|
Hackan Slash posted:The fact that professional Call of Duty players can't get above a 2 K/D may be an indication that sbmm is tuned a bit much. really? because it would seem to be a sign that it's succeeding in putting them in against players of comparable skill they really just need to give people the option to see their numeric rating - it would engender a fair bit of toxicity, but it would also give people an incentive to actually improve/care about performance
|
#
¿
Nov 25, 2020 19:10
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 09:58 |
|
|
AccountSupervisor posted:I havent played a COD since MW2 on the 360 and I am having a grand ol time with this on my PS5. Shootin feels great and the maps are fun. This feels barely any different than my memories of the classic cod days. Not having the context of the past 10 years of COD probably helping my opinion, but regardless, I just dont get what people find so unbearable about this iteration? that it barely feels any different from those old titles is part of the issue it's right on the heels of a very good COD that actually iterated and felt different/like a step forward, and while Cold War absolutely does some things better, the overall experience is very much not an unalloyed improvement and feels like a step back in some ways this is exacerbated by the extent to which it feels relatively unfinished/unpolished compared to Modern Warfare on (and shortly after) launch
|
|
#
¿
Dec 3, 2020 19:18
|
|
|
huh, apparently scope glint is *completely* different in this game than past COD titles the big takeaways *scope glint is no longer broadcast at an angle, you only see it if a sniper is aiming at a bubble ~1.5 body lengths from you - which means it's something you should take *much* more seriously if you ever see it b/c it means they're essentially aiming right at you *magnification/optic currently has zero impact on the appearance of scope glint - you'll get a big flaring "scope glint" with iron sights
|
|
#
¿
Dec 7, 2020 23:57
|
|
|
Gasoline posted:Very much so, with the addition that none of the maps were in any way enjoyable. No it wasn’t It has bugs and the (larger number of) release maps were eh, but it was *substantially* more polished than Cold War from the jump
|
|
#
¿
Dec 8, 2020 18:37
|
|
|
ethanol posted:the lack of factions in vanguard is really weird and jarring and kinda sucks if you're going to do that idk why you wouldn't just actually have fun and make the whole game setting fully ludicrous dieselpunk
|
|
#
¿
Sep 17, 2021 20:47
|
|
|
|
| # ¿ Apr 27, 2024 09:58 |
|
|
WattsvilleBlues posted:That's the problem, that unless you go ridiculously anachronistic, the time period traps you in what you can do. Like the killstreaks, they're just shitter versions of what we've all seen done better. limitations can help create good art, it's really only a "trap" if you're trying to replicate an incompatible formula rather than pursuing a cohesive vision taking advantage of the setting you selected if you're bored with WW2 then either don't make a WW2 game, or yeah go ahead and do a wild sci-fi dieselpunk thing/license Achtung! Cthulu, or w/e but like, it's pretty clearly not impossible to make a good COD game set in world war 2, and nothing about being set in world war 2 (or being a COD game) requires hackish implementation of the MW weapon customization system, having the killstreaks be sub-par versions of things done in previous COD's, etc.
|
|
#
¿
Oct 25, 2021 00:41
|
|