|
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 16:29 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 07:24 |
|
right country and industry wrong intellectual https://twitter.com/Hideki_Naganuma/status/1367163881693401089?s=20
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 17:55 |
|
https://twitter.com/ChrisLynnHedges/status/1366781882466250753?s=20
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 20:00 |
|
me
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 20:00 |
|
tbh after 1917, the best leftist intellectuals like Gramsci and Walter Rodney are likely to get murdered or jailed. This is why podcasts stay mediocre. if Will Menaker embraces Marxist-Leninist Thought, the feds will put a bomb into his podcasting equipment.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 21:12 |
|
Due to things like the internet, public domain, and widespread literacy public intellectuals seem a lot less necessary now. All the essential M-L writing of the last 175 years is available for free in multiple languages and formats. Obv not everyone has the time or ability to read it/listen to it but broadly speaking the working class is as educated as it's ever been and reading theory/discussing theory is easier than ever. I'm sure public intellectuals still have a place in leftist movements but obv they should not be at the forefront of them
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 21:29 |
|
Atrocious Joe posted:tbh after 1917, the best leftist intellectuals like Gramsci and Walter Rodney are likely to get murdered or jailed. I thought the chapos were already a CIA OP.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 21:33 |
|
This guy is still pretty good imo
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 21:38 |
|
MeatwadIsGod posted:Due to things like the internet, public domain, and widespread literacy public intellectuals seem a lot less necessary now. All the essential M-L writing of the last 175 years is available for free in multiple languages and formats. Obv not everyone has the time or ability to read it/listen to it but broadly speaking the working class is as educated as it's ever been and reading theory/discussing theory is easier than ever. I'm sure public intellectuals still have a place in leftist movements but obv they should not be at the forefront of them I still think there's a place for a modern Chomsky or Parenti to contextualize modern events, and I think people like Vijay Prashad or even Michael Brooks (from what I've seen of him RIP) are doing this. Leftist podcasts on the other hand are loving boring.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 21:55 |
|
Michael Brooks was liberal garbage and the way “leftists” keep deifying him is gross. He was good at hoodwinking the poor into identifying with their neoliberal oppressors in the Democrat Party, I’ll give him that. He also worked for MSNBC shill Sam Seder.
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 22:09 |
|
Soul_ posted:Matt's hobbyhorse is the alienation caused by liberal individualism, but he reaps more benefits from it than most people by being an antisocial weirdo Sounds like a philosopher to me
|
# ? Mar 7, 2021 22:47 |
|
your intellectual sucks!
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 01:31 |
MeatwadIsGod posted:Due to things like the internet, public domain, and widespread literacy public intellectuals seem a lot less necessary now. All the essential M-L writing of the last 175 years is available for free in multiple languages and formats. Obv not everyone has the time or ability to read it/listen to it but broadly speaking the working class is as educated as it's ever been and reading theory/discussing theory is easier than ever. I'm sure public intellectuals still have a place in leftist movements but obv they should not be at the forefront of them i think this forum is a good example of why it's important to have people who understand and think about socialism at a deeper level than memes
|
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 05:40 |
|
yeah me bitch
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 05:52 |
|
didnt read the thread. sorry if someone posted that one before
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 05:53 |
|
adolph reed, imo
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 06:00 |
|
I'm really disappointed with how poor a job Virgil did playing himself in Disco Elysium.
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 08:10 |
|
Whatever man that shits boring who cares
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 08:29 |
|
getfiscal
|
# ? Mar 8, 2021 09:09 |
|
Claims humans will go extinct because of climate change. Verdict: Pseud
|
# ? Mar 9, 2021 05:50 |
|
R.Сам is killing it today. He's wrong about his analysis of the left, like confusing radlib exotericism with radlib esotericism and not acknowledging the (unrelated) schizo-Christian throughline, but all his takes are inspired and he's got Nick Land mad at him. Where is the equivalent with Matt Christman gloriously taunting Zizek? Nowhere.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 16:36 |
|
This thread's lack of Phil Greaves is shameful. Also I thank Chomsky for all his good work, but he should retire so he can focus on his true passion, genocide denial. There are multiple genocides he could be denying right now, so I feel it's cruel to demand that he continue to be an intellectual.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 17:49 |
|
Chomsky more like chumpsky
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 17:52 |
|
Chris Hedges and Cornell West are very good. (and Orb Mother, from like a more spiritual perspective. YMMV)
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 18:07 |
|
Finicums Wake posted:adolph reed, imo
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 18:30 |
|
Sure OP. There's Rachel Maddow. David Frum. That ugly guy who looks hosed up.. Chris Hayes I think. Alan Colmes (RIP (Rest In Power)).
