Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Locked thread
Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Steve2911 posted:

I mean, did you expect the film to flash forward a decade and show how Wakanda's impacted the rest of the world?

What exactly did you want T'Challa to do at the end?

I don't know. I'm not the film's screenwriter. The film's screenwriter, however, wrote a situation where an African king is confronted with the staggering inequality of the world, specifically the US, and his response is to build an outreach centre in the US, in accordance with its laws and with the approval of a CIA agent.

So, maybe be in a better thought out film? One that doesn't imply that the oppression of the Black Diaspora is somehow the fault of a small African nation?

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

temple
Jul 29, 2006

I have actual skeletons in my closet
I saw it. I was blown away. It felt like a dream because I never thought this style of movie would exist. There hasn't been a movie with its budget, marketing, and profile be so thoroughly black. Black Panther is like the Obama inauguration all over again. If you don't feel something than you haven't paid attention to the struggle in America. The plot dealt with a timely issue in the diaspora. The characters were varied. It had fantasy and sci-fi. I think Black Panther will be the the bar for future black films, at least non-dramas. Pretty much everyone I know has seen it or planning.

3D sucked.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

temple posted:

The plot dealt with a timely issue in the diaspora.
The issue of princes returning to Africa and trying to distribute superweapons?

stev
Jan 22, 2013

Please be excited.



Snowman_McK posted:

his response is to build an outreach centre in the US, in accordance with its laws and with the approval of a CIA agent.

That's like one thing? And intended to be a first step. He was also shown to take in refugees and offer help at the UN. If you wanted him to go to war with the US well... That was never going to happen, was it?

temple
Jul 29, 2006

I have actual skeletons in my closet

Snowman_McK posted:

The issue of princes returning to Africa and trying to distribute superweapons?
of course

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Steve2911 posted:

If you wanted him to go to war with the US well... That was never going to happen, was it?

And having you say that about a film called 'Black Panther' is kind of loving depressing isn't it?

Also, about the 'first step,' do you not sort of see the problem with arguing for incremental change working within the system in the present day US?

Uncle Wemus
Mar 4, 2004

It was a happy ending for the CIA who now knows about Wakandas tech, weapons, and resources which historically has never resulted in anything bad happening.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
I think if the post credits scene was a small 'flash forward' or something yes it woulda helped the movie a lot. Instead it literally ends with ~teach the inner city to code~ and then...I guess they're still lying to the UN? Like who are they even helping? Is it literally just a US/Wakanda thing, was that sly smile supposed to mean he's gonna show the whole UN what he's got? Maybe a jump ahead to show the good work Wakanda is doing and all, something to show they're on the global stage as a source of progress to contrast Killmonger? You kinda can't just end it on 'eh maybe we'll teach em to code'!

Also yea it's never not gonna be gross when a movie called Black Panther ends with a white CIA agent being their best friend.

RevolverDivider
Nov 12, 2016

The lengths morons are going to willfully ignore what the movie is doing and saying in this topic just to piss and moan about the MCU is astounding.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

RevolverDivider posted:

The lengths morons are going to willfully ignore what the movie is doing and saying in this topic just to piss and moan about the MCU is astounding.

What was the film doing and saying?

Inspector Gesicht
Oct 26, 2012

500 Zeus a body.


This movie started on the wrong foot for me since it's an action-scene starring a guy in a black-costume at night with a shaky camera. The last fight scene is a bit of a miss as well since it's two guys wearing the same black outfit fighting in a dark mine-shaft. Really I liked the all non-action drama-scenes because they're obviously more the director's forte. Only the fight scenes at the waterfall worked for me because they were simple; just two shirtless dudes duking it out. I wish the producers of these superhero-movies would hire out these sequences to REAL-action-directors and give us cleaner, easier to follow yet intense action scenes like The Raid, only with less blood and faces on hot-plates.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=orNKptscG0A

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
in the grand cultural sense the movie is a net positive as it's more mainstream acceptance of diversity in these stories and all and that's good but like most things getting mainstream acceptance it usually has to come at the cost of saying 'now it's ok, we're not like those RADICALS'.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

sexpig by night posted:

in the grand cultural sense the movie is a net positive as it's more mainstream acceptance of diversity in these stories and all and that's good but like most things getting mainstream acceptance it usually has to come at the cost of saying 'now it's ok, we're not like those RADICALS'.

