|
why the gently caress not sure.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2017 01:07 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 20:31 |
|
i didnt read the op but we should kill merk
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 01:37 |
|
permanene, i will lead your defense but only because i think you may be eligible for a HUGE SETTLEMENT call now. our operators are STANDING BY. Tired Moritz posted:Have you ever played with me before who this
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 01:42 |
|
peramene posted:Jeabus Mahogany, I have seen you refuse to surrender in the face of adversity and put up with a tremendous amount of horseshit. I therefore ask you to be my defense counsel i have seen every episode of the good wife, yOU PHILISTINE
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 02:03 |
|
how often do you beat your wife, para
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 12:14 |
|
Yeah, I was trying to make a "Do you still beat your wife" joke, but I hosed it up because I am dumb and not actually funny.
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 14:28 |
|
Growing increasingly uncomfortable with the half-jokey drive against the defendant, especially as people start voting. Also, what is stopping the town from systematically declaring people guilty and having the judge order a search on them?
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 15:37 |
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Generally agree its better not to vote pERA today even though she is being suspiciously quiet This is a weird equivocating post. In what way is she suspiciously quiet?
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 23:14 |
|
Also, it has literally been two years since I last played a Mafia game (not counting the one I just played in CC). Has a meta developed around Hal that I'm not aware of?
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 23:16 |
|
this is a stickup posted:pera is extremely wordy, and the utter lack of is surprising, but it's too early to for us to really say this means anything This seems like a reach less than 24 hours after the start of the game, but what trips me up is Hal thinking something is suspicious while also thinking that "its better not to vote pERA today." (1)
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 23:45 |
|
For some reason I thought the investigation required a guilty verdict.
|
# ¿ Sep 27, 2017 23:55 |
|
peramene posted:gulag's posting is so far the sole highlight of a bleak day in hell r u the mafia, pera?
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 01:52 |
|
b-minus1 posted:I mean you're welcome to investigate me if you want lol. it would just be a waste and yes this is a hardclaim that i am vanilla town that didnt answer the question
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 02:39 |
|
r u scum
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 02:40 |
|
pera, do you find anyone suspicious
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 02:47 |
|
What do you think about :b-minus1 posted:I mean you're welcome to investigate me if you want lol. it would just be a waste and yes this is a hardclaim that i am vanilla town and Hal Incandenza posted:Generally agree its better not to vote pERA today even though she is being suspiciously quiet
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 02:56 |
|
bminus’s conduct thus far reminds me a lot of his play in “Death of the Author,” where he flipped scum. It’s the same jokey, mechanics-focused posting. I have expressed issue with Hal’s equivocating before, but bminus’s most investigation posts give me a worse vibe. I would lean toward a discussion focused on him/her tomorrow.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 03:41 |
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:Is it your previous experience with him that makes you lean scum? Because a lot of other people have discussed a pragmatic mechanics-based vote. Reminds me of past behavior. b-minus1 posted:"maybe we should not kill peranene on day 1 and instead investigate another player" Probably by stating my reasoning from the get-go and finding a justification that didn't revolve solely around lurking.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 12:06 |
|
Confused. Thought the only possible votes were to declare perm innocent or guilty
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 17:56 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:you can vote for anyone! the defendant system is a cosmetic add-on to the mafia game that allows the judge to fudge with the execution, and might give a couple players a boon. Well, poo poo! ##vote: bminus
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 18:25 |
|
Don't get a sxum vibe from 100. Points seem logical and consistent. Took mord's original pist as a joke and forgot about it, but need to reread.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 20:31 |
|
Mordiceius posted:Gulag and b-minus are scum. Hth Elaborate.
