Register a SA Forums Account here!
JOINING THE SA FORUMS WILL REMOVE THIS BIG AD, THE ANNOYING UNDERLINED ADS, AND STUPID INTERSTITIAL ADS!!!

You can: log in, read the tech support FAQ, or request your lost password. This dumb message (and those ads) will appear on every screen until you register! Get rid of this crap by registering your own SA Forums Account and joining roughly 150,000 Goons, for the one-time price of $9.95! We charge money because it costs us money per month for bills, and since we don't believe in showing ads to our users, we try to make the money back through forum registrations.
 
  • Post
  • Reply
mind the walrus
Sep 22, 2006

It's said that the Horror stories of a culture reflect its deepest anxieties. Zombies as mindless consumers, you've heard it before. SomethingAwful even tried to get in on that action with Slenderman, combining Lovecraftian imagery with a Pied Piper gimmick that ended up with a little girl getting stabbed and a truly terrible movie. Good work all-around A+.

In the last few years, there's been a rise in new horror-- the "game"-based killer. I don't mean like Jigsaw, although he's definitely a forerunner. I mean poo poo like Bird Box



or A Quiet Place



or It Follows



or those Weeping Angels/SCP-173





or The Pale Man from Pan's Labyrinth



Monsters where you have to follow 1-2 rules and you'll be left alone, but violate them, even a tiny little bit, and you're dead.

This isn't entirely new, Freddy Kruger's whole thing was "he can only kill you in your dreams." Gremlins had their whole "don't get wet/don't feed after midnight" thing. Scream was the mainstream codification of "there are certain rules you must follow in order to survive a horror movie." Dracula can't cross running water and must count everything. Hellraiser's Cenobites could be put away by the puzzle box. Bodysnatcher movies usually feature at least one scene of a character trying to fool the snatched. The idea of monsters being bound by rules which make them fallible, even exploitable, isn't new.

But this is different. These movies are a different breed from late 90s/early 00s Funny Games/Saw/Human Centipede/Hostel fear that somewhere out there someone is watching and will torture you for fun. It's different from 80s and 90s slashers which would kill you for spectacle. It's different from earlier more folkloric monsters like Vampires, Werewolves, Wendigo, and Ghouls where the creature's ultimate goal is animal sustenance, however complicated. This new variant, this new subspecies... *pauses to take off trendy "nerd" glasses* is about invisible authority.

I actually don't like this new type of monster to be honest. They seem even more formulaic than slashers or torture porn. But what they say about what we as a society are afraid of is interesting.

They're the anxieties of people who feel as though they're stepping on eggshells wherever they go, where even minor transgression is punished with maximum hostility. They can continue to live their lives, often even approaching normalcy, but with an inexorable dread that if they violate "the rules" they're going to die painfully and doom their loved ones. The very idea of containing, stopping, or fighting back against these monsters is usually not even up for consideration, as they are too powerful and too fast to do anything more than survive against.

That says something about where we are as a society.

Gamers rise up.

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

Nefarious 2.0
Apr 22, 2008

Offense is overrated anyway.

mind the walrus posted:

It's said that the Horror stories of a culture reflect its deepest anxieties. Zombies as mindless consumers, you've heard it before. SomethingAwful even tried to get in on that action with Slenderman, combining Lovecraftian imagery with a Pied Piper gimmick that ended up with a little girl getting stabbed and a truly terrible movie. Good work all-around A+.

In the last few years, there's been a rise in new horror-- the "game"-based killer. I don't mean like Jigsaw, although he's definitely a forerunner. I mean poo poo like Bird Box



or A Quiet Place



or It Follows



or those Weeping Angels/SCP-173





or The Pale Man from Pan's Labyrinth



Monsters where you have to follow 1-2 rules and you'll be left alone, but violate them, even a tiny little bit, and you're dead.

This isn't entirely new, Freddy Kruger's whole thing was "he can only kill you in your dreams." Gremlins had their whole "don't get wet/don't feed after midnight" thing. Scream was the mainstream codification of "there are certain rules you must follow in order to survive a horror movie." Dracula can't cross running water and must count everything. Hellraiser's Cenobites could be put away by the puzzle box. Bodysnatcher movies usually feature at least one scene of a character trying to fool the snatched. The idea of monsters being bound by rules which make them fallible, even exploitable, isn't new.

But this is different. These movies are a different breed from late 90s/early 00s Funny Games/Saw/Human Centipede/Hostel fear that somewhere out there someone is watching and will torture you for fun. It's different from 80s and 90s slashers which would kill you for spectacle. It's different from earlier more folkloric monsters like Vampires, Werewolves, Wendigo, and Ghouls where the creature's ultimate goal is animal sustenance, however complicated. This new variant, this new subspecies... *pauses to take off trendy "nerd" glasses* is about invisible authority.

I actually don't like this new type of monster to be honest. They seem even more formulaic than slashers or torture porn. But what they say about what we as a society are afraid of is interesting.

