Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Thompsons posted:

The Last of Us 2 looked so violent and miserable that I couldn't help wondering if it was originally designed as a videogame remake of Hostel.

The first game has a boss fight against a pedophile cannibal that ends with Ellie hacking his face off

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Hemingway To Go! posted:

could rattle off a list but you know what, i think this expresses my feelings the best
https://twitter.com/RepJoeKennedy/status/1005114067059728384

What's hilarious about this is there's a process in place to change your vote retroactively after the vote is over for like a week afterwards and he didn't bother to do that, so you know he's just lying outright.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Did Thanos shedding a tear when he kills Gamora really make so many people forget he was the villain? It's amazing how many takes I've seen that think the movie is promoting Thanos or his point of view.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Junpei Hyde posted:

anyway infinity war talk should prob go in CineD idk

Jesus Christ, no. I would never wish that on anyone.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Junpei Hyde posted:

look if you can't avoid spoilers on a topic that isn't really super relevant to the thread then idk what else to tell you

my condolences tho, CineD is mostly a trashfire

Sorry about the untagged spoilers, but the movie's been out for a while now, one tends to figure the people who cared about remaining unspoiled have made an attempt to see it by now.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Terrible Opinions posted:

See this is perfectly fine and good. However the movie should also refute the idea that the "greater good" he is aspiring to is even good at all.

It does. How does it not?

Gamora yells at him that his whole plot is stupid as gently caress and the movie further reinforces that his plan is not good when we see half the cast of heroes die horribly

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Wheat Loaf posted:

I think $250 million was the budget including reshoots and it was less than $200 million originally, but I've also heard that it had been going over-budget when Lord and Miller were directing anyway.

But they also probably heavily underestimated the advertising budget, I've heard it's usually as much as the entire production budget for major releases like a Star Wars movie, sometimes even more.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Wheat Loaf posted:

My hawt take is of course that Episode IX will underperform both TFA and TLJ. :troll:

Honestly I think IX might be another huge hit because Disney is totally going to sell it as the Big Finale of Star Wars (spoilers, it won't be, of course) and all the controversy over TLJ is going to make people want to see this one even more.

TheMaestroso posted:

Gonna give this a bump, because I just watched her Tim Burton video and it's legit fantastic.

She's 100% right about Man of Steel and it gave me great joy to hear her express how loving dumb Pa Kent's "maybe let all those kids on the bus die, Clark!" speech is.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Groovelord Neato posted:

i got a migraine yesterday reading cd defend pa kent.

"Whoa, wait, who the gently caress are you to say that Pa Kent is supposed to be a model of morality for Clark Kent?" - the CineD consensus, apparently.

business hammocks posted:

AND THEY TRIED TO PROMOTE IT WITH A WEBSITE ENCOURAGING CHURCHES TO WRITE SERMONS ABOUT SUPERMAN.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BVIB9sGYeUw

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Groovelord Neato posted:

i couldn't wrap my head about their defense of him dying to a tornado, something clark could easily save him from. the whole point is to kill him in a way clark can't help him (heart attack) so clark learns that his true weakness is he can't save everyone.

Well, that and magic :v:

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Jimbot posted:

Pa Kent's "maybe" wasn't the answer anyone wanted to hear but he believed it was the best one because the situation, for him, was a complex one. He believe Clark, and the world, were not ready for each other. He believe the world would shun him and didn't think his young son wasn't ready to carry the weight of expectation on his shoulders. He died for those convictions and it shaped Clark into the person we see through the films.

The line goes "What was I supposed to do, just let those kids die?"

And he says "maybe" before he continues on with his spiel about the world not being ready for Clark.

That's not Pa Kent. He can be concerned about his son, want to hide him from the world, that's loving fine. But the character has to say "No, of course not" before going into that bit, not "maybe"

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

nine-gear crow posted:

Star Wars is kind of slowly becoming That Thing All The Racist Kids Like in public cultural perception

I think this is overstating things a bit.

Nuebot posted:

A lot of furry social groups really, really suffer from that dumb internet nerd thing where it's a bunch of people who view themselves as perpetually maligned and bullied in life, specially during their school years so online they want to be super inclusive and accepting of everyone to the point where it becomes detrimental to their communities. Because by the time they start realizing maybe they shouldn't let literal pedophiles and nazis hang around and scream, shout and post whatever horrifying things they want - the simple act of saying "Okay, no more of this" gets their whole community up in arms over it. It's very easy for places like that to be taken over by creeps because most people don't want to speak out, out of fear that they'll be the bully now and punished accordingly. Most furry sites I've been exposed to treated things like "kink shaming" worse than actual bigotry and harassment. But anecdotal evidence and all.

