|
i have been doing a histographic paper on Nixons legacy? any tips or sugestions. here is all the sources i have used so far. all the president men by woodward and bernstein all the volumes of The Nixon Watch by John F oseborne Richard Nixon memoirs. the nixon trilogy by stephen Ambrose(probably using the last two books more) Nixonland by pearlstein Invisible Bridge by Pealstein Richard Nixon: the life by John A. Farrell president Nixon:alone in the white house by richard reeves. Reinventing Richard Nixon by Daniel Frick(talks alot about the museum and how the media rehabilitated his image) and Being Nixon: a man divided by evan thomas(who wrote a great book on Eisenhower) i am trying to find the source/article that first talks about him killing the paris peace talks. also any other suggestions.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2018 01:36 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 15:46 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Richard Nixon: A Life, by John Farrell thanks. my basic outline is, he was viewed as a giant piece of poo poo after he resigned but ambrose and his museum slowly made him sound decent through various bullshit and decorum. most works now treat him as either a evil gently caress who took lessons from nixon or a weird complicated rear end in a top hat.
|
# ¿ Apr 1, 2018 02:09 |
|
Teriyaki Hairpiece posted:Here's my post about Chester Arthur. i mean Garfield was basically murdered because of the patron system anyway by a crazed syphilitic man who wanted to be a consul and then spent months in horrible agony as doctors poked around him until he died. i am sure Arthur saw alot of it. plus sphilic dude screamed "arthur is president" over and over again when he was tackled. so that could have lead to change too.
|
# ¿ Apr 15, 2018 05:30 |
|
Rappaport posted:Why is it so important to maintain an illusion that gross people aren't? The Kennedys had one girl lobotomized because she talked too much. Joe Kennedy sr was a evil piece of poo poo. kinda of fred christ trump style rear end in a top hat.
|
# ¿ Apr 21, 2018 20:55 |
|
Alter Ego posted:TONS OF AWESOME WRITING AND STUFF. I knew he ended up being pretty cool with anti corruption stuff, but i didnt know about the pro civil rights he was. in general, who would you say was the last good Republican president. if going by the last 70 years or so(not counting the progressive eras ones) id say Eisenhower.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2018 00:18 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Eisenhower is the only one you'd have had to convince me not to vote for. Yeah, i have been reading a good evan thomas book on him. he did/made lovely mistakes that would gently caress us in the future but he did good domestically. I have been writing my final term paper on Nixon and how his legacy has changed throughout the years. maybe when i finish it i will some up some of my lovely findings.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2018 03:05 |
|
Alter Ego posted:I'd like to read that. Your paper could be the effortpost on Nixon maybe. i might PM you for some question. either way, right now i just finished summarizing is autobiography and i am getting into how american becoming more conservative during and after carter led to he rehabilitation. i know a bunch of it came from clowns like buchannan and such and kissenger and stephen ambrose. what sucks is its a historiography term paper so i cant do a straight narrative.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2018 03:16 |
|
Alter Ego posted:All right, fellas. It looked close for a while there, but I think we have a winner: Franklin Pierce, the man from Concord. he is the one who saw his son get horrifically killed in front of him in train, right and it broke his wife(understandably) and she spent the entire term in the bedroom praying.
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2018 03:41 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:i think instead of Alter Ego writing a big long 8-post epic about how awful Ronald Reagan is we should just have a book club reading of The Invisible Bridge and The Clothes Have No Emperor and all regale in tales of Ronald Reagan's soulless, empty-headed, country-ruining time on our planet. i have been using invicible bridge for my paper. its good poo poo but i cant pleasure/hate read because paper
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2018 15:50 |
|
great post alter ego, as always. basicaly grant did what most of the other union generals didnt do. he realized confederates didnt have resources or manpower and if he kept punching them, they would eventuality give up. a bunch of the other generals were either overly cautious and or didnt push any advantage when they had it. or they were just lovely commanders.
