes with standoff stuff are just better. just limit the supply and make so we have like 5 per theater. Make them reserved for things absolutely need to go down.
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 01:27
|
|
|
Crazycryodude posted:This is not inspiring. So what went wrong? 
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 04:50
|
|
|
yes, im sure this automated mining system is totally real and tested and not just, at best, a computer janitor's fever dream that makes any mineral extraction engineer stare in mute horror. at worst it will be "literally slave labor, but with a curtain around it.
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 05:08
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:Can we coordinate with Musk to get the dictator hit hard in Luanda to free us up for CAS? lmao that this sentence makes perfect sense in context
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 15:41
|
|
|
same, if only because the Tesla Loss Prevention division is likely as unprofitable as there cars are and we can snatch the f22s up if/when it goes under
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
Galaga Galaxian posted:Guys the free state might reaaally piss of the corps or the UN if they intentionally blow up a civilian cargo ship. ftfy
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 21:23
|
|
|
i mean really, do you think we would fly a kfir with an anime waifu painted on it? look we cant be help responsible for the action of the so called "free" state, clearly they've gone off the deep end. You know, our current contract is about to expire, if y'all need help tracking down their leadership for a trial well im sure we can discuss a good price...
|
|
#
¿
May 14, 2017 21:31
|
|
|
Red Handed. we do not have the firepower for a full purge
|
|
#
¿
May 16, 2017 15:31
|
|
|
By the numbers. Lets hope that mystery bogey doesnt make our false flag preparations necessary.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2017 02:40
|
|
|
power crystals posted:I am kind of curious as to why the Wedgetail was up but not emitting, especially at that time. Aside from stalking our S-100, what possible use does that mission profile have? Did someone tip them off? Early response against night raids possibly.
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2017 03:42
|
|
|
the real question is: Can we blame this on the freestate somehow?
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2017 04:05
|
|
|
guys let's be honest, insurance fraud isn't a crime because that assumes insurance companies don't deserve to lose money
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2017 17:09
|
|
|
xthetenth posted:Agreed. We'll have to hit some things with suboptimal weapons, but we should try to be efficient. Also a frogfoot full of Vikhrs is quite effective at tearing through armor because it carries a lot of tank kills. when the missiles don't malfunction anyway
|
|
#
¿
May 17, 2017 20:01
|
|
|
welp, hope von Hoff actually had statesmen just waiting in the wingsc ause otherwise this whole country will fall into anarchy.
|
|
#
¿
May 22, 2017 13:19
|
|
|
The Ivanov Support package looks killer as hell, those hinds could free up a lot of ground attack assets and im eager to mess around with a bote.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2017 04:33
|
|
|
thatbastardken posted:tell that to 42 dead pixel sailors look at mister white star line here, wanting to cut back on life boats.
|
|
#
¿
May 23, 2017 05:09
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 28, 2024 08:50 |
|
|
1. BLFM CAS 2. Ivanov support 3 K&P Fighter
|
|
#
¿
May 24, 2017 13:16
|
|