|
Tell us a bit about you--do you like funny episodes? Serious episodes? Any big turn-offs?
|
# ¿ Sep 23, 2020 20:38 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 04:31 |
|
All right. I got summoned in the Tumblr-star-trek thread. So I'm going to participate, in a way. But ultimately, this is half an explanation and half a confession. First, explanation: Deep Space 9 is simply not a Trek that is all that fun if you approach it with a shotgun approach to episodes. It's compelling because of its broader themes, which often take time, and because of its characters, where the characterization needs gradual breathing room to develop and in some cases to change. There's no "great Dukat" episode, singular, without knowing who Dukat is and his relationship with other people. I love "Civil Defense" but it is entirely an episode that plays on character dynamics you already know, and because it provides contrast to more serious episodes. I really like "Once More Unto the Breach", but unless you understand Martok and his role in the show, it's only mildly interesting. For a character to become a great character, we need to see them in a variety of circumstances, making a variety of choices, so we get to intuitively understand them beyond what we're told about them. Much more than TNG, every DS9 character represents a set of values and to some extent an ideology. (e.g., Garak is realpolitik.) Similarly, the themes of DS9 are usually not self-contained. The major themes are certainly not self-contained. Now let's just segue into the confession: I do not like Deep Space 9 as intended. I think this is where some people get tripped up. I love TOS (my favorite) and like TNG. I like them as intended. I like them the way they were, essentially, designed to be liked. I think, if I were in a conversation with the writers and the showrunners, we'd mostly be on the same page about what the episodes are doing, why they're doing it, and the message that was communicated in the process. (More so for TOS than TNG, where I do think TNG has not always aged well and/or more often, in the interests of "complexity", TNG semi-regularly told a really messed-up moral that doesn't adhere to its own purported internal logic). I do not like Deep Space 9 "as intended". I think DS9 is a great idea, in theory. It's a deconstruction, on its face. It makes no bones about that; Sisko dang near says as much, to Picard, in the pilot. (Or when he punches Q.) And I generally agree with the things that Deep Space 9 tells you it is saying. What I love about Deep Space 9 is that it always shows you, the opposite. Of its own theme. It has characters say and do things with a fascinating level of self-righteousness, despite often being shown to be wrong, in their own universe, without the show apparently being aware of this. It's a deconstruction that got the "moral of the story" right, and tells you what the moral is, but doesn't realize that's not the story it just showed you. Take for example, this post from our Anonymous Zebra: Anonymous Zebra posted:While it's fun and all that we're talking about TNG in the DS9 thread, I figured I'd try and get things a back on track with a hot take: Anonymous Zebra posted:The Federation, Klingons, Romulans, and Cardassians combined were no match for The Dominion. The combined powers didn't beat The Dominion, they beat a tiny fragment that was cut off from the rest by space gods living in a wormhole, and only at a huge cost. Remember, there was always an existential threat that MORE ships were just sitting on the other side of the wormhole, and the only thing stopping that was a minefield and later The Prophets. I think that post is exactly right. Now, I do think they showed a Dominion where war is inevitable. But then they have other characters act like they've correctly identified that it's inevitable (e.g. Tain), and they're punished for it. The actions of the Federation are only excusable if it was inevitable. Huh?? Over and over, DS9 tries so hard to "break down" the TNG-era Federation and writing style and approach. And time and time again, it congratulates itself for doing so, despite setting up a scenario that is obviously rigged, but rigged against their own conclusion. Their overall conclusion is, I think, almost always right, but they structure something that forces the opposite, and never seem to realize it. Not just that these things are decoupled: the exact opposite. It's not a 1:1, it's a 1:-1. It happens with the Maquis. It happens with the Dominion War. It happens with Dukat. It happens with Kira. It happens over and over and over. It's honestly baffling. I've never seen anything like it. I've been way into DS9 for like two years and chat about it almost every day with my fellow ds9 buddies, but the well never runs dry on how vast the divide is between what the show thinks it's doing and what it's actually doing. The actual logical implications of what it's actually showing you are bizarre on closer examination. I find DS9 incredibly compelling, incredibly engrossing, because it's this, but a show: It knows the right answer but absolutely shoots itself in the dick for seven seasons getting there. So do I like Deep Space 9? In a lot of ways........................ no, actually. But I LOVE to discuss deep space 9. So anyway, "House of Quark" is pretty good. Pick fucked around with this message at 04:39 on Sep 26, 2020 |
# ¿ Sep 26, 2020 04:33 |
|
Oh, also OP, I don't really like "gray Federation" much myself. I see the Federation as aspirational, which was best communicated to the audience in TOS. That's why TOS is my favorite (and TAS my second-favorite!) Focusing on the Federation per se too much, I think, is a mistake. I think the Federation is a set of deals which people like Admiral Cartwright can fail. But that its ideals are fundamentally good, and people are good for adhering to them.mercenarynuker posted:This is bullshit, Pick. You haven't even talked about how those Vulcans are loving pricks about baseball I actually do not like that episode, or the heist episode, at all . I also find the baseball episode fascinating in the context of being bookended by an existential war, the exact situation where victory is not "the friends you made along the way" and "trying your best". Pick fucked around with this message at 04:53 on Sep 26, 2020 |
# ¿ Sep 26, 2020 04:43 |
|
oh and if you don't like "the wire" you're a homophobe. go to jail.
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2020 05:02 |
|
I did, I did recommend House of Quark. It is actually internally thematically coherent, fun, and has quite a bit of characterization even in 47 minutes. (USER WAS PUT ON PROBATION FOR THIS POST)
|
# ¿ Sep 26, 2020 23:21 |
|
They are seen in enterprise
|
# ¿ Oct 2, 2020 18:42 |
|
|
# ¿ Apr 26, 2024 04:31 |
|
the wire is 100% worth it for Enabran Tain, an actual realistic look at how amicable a lot of truly terrifying people are in similar administrations for further reading, "How to Feed a Dictator" is one of my top fun books of 2020 (tales from the chefs of dictators, e.g. idi amin and pol pot)
|
# ¿ Oct 5, 2020 06:04 |