This is sort of what frustrates me: in terms of representation, the film is a gigantic step forward. I never expected to see 'afro-futurism' in the broader cultural dialogue. In many respects, it's absolutely top notch. Even the plotting, as far as being a film plot, is structurally sound

It's just the film's statement when you remember that Africa, Oakland and the CIA all really exist, is muddled at best.

I have this feeling that there's a tendency for film's about under-represented groups to both try and do a bit too much because you don't know how long it'll be before you get to make another(there was enough plot in Black Panther for at least two movies, maybe three) and also face far too much scrutiny, since a lot of the weight of representation falls on too few films and shows.

Martman
Nov 20, 2006

Saw this opening night in Oakland, had no idea that connection was gonna be there which was awesome. Everyone was super into it.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
also to be clear the movie was loving awesome and easily one of the best MCU products, everyone's performance was great and the visuals were fantastic. You can have philosophical issues with a product you enjoy.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

sexpig by night posted:

also to be clear the movie was loving awesome and easily one of the best MCU products, everyone's performance was great and the visuals were fantastic. You can have philosophical issues with a product you enjoy.

The whole sequence in the Casino is terrific, and I really wanted more of African James Bond telling a CIA agent to gently caress off.

Gatts
Jan 2, 2001

Goodnight Moon

Nap Ghost
I'm pretty meh about it but it was solid. Chadwick was very subdued. The humor I thought worked well. Michael B Jordan was great and full of passion and I thought Klaw was awesomely entertaining as if it was all a rollercoaster adventure. Okoye/Dora Milaje was cool, Lupita was awesome, and so was Shuri. Those three were very natural and brought life to the movie. I liked the scenes in the mountains with M'Baku, that despite rivalry, they had respect for things. The effects, frankly, kind of sucked, and I didn't think Wakanda had a great grandeur but it was okay and the sets were limited. I felt some of the tribal elements were kind of awkward, the chest bobbing during the trial by combat, but it was like they wanted to blend the history with modern and futuristic so it kind of felt a bit off and not cohesive in vision/design. I'm almost okay they didn't reference the Soul Gem allowing them to talk to their dead but that's obvious what that is. I did like the panthers representing the elder dead Kings.

The overall story arc was good. It was borne out of something complex and admitted the issues of sins past and what needed to be done for the future.

I think the proper viewing sequence is Captain America: Civil War -> Black Panther -> Coming to America.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Snowman_McK posted:

The whole sequence in the Casino is terrific, and I really wanted more of African James Bond telling a CIA agent to gently caress off.

Yea the casino scene was way too rushed feeling for how good it was.

Also, we need an M'Baku solo spin-off from this, come on Netflix.

Mazzagatti2Hotty
Jan 23, 2012

JON JONES APOLOGIST #3

Snowman_McK posted:

And having you say that about a film called 'Black Panther' is kind of loving depressing isn't it?

Also, about the 'first step,' do you not sort of see the problem with arguing for incremental change working within the system in the present day US?

My impression is that this film would be a failure to you unless it actually showed them fixing systemic inequality at the end. Which, while I would be interested how they accomplished that myself, I'm perfectly satisfied seeing the first steps being taken.

The film concludes with the cardinal sin of Wakanda's ruling family being put right. T'challa is not abandoning the little boys in Oakland like his father did Erik. He is putting the resources of his nation behind making the world a better place for them. He is announcing to the world that Wakanda is there to help them all forge a new path together.

What will come of this remains to be seen, but it certainly ends on the idea that there is hope for the future. I'm excited to see where they take this in the inevitable sequels.

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth
I don't think it had to be FIXED but seeing them do literally anything about it beyond 'let's build an out reach center here soon' would have helped yea.

Having Killmonger be a revolutionary with an agenda means we need to see T'Challa's agenda succeed as the more just and moral one in the story. We never really see that payoff even in the little post-credits scene, so we're just kinda left with 'well, Killmonger at least got poo poo going before he got train/claw murdered' vs 'sometime soon we'll teach these kids about technology' which is a noble goal but...why can't we just see it? I don't think it needs to end with some saccharine 'and that's how Wakanda fixed racism' but why not a final scene of them IN the outreach center passing by young black American kids learning about Wakanda to contrast with the opening 'tell me about home' stuff? You can still have T'Challa there talking about how the center was built on the site of his father's greatest failure and all, just...be inspirational? It's a loving super hero movie, have a goal other than 'some day soon we'll share our magic space metal with the CIA'?