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 21:49 |
|
Sally Albright and Elon Musk, duh
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 22:00 |
leaning more heavily on the intellectual side there's also neil degrasse tyson
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 22:10 |
|
Comrades: -Michael Parenti -David Harvey -Richard Wolff -Adolph Reed Jr Not Comrades: -Chris Hedges -Noam Chomsky -Ben Burgis and pretty much every guest that's appeared on The Majority Report and pretty much every host they've ever had
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 22:23 |
|
thekeeshman posted:This thread's lack of Phil Greaves is shameful. chomsky kind of sucks, but not because he likes denying genocides. stick to video games
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 22:25 |
|
i haven't read any of zizek's books, so i can't say if he's good or not, ultimately. but he did the left a huge favor in owning jordan peterson, so maybe zizek counts
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 22:27 |
|
Soul_ posted:R.Сам is killing it today. He's wrong about his analysis of the left, like confusing radlib exotericism with radlib esotericism and not acknowledging the (unrelated) schizo-Christian throughline, but all his takes are inspired and he's got Nick Land mad at him. Where is the equivalent with Matt Christman gloriously taunting Zizek? Nowhere. are you talking about some twitter personality? i don't understand the significance of pissing off some dumb, has-been philosopher boomer like nick land. nor do i understand the hypothetical significance of a situation where christman 'gloriously' taunts zizek. i'm extremely online and brokebrained, yet i still can't understand this post
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 22:31 |
|
Finicums Wake posted:chomsky kind of sucks, but not because he likes denying genocides. stick to video games I'm open to the idea that Chomsky sucks for many reasons, but I regard genocide denial as a sucky thing so I will keep that on the list of Chomsky's multi-faceted suckitude. Feel free to add to the list. If you think genocide denial is not a sucky thing then maybe you're the one in the wrong forum? I'm sure you can find other places to hang out with your fellow tankies.
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 23:48 |
which genocide is he denying again
|
|
# ? Mar 11, 2021 23:56 |
|
Cambodian I'm guessing, and he also gets accused of denying Srebrenica as a genocide (I don't know much about the whole Yugoslav confilct) . Edward Herman (the guy who wrote most of Manafacturing Consent) also denies the Rwandan genocide.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:16 |
|
just got off the phone with Noam. I asked him if he believed the Holocaust happened and he laughed and hung up on me. Very rude!
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:44 |
|
Lookit at this sorry collection of plebes and assorted lumpens who have never read professor boaventura santos, buncha armchair socialists. Next you're gonna tell me you haven't read Badiou or michael hardt, as if
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 00:54 |
|
that hot Catholic lady
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 03:37 |
|
Finicums Wake posted:are you talking about some twitter personality? i don't understand the significance of pissing off some dumb, has-been philosopher boomer like nick land. nor do i understand the hypothetical significance of a situation where christman 'gloriously' taunts zizek. i'm extremely online and brokebrained, yet i still can't understand this post Nick Land being pissed was an emblem of so many NeoRX and more generalized alt-right people being pissed. And Matt Christman making Zizek mad would show that Matt is willing to say anything, although I can't imagine Zizek ever getting in a Twitter dispute. If he's mad at someone he just writes an article where he uses his anger as a jumping off point for some bigger argument. Wheeee posted:which genocide is he denying again Bosnian and Cambodian. Denying a genocide is also good evidence that someone is just a pundit and a pseud because genocide denial is always for politically convenient reasons.
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 15:07 |
|
|
# ? Apr 26, 2024 07:24 |
|
|
# ? Mar 12, 2021 15:21 |