|
# ¿ May 6, 2018 20:55 |
|
almost finished my nixon paper and i find myself in a weird quandary. even though he is far worse monster then trump(and most modern president maybe other then W) i find myself relating to him much more and being much more "likeable". From reading all his bios and memoirs and poo poo, i can at least understand why he believed in what he did and i can sorta understand why he did it. he was a paranoid little man who pushed people away because he was afraid of dragging others down with him. like at least nixon has depth. trump is just a dumb monster who doesnt care about anyone but himself. nixon had the same streak but that mostly started in his second term when everything started going to hell. i am not defending him at all but nixon was fascinating creature.
|
# ¿ May 7, 2018 22:34 |
|
Alter Ego posted:That's why I find Nixon's character fascinating. You get the feeling that if he had had even slightly more confidence in himself that his life would have been drastically different. yeah. he had a massive chip on his shoulder because he didnt go to an ivy league school(back when that mattered a ton) and he came from poverty and he always felt looked down up by the rich liberals(he was probably right about that) He was only the VP because he was the palin of the time and it would keep the hard right satisfied because Eisenhower was pretty liberal and wanted to expand on parts of the new deal while pretending he wasn't. its interesting stuff.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2018 00:34 |
|
Alter Ego posted:You may be slightly disappointed. he wasn't that bad of a guy. hell he did a ton of good. the problem was he was stuck in the hard line conservative belief that goverment couldn't do poo poo about depression and "it had to sort itself out" also he was a crushed a peaceful demonstration with women and children with loving tanks.
|
# ¿ May 8, 2018 16:30 |
|
tigersklaw posted:There’s a line from that Oliver Stone movie where I think Kissinger says something like “Nixon would have been a great man if someone actually loved him” or something like that. I could be wrong and yea it’s a movie not a documentary but I’ve always found that fascinating too its not far off the mark. l can find it in my self to "forgive" him sorta for watergate. to use the excuse a bunch of his supporters used, everyone probaly did that sorta poo poo to an extent though he took it insanely far. thing is he did so much worse then that. his worse act was sabotaging the 1968 peace talks with the NVA. https://www.politico.com/magazine/story/2017/08/06/nixon-vietnam-candidate-conspired-with-foreign-power-win-election-215461 Dapper_Swindler fucked around with this message at 22:31 on May 8, 2018 |
# ¿ May 8, 2018 22:20 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:nixon is a garbage human being please stop this dumb dumb line of discussion. go read Hunter S. Thompson's memorial of the man if you seem to have forgotten that fact. yeah, i know. I am sorry. I deep in the trenches of reading stuff about him. He is an evil monster but i can see why he became one in a depressing way i guess. and yes i love that article too.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 19:14 |
|
tigersklaw posted:Nixon was absolutely a trash monster of a man, a villain of the highest order, and if there is a hell (there’s not) he’s frying in it now. That being said he didn’t come out of the womb a fully formed shitbag of a person. It’s occasionally interesting to speculate on how he became the rear end in a top hat he was this. Nixon is the story if Horatio Alger Jr wrote a book about a broken rear end in a top hat who became president. he grew up poor and was bitter shithead but was smart and knew how to read people. basically he knew how to divide and conquer. I guess i just hate trump more then him. if nixon is the original presidential monster, then trump is the lovely sequel with none of the "good" and all of the bad but with more dumber versions of bad.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 22:07 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:Trump is all the worst aspects of Reagan (stupid, senile) combined with all the worst aspects of Nixon (paranoid), with an extra helping of corruption (which both men had in spades) and topped off with the cherry of being incapable of feeling shame. I completely understand hating him more than the others but it’s also like saying which type of cancer is the worst. well that and i am living during his presidency. both HW and Clinton when i was little. to young to remember outside the sex scandal vaguely. I liked W and fox news because i was little dumb shithead young republican in my early teens, mostly because of my "cool" uncle. grew out of that because of a ton of reasons and became an online woke liberal during obama and i gradualy turned cynical dirtbag sorta chapo left toward the very end of obamas term and under trump. Dapper_Swindler fucked around with this message at 22:49 on May 9, 2018 |
# ¿ May 9, 2018 22:44 |
|
sean10mm posted:Trump has the least amount of anything you want of any president ever. There's nothing loving there. yeah, he is your angry moron/rear end in a top hat relative but with money and now power. he is smart enough to gently caress a ton up, but he is also dumb and cowardly. I have seen both sides of the aisle try to pain him as smart chess master. he just reacts. all of those tweets of him acting like he will take away press access or destory the FBI are just impotent bitching from his angry little mind.
|
# ¿ May 9, 2018 22:59 |
|
achillesforever6 posted:He's also probably more corrupt than Warren Harding too harding is kinda tragic. he didnt really want to be president and was unsuited for it. he was picked because of his looks basically.
|
# ¿ May 10, 2018 23:52 |
|
Alter Ego posted:All right, you jerks asked for it. stupid question but could you recommend some good books on hoover?
|
# ¿ May 17, 2018 20:46 |
|
Night10194 posted:Hoover is a man of endless good intention and ability who hosed up badly at one of the most critical moments possible. He is one of our most interesting disastrous presidents. yeah.though i am curious about alter Egos opinion on Hoovers role with quashing the bonus army because he thought they were all communists.
|
# ¿ May 18, 2018 03:12 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Only one I can think of is one that just came out: Hoover: An Extraordinary Life, by Kenneth Whyte. thanks. i'll give it a look sometime. also great posts.
|
# ¿ May 18, 2018 03:12 |
|
Alter Ego posted:My favorite part of that was that the rear end in a top hat he sent to do it got famous for being an even bigger rear end in a top hat 20 years later. which one. there were 2 of them. and both were giant overrated assholes.
|
# ¿ May 18, 2018 18:28 |
|
Alter Ego posted:Thomas Woodrow Wilson, 28th President of the United States Wilson is one of those people/presidents id love to like if not for the horrific racism and segreagation policies. His ideas about building a post ww1 europe are admirable and pretty enlightened for their times. yeah he is overly high minded but i feel like if he had played politics at home better(he hosed the GOP and other democrats out of his peace trip and policies) he may have been able to pull it off.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2018 18:33 |
|
thanks for the great FDR piece. as it happens i am going with my godfather to his house and library. i'll take some pics for the thread.
|
# ¿ Jul 16, 2018 22:07 |
|
so i went to the FDR museum/library and childhood/adult home. gently caress me it was amazing. if you can go there. do it. its phenomenally done and they have great stuff on Eleanor too. as a physicaly challanged person, seeing his house brought a tear to my eyes.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2018 19:43 |
|
Tony Gunk posted:De Gaulle was more Roosevelt's problem, to be honest. Monty was, far and away, Ike's biggest problem. Every bio of Eisenhower that exists--Stephen Ambrose's Soldier and President and Jean Edward Smith's Eisenhower in War and Peace foremost among them--mentions Montgomery as the guy who fought Ike every step of the way in the planning for both North Africa and in France. How is monty viewed in history now a days. i know a ton of books are writen about his north africa days because he beat the poo poo out of rommel and because of how overhyped rommel is now a days, he is viewed as the rommel killer. then he did his great gently caress up with market garden.
|
# ¿ Aug 29, 2018 02:57 |
|
Lost Season posted:
did't he also accuse stanton of wanting lincoln dead or what.
|
# ¿ Sep 4, 2018 02:59 |
|
Lost Season posted:Yep! Claimed Stanton wanted Lincoln dead so he could become president... somehow? jesus, how loving stupid is that rear end in a top hat.
|
# ¿ Sep 5, 2018 19:45 |
|
Harding because he is basically a non evil version of trump.
|
# ¿ Sep 12, 2018 03:39 |
|
Tony Gunk posted:We've reached that time again, folks...it's time to choose who our next topic for discussion will be. I'm your host, Tony Gunk, and let's play our game! id say Lincoln and teddy. with lincoln being top.
