|
Sorry about that, can’t play at work and life otherwise got busier than I expected. Still busy tonight but hope to be around tomorrow, not that I expect to live until then. As a free lunch I should probably be voted. In the interest of full disclosure I am a town even night watcher, so nothing to report
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 00:56
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 02:37 |
|
|
Toalpaz posted:No one dies at night... and in the morning the headline reads thusly... Also going to point out that this was posted for any of those that ignore mod morning posts
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 00:56
|
|
|
##unvote Is this just standard too busy to actually play/disinterested GK or scum?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:05
|
|
|
George Kansas posted:Sorry about that, can’t play at work and life otherwise got busier than I expected. Still busy tonight but hope to be around tomorrow, not that I expect to live until then. As a free lunch I should probably be voted. That’s a hell of a fake claim if it is. ##unvote to reassess.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:11
|
|
|
If that’s a fakeclaim, I’ll go on to say it’s the best fakeclaim I’ve seen in a long time. It gives the town a potential carrot to not lynch you without needing to claim any results now and it plays on three claims in thread about targeting, one of which saying their role exists to mess with watchers and trackers. It feels like a perfect fit in the setup as we have learned so far. If fake, very much bravo. If real, whatever.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:13
|
|
|
The thing that is getting me is them saying it makes sense to use the free lunch on them. Them showing up like they did pretty much ensures that isn't going to happen quickly.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:15
|
|
|
Hunt11 posted:The thing that is getting me is them saying it makes sense to use the free lunch on them. Them showing up like they did pretty much ensures that isn't going to happen quickly. I would say that if I was in their shoes myself. In fact, I did this repeatedly as exe in my very first SA game, and it was really good at getting people off of me. AA even when off of me multiple times, even though they were my target and I basically never stopped pushing them
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:19
|
|
|
So basically scum had their choice of two towns yesterday. Great
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:29
|
|
|
Hal Incandenza posted:Oh come on Gotcha, thanks Hal 
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:36
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:So basically scum had their choice of two towns yesterday. Great So think about who seemed the most disinterested in who actually got lunched and more ensuring a lunch happens (Hum, Amni)
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 01:49
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:So basically scum had their choice of two towns yesterday. Great Uh why do you say that?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:00
|
|
|
##vote Humalong
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:01
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:They are both bad votes but both need to be removed from the game. Steak lied about his role yet again and GK is lurking. This post is the case.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:02
|
|
|
“I don’t care about their alignments” + defense != scum hunting
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:03
|
|
|
I dislike leaving GK alive, Mega has pretty well stated my reasons for it. If we're going to move off of GK then I would be moving to Humalong or RF.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:05
|
|
|
merk posted:This post is the case. To even SUGGEST hum makes you scummy though, merk, how do you rectify that?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:05
|
|
|
humalong's anti-steak status has not only been seen in his town game, but has also been classified as justified by academics.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:06
|
|
|
Sandwolf posted:To even SUGGEST hum makes you scummy though, merk, how do you rectify that? Unabashedly
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:09
|
|
|
My question for Humalong would be this: Mr. Humalong posted:Lot of people chiming in to show a willingness to vote Steak. Also suspicious imo What led you to express this wariness, then moving your vote near the end?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:10
|
|
|
I understand getting busy but, even night town watcher, boy that sure is convenient that there are no results to claim after N1. ##vote GK
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:10
|
|
|
Leith Maclaine posted:I understand getting busy but, even night town watcher, boy that sure is convenient that there are no results to claim after N1. ##vote Leith I agree with the take that if this is a fakeclaim it's a good one, if GK isn't a watcher it'll become apparent before long, this reads scummy to me
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:14
|
|
|
Nep-Nep posted:##vote Leith ....how will it become apparent before long? We're in a cult game, we don't know who is being visited at night because people don't die every night.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:17
|
|
|
I switched because I believed them to both be town but knew that being around and not voting would mean people would take the opportunity to push me for it the next day. Then I voted and people are still pushing me for it instead of hunting actual scum. lol
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:17
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:....how will it become apparent before long? We're in a cult game, we don't know who is being visited at night because people don't die every night. Not gk's alignment but the watcher claim? Like if GK is faking results that's gonna require some luck
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:24
|
|
|
Nep-Nep posted:Not gk's alignment but the watcher claim? Like if GK is faking results that's gonna require some luck Or if it’s fake he will be forced to continually implicate his scumbuds in order to escape the lie
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:25
|
|
|
Nep-Nep posted:Not gk's alignment but the watcher claim? Like if GK is faking results that's gonna require some luck It's not a huge amount of luck to say that you watched someone and no one visited? I guess we do have a lot of moving people that don't need to hide their identity because they're just visitors, but I feel like early on the likelyhood of picking a random person no one visited isn't high? Also, the inevitable "I was super busy and forgot to submit my action."
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:26
|
|
|
Mr. Humalong posted:I switched because I believed them to both be town but knew that being around and not voting would mean people would take the opportunity to push me for it the next day. When you say "take the opportunity" it sounds like you think scum would do that, but you use the alignment neutral "people" instead. Are you saying you moved your vote with the primary motivation of not getting cased? I'm trying to understand your motivations in those moments
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:28
|
|
|
Amnistar posted:Also, the inevitable "I was super busy and forgot to submit my action." If this then happened I would agree that's way too convenient and vote GK
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:29
|
|
|
Nep-Nep posted:If this then happened I would agree that's way too convenient and vote GK We lunched Quid on (partly) this logic in Fate and it was a mistake
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:31
|
|
|
Leith Maclaine posted:I understand getting busy but, even night town watcher, boy that sure is convenient that there are no results to claim after N1. Rethink this
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 02:57
|
|
|
On one hand, why not replace out? Why claim?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 03:03
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:Rethink this It is an amazing claim, but there is the point that if GK was scum, his scumbros would be absolutely screaming on him to have a few dozen idiot posts to avoid the pressure. I even made that point last night so ##unvote I can always put it back tomorrow.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 03:44
|
|
|
##vote Hum Since we're not taking advantage of our free cuddle to get rid of the lurker.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 03:50
|
|
|
George Kansas posted:Sorry about that, can’t play at work and life otherwise got busier than I expected. Still busy tonight but hope to be around tomorrow, not that I expect to live until then. As a free lunch I should probably be voted. Who did you watch then?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 04:15
|
|
|
Isn't it susp that they claimed and didn't say who they watched get visited by no one? This would give us info on who at least wasn't turned into cult, and give their claim legitimacy. Like, are they afraid to say someone that was visited?
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 04:17
|
|
|
MegaZeroX posted:Isn't it susp that they claimed and didn't say who they watched get visited by no one? This would give us info on who at least wasn't turned into cult, and give their claim legitimacy. No, none of that is susp
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 04:20
|
|
|
MegaZeroX posted:Isn't it susp that they claimed and didn't say who they watched get visited by no one? This would give us info on who at least wasn't turned into cult, and give their claim legitimacy. ....you quoted the post dude. Reread it.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 04:20
|
|
|
b-minus1 posted:No, none of that is susp
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 04:25
|
|
|
dang maybe mega was scum and he sent me barking up the wrong tree
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 04:28
|
|
|
|
| # ? Apr 28, 2024 02:37 |
|
|
IcePhoenix posted:dang maybe mega was scum and he sent me barking up the wrong tree For failing to meet posting restrictions IcePhoenix, Fiona Uffermann, Town-Aligned compulsive visitor and Doll has been modkilled. The day continues.
|
|
#
?
Feb 13, 2020 04:43
|
|