They're the anxieties of people who feel as though they're stepping on eggshells wherever they go, where even minor transgression is punished with maximum hostility. They can continue to live their lives, often even approaching normalcy, but with an inexorable dread that if they violate "the rules" they're going to die painfully and doom their loved ones. The very idea of containing, stopping, or fighting back against these monsters is usually not even up for consideration, as they are too powerful and too fast to do anything more than survive against.

That says something about where we are as a society.

Gamers rise up.

good point op

Hemingway To Go!
Nov 10, 2008

im stupider then dog shit, i dont give a shit, and i dont give a fuck, and i will never shut the fuck up, and i'll always Respect my enemys.
- ernest hemingway
Are these horror movies reflecting people's current anxieties or are horror writers just getting lazy

It's easier to write monsters this way than to actually provoke people

super sweet best pal
Nov 18, 2009

A horror movie where businesses conspire to refuse the main character a job and they die homeless in an alley somewhere.

A horror movie where the main character's identity gets stolen and their life is ruined.

mind the walrus
Sep 22, 2006

Hemingway To Go! posted:

Are these horror movies reflecting people's current anxieties or are horror writers just getting lazy

It's easier to write monsters this way than to actually provoke people

Writers are always lazy but this has actually caught on with audiences, meaning they that it speaks to them.

mind the walrus
Sep 22, 2006

super sweet best pal posted:

A horror movie where businesses conspire to refuse the main character a job and they die homeless in an alley somewhere.

A horror movie where the main character's identity gets stolen and their life is ruined.

I haven't seen it but isn't this like 75% of "The Game" before it pulls back to reveal it was all a rich people prank?

Nefarious 2.0
Apr 22, 2008

Offense is overrated anyway.

mind the walrus posted:

It's said that the Horror stories of a culture reflect its deepest anxieties. Zombies as mindless consumers, you've heard it before. SomethingAwful even tried to get in on that action with Slenderman, combining Lovecraftian imagery with a Pied Piper gimmick that ended up with a little girl getting stabbed and a truly terrible movie. Good work all-around A+.

In the last few years, there's been a rise in new horror-- the "game"-based killer. I don't mean like Jigsaw, although he's definitely a forerunner. I mean poo poo like Bird Box



or A Quiet Place



or It Follows



or those Weeping Angels/SCP-173





or The Pale Man from Pan's Labyrinth



Monsters where you have to follow 1-2 rules and you'll be left alone, but violate them, even a tiny little bit, and you're dead.

This isn't entirely new, Freddy Kruger's whole thing was "he can only kill you in your dreams." Gremlins had their whole "don't get wet/don't feed after midnight" thing. Scream was the mainstream codification of "there are certain rules you must follow in order to survive a horror movie." Dracula can't cross running water and must count everything. Hellraiser's Cenobites could be put away by the puzzle box. Bodysnatcher movies usually feature at least one scene of a character trying to fool the snatched. The idea of monsters being bound by rules which make them fallible, even exploitable, isn't new.

But this is different. These movies are a different breed from late 90s/early 00s Funny Games/Saw/Human Centipede/Hostel fear that somewhere out there someone is watching and will torture you for fun. It's different from 80s and 90s slashers which would kill you for spectacle. It's different from earlier more folkloric monsters like Vampires, Werewolves, Wendigo, and Ghouls where the creature's ultimate goal is animal sustenance, however complicated. This new variant, this new subspecies... *pauses to take off trendy "nerd" glasses* is about invisible authority.

I actually don't like this new type of monster to be honest. They seem even more formulaic than slashers or torture porn. But what they say about what we as a society are afraid of is interesting.

They're the anxieties of people who feel as though they're stepping on eggshells wherever they go, where even minor transgression is punished with maximum hostility. They can continue to live their lives, often even approaching normalcy, but with an inexorable dread that if they violate "the rules" they're going to die painfully and doom their loved ones. The very idea of containing, stopping, or fighting back against these monsters is usually not even up for consideration, as they are too powerful and too fast to do anything more than survive against.

That says something about where we are as a society.

Gamers rise up.

i think people are very anxious about all the rules they have to follow and can relate to a story in which they will die if they break the rules op

SIDS Vicious
Jan 1, 1970


I liked a quiet place but I wish I could find one haha these kids are killing me!

Nefarious 2.0
Apr 22, 2008

Offense is overrated anyway.

Sid Vicious posted:

I liked a quiet place but I wish I could find one haha these kids are killing me!

good!

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Sid Vicious posted:

I liked a quiet place but I wish I could find one haha these kids are killing me!

lol

Big Beef City
Aug 15, 2013

On the other hand Dracula doesn't have to count anything at all, so I feel like maybe you've got some real thinking to do about this whole thing, OP

Frank Frank
Jun 13, 2001

Mirrored

mind the walrus posted:



Monsters where you have to follow 1-2 rules and you'll be left alone, but violate them, even a tiny little bit, and you're dead.



I would possibly argue that Candyman started this.

Mr. Meagles
Apr 30, 2004

Out here, everything hurts


Candyman loving owns

mind the walrus
Sep 22, 2006

Candyman is loving :krad: but his rules are just a variant on Bloody Mary.