The Geek Social Fallacies

http://www.plausiblydeniable.com/opinion/gsf.html

quote:

Geek Social Fallacy #1: Ostracizers Are Evil
GSF1 is one of the most common fallacies, and one of the most deeply held. Many geeks have had horrible, humiliating, and formative experiences with ostracism, and the notion of being on the other side of the transaction is repugnant to them.

In its non-pathological form, GSF1 is benign, and even commendable: it is long past time we all grew up and stopped with the junior high popularity games. However, in its pathological form, GSF1 prevents its carrier from participating in -- or tolerating -- the exclusion of anyone from anything, be it a party, a comic book store, or a web forum, and no matter how obnoxious, offensive, or aromatic the prospective excludee may be.

As a result, nearly every geek social group of significant size has at least one member that 80% of the members hate, and the remaining 20% merely tolerate. If GSF1 exists in sufficient concentration -- and it usually does -- it is impossible to expel a person who actively detracts from every social event. GSF1 protocol permits you not to invite someone you don't like to a given event, but if someone spills the beans and our hypothetical Cat Piss Man invites himself, there is no recourse. You must put up with him, or you will be an Evil Ostracizer and might as well go out for the football team.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

MariusLecter posted:

Everyone should read, Roadside Picnic, btw.

I got recommended this by a friend a few weeks back and yea, I second this.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

stillvisions posted:

For me that was the missing takeaway from Ghostbusters; plenty of male-led generic action comedies/reboots make mad bank at the box office and the world shrugs and says "that's Hollywood". For Ghostbusters the sexism isn't found in the "you must like this movie and declare it good or else you're a bad person", the sexism is found in the "this movie must best a classic comedy in every way or else it is trash and must not be seen by anyone". That movie got painted into a corner where crowds needed the nod of universal acclaim to see it, and critics tried, but ultimately it wasn't enough.

Counterpoint - Bridesmaids was extremely well received critically and commercially and certainly isn't a "classic comedy in every way"

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

sexpig by night posted:

they're hack frauds!

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

I Before E posted:

You all hated Lamps, but through this they've contributed to this thread's best post in pages.

Lamps didn't make the comic

If he wants to go around posting other people's work and never offer his own thoughts again, he'd be a much better poster

That is a fantastic comic

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010


I can't :five: this hard enough

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Yea there's really no point in going "Shame on you, Milo!" because Milo is an admitted troll and doesn't give a gently caress or feel shame.

Whereas centrist dipshits like Boogie do feel shame and so should be shamed into not having such god awful opinions about how we have to give the benefit of the doubt to pedo Nazi fucks.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Dapper_Swindler posted:

Uncharted is basically modern Indiana jones aka pulpy adventure poo poo. the hero is always a wise cracking dude with a body count.

I guess, to me, the difference is scale.

Like Indiana Jones kills a couple dozen people over the course of his 4 movies, and most of the time it's in a pretty clear survival "me or you must die" situation. Nathan Drake kills hundreds, if not thousands, of men, often just in the pursuit of treasure. Hell, the "Ludonarrative Dissonance" achievement activates after 1,000 kills.

That makes it a little tougher to swallow the charming joking hero bits. Or at the end of the game when (minor spoilers) their daughter finds out about both of their pasts. Are Nathan and Elena going to explain to their kid about how they murdered thousands of men on their travels, or you think they'll leave that bit out?

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Calaveron posted:

If I lived in a darling little seafront chalet you bet your rear end I'd be OK with my parents telling me how they melted a bunch of nazi faces off to get said riches

Imagine this scene playing out thousands and thousands of times:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Ag_AFraxj-4

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

There's different kinds of henchmen, though.

For example, the ones in 2 are clearly working for an insane madman warlord, easy to dispatch with sympathy for them, they are clearly bad men working for a bad cause.

But in 4, Shoreline are a PMC, and oftentimes you are engaging them on land that they own and are assigned to protect, like the church of St. Dismas. In that case, many of these men are literally just normal dudes who work for a normal PMC who does normal non-evil tasks like provide security. Similar with the guards who show up during the auction scene.

I guess the problem goes back to 4 trying to tell a much more serious and grounded story while still having the same hordes of bad guys to slaughter from the previous games, much like this post says:

Jimbot posted:

4 is just what happens when you take an already ridiculous premise and try to take it to serious territory. Not to say that there isn't a place for asking these kinds of questions or exploring the ramifications of killing hundreds of dudes on your adventure, but the fourth entry in a series is hardly the place to start that. Same goes with Shadow of the Tomb Raider or whatever the new one is called. It's not exactly the best time to be exploring the problematic and ethical issues of tomb raiding and meddling with things you don't understand. Those are certainly interesting and great topics to explore but not so much in the third entry of a series.

None of this "ruins" the Uncharted games for me, I still find Nathan Drake a funny and likeable character, but it is interesting to think about and discuss.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Alaois posted:

normal, non-evil PMC work, like

I mean, I know, but in this case they're not played up to be comically evil, like you don't hear about Shoreline going off to fight in Afghanistan, they're just providing security for the bad guys and you roll up and kill them.

