Squibbles posted:Except the webpage says (Web2)(Web3) = Web5. So really it should be Web6 if they are multiplying like their thing indicates. Wouldn't that then be Web26? Even more growth!
|
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2022 20:22 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 17:36 |
Conceptually isn't it web2 served via web3? So web2 over web3, expressed as web2/web3 = 0.666. Ergo, Jack Dorsey is the devil. QED
|
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2022 20:57 |
Hey, funny how quote isn't edit.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2022 20:57 |
latinotwink1997 posted:If it’s daytime where you are, the moon would be on the other side of the planet and therefore down. This makes crypto “to the moon” always a valid statement** I know this is from like five pages back, but, uh... I feel like this needed to be addressed. What?
|
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2022 02:21 |
MarcusSA posted:They are basically saying buy at the dip and hodl Oh, I get their intent, but the moon isn't only up at night.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 14, 2022 02:37 |
fullroundaction posted:One of my true believer friends half joking / half not-joking was telling me to buy the dip. Obviously I would never, but I let myself think about it for a few minutes. You're not weighing the risks and benefits properly. If you bought at $20k, the downside risk is a 10% loss because 18k is the price floor1. The upside potential is unlimited, but realistically were talking about Bitcoin $100k to $1mm by year end2. 1. See these charts covered in PowerPoint shapes that conclude an 18k price floor 2. See these contradictory charts covered in PowerPoint shapes that conclude a trend towards $1mm
|
|
# ¿ Jun 16, 2022 14:40 |
Mooseontheloose posted:This doesn't surprise me. I work in politics, policy, and campaigns and live in New England. I know exactly the type you are talking about. I bet you love the Free Staters.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 17, 2022 17:55 |
nexous posted:Have you ever watched the movie Pi? It’s about a guy who tries to predict the stock market and then gives himself a lobotomy with a drill. 11:27, press return.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2022 16:27 |
OzyMandrill posted:That's how a hash works in normal computing, but bitcoin is stupid. The use of the term guess is what, I think, is a bad choice. It doesn't guess a random number, it just generates one, computes the hash, and checks if the result meets the difficulty requirements. There's no current shortcuts that would enable you to reduce the search space of that random number. There are broken hash methods that do, and if we were using one of those, I think "guess" would be a fine word to use. As it stands now, to most people, guess would imply that there can be some strategy or methodology to it, but it is literally just random numbers as inputs. It doesn't even need to be random. You could just start at 0, then 1, then 2, etc.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2022 17:35 |
That is exactly the demographics I expected if asked who you might find in a "Golden Ape" club.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 22, 2022 00:49 |
Dr. Video Games 0031 posted:put every nft bro onto one of elon musk's rockets (they'll sign right up) and then launch it directly into the sun I thought we all learned how orbital mechanics works via kerbals.
|
|
# ¿ Jun 24, 2022 23:04 |
LifeSunDeath posted:
E: this was like the $40k or $30k dip. Good thing I bought in hard! carticket fucked around with this message at 14:22 on Jun 30, 2022 |
|
# ¿ Jun 30, 2022 14:12 |
The problem with technical analysis is that it's too right. It is 100% correct. However, if you take action based on your analysis, you've changed the future and you must re-analyze with the new information, which at that point is completely wrong. Much like a cryptographic hash, the smallest change to the input results in a wildly different output. Technical analysis only looks wrong because people are smart enough to figure it out, but dumb enough to act upon it.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2022 01:28 |
The book is both sci-fi and not sci-fi until you read it and force it into one state or the other.
|
|
# ¿ Jul 4, 2022 05:14 |
I kind of hope that story continues until Bitcoin crashes to the point that his hard drive is worthless, and then the municipality finally says "ok".
|
|
# ¿ Jul 28, 2022 12:53 |
How do you suppose Nugen is doing these days?
|
|
# ¿ Jul 31, 2022 02:48 |
Party Ape posted:This just reminds me that people have no real understanding of risk vs reward. These people don't understand that "5% return on an investment" is the same as saying "hey, give me your entire 100k of life savings for a year and if my idea pans out I'll give you 5000 back but if it doesn't lol gently caress you". No, it's only 5%! It must be a safe investment. That's basically the long and short of it. People conflate low reward meaning low risk.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 1, 2022 03:44 |
Rotten Red Rod posted:Boy, who could have seen this coming I suspect some of them are the same company. This time it will be big.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 5, 2022 22:13 |
How could BDO Italia even do this. You can't properly translate Arabic numbers that large into Roman numerals.
|
|
# ¿ Aug 19, 2022 23:07 |
They did what appears to be a log curve on an x-log y chart, which iirc basically makes it linear growth.
|
|
# ¿ Sep 7, 2022 20:00 |
Fishstick posted:Can someone explain to a financial idiot (me) why PoS would trigger SEC rules but PoW doesnt? Proof of Work/Waste is doing something in exchange for a reward, which in the long run ends up proportional to the amount of work. Proof of Stake is doing nothing (I think you need to still run a validator node, but that's basically no work), and getting a reward, which in the long run ends up proportional to the amount staked. The Howey test is used to decide if something is a security, with the following four points. An investment of money In a common enterprise With the expectation of profit To be derived from the efforts of others So, PoW lacks the investment (I don't think capital equipment would count, but maybe), common enterprise, and the efforts of others. Mining pools add a common enterprise, but payout is proportional to your effort. Selling mining pool shares would pass this test and be a security. PoS is still a little gray, I think. There's definitely an investment of "money". The way staking does selection of stakers to generate blocks could probably be considered a common enterprise. The last point is where I think it's iffy. You are selected proportional to your stake, as I understand it, but the validation/generation could be considered your work, thus failing the test. Staking pools (the analog to mining pools) remove the element of your work and easily pass as securities. I would imagine most staking is done via pools. I am not an expert on this at all. I just learn what I have to in order to make fun of crypto in an informed manner.
|
|
# ¿ Sep 16, 2022 11:16 |
Vampire Panties posted:
A-series VC round was led by Martingale Capital
|
|
# ¿ Nov 14, 2022 23:15 |
|
|
# ¿ May 16, 2024 17:36 |
I would blow Dane Cook posted:vitalik buterin bulge FYI this is your something awful tab. Just type in the address bar to search Google.
|
|
# ¿ Nov 24, 2022 01:54 |