Speleothing
May 6, 2008

Spare batteries are pretty key.
The problem is that they went too hard on the advanced technology. If it wasn't a sci fi paradise with perfect healthcare and energy weapons and free hovercars then the decision to remain isolated would seem less insulting to the rest of the world.

Gatts
Jan 2, 2001

Goodnight Moon

Nap Ghost

Z. Autobahn posted:

Also the point of the “WHAT ARE THOSE” line isn’t to make a reference for a gags’s sake, it’s to establish that Shuri is the kind of dork who makes Vine references in her super-lab. Same with M’baku’s vegeterian joke. That’s actually one of the things I liked most about it compared to the MCU’s typical quip-a-minute style, that the jokes were all humanizing elements grounded in the characters personalities and not just “oh no put a joke here because sincerity is uncomfortable”

I agree. The jokes felt borne out of character than dumbass quips that could have come out of anyone's mouth. The supporting cast had good life and sincerity to them.

temple
Jul 29, 2006

I have actual skeletons in my closet
wakanda didn't cause the world's problems so idk why they have to solve the world's problems. why not make a movie showing america stop oppressing black people?
:thunk:

The REAL Goobusters
Apr 25, 2008

Z. Autobahn posted:

Also the point of the “WHAT ARE THOSE” line isn’t to make a reference for a gags’s sake, it’s to establish that Shuri is the kind of dork who makes Vine references in her super-lab. Same with M’baku’s vegeterian joke. That’s actually one of the things I liked most about it compared to the MCU’s typical quip-a-minute style, that the jokes were all humanizing elements grounded in the characters personalities and not just “oh no put a joke here because sincerity is uncomfortable”

drat they really have a what are those line in this movie


That’s pretty wack

sexpig by night
Sep 8, 2011

by Azathoth

Gatts posted:

I agree. The jokes felt borne out of character than dumbass quips that could have come out of anyone's mouth. The supporting cast had good life and sincerity to them.

yea I normally hate 'oh look how clever this kid is they're just so smart and goofy and quirky' characters but I love Shuri in the comics and her actress nails her in the movie. Everyone clearly was having a good time with their roles, I have no idea who was how 'big' a fan of the comics and all but basically anyone with meaningful screen time clearly was trying hard to nail the character as a living being rather than just a comic character.

AndyElusive
Jan 7, 2007

I have a friend who's convinced the "Don't freeze" line is referencing the Ugandan Knuckles meme.

temple
Jul 29, 2006

I have actual skeletons in my closet
Another thing that struck me leaving the film. Wakanda makes more sense than other places in comics. Any wakandan could be black panther, T'Challa is him because of his royality. But all Wakandans enjoy their technology and gifts because black panther's power is the power of his civilization. So, his powers and technology are pretty standard for super heros, its just expanded to include all citizens. This places the rest of the comic heroes in a bind. Why doesn't Stark share his technology? Why aren't the avengers ending world hunger? I know the MCU tries to deal with these issues but it comes off as hypocritical to criticize Wakanda for not sharing when the rest of the heroes are fine keeping their powers and tech to themselves.

temple fucked around with this message at 03:18 on Feb 19, 2018

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Mazzagatti2Hotty posted:

My impression is that this film would be a failure to you unless it actually showed them fixing systemic inequality at the end. Which, while I would be interested how they accomplished that myself, I'm perfectly satisfied seeing the first steps being taken.

Or, just not directly allude to it repeatedly while doing nothing to change the very horrifying status quo, where 1 in 9 young black men are in prison, for instance, or where there is a significant, measurable gap in life expectancy based on race.

Again, this is a film where a character called BLACK PANTHER works alongside a member of the American intelligence community against a orphaned, impoverished black kid who pulled himself up by his bootstraps.

The ending is about as good an ending as we could get from the plot that precedes it. The fix is in the film leading up to it, not the ending itself. Killmonger should not have been an out and out villain (you can argue about how complicated he is, but the narrative path is always about confronting him and stopping him, not redeeming him) the loving CIA agent shouldn't have been a good guy (which he is, unless you want to demonstrate a scene where is not) The victim of oppression shouldn't have immediately become the oppressor. Don't have a film where its implied the continued suffering of black people only happens because an African nation with-holds help.