|
# ¿ Sep 24, 2018 17:43 |
|
Deteriorata posted:It wasn't just McGovern's loss. Carter ran as a moderate and barely won in the Watergate aftermath, then Carter and Mondale both lost to Reagan and Dukakis lost to G. H. W. Bush. The country as a whole was embracing conservatism as the Dixiecrats had abandoned the Democratic party over civil rights. The path to an electoral majority largely disappeared for an overtly liberal agenda. The Democrats' abandonment of liberalism wasn't the cause, it was the effect of the country generally moving to the right in the '80s. pretty much. people also forget that the end of the 60s and most 70s were a lovely time in general, gently caress tons of crime, lots of reported serial killers. various race riots, than the gas crisis and iran hostage crisis and jonestown carter gets alot of the blame even though alot of it wasn't his fault and he wasn't president during alot of it. but people didn't just the left or liberals any more. it didn't help that the DNC had had a mini civil war and were only left with centrists. the dixicrats left to be in the GOP as did the evangelicals once carter didn't stick to his promises. also the lefties had been purged out for a while and were back to eating each other or becoming state centered.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2019 00:07 |
|
Android Apocalypse posted:what a hell of a writeup! i think mitch is one of the few things keeping trump in power at this point. sure fox keeps the base happy, but trumps polls are getting worse by the day even on fox.
|
# ¿ Aug 27, 2019 05:19 |
|
Fritz Coldcockin posted:Nope. Pissboy and Obama are exempt; I would like to do one on Obama but I know how D&D feels about him as a whole and I don't want to drag USPOL/CSPAM bullshit into this thread, and Donald Trump makes me so loving angry when I even THINK about him that I would break things while writing about him. id say do trump if he loses in november.
|
# ¿ Apr 6, 2020 02:20 |
|
Fritz Coldcockin posted:Regrettably, you're absolutely right. While Steve Bannon, for example, will most likely not be hired by future Republican administrations, Stephen Miller absolutely will worm his way into someone else's confidence. There's a reason that "DC staffer" is a lifetime job and not just a gig someone works for a few years under one administration. There's always another game, another grift, another lunatic to hitch your wagon to if you're a young Republican rear end in a top hat and you're ambitious enough. idk. i feel like miller has bannons problem too that he is too obviously awful and visible and he makes an easy scapegoat for poo poo. like yeah miller will probably work at some super alt right think tank place. but the Romney/kasich types who will probably try to "reclaim" the party somewhat if trump loses will use miller as an obvious "look at this loving ghoul" type poo poo. its the fuckers like pompeo/barr/ratcliff who will keep worming their way around after trump falls.
|
# ¿ May 23, 2020 16:27 |
|
reading the whole ford thing. its interesting seeing the last shot of the GOP being socialy progressive or at least somewhat socially liberal. i always forget a sorta progressive wing of the GOP did exist after nixon and battle for the future of the party was happening for a bit before they were cast out by the evangelicals and reagan.
|
# ¿ Jun 10, 2020 00:26 |
|
https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1266048518176641025.html?fbclid=IwAR3UVhj0a7oeEwiZHK_mAdyyEesjrCwD9AYnccNcpH3p7l0F4Bp_NjEhMc8 i found this today on my facebook. its a illustrated pamphlet made in japan about grant during his world tour. the assassination of lincoln looks like something out of the ideas of march or a Kurosawa film.
|
# ¿ Jun 19, 2020 18:28 |
|
DC Murderverse posted:Anyone who's looking for more should listen to the first couple seasons of Slow Burn. I went through the entire show over the last week and learning a lot more about Watergate and Bill Clinton is a Scumbag-gate was very interesting. yeah. i have listned to it too and its interesting as gently caress. anyway, a dark part of me is sometimes "relived" clinton imploded in 2016 when i read the hosed up poo poo about the clintons(the real stuff not the insane chud poo poo) because while the DNC will still kiss their rear end on some level(through cabinet picks and such) they are never gonna hold any full political power again. and they arnt exactly liked by younger progressives/leftists or even libs/independents. like i am happy that clinton was able to lead the DNC out of the wilderness it had been lost in since carter and earlier but it was a loving monkeys paw to some degree.
|
# ¿ Nov 30, 2020 04:38 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 28, 2024 15:46 |
|
Ginger Beer Belly posted:Extra History has recently put out a 5-part series on Teddy Roosevelt called "Teddy the Trustbuster". https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=reWe7POryt0 extra histories has gotten alot better in the last few years. its nice.
|
# ¿ Mar 20, 2021 20:05 |