Psychepath posted:

Every game should have Alpha Protocol's "orphans created" counter, where you can marvel at how the 9 men you killed were all widowed and had 54 children between them after each mission.

This goon gets it

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Dapper_Swindler posted:

pretty much. honestly it depends on the game. like stuff like spec ops the line makes you feel bad for everything you kill. because the whole thing could maybe be solved if everyone one calmed down for a second.

Spec Ops was making this dissonance more explicit by the simple trick of making the "faceless hordes of enemies" American soldiers.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

RareAcumen posted:

Anyway, can someone explain ludonarritive dissonance succinctly? Is it just when gameplay and cutscene clash or is there more to it?

Basically it's when gameplay emphasizes one thing while the narrative emphasizes another.

For example, in Bioshock Infinite, Booker DeWitt is a man who is plagued by thoughts of his violent past and doesn't want to commit any more violence, but the gameplay is telling you "okay now skyhook slam into this dude because look how awesome it looks"

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

I think what's often missed is that it's not inherently a bad thing, either.

Spec Ops: The Line uses ludonarrative dissonance in a fantastic way.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

business hammocks posted:

They should include a scene with Laura Dern or Sam Neill complaining that the bottom fell out of paleontology and they have to be adjuncts at 65 because of Jurassic Park, even though real dinosaurs are totally different and worth studying.

lol

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

khwarezm posted:

In all seriousness, the whole scales rule feathers drool thing annoys me since I must have missed the memo where it was decided things like a Harpy Eagle or Cassowary are big 'ol pussies.

Far Cry 3 taught me about how Cassowaries are basically modern day raptors.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

a cartoon duck posted:

Twitter is in fact a hellsite that exists purely to amplify human misery and we as a species would be better off if it was shut down permanently.

This is the conclusion I keep coming back to, yes.

All the good memes and gifs and cute animals and stuff will find another platform, life finds a way.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Terrible Opinions posted:

At will employment is a tool to turn workers into slaves and should not be defended.

:hai:

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Just found this video today and it's perfect.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GwVERl0OYjc

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

DoctorWhat posted:

are they capable of moving past that, do you think?

Not as long as the money train is still rolling.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

My favorite thing about Deadliest Warrior is how much they hype up the powerful computer simulation program and then they quickly pan by the guy's computer screen and it's just Excel.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

If you haven't seen the Every Frame A Painting videos, they're all pretty overwhelmingly passionate/positive and well worth watching

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3FOzD4Sfgag

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Jimbot posted:

a lot of them made by a guy in his 40's.

I've seen this kind of thing pop up a couple of times in regards to this issue and it strikes me as totally bizarre. I didn't realize comedy had an age limit where once you hit a certain age you can't tell certain jokes anymore.

I'm glad Carlin died before things got this way, people would have crucified him.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

I think it's also worth noting that the majority of the CoD player base has never touched the single player campaign.

So a giant part of the audience has never thought about the plot critically because they haven't even seen the plot.

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Dapper_Swindler posted:

That’s sad because the multiplayer is boring as hell.

But it plays that sick guitar riff when I level up, bro!

*cracks open another Bud*

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

There's CinemaSinsSins, who is basically dedicated to this entire genre of thing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=p9bODwT_wfo

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

David Cage is much worse than we all thought - https://www.canardpc.com/373/strange-atmosphere-quantic-dream (warning, link is :nws:)

quote:

CanardPC did an in depth investigation on Quantic Dream and found tons of garbage behavior from David Cage and staff. For the sake of brevity, some of the lesser bad things included:

- 600 images of photoshopped employee heads onto porn and nazi imagery, including captioned calling employees "whores".
- Displaying said images publically in the office and messages telling employees to "stop loving things up bitches".
- Employees being called into the HR department, yelled at, and having their contracts ripped up, and then forced to sign a new one demanding more work and less pay.
- 70 hour work weeks at minimum pay, leading many employees to suffer nervous breakdowns.
- Creating fake misconduct reports to fire employees before the end of their contract, in order to avoid paying them.

There's a lot more that's being considered in the next lawsuits involving Quantic Dream, but to sum it up with a quote from the General Manager Guillaume de Fodaumiere, "It is perfectly legal, and it is none of your business."

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

Someone slap the YouTube logo onto the van, tia

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EN_VBc98dzg

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

WampaLord
Jan 14, 2010

If it's really all an act, then he's a giant shithole because any decent person would realize the very real damage their "act" is doing and stop it.

E: VVV :agreed: my point being if people try to excuse it with "oh it's just an act" that doesn't actually excuse anything

WampaLord fucked around with this message at 19:49 on Aug 7, 2018

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply