|
Somebody Awful posted:Also, make sure to read the end notes and citations and take any statement that cites Grigori Medvedev with a large grain of sand and boron, especially if it's a dramatic scene. Medvedev invented a bunch of bullshit to sex up his own account of Chernobyl, published relatively soon after the event, and subsequent authors have been largely content to repeat his lies even when they're flatly contradicted by the testimony of pretty much everyone who was actually there and lived to tell about it. Nobody had heated arguments in the control room. Nobody went into the reactor hall and saw channel caps bouncing up and down. Nobody, so far as has been credibly determined, got close enough to actually see the destroyed reactor and report back. Really? His account is the main one I've read, and I bought it specifically because I assumed someone who was on site so soon after the event, and had previous experience with the plant, would have a good and interesting perspective. I'd certainly like to add something else to my reading list if he's unreliable.
|
# ¿ Jan 13, 2020 02:46 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 11:51 |