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 20:32 |
|
please don't leave me out of the fishing expedition, y'all
|
# ¿ Sep 28, 2017 20:47 |
|
100YrsofAttitude posted:TLDR 100YrsofAttitude posted:My observations after thoroughly reading what's been said: 100, I went back and looked over Mord's posts. While I agree that (s)he is "antagonistic" and "dismissive," I can't think of a good reason for why scum would expose themselves by vouching for another player (1) on D1, especially when there was minimal non-joke pressure on that player. Both the manner in timing strike me as odd strategy for an anti-town role. If Mord does have additional information, I can't see how a scum player could be that confident. I still prefer bminus for the lynch.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2017 00:09 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:oh no Do footnotes upset you, PMom? I know it has been a while since I've broken them out (1), but I am sure that you will agree that my David Wallace Foster (2) style posting has been a boon for the town in games past (3), (4). It isn't a perfect tactic. I know that some have criticized it as unnecessary and obtuse. Still others have pointed out that it can be obtuse (5) or unnecessary (6). While the record is ultimately mixed, I feel that it has some utility in building cases (7). I can get carried away with the gimmick, but that is a risk for any poster.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2017 00:37 |
|
QuoProQuid posted:Do footnotes upset you, PMom? I know it has been a while since I've broken them out (1), but I am sure that you will agree that my David Wallace Foster (2) style posting has been a boon for the town in games past (3), (4). It isn't a perfect tactic. I know that some have criticized it as unnecessary and obtuse. Still others have pointed out that it can be obtuse (5) or unnecessary (6). ah beans, messed up my own jokes again by failing to preview a post again
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2017 00:37 |
|
tbqh, there's no votecount in the op and i legit have no idea who is voting for whom
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2017 00:38 |
|
Votecount for Day 1 b-minus1 (1): QuoProQuid Diqnol (1): Jeabus Mahogany 100YrsofAttitude (1): Diqnol Jonathan Fisk (1): Pinterest Mom Tired Moritz (1): Tired Moritz peramene (1): this is a stickup Mordiceius (1): 100YrsofAttitude Not Voting (8): b-minus1, GulagDolls, Hal Incandenza, Jonathan Fisk, Mordiceius, peramene, Retro Futurist, vector_to With 15 alive, it's 8 votes to execute. The current deadline is September 29th, 2017 at 6 p.m. EDT -- that's in about 22 hours, 20 minutes.
|
# ¿ Sep 29, 2017 00:40 |
|
Pinterest Mom posted:b-, town Can I assume that, because you are not voting for him, b-town did not flip scum?
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 17:07 |
|
im illiterate
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 17:09 |
|
Mord ended the day pointing a finger at me (1), (2), which seems, in context, more serious than his previous suspicions (3). He was otherwise a fairly minor disruptive force (4) who had attracted some serious suspicion over the previous day (5). It would seem to make more sense to keep him alive to sow chaos than to kill him. Unless the kill was random or done for meta reasons, the kill looks like it was intended to sow suspicion against me. Rereading.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 17:25 |
|
Looking back, the only things resembling attacks from yesterday were from 100 (1), (2), but the former post is a joke and the latter is a clarifying question, and Hal (3), which was also just a clarifying response. I get town vibes from 100 because of her logic and casing (4). Hal hasn't posted enough for me to have a good read on him and I wouldn't be comfortable pursuing a case against him at the moment. peramene posted:Ladies and gentlemen of the Jury, The mechanics give me a headache, but I think the strongest play is to do what we did yesterday: Split the vote between two players and have to searches. Agree with you on PMom and think her flips ought to be validated as soon as possible.
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 17:42 |
|
Wait, was there a third flip?
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 17:52 |
|
Little Mac posted:Sorry for the late post. Had plans tonight and set the time for six so I would be able to end the day before I left, but company showed up early. ??????????????
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 17:52 |
|
Is there reason to believe that 100 is self-aligned and not acting with a posse?
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 18:45 |
|
GulagDolls posted:oh. 100 years was only interested in the kill everyone plan due to being an invulnerable murderer invulnerable?
|
# ¿ Oct 1, 2017 18:46 |
|
I tentatively agree with PMom that there is... a significant risk of trying to split the vote when 100 has a vested interest in ensuring that that does not occur. I would be uneasy in participating in such a plan. I think the best option is to vote GUILTY on 100, have the judge stump her, and play the game normally. I don't want to waste an alignment flip unless 100 has other partners and/or we have a good idea who the Mafia is. If 100 wants to continue "playing as town" and scumhunting, she can continue to do so... as a stump.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2017 01:14 |
|
peramene posted:I suppose this would be the town-aligned use of this ability. Does it nullify all the person's votes for that day or just the specific vote on a person? If I vote for you and you object, can I switch my vote to Jeabus?
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2017 01:16 |
|
Diqnol posted:I won't lie to you all. I'm really not feeling the concept of reading the thread right now. Still have a couple of days, though! thx for letting us kno
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2017 01:17 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 20:31 |
|
It seemed important to look at the night kill because most of the D1 posts were jokes. Looking over Mord's posts, the intent seemed to be a frame job, which happened in the last Mafia game I played. I prefer footnotes to quoting. Generally only lstter use when I am on mobile. Mom, is there any content in the 100 discussion that seems suspicious to you? It seems like a good way to boost activity without committing reads.
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2017 17:58 |