|
Signing on as the dainty daughter.
|
#
¿
Apr 3, 2017 00:28
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 8, 2024 14:53 |
|
|
confirming and going to bed.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 04:06
|
|
|
To be aboard this ship is to be at home. HAWKE man, are you scum?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 11:27
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Confirming, that I'll be back later this afternoon. I wouldn't say so, but it seems to be a trend recently developing.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 11:29
|
|
|
 FWIW though, I do feel this Infi turbo is kinda scrumby. Ecco has out of games reasons to policy lynch Inf, but would Ecco bring that into a maf game? I dunno, I need to read this game over a but but I'm at work. Will be home in a few hours (plus I have two other games going, is there a Mafia addicts support group somewhere?)
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 18:31
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:if you're one of the eleven people not voting infinitum, can you explain why? i'm not saying that it's unequivocally the right choice, i'd just like to hear the explanation. Personally I feel like jokephaize votes that aren't discussed and that actually turn into turbos are bad. Like Keane mentioned, there's really no substantial basis behind it. I can understand if it's a personal policy thing, but I don't have a vote Infi D1 policy that I adhere to baring some outrageous scum slip or something so anti-town that it can't go unpunished.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 22:53
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:can you explain WHY they are bad vote? Dick Bastardly posted:Personally I feel like jokephaize votes that aren't discussed and that actually turn into turbos are bad. Like Keane mentioned, there's really no substantial basis behind it. I can understand if it's a personal policy thing, but I don't have a vote Infi D1 policy that I adhere to baring some outrageous scum slip or something so anti-town that it can't go unpunished. I'm not going to spoon feed you again. poo poo, I'm the child on this ship, SPOONFEED ME.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 23:37
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:you're not hearing me. i'll break it down when i get home. I look forward to it. I'M STILL SWEET drat IT. poo poo. got some chores tonight posted:drat i forgot dickbastardly was my child good thing i dont love her  How could you not love this face? I've been told I have your eyes.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 23:50
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:chapo skipped the most important line "As you grow and change, Caleb, Mama and I have to make changes in the way we treat you. For example, you have chores now." got some chores tonight posted:is this how caleb ends up in ny  M-M-Mommy?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 23:52
|
|
|
Yeah that's right, I have two moms. So there.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 4, 2017 23:53
|
|
|
Somberbrero posted:no, now you are my spiteful son. That's a lot to read into from this Somberbrero posted:can you explain WHY they are bad vote? but, never the less I do see your point. I'm sorry for being a brat 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 00:32
|
|
|
Somber, can you explain why voting Inf is a good vote?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 00:38
|
|
|
Moatillata posted:Also please use a nautical analogy for the infinitum lynch the trashcan one is ruining my immersion *ahem* excuse me, my apologies. Can Somber please explain why keelhauling Inf is a good thing to do?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 00:40
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:actually lets not i dont care for salads Have you tried Octopus Salad? I think you'd enjoy it, it's squishy.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 00:41
|
|
|
Moatillata posted:Dick is this some kind of strange omen baby situation where you are in fact the devil-child and ruler of the scum I just... I feel bad for Inf. I just want someone to tell me why it's a good idea to vote.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 00:43
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:You discern alignment from behaviour. We know in advance that Inf is not going to play to town's win con. We should vote him out now, when it's low-pressure and low-consequence, rather than be stuck on day 5 and asking ourselves "is this town anti-town Inf or scum anti-town Inf" Ok, I can get behind this. If it looks like Infs number is up I'll vote/hammer.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 00:50
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:dick scum prob pmom's explanation makes perfect sense for me. I wasn't really thinking about how Inf's likely future posting factors into it, I was more concerned with the push itself. Do you think I'm too easily persuaded?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 01:01
|
|
|
There's a reason I didn't just throw down a vote. We have plenty of time to discus which is what I think we should do. All I said was I'd vote and/or hammer if it looked like that's the way D1 is going. I think Pmom's explanation was good. chores, moat What are your opinions of Pmom's reasoning?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 01:06
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:im not playing your game im your father slash kidnapper i dont answer your questions but, but, but DAAAAAAAAD! 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 01:18
|
|
|
Moatillata posted:Not particularly taking it at face value atm. How do you feel about chores?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 02:00
|
|
|
chores, why did you vote Infi? 'Tis a simple request for a simple answer.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 11:20
|
|
|
I don't like how chores is dodging my questions. 100 yrs does seem a bit.. put on? But I've never played with said player before so I'm not sure if my feelings are accurate. So far I feel like Inf's own defense does make a decent point. ##vote chores
|
|
#
¿
Apr 5, 2017 23:55
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:i wasnt aware you asked me a question but the answer is probably that youre an idiot It's ok, just keep dodging scum.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 00:03
|
|
|
100, is the chance that you may be doing scum's bidding by mislynching Inf an acceptable risk to do a favor for a friend? What is your take on Ecco's alignment so far ? Do you think Ecco's beef with Inf is reasonable?