Stuff like that.

Again, the film is fine in a vacuum where Oakland, the US, Africa and the CIA all don't exist in their current form, but the idea that this film is making a statement is loving laughable.

Samara
Jan 6, 2011

quote:

Deposited $150 at Mt Gox to try this Bitcoin thing out.

Stolen 6 days later. Really enjoyed my time there.

Helpful? Please donate - being this retarded ain't cheap!

Samara Investments
Basement Suite #101
Mom's House, Hometown FL
USAAA+
I loved it. Why is this forum always such a poo poo show

Spacebump
Dec 24, 2003

Dallas Mavericks: Generations

Samara posted:

I loved it. Why is this forum always such a poo poo show

Sometimes people forget the difference in fact vs opinion then feel the need to post for a few weeks about a movie they didn't like.

Unormal
Nov 16, 2004

Mod sass? This evening?! But the cakes aren't ready! THE CAKES!
Fun Shoe
Movie ruled. Colonizer BBS divided on if it sucked or not.

BrianWilly
Apr 24, 2007

There is no homosexual terrorist Johnny Silverhand
There's a sense that Wakanda might not actually know how bad the problems of the world had become beyond some broad strokes insipidies of "Oh all those outsiders sure are backwards not like us noble Wakandans" or whatever. Again, it's no coincidence that every character in this film who actually lived outside of Wakanda -- that's N'Jobu, Killmonger, and Nakia -- wanted Wakanda to step out and fix problems.

Erik Stevens in particular is not just a product of the outside world or a product of Wakanda, but specifically a product of Wakanda's negligence to the outside world. T'Challa being confronted with this person is him literally being beat over the head with this outside problems/Wakanda's negligence to the point that he can't ignore it anymore. His arcs in both Civil War and this film are essentially him being stubbornly dismissive of some easy-to-see truths, and then eventually finding clarity through opposition against those truths.

Raccooon
Dec 5, 2009

Michael B Jordan is a very handsome man.

SatansBestBuddy
Sep 26, 2010

by FactsAreUseless

Snowman_McK posted:

What was the film doing and saying?

When you are in control of a powerful and wealthy nation, you should use that power to help people.

This is not that hard to figure out, people.

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

Spacebump posted:

Sometimes people forget the difference in fact vs opinion then feel the need to post for a few weeks about a movie they didn't like.

There's no one here who's forgotten that difference, dickhead.

Deadulus posted:

Michael B Jordan is a very handsome man.

This is true. He also looks like he killed and ate the version of himself in Creed. He is loving massive.

BrianWilly posted:

There's a sense that Wakanda might not actually know how bad the problems of the world had become

Become? The oppression of black people is not a new phenomenon, and the prologue specifically depicts the slave trade. The Great African War and the Belgian Congo happened more or less on their doorstep.

SatansBestBuddy posted:

When you are in control of a powerful and wealthy nation, you should use that power to help people.

This is not that hard to figure out, people.

And if this message wasn't played through the filter of an African nation, whose leader works alongside the CIA, in a franchise that also features Tony Stark (what was the last thing he did to help people? And how much difference did it make), it would not be as troublesome as it is.

Yes, the message is very obviously 'do good things, stop bad things' but ignoring the specifics is the thing that requires one to be pretty loving dense.

Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 02:29 on Feb 19, 2018

SatansBestBuddy
Sep 26, 2010

by FactsAreUseless

Snowman_McK posted:

And if this message wasn't played through the filter of an African nation

A fake utopian nation, which is also in Africa. I feel that it being both a fantasy nation and a peaceful utopia are more important that it being African, ie if this was a secret fake Asian nation revealing itself to help the world the basic message would be the same, it's the context that would be different.

quote:

whose leader works alongside the CIA

One member, unofficially, and it's somebody he only learns to trust after said agent helps save his girlfriends life. We also don't know to what degree it even matters, since they reveal Wakanda's technology at the end anyway, so even if the CIA were informed they had maybe a week with that knowledge before the rest of the world found out.

quote:

in a franchise that also features Tony Stark

Who isn't mentioned or consider at all at any point in the film? And who also isn't the king of a nation.

quote:

it would not be as troublesome as it is.