Colonel Cancer
Sep 26, 2015

Tune into the fireplace channel, you absolute buffoon
You are forgetting the most popular horror anxiety, spooky ghosts that show up on camera at night. What say you about that?!?

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Colonel Cancer posted:

You are forgetting the most popular horror anxiety, spooky ghosts that show up on camera at night. What say you about that?!?

we don't like them

numberoneposter
Feb 19, 2014

How much do I cum? The answer might surprise you!

big leprechaun fan over here

Junk
Dec 20, 2003

Listen to reason, man. Why make your job difficult?
It Follows was a loving dumb and boring bullshit movie that wasn't scary at all

SIDS Vicious
Jan 1, 1970


Junk posted:

It Follows was a loving dumb and boring bullshit movie that wasn't scary at all

Look at this virgin lol

Lil Swamp Booger Baby
Aug 1, 1981

Junk posted:

It Follows was a loving dumb and boring bullshit movie that wasn't scary at all

Naturally after this post it follows that you suck freaking eggs lmao

Devils Affricate
Jan 22, 2010
Pretty sure this story archetype is a lot older than you think, OP

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Passover

The Cockler
Mar 31, 2018

by Fluffdaddy
the near omniscient nature of older horror villains was usually delivered as sort of dream-like, whereas today's just /are/ omniscient (in both cases though its just script-writing convenience)

Sophy Wackles
Dec 17, 2000

> access main security grid
access: PERMISSION DENIED.





A Quiet Place somehow manged to be even worse than Bird Box. I can't wait for the next movie where the monsters get you through smell.

SIDS Vicious
Jan 1, 1970


Pawn 17 posted:

A Quiet Place somehow manged to be even worse than Bird Box. I can't wait for the next movie where the monsters get you through smell.

That's called my room when I eat beans and weenies

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Sid Vicious posted:

Look at this virgin lol

lol
now let's discuss the new movie staring Chucky

Junk
Dec 20, 2003

Listen to reason, man. Why make your job difficult?

Sid Vicious posted:

Look at this virgin lol

Lil Swamp Booger Baby posted:

Naturally after this post it follows that you suck freaking eggs lmao

lol i want to actually hear you defend that garbage movie

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Sid Vicious posted:

That's called my room when I eat beans and weenies

lol

SIDS Vicious
Jan 1, 1970


Mumpy Puffinz posted:

lol
now let's discuss the new movie staring Chucky

It has Mark Hamill voicing him which is cool but like really can Chucky not be Brad Dourif and still be Chucky?

Hell Yeah
Dec 25, 2012

bird box was so poo poo. john malkovich comes into the movie and starts absolutely kicking rear end and then they are like, no, we need to lock this guy in a box so the rest of the movie sucks.

Nigmaetcetera
Nov 17, 2004

borkborkborkmorkmorkmork-gabbalooins

Sid Vicious posted:

It has Mark Hamill voicing him which is cool but like really can Chucky not be Brad Dourif and still be Chucky?

No he can’t, he can only be a prepubescent Joker.

SIDS Vicious
Jan 1, 1970


Hell Yeah posted:

bird box was so poo poo. john malkovich comes into the movie and starts absolutely kicking rear end and then they are like, no, we need to lock this guy in a box so the rest of the movie sucks.

In a... In a bird box? Heh.

Hell Yeah
Dec 25, 2012

if i was the people who made this movie i would have put john malkovich in every single scene even after he dies in the movie.

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

Sid Vicious posted:

It has Mark Hamill voicing him which is cool but like really can Chucky not be Brad Dourif and still be Chucky?

Mark Hamill is voicing Chucky?

SIDS Vicious
Jan 1, 1970


Mumpy Puffinz posted:

Mark Hamill is voicing Chucky?

Yeah man

Mumpy Puffinz
Aug 11, 2008
Nap Ghost

that is awesome
Now I might watch it

Alien Sex Manual
Dec 14, 2010

is not a sandwich

Best horror creature of the past decade was the monster from The Ritual, she owns and I love her.

The Babadook was pretty rad but nothing original really. I liked how it explored themes of wanting to murder your child because he’s being a little poo poo though.

SIDS Vicious
Jan 1, 1970


Labes for days posted:

Best horror creature of the past decade was the monster from The Ritual, she owns and I love her.

The Babadook was pretty rad but nothing original really. I liked how it explored themes of wanting to murder your child because he’s being a little poo poo though.

The whole movie was absolutely just about post partum depression slash psychosis

Brother Tadger
Feb 15, 2012

I'm accidentally a suicide bomber!

Junk posted:

lol i want to actually hear you defend that garbage movie

The joke, in case you missed it, was that you’ve never had sex and therefore you would clearly have no reason to be afraid of a monster that “follows” the last person who had sex with a cursed line of sex-havers. Also, as someone who has had sex, I thought it was pretty scary.

Lil Swamp Booger Baby
Aug 1, 1981

It follows. So what? Follow me all it likes as long as it doesnt try any gay stuff

Adbot
ADBOT LOVES YOU

pr0p
Dec 8, 2011
Nosferatu was totally just a jew right?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • Post
  • Reply