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 16:58
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:no he doesn't. I disagree. Inf's "content" may be off the mark most of the time, but I think it can lend to provoking thoughts. Specifically, I like to take Inf's lumpen lists and literally flip them upside down so that his town reads become his scum reads. That seems to end up being more accurate. 100, feel free to answer my questions for you on your own behalf.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 17:07
|
|
|
*Ecco poison's Capt Chores meal tonight* Sweet dreams..heh heh...
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 17:19
|
|
|
The chores/Ecco exchange feels fake to me.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 17:24
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:youre fake Oh yeah? Well... YOUR NOT MY REAL DAD, SO THERE!
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 17:27
|
|
|
I'm not feeling the Slamburger push. It's two joke-votes and a me too. The only case on Slamburger I can gather that has any basis in his/her posting is his/her initiation of the flavor discussion. I'm not sure the direction that burger tried to go in with that thought made him/her look good, but there are more posts that look like burger contributing to scum-hunting. There just aren't any votes that have a clearly defined case or thought out reasoning behind them. All in all, I'm leaning town with burger and disagree with the basis of the push so far. I think TNL has more to read into about flavor than anything that came about from burger's post. To be clear, I'm not reading TNL one way or the other on alignment, but I can say that there's a theme with TNL's posts that I'm picking up on. I just don't know what to make of it yet. I think Ecco and 100 are possible scumbros, with chores rounding out the bottom of that list. Ecco inviting 100 along to vote with her seems to be a way of distancing their relationship to one another, and how 100 had explained his/her vote as a favor to Ecco feels like more back-handed distancing. Chores is more of a gut feeling for me, coupled with avoiding my questions, it doesn't sit well with me. I'm willing to admit that this my just be a tunnel forming because chores is difficult to read. My vote was probably impulsive and lacking a solid foundation at this time. I just don't buy Ecco's sincerity in regard to the Inf dunk. I think if Ecco is playing to town's win condition, then she'd whether out the storm of Inf's bad posting and put more effort into actual scum-hunting rather than a policy dunk. ##vote Ecco
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:08
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:this entire paragraphs is nonsense by the way. "they're distancing from each other by very visibly colluding." On the contrary, it's the way in which the collusion is portrayed. The actual collusion is occurring in the scum doc, so a facade must be fabricated to give the illusion that non such collusion has occurred. Ecco: "Do me this favor in which it is visible in this here thread that I am asking this of you and you will agree of your own accord, having no ties to me in any way" 100: "yes, I shall agree to do you this favor while simultaneously acknowledging the fact that this push is not necessarily contrived on a notion of a pro-town play, I mean... it's possible Ecco is scum and I'd be saddened by the betrayal of trust if Inf flips town"
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:19
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:whats your question dingus See below: Dick Bastardly posted:pmom's explanation makes perfect sense for me. I wasn't really thinking about how Inf's likely future posting factors into it, I was more concerned with the push itself. Do you think I'm too easily persuaded? Dick Bastardly posted:chores, why did you vote Infi? 'Tis a simple request for a simple answer. Dick Bastardly posted:There's a reason I didn't just throw down a vote. We have plenty of time to discus which is what I think we should do. All I said was I'd vote and/or hammer if it looked like that's the way D1 is going. I think Pmom's explanation was good.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:27
|
|
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Is that how I should start talking to be better understood? 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:28
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:this is not how scum talk to each other. nobody talks this way. The first bold portion of text above is the same reasoning why I have my theory about you and 100's exchange in regard to the Inf push. The second bold portion of text above is not true as demonstrated below: EccoRaven posted:I just don't buy Ecco's sincerity in regard to the Inf dunk. I think if Ecco is playing to town's win condition, then she'd whether out the storm of Inf's bad posting and put more effort into actual scum-hunting rather than a policy dunk. This is the focal point of my vote (nice try though)
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:37
|
|
|
I will admit the first point (about you and 100's interaction) is a bit WIFOMY but I still stand by it.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:40
|
|
|
Something went wrong with my copy pasta and it made the last quote look like an ecco quote, but that is my vote I quoted obviously. I'm getting tied up at work, I should be around for dead line. Hopefully well before.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:50
|
|
|
got some chores tonight posted:if you dont already know i cant help you You couldn't be bothered to answer then so I can't expect you to now. It doesn't help me feel better about you however. I know you don't care and that's fine.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:53
|
|
|
Pinterest Mom posted:You understood and agreed with the logic when I explained it to you, but now you're voting Ecco for it? I'll re-read and address this when I get home, but I am not really following you here 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:56
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:hey DB address my response to your case. I will later. I have work stuff, then a drive home.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 18:57
|
|
|
EccoRaven posted:PMom explained why voting for Infinitum is good for the town (it's because he's a poo poo player and he needs to stop playing mafia). Yes. Ok, so as I've stated before, I understand policy voting. I just don't believe you on this one. From my post agreeing with pmom to now I've changed my mind about voting Inf. I think avoiding no-Lynch is probably the only vote I'll give Inf today. OK I'm gone for real. I'll be on for deadline.
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 19:01
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ May 8, 2024 14:53 |
|
|
Mr. F! posted:I'd rather no lynch 
|
|
#
¿
Apr 6, 2017 23:09
|
|