This reads more like you're trying to find ways to make it troublesome than it actually being so.

quote:

Yes, the message is very obviously 'do good things, stop bad things' but ignoring the specifics is the thing that requires one to be pretty loving dense.

But you're only cherry picking the negative points, yes there is more complexity to the issues at large but I don't know how you'd expect a loving Marvel Movie to address any of those points? The closest they came to political discourse was arguing over who had custody of Klaw, did you really expect they'd have a meeting to discuss how to deal with the CIA or which countries will get outreach centres or the degree to which they share technology with the world?

Like, I get what you're saying, but I also have no idea why any of it detracts from the overall sentiment of the movie?

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

Ritual combat seems a poor way to appoint the head of the executive.

Abolish the monarchy, proportional representation with certain seats being tribal, others directly elected.

Minister of Defence M'baku replaces all weapons with really long sticks.

Minister of Culture that dude with the lip plate advocates everyone wear his great suits.

im on the net me boys
Feb 19, 2017

Hhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhjhhhhhhjhhhhhhhhhjjjhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh cannabis

Aurubin posted:

Ritual combat seems a poor way to appoint the head of the executive.

Abolish the monarchy, proportional representation with certain seats being tribal, others directly elected.

Minister of Defence M'baku replaces all weapons with really long sticks.

I'd prefer a dictatorship of the proletariat tbh

Snowman_McK
Jan 31, 2010

SatansBestBuddy posted:

A fake utopian nation, which is also in Africa. I feel that it being both a fantasy nation and a peaceful utopia are more important that it being African, ie if this was a secret fake Asian nation revealing itself to help the world the basic message would be the same, it's the context that would be different.
You're right to invoke the context. Because the context of asking a wealthy fictional African nation is kind of different to a wealthy fictional nation of anywhere else. And this film features a fictional wealthy african nation and specifically invokes the black diaspora.

quote:

One member, unofficially, and it's somebody he only learns to trust after said agent helps save his girlfriends life. We also don't know to what degree it even matters, since they reveal Wakanda's technology at the end anyway, so even if the CIA were informed they had maybe a week with that knowledge before the rest of the world found out.
One member of THE CIA, WHICH IS A REAL THING THAT EXISTS AND HAS A loving HORRIFYING HISTORY IN AFRICA AND WITH THE BLACK COMMUNITY IN AMERICA. I mean, this is a comic book movie. Make it a fictional agency, not a real one that, again, has an absolutely horrifying history.

Also, yes, he's only one character, so is M'Baku, who is absolutely representative of his people.

And what makes you so sure he was there unofficially? He was in South Korea officially, and then was injured. He didn't go off the grid or anything.

quote:

Who isn't mentioned or consider at all at any point in the film? And who also isn't the king of a nation.
Stark becomes a one man army to solve the problem of some terrorists that kidnapped him. T'Challa, to address the problem of systemic racism, poverty, and oppression, builds an outreach centre. Let's play spot the difference.

quote:

This reads more like you're trying to find ways to make it troublesome than it actually being so.
Yes, 'the problems of the world's black population would be alleviated if an African nation did more' is certainly a thing that one needs to work hard at to find problems with.

quote:

But you're only cherry picking the negative points, yes there is more complexity to the issues at large but I don't know how you'd expect a loving Marvel Movie to address any of those points? The closest they came to political discourse was arguing over who had custody of Klaw, did you really expect they'd have a meeting to discuss how to deal with the CIA or which countries will get outreach centres or the degree to which they share technology with the world?
I'm not cherry picking, i'm noticing specifics. Specifics that the film chose to include.
And no, I don't expect them to address them in any real way, which is why i'm mystified that they brought them up.

quote:

Like, I get what you're saying, but I also have no idea why any of it detracts from the overall sentiment of the movie?
You don't get why the specifics of a film's text impact the reading of that text? Is this a real statement?

Snowman_McK fucked around with this message at 03:22 on Feb 19, 2018

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Aurubin
Mar 17, 2011

If I can nitpick about something other than if the message of the movie was effective or not; everyone's using energy swords and capes with force fields in them, and the Jabari show up with shillelaghs.

Just made me chuckle a bit.

